ellauri002.html on line 58: Oiskohan Harry ollut iloinen et nää on suomalaisille tärkeimmät faktat siitä? Et se on jutkuluopio, sen nimellä on joku kämä düsseldorfilainen palkinto ja se oli Schubertin sanoittaja? Düsseldorf on Saxan Philadelphia. Ja kokonaan jää mainizematta Kaiserslauternin Heinrich Heine-gymnasium, David Foster Wallacen tennisvalkku Schitin alma mater. Harry kävi kouluja (senverran kuin kävi) Düsseldorfissa.
ellauri002.html on line 1775: Jane Simpson ja David">David Nash.

ellauri002.html on line 1777: ei David koskaan suvainnut hankkia.

ellauri002.html on line 1779: David puolustaa aboriginaaleja,

ellauri002.html on line 2252: P.S. Andreas Scholl (onxe sukua Dr. Schollille tai Johnin ja Miikan Schollylle?) vetää tän Dowlandin piisin hyvin. Se tietää että Dowlandiin ei pidä eläytyä eikä näytellä hikisenä ahistunutta kuin joku vitun David Foster Wallace. Dowlandin musiikki tekee kaiken yxin paremmin.
ellauri015.html on line 1123: Donald Davidson.
ellauri016.html on line 780: In 1999, "Pink Moon" was used in a Volkswagen commercial, boosting Drake's US album sales from about 6,000 copies in 1999 to 74,000 in 2000. The LA Times saw it as an example of how, following the consolidation of US radio stations, previously unknown music was finding audiences through advertising. Fans used the filesharing software Napster to circulate digital copies of Drake's music; according to the Atlantic, "The chronic shyness and mental illness that made it hard for Drake to compete with 1970s showmen like Elton John and David Bowie didn't matter when his songs were being pulled one by one out of the ether and played late at night in a dorm room." In November 2014, Gabrielle Drake published a biography of her brother. Over the following years, Drake's songs appeared in soundtracks of "quirky, youthful" films such as The Royal Tenenbaums, Serendipity and Garden State. Made to Love Magic, an album of outtakes and remixes released by Island Records in 2004, far exceeded Drake's lifetime sales. In 2017, Kele Okereke cited Pink Moon as an influence on his third solo album Fatherland. Other contemporary artists influenced by Drake include José González, Bon Iver, Iron & Wine, Alexi Murdoch and Philip Selway of Radiohead.
ellauri019.html on line 582: Unen välitti minulle David Bush. Erään jo edesmenneen saarnaajan tytär näki unta noin kaksi viikkoa ennen Amerikan presidentinvaaleja 4.11.2008.
ellauri020.html on line 420: Katri pitää Tuomakselle leffakuzut, jonne tulee Woody Allen, Diana Keaton, William Goldman, Joseph Papp, David Mamet, Robert de Niro, Mayor Koch, Martina Navratilova, Milos Forman, Walt Disney, Jesus Nasaretilainen ja Lieko Sahovalovaa, Prahan ääni. Kaikki laulavat tshekkiläisiä kansanlauluja Katrin kitaran säestyxellä. Prahalla äänellä.
ellauri021.html on line 721: Pompey, David, Samson, Caesar,
ellauri022.html on line 468: nimeltä Just David. Sen arvostelut olivat että "mush", ja "too perfectly lovely".

ellauri022.html on line 469: David oli naiivi löytölapsi, joka pääsi takas rikkaisiin sukulaisiin. Riches to riches.

ellauri022.html on line 472: David möi, vaikkei niin hyvin kuin Pollyanna. Tää oli suursodan aikaa 1916, ennen loppumelskeitä.

ellauri029.html on line 484: Vasta 1500-luvulla Francis Bacon kyseenalaisti tämän Euroopassa vallinneen ajatustavan. Kaksi vuosisataa myöhemmin David Hume katsoi, että sattuma voi pitkinä ajanjaksoina selittää suunnittelun harhan. Sata vuotta Humen jälkeen Charles Darwin selitti asian evoluutioteorialla.
ellauri033.html on line 55: Muotikirjailija julkkis pääsee akatemiaan 43-vuotiaana 1895. Vähän myöhemmin kuin mä Kovvolaan. Kirjailijana se on yhtä kausituote kuin Esa Sariola. Ilmeisesti ihaile triesteläistä jesuiittasukuista kaunista ja fixua Minnie David vaimoa joka osaa italiaa ja on hyvä kääntäjä. Senköhän käskystä se tekee täyskäännöxen aktiiviuskovaisexi 1901. Pettää sitä kyllä, se on normaalia. Asuvat koko ikänsä bulevardilla kuin Esa Saarinen ja Pipsa. Ne on lapsettomia. Paul on pessimisti eikä piittaa laahuxesta enempää kuin Pentti Linkola. Se ei ole ritarillinen vaan pelkkä porvari, valittaa aatelinen tuttava. Sillä ei ole syntyperää. Se on vähän maalta, Ardèchen kultahattu, moukka. Aatelisrouvien eunukki, mut bylsiihän se Marie Kannia. Matkustelee tosi paljon itexeen. Minnie jää kai kotiin kastelemaan kukkia kuin Mme Maigret. Jenkkituomisina tuo ranskankieleen sanan building. Ois saanu jättää tuomatta. Minnie kääntää jonkun Paulin ihaileman jenkkiromaanin, kääntäjättären nimeä ei "tietystikään" panna esille.
ellauri033.html on line 689: (plussaa) Marx, Davidson, G. Eliot, Herder, Leibniz, Russell, Wittgenstein, Freud, Vygotsky.
ellauri036.html on line 85: Te marmori-ihmiset, ylpeät ja itsekkäät, te verrattomat järkiviisaat, jotka milloinkaan ette ole tehneet epätoivoista tekoa ettekä laskuvirhettä — jos kaikki tämä sattuisi teille, niin muistakaa häviönne hetkenä Abeilard´ia, joka menetti Héloïsen. Sillä hän rakasti Héloïsea enemmän kuin te rakastatte hevosianne, kultakolikoitanne ja rakastajattarianne; sillä menettäessään hänet, kadotti hän enemmän kuin te voitte kadottaa, enemmän kuin teidän ruhtinaanne Saatana menettäisi, jos hän toisen kerran syöstäisiin alas taivaasta. Sillä hän rakasti sellaisella rakkaudella, josta sanomalehdet eivät puhu, ja josta vaimonne ja tyttärenne eivät näe varjoakaan teattereissa ja kirjoissa. Sillä hän oli kuluttanut puolet elämäänsä suutelemalla Héloïsen valkeaa otsaa ja opettamalla häntä laulamaan David">Davidin psalmeja ja Saulin lauluja; hänellä ei ollut mitään muuta maan päällä. Kuitenkin on Jumala antanut hänelle lohdun. Uskokaa minua, jos te ahdingossanne ajattelisitte Abeilard'ia, te ette enää katsoisi samalla silmällä vanhan Voltairen jumalanpilkkaa ja Courier'n ilveilyjä. (Kuka toi Courier on? Ei hajua.)
ellauri042.html on line 333: sanoi, kuten olen jo kertonut, amerikkalainen ajattelija David Thoreau.

ellauri046.html on line 272: Not only does this book make Kierkegaard accessible but it also entertains, regales with story, and amuses. It will be useful for the lectern, pulpit, and after-dinner dais. The selections, which made me laugh, illustrate sardonically the contradictions of existence."—David J. Gouwens, Brite Divinity School, Texas Christian University.
ellauri047.html on line 974: Tuomarina Retu ei ollut niin julma kuin Hänschelhans, joka mestaili hätäänjoutuneita naisia. Retu sentään kielsi kidutuxen ja piti kuolemanrangaistusta varkauxista porhojen julmana kexintönä. Nyt on jenkit ja Isis tuoneet takas käyttöön molemmat. Mitäs hyvää vaihtamaan. Saxalaisten julmuutta selittää, et niillä ei ollut siirtomaita, minne siirtää ei-toivotut porukat. Niinkuin David Nashin näpistelevän esi-isän, tai Jillin ja Janetin piippaavat hihhuli-esivanhemmat.
ellauri049.html on line 543: Total Eclipse (vuoden 2010 televisioesityksessä Total Eclipse – kielletyt tunteet) on vuonna 1995 ensi-iltansa saanut draamaelokuva ranskalaisten runoilijoiden Arthur Rimbaud’n ja Paul Verlainen homoseksuaalisesta suhteesta. Elokuvan on ohjannut Agnieszka Holland ja pääosia näyttelevät Leonardo DiCaprio ja David Thewlis. Tässäkin kuten tosielämässä Rimpautus on söpömpänä tähti osassa.
ellauri052.html on line 639: Krishnamurti keskusteli monien tiedemiesten, taiteilijoiden, poliitikkojen ja uskontotieteen edustajien kanssa. Fyysikko David Bohmin kanssa käytyjä dialogeja on julkaistu mm. kirjoissa Ajan päättyminen, Elämän kokonaisuus ja Oivalluskyky herää.
ellauri052.html on line 649: Amerikkalainen fyysikko David">David Bohm (1917-1992) kärsi masixesta ja sai sähköshokkeja. Se oli juutalainen mutta agnostikko. Ehkä jehovakin on vain kvanttiaaltoa. Se tuumas että ajatustakin on joteskin joka paikassa kuten se kissa joka on laatikossa ja samaan aikaan ei ole siellä. Nää ajatuxet sinkoilee kaikkialla kuin fotonit, ja ne voi mennä vinxalleen bittiavaruudessa (elettiin aikaa ennen läppäreitä ja pilvilaskentaa). Tätä se jaxoi jauhaa Jiddu Krishnamurtin kanssa neljännesvuosisadan, ja oli muutenkin epäilyttävä: entinen marxilainen, mutta luopui siitä kun ryssät meni sen isän vanhaan kotimaahan Unkariin. Silti sillä oli paljon vaikeuxia jenkkiviranomaisten kanssa, ei päässyt edes töihin atomipommitehtaaseen.
ellauri052.html on line 692: still laughter, and our love was pertect tor a moment, more pertect than any love I have known since, for either man or woman. The very echo of David's lament for Jonathan in 2 Samuel 1: 26 ('thy to me was wonderful, passing the love of women.)
ellauri052.html on line 958: During an awkward sexual encounter with Harriet Wasserman, she remembered “asking him for permission, as if it were a museum objet d’art, ‘Can I touch this?’” Many of his mistresses remained in love and in touch with him. Scott Fitzgerald said that Hemingway “needed a new woman for each big book”; Bellow lost a woman with each big book. He spilled sperm as he spilled ink, and sex both interfered with and inspired his writing. Bellow created and lived on turbulence, thrived on chaos, courted conflict and was inspired by personal cataclysm. He reported that one lover (mies vai nainen?) “caused me grandes dificultades in England and in the south, but I finished Sammler just the same.” The bearers of erogenous zones (either sex) made him feel younger, “it was a way of avoiding the Angel of Death,” and he cherished their provocative bitchiness. Bellow’s emotional upheavals — his guilt and remorse, multitudinous failings and need for self-condemnation — made him beat his breast at his private Wailing Wall. Se oli kuin kunkku David jolle tuotiin neitosia pyllynlämmittimixi.
ellauri055.html on line 877: Sillinpää aloitti koulunkäynnin syksyllä 1900 Tampereen Suomalaisessa Reaalilyseossa, asuen ensin alivuokralaisena kirvesmies Janne Davidssonin perheessä Mustanlahdenkadulla Amurissa ja myöhemmin Kuninkaankadulla. Hänen koulutovereitaan olivat muun muassa Lauri Pohjanpää, Brynolf Honkasalo, Arvo Sotavalta ja Bertel Strömmer. Vanhemmat saattoivat tukea häntä vuoteen 1905 saakka, mutta sen jälkeen Sillinpää joutui itse hankkimaan varoja koulun jatkamiseen. Hän saikin jonkin verran rahallista tukea eri tahoilta, mutta tärkeimmäksi tukijaksi tuli tamperelainen tehtailija Henrik Liljeroos, jonka nuorimman pojan kotiopettajana Sillinpää toimi viimeisinä kouluvuosinaan. Sillinpää oli kesäisin myös kotiopettajana Lempäälässä Sotavallan ja Lopen kartanoissa sekä yhden kesän tamperelaisen Aamulehden kesätoimittajana. Sillinpää pääsi ylioppilaaksi 1908 hyvin arvosanoin. Samana vuonna Wilho Pylkkänen läht Kiinan reisulle.
ellauri055.html on line 999: Ja koska nyt kerran Forsmanit, joista sittemmin tuli hyviä ystäviäni, näin puheeksi tulivat, niin on minun elämäni kohtalossa kahdella sen suvun jäsenellä ollut erinomaisen tärkeä merkitys. Kun vanhempieni varat olivat minun viisi luokkaa lyseota käytyäni ehtyneet ja minä silti lähdin vielä kuudennelle, niin satuin tällöin jostakin syystä olemaan jonakin päivänä poissa koulusta, ja kerran saksan ja ranskan kielen opettajani Eino Sakari Yrjö-Koskinen eli Pekka pistäytyi katsomaan, mikä nuorta herra Sillanpäätä vaivasi. Ja vaikka vapaaherra kääntyikin sieltä (kortteeri-isäntäni) Davidssonin ja kolmen muun huushollin yhteiskeittiöstä takaisin luokseni tulematta, niin, ehkä asuntoni hukan proletaariset piirteet olivat häntä hämmentäneet, hän hankki minulle paikan silloiseen mahtavaan Liljeroosin perheeseen sen kuopuksen eräänlaiseksi henkiseksi imettäjäksi.
ellauri062.html on line 174: The price of admission onto the 29th Rich List was a staggering $1 billion, and, not surprisingly — as far as minorities go, at least — Jews excelled. The breakdown, according to Gawker’s research, included one black woman (No. 130, Oprah Winfrey), three gay men (No. 54, David Geffen; No. 332, Barry Diller; and No. 365, Peter Thiel), four Indians, six (non-Indian) Asians, 34 women, and, of course, 30 Jews in the top 100 (see below). They must have stopped counting after the 100 mark.
ellauri062.html on line 191: No. 54 — David Geffen
ellauri062.html on line 196: No. 62 — David Tepper
ellauri062.html on line 394: Stubblebine's statements questioning the plausibility of the damage done to The Pentagon by the hijacked aircraft during the September 11 attacks have been cited by David Ray Griffin to suggest that there was a conspiracy involving some elements of the U.S. government.
ellauri062.html on line 604: Teste David cum Sibylla kun on kaikki katoava, Taavi todistaa ja Sibylla So says Virtue, so says Beauty.
ellauri062.html on line 942: The star they call the star of David is actually called the star of Moloch in scripture and is the symbol of Judaism as well. It´s strange that very few people realize this. This is true. It is also called in scripture the
ellauri063.html on line 422: David Foster Wallace kirjotti 1000-sivuisen romaanin Infinite Jest 1996. Wallace oli kärsinyt yli 20 vuotta masennuksesta ja teki vuonna 2008 itsemurhan hirttäytymällä 46-vuotiaana Claremontissa Kaliforniassa. Jaska on takuulla kärsinyt samasta vaivasta. Maaniseseta sanaripulista ja sitä seuraavasta masennuxesta. Täytyypä varoa.
ellauri063.html on line 434: David Foster Wallacen kulttuuristen ja kirjallisten viittausten runsaudensarvi on perusasetelmiltaan yksinkertainen, kirjoittaa Tommi Melender.
ellauri064.html on line 130: David Vaughan Icke (s. 29. huhtikuuta 1952 Leicester, Englanti) on brittiläinen kirjailija ja salaliittoteoreetikko, joka on vuodesta 1990 lähtien omistautunut selvittämään ”kuka ja mikä todella kontrolloi maailmaa”. Icke on entinen Englannin liigan jalkapallomaalivahti, toimittaja, urheiluselostaja ja vihreän liikkeen kannattaja. Hän on kirjoittanut näkemyksistään yli 20 kirjaa.
ellauri064.html on line 199: Ground Control to Major Tom. David Bowien ykköshitti Space Oddity. Bowie-puukko on semmonen iso puukko kun oli sillä aussie jäbällä "that ain't no knife. Now this is a knife." Selvä penismeemi. Was he gay, bisexual or bowie? Kai tätä kaikkea. Gender outlaws are cool. Laulussa on myös ankeampi teema, ja sanoitus on myös vertauskuva huumausaineille. Kappaleessa kuultava lähtölaskenta onkin kuvaus heroiinipiikin ottamisen ja sen vaikutuksen alkamisen väliselle ajalle. Heroiinia on pidetty traumatisoituneiden ja heikosta itsetunnosta kärsineiden henkilöiden huumeena, minkä vuoksi se toimi hyvänä metaforana hylätylle, avaruudessa ajelehtivalle astronautille. Huumeaihe oli Bowielle jokseenkin tuttu, sillä hän oli itse kokeillut heroiinia vuonna 1968.
ellauri064.html on line 448: Bilderbergin alkuunpanija oli puolalaissyntyinen Joseph Retinger, joka oli toisessa maailmansodassa Britannian SOE:n agentti ja kiertävä diplomaatti. Sodassa Retinger toimi linjojen takana Puolassa. Sodan jälkeen hän paneutui kamppailuun yhtenäisen Euroopan puolesta CIA:n tuella. Hänen toimintansa seurauksena 29. toukokuuta 1954 Alankomaiden Oosterbeekin Hotel de Bilderbergissä järjestettiin kolmipäiväinen huippusalainen kokous, jossa 75 eri alojen merkittävää henkilöä 14 maasta pyrki keskustelemalla yksimielisyyteen maailmanpoliittisista aiheista. Tunnetuin osallistujista oli liikemies David Rockefeller. Osallistujajoukon toivottivat tervetulleiksi Retinger itse ja toinen Bilderbergin perustajahahmoista Alankomaiden prinssi Bernhard.
ellauri066.html on line 292: Onnexi jotkut lukijat tykkää Pynchonista jotka diggaa myös Neil Stephensonista, William Gibsonista ja David Foster Wallace-vainaasta (nää on Pynchonin perikuntaa ja yhtä vaikeita). Pynchon ei ees tee alaviitteitä kuten Yli-Juotikas ja Foster Loppumattomassa läpässä. Points well taken. Mutta toisaalta:
ellauri066.html on line 726: The restaurant manager at Nya Car- negiebryggeriet brew- ery pub, David Manly, 38, says: “We feel like we’re living in a different world to other countries. We’re incredibly grateful.”
ellauri071.html on line 121: Another of Coward's wartime projects, as writer, star, composer and co-director (alongside David Lean), was the naval film drama In Which We Serve. The film was popular on both sides of the Atlantic, and he was awarded an honorary certificate of merit at the 1943 Academy Awards ceremony. Coward played a naval captain, basing the character on his friend Lord Louis Mountbatten.
ellauri071.html on line 643: Ihan hyvä pointti kirjallisuustieteen dosentilla Tiina Käkelällä-Puumalalla. Tohon James Woodin kritiikkiin "hysteerisestä realismista" pitää ehkä perehtyä lähemmin. Zadie Smith, Don DeLillo, Salman Rushdie ja David Foster Wallace mainitaan esimerkkeinä. Ja onhan siinäkin perää että tämmöisiä liimauxista pursuavia kirjoja tehtiin Menippoxen aikana, ja onhan Rabelaiskin hyvin samantapainen. Sitonse tshekki Hasekin sotaromaani (Svejk etc), josta en tykännyt. Ize asiassa en mä ole tykännyt näistä muistakaan. Mä en ilmeisesti ole mikään hysteerinen realismifän, en siedä karnevalismia. Se on liian hulvatonta pikku minulle. Siitä innostuvat on jotenkin salanazeja.
ellauri072.html on line 33:

David Foster Wallace


ellauri072.html on line 114: Wallace David Foster 46 Leukakiikku autotallissa
ellauri072.html on line 487: It is highly likely that while reading “Every Love Story Is a Ghost Story,” D. T. Max’s biography of David Foster Wallace, you will experience both of the following emotions. The one is that you find it painful, to read about someone in chronic severe emotional distress. The other emotion is that you just don’t find Wallace all that nice.
ellauri072.html on line 499: David Foster Wallace wrote three novels, three story collections, two collections of essays, and other things too, but his reputation still rests mainly on “Infinite Jest” — the 1,100-page novel published in 1996 and set alternately in a tennis academy and a rehab center — and on his sui generis now-nearly-a-genre long-form journalism about topics ranging from lobsters to dictionaries to John McCain to the Adult Video News awards for pornographic films. Wallace’s best work, perhaps by far, is “The Pale King,” an unfinished novel about I.R.S. employees that was assembled posthumously by Wallace’s editor, Michael Pietsch.
ellauri072.html on line 584: David Foster Wallace was born in Ithaca, New York, to Sally Jean Wallace (née Foster) and James Donald Wallace, and was raised in Champaign-Urbana, Illinois along with his younger sister, Amy Wallace-Havens.
ellauri072.html on line 590: In the 1996 novel Infinite Jest by David Foster Wallace, each year has a corporate sponsor; most of the action takes place in year 8, the "Year of the Depend Adult Undergarment".
ellauri073.html on line 168: 10v sitten David Foster Wallace meni autotalliinsa ja sitoi silmukan, heitti sen kaulaansa ja potkaisi pallin nurin. Kirjailijamaailma meni tolaltansa surusta. Wallu oli vasta 46vee eikä enää kirjoittaisi teräviä esseitä joissa on hirmu pitkiä lauseita ja paljon jalkanuotteja.
ellauri073.html on line 210: John McCain oli US politiikan David Foster Wallace (jatkaa Matt): pelkkää pintaliitoa. Molempien ura oli vaihtoehtoista totuutta. Wallace oli muka “avant-garde” artisti mutta matki Hubert Selbyä, Franz Kafkaa ja 12 muuta hemmoa; McCain oli "sotasankari" joka särki 8 konetta ja särkyi kidutuxessa. (En mä ois kyllä, miettii Matt). Molemmat oli huonoja koulussa: Wallu jätti kesken tohtoriopinnot ja Johnu sai melkein potkut sota-akatemiasta. Ne oli ilkeitä naisille: Wallu stalkkasi useita naisia ja kerran työnsi tyttöystävänsä liikkuvasta autosta. McCain otti avioeron vammaisesta vaimosta ja nimitti tosta vaimoa julkisesti "vituxi". Wallace oli olevinaan omaperäinen vaikka se kirjoitti kuin ala-asteella, ja McCain oli olevinaan kapinoizija vaikka se oli rebublikaanina ihan keskitasoa. Tähän vähän lisää Wallun plitiikkanäkemyxiä:
ellauri073.html on line 267: The character's debut performance (May 8, 1993) has been called one of the best segments in SNL history. The reception of the audience combined with visible stifled laughter from David Spade and Christina Applegate on stage added to the popularity of the sketch. Notable physical gestures from Farley included what Spade referred to as “the thing with the glasses” when Farley lifted his glasses on and off of his face commenting, “Hey Dad, I can’t see real good, is that Bill Shakespeare over there?” and perhaps the most defining gesture was one that Farley saved for the live performance when he alternated hands adjusting his trousers, grabbing the hilt of his belt with one hand and the back of his pants with the other.
ellauri073.html on line 275: Quickly on your attacks on Wallace's writing style, I will mention that -- contrary to your rather baffling notions -- people did enjoy Infinite Jest and other works of his. They will continue to do so for decades. Listen Fartey: his work will live on. People recognize great writing wherever it materializes. Forget your distaste of footnotes, or your struggle in understanding the themes and ideals his work encompasses. His audience is clearly beyond you, so try to see that not everyone feels the same as you. You don't have to like his writing, but when you detract from it it makes it even more apparent that you are the lesser man. Your comments on Foster's writing ability led me to some of your other articles, and to be completely honest, it wasn't all bad. I genuinely enjoyed your "Fucking vs. Making Love" poetry bit, although it did seem like a cheap knockoff of Black Coffee Blues. Regardless, I can still acknowledge that the piece had its moments. However (and this is where I want you to pay attention you tub of lard), the piece can also be slammed in several areas. This is highly important, as we can see the parallels between this aspect of "Fucking vs. Making Love" and anything David Foster Wallace wrote. When it comes down to it, your writing can be criticized stylistically and formatically just like his can; the only difference is that there are few that actually give a shit about your writing, whereas Wallace's work is meaningful to the point where people have legitimate incentive to think critically about it. So defile it with your petty blog posts all you want, but at the end of the day you're the one who's only making yourself look bad, and as a heavily obese man based in Europe you are surely having few problems achieving this in the status quo, since Europeans are notably fatist.
ellauri073.html on line 277: Remember this Fartey, for it will serve you well: There is nothing inherently admirable or intriguing in your choosing to complain about various outlets, activities, or people. It's mundane, tiresome, and has little uniqueness. Suffice it to say, there are a million of you, Matt Fartey (and when I say you I really mean babbling little shits). You will be forgotten; there is only one David Foster Wallace...so tell me, who's really the mediocre one here?
ellauri073.html on line 357: Wallace's father said that David had suffered from major depressive disorder for more than 20 years and that antidepressant medication had allowed him to be productive. Wallace experienced severe side effects from the medication, and in June 2007, he stopped taking phenelzine, his primary antidepressant drug, on his doctor's advice. His depression recurred, and he tried other treatments, including electroconvulsive therapy. Eventually he went back on phenelzine but found it ineffective. On September 12, 2008, at age 46, Wallace wrote a private two-page suicide note to his wife, arranged part of the manuscript for The Pale King, and hanged himself from a rafter of his house.
ellauri073.html on line 393: Taavi koitti ensin olla vanhemmille mielixi, luki isän vanhassa yliopistossa Amherstissa äidinkieltä ja filosofiaa kandiin asti ja lähti vielä opiskelemaan jatkotutkinnossa modaalilogiikkaa ja matikkaa. Se lauloi yliopiston kuorossa kauniisti. Taavi kirjoitti gradun nimeltä Fate, time, and Language: An Essay on Free Will (2011). Sovelsi sitten opittua: lopetti luvut ja rupesi kirjailijan epävakaalle uralle. Se sanoi David Lipskylle että filosofiassa sen pää kävi vaan yhdellä pytyllä, kirjallisuudessa käynnistyi koko 2-tahtimoottori.
ellauri073.html on line 437: Ja sit David Lipsky väsäs tän "Loppupeleissä susta tulee kuitenkin tietty oma izesi", joka kertoo hengauxesta Wallun kaa kateellisena kakkosmiehenä. On näitä siis muitakin. Lipsky on tunnetuhko kirjailija joka kirjoitti kohtuulliset arvostelut saaneen romaanin ja toimii nyttememin tavistoimittajana.
ellauri073.html on line 512: Mrs. Wallace was predeceased by her husband of 59 years, James D. Wallace; son, David Foster Wallace; sister, Barbara Sealander; and brother, Gerry Foster.
ellauri073.html on line 520: Sally Foster Wallace will be missed for generations to come. By her son David in particular.
ellauri073.html on line 540: David Foster Wallace became a regionally ranked tennis player while growing up in Illinois. David Foster Wallace´s thesis, The Broom of the System, that he wrote while at Amherst College was published in 1987 while he was attending graduate school. In 1989 David Foster Wallace´s short story collection titled Girl with Curious Hair was published. After graduating from the University of Arizona David went on to study philosophy at Harvard University but soon chose to leave. He moved to Syracuse to be with the poet and novelist Mary Karr. While in Syracuse David Foster Wallace wrote most of his famous novel Infinite Jest. The finished book was 1,100 pages long. The novel dealt with addiction, art, and consumerism, and was set in the near future.
ellauri074.html on line 159: The Glad Products Company is an American company specializing in trash bags and plastic food storage containers. The Glad brand originated in the United States in 1963 when Union Carbide owner and CEO, David Darroch, launched Glad Wrap, a polyethylene film used as a food wrap.
ellauri077.html on line 46: This article examines David Foster Wallace’s Infinite Jest alongside its eponymous film, arguing that they share a common purpose, but that the former succeeds where the latter fails. Coupled with a biographical and phenomenological analysis, the aim of this examination is to better understand Infinite Jest’s place in the cultural and literary movement away from post-modernism. Through the novel, Wallace seeks a cure for the postmodern malaise that is irony, which creates a distancing effect between author and reader. I argue that he collapses this distance by creating a conversation-like novel that uses sentimentality and endnotes to converse with a generation bombarded with easily consumable irony from television, advertisements, and even art. The results of this conversation are the curtailing of passive consumption of entertainment and the beginning of a new sincerity in literature, which allows for grand narratives without the unending cynicism of postmodernism.
ellauri077.html on line 50: Tää on jatkoa albumille 74 jossa aiheena on yhä David Foster Wallace. Kuvituxena on harvinainen kuva iloisesta Wallacesta. Se oli lapsena iloinen ja vekkuli. Sen äiti oli wickedly funny. Sen isä ei kai ollut surullinen haikara, vaikka hullu kyllä. Wallulla on kivat silmälasit kuvassa. Pitikö se ozarättiä hien vai karanneen hiusrajan takia, vai molemmista syistä, vai koska se oli siitä coolia? Vai kaikista 3 syystä yhteensä? Who knows, Wallu on jo iäxi vaiennut. Wallu on mikkihiirimäinen pikkumies, Nipsu pikemminkin Aku Ankka, sehän oli oikeasti seilori.
ellauri077.html on line 54: Onko Christoffer Bartlett1 oikeassa että tää ei olekaan postmoderni romaani vaan merkkaa paluuta Dickensläisiin suuriin kertomuxiin? Tokkopa. Kyllä Wallu on aika keekoileva, ei tää mikään David Copperfield ole, vaan ihan vaan David Sikiö. Ei se mitenkään tee parastansa että lukija ymmärtäisi mitä se on ajamassa takaa. Aika postmodernia puun takaa tirkistelyä tääkin on, vaikka vähemmän kuin 2 muuta puurtamaani tiiliskiveä, Pynchon ja sen suomalainen coveri. Se on sentään kiva että Risto mätkii leffatuotantoa kunnon petkeleellä, navan alle napsuttelee suurella sukunuijalla kuin vaka vanha Wäinämöinen pani piika pikkaraista.
ellauri077.html on line 56: 1Christopher Bartlett* (2016) “An Exercise in Telemachry”: David Foster Wallace’s Infinite Jest and Intergenerational Conversation. in Critique: Studies in ContemporaryFiction, 57:4, 374-389, DOI: 10.1080/00111619.2015.1113921
ellauri077.html on line 63:

The Net Worth of David Foster Wallace
ellauri077.html on line 65: How tall is David Foster Wallace – 1,72m.
ellauri077.html on line 67: How much weight is David Foster Wallace – 79kg
ellauri077.html on line 80: David Foster Wallace syntyi helmik. 21 pnä 1962 Ithakassa, New Yorkissa, USA:ssa. Sen isä James Donald Wallace on moraalifilosofian emeritusproffa Illinoisin ylopistossa ja sen äiti Sally Jean os. Foster oli äidinkielen ope Parkland Collegessa, Champaignissa.
ellauri077.html on line 103: V.1980, David Foster Wallace pääsi koulusta ja Amherstin Collegeen, jossa sillä oli 2 pääainetta, äidin äidinkieli ja isän filosofia. Se oli menestyvä opiskelija, luki modaalilogiikkaa ja matematiikkaa filosofiassa ja otti osaa laulukuorotoimintaan. Siitä tuli kaverien kesken tosi suosittu.
ellauri077.html on line 115: Vuonna 1984, David Foster Wallace päräytti ekan novellinsa, ‘Trillafonin planeetta ja sen suhde pahaan asiaan’, joka julkaistiin Amherstin kazauxissa. Senjälkeen se jatkoi novellien julkaisua, joista monet sisältyy sen ekaan novellikokoelmaan, 'Tyttö omituisella tukalla', julk. elok. 1989.
ellauri077.html on line 169: 1990-luvulla David Foster Wallace retkahti runoilijaan ja esseistiin Mary Karriin, ja suunnitteli jopa tämän aviomiehen, Michael Milburnin nirhausta. Myöhemmin Wallulla oli lyhyt mutta melskeinen suhde Maryn kaa.
ellauri077.html on line 207: But not all things emanating from this country move quite so quickly. Take, for instance, David Foster Wallace’s near-canonical mega-novel Infinite Jest: released in the States in 1996, it has in 20 years been translated into just five languages. (A sixth translation into Greek is currently in the works.) At this rate, it is moving only slightly faster than the massive Quixote, which had appeared in England, France, the Germanic territories, and Venice 20 years after its complete Castilian publication in 1615. However, Jest is massively behind the 3,600-page über-novel My Struggle, which—just 5 years after its complete Norwegian release—is available or forthcoming in over 20 languages.
ellauri077.html on line 209: To determine precisely what forces have determined the globalization of David Foster Wallace’s magnum opus, I spoke to writers, translators, and publishers in eight countries familiar with the work and its multiple manifestations. This is what they told me (2016).
ellauri077.html on line 458: About Existentialist Engagement in Wallace, Eggers and Foer. The novels of David Foster Wallace, Dave Eggers and Jonathan Safran Foer are increasingly regarded as representing a new trend, an 'aesthetic sea change' in contemporary American fiction. 'Post-postmodernism' and 'New Sincerity' are just two of the labels that have been attached to this trend. But what do these labels mean? What characterizes and connects these novels?
ellauri077.html on line 571: 1This essay is an adapted version of a chapter of my dissertation,“Love Me Till My Hearts Stop.” Existentialist Engagement in Contemporary American Literature, a philosophical analysis of the fiction of David Foster Wallace. Tarkistuskysymys: Millä eläimellä on useita sydämiä? Entä puhuvia päitä?
ellauri077.html on line 770: Felo de se: Felo de se è una locuzione latina, il cui significato letterale è: "fellone da sé" ed è un termine legale arcaico (soprattutto in uso nell´area anglosassone) utilizzato per indicare il suicidio di una persona o la sua morte durante un tentativo di commettere un altro crimine (ad esempio un furto o un omicidio). Typically anglosaxon pig latin. Si trova nel romanzo Infinite Jest di David Foster Wallace, in riferimento alla morte del regista James Orin Incandenza.
ellauri077.html on line 849: Why is it that it´s the hierarchically oriented types that want to feel there is something bigger than themselves? Religious types, patriots, all sorts of bigots and fundamentalists? Lots and lots of authors and philosophers, including David Foster Wallace.
ellauri078.html on line 74: Emily Dickinson (1830-1886) on (oli) 1 American suurimmista ja omaperäisimmistä runosepoista ja kaikkien aikojenkin omaperäisimpiä. Kuten kirjoittajat kuten Ralph Waldo Emerson, Henry David Thoreau, and Walt Whitman. Nää äijät mul on jo mut Emilyä ei vielä oo. Aika sovinistista.
ellauri079.html on line 122: A lot of fans will remember this awkward but funny family from TV and probably be able to sing the theme song without having to hear it. The Beverly Hillbillies were after all a favorite show back in their day and inspired a lot of other ideas that came much later, like David Foster Wallace´s magnum opus The Infinite Jest. The attempt to make a movie out of the show wasn’t all that successful and kind of left a bad taste in a lot of peoples’ mouths since it was such a poor attempt that even watching the trailer was something that people didn’t want to admit for a while. Sometimes the best thing you can do is remember the good times and think back to the original that made it something special. Lets hope they will never, never try to make a movie out of Infinite Jest. Jim Incandenza tried that once already, with singularly bad results.
ellauri080.html on line 97: Surullista, surullista. Aika masentavaa. Samaa maata on David Foster Wallacen Eskaton-peliselostus.
ellauri080.html on line 299: Based on this research, many psychologists now believe that the five personality dimensions are not only universal; they also have biological origins. Psychologist David Buss has proposed that an evolutionary explanation for these five core personality traits, suggesting that these personality traits represent the most important qualities that shape our social landscape.
ellauri080.html on line 490: “…amidst all the variety and caprice of taste, there are certain general principles of approbation or blame, whose influence a careful eye may trace in all operations of the mind.” — David Hume (ENTP). Hume oli siis quirky and verbally fluid people person. No jaa, myssypäinen poikames. Yhtä saamattomia olivat kumpikin.
ellauri080.html on line 805: Gandhi was also inspired by Henry David Thoreau’s “Civil Disobedience” John Ruskin (for his critique of capitalism) and Leo Tolstoy and his philosophy of non-violence.
ellauri082.html on line 27:

David Foster Wallace


ellauri082.html on line 41:

Six Things You Didn’t Know About David Foster Wallace


ellauri082.html on line 54: When David Foster Wallace committed suicide in 2008, it was clear he had been profoundly depressed. But the first major biography of the writer, D.T. Max’s Every Love Story Is a Ghost Story, out on August 30th, reveals an even more troubled mind than anyone realized. From the time he was in college, the brilliant author of Infinite Jest was in and out of institutions as he struggled with depression and addictions to alcohol and marijuana. But the book is also full of all kinds of other strange surprises, painting the most complete, and warmest, portrait of Wallace yet.
ellauri082.html on line 81:

Yeah Fuck David Foster Wallace!


ellauri082.html on line 83: In celebration of the empathetic, magical humanism of author David Foster Wallace. Seuraavassa Wallun valikoituja aforismeja.
ellauri082.html on line 103: More than anything the biography is a testament to something even DFW himself would have said: do not build monuments to individuals. His genius is in his work, and in his case his work was both in writing and in acting; the DFW one sees and hears in interviews is DFW as spinner of fiction, not DFW as himself. One need not pretend David Foster Wallace was a god of sincerity and morality and self-awareness; his work clearly shows he was not.
ellauri082.html on line 174: Tänä syksynä kääntäjä Tero Valkonen on iloinnut kääntämänsä romaanin, David Foster Wallacen Päättymättömän riemun, menestyksestä. Kirjasta on otettu jo kolmas painos.
ellauri082.html on line 209: No ainakaan tässä ei näytä olleen minkään laista tiimiaspektia mukana. Flik heiluu yxinäisenä muurahaisena kuin David Foster Wallace. Joka kyllä inhosi kaikkia oravaa pienempiä ötököitä, ja isompiakin. Esim kissoja sopii tukehduttaa muovipusseihin, jos se helpottaa omaa oloa. Sen mielestä rotat ovat hirveitä kun niiden hännät ovat paljaita ja vaaleenpunaisia. Se tappaa niitä isoilla kivillä. Vittu ize se on hirveä, se on kokonaan paljas ja vaaleenpunainen paizi pitkähköä karvaa kaljun ympärillä ja lyhkösempää lyhven hännän ditto. Onnexi se tappoi senkin, vaikka narulla. Odd Rönningen: yxinkertaisin välinein. Muistaaxeni voitin kirjan raittiuskilpakirjoituxista. Voin muistaa väärinkin.
ellauri082.html on line 216: Robert Lee Frost (26. maaliskuuta 1874 San Francisco, Kalifornia, Yhdysvallat – 29. tammikuuta 1963 Boston, Yhdysvallat) oli yhdysvaltalainen runoilija ja kirjailija. Sitä ei pidä sekoittaa britteihin TV-hahmo David Frostiin eikä covid-tartuntaiseen brexit-neuvottelijaan elinikäisparoni David Frostiin.
ellauri083.html on line 588: So David and all the house of Israel brought up the ark of the LORD with shouting, and with the sound of the trumpet.
ellauri090.html on line 389: Ei muuta kuin sarjayrittämään vaan, kyllä se siitä muovautuu, kuten venäläinen sanoisi, eipä aikaakaan niin ollaan kohta taas kokkareina pinnalla, jonkun vaikka liikkuvan intialaistyyppisen ravintolariksan ohjissa. Reinikainen kazoo suopeasti päältä ja nostaa venelakkia. Täst mie piän, tää on hyvä ohjelma, sanoisi myös David Foster Wallace. Save America, if you cannot keep it great.
ellauri092.html on line 145: Opillisesti baptismi painottaa Raamatun erehtymättömyyttä ja arvovaltaa. Samoin korostetaan omakohtaista uskoontuloa. Ainoastaan uskonsa tunnustaneet henkilöt kastetaan. Kaste toimitetaan upottamalla ja se käsitetään lähinnä vertauskuvalliseksi uskon tunnustamiseksi. Kaste suoritetaan vain kastettavan omasta pyynnöstä ja sen kautta liitytään paikallisseurakuntaan. Vauvoja ei kasteta, mutta heidät siunataan Jeesuksen antaman esimerkin mukaisesti. Mitään ikärajaa ei kuitenkaan kasteelle menolle ole asetettu, vaan riittävää on nimenomaan se, että henkilö on väittänyt haluavansa kasteen ja uskovansa. Lasten ja imeväisten suusta sitä kuulee vähemmän. Seurakunnan jäsenyys on tarkoitettu pelkästään henkilökohtaisesti uskoville. Varsinaista yhteistä uskontunnustusta ei baptisteilla ole. David Foster Wallacen peukuttamat mennoniitat oli anabaptistien sekti.
ellauri092.html on line 243: There are many famous pastors in both Methodism and Baptists. Famous Baptist pastors include Charles Spurgeon, John Gill, John Bunyan. Present-day famous pastors include preachers like John Piper, David Platt, and Mark Dever.
ellauri095.html on line 194: Inkscape on aika hankalakäyttöinen scalable vector graphics-piirustusohjelma. Ink on hevosen jalan paise, typ av hudsvulst hos häst eller nöt­kreatur. Sanahöpsöjä skizoja ollaan koko porukka, Jerry "Miehekäs" Hopkins, David "Sikiö" Wallace ja mä. Sitä on liikkeellä. Suojaimien pakollisuutta harkitaan.
ellauri096.html on line 167: David Kaplan and Richard Montague (1960) think the announcement by the teacher in our surprise exam example is equivalent to the self-referential
ellauri096.html on line 582: Kenenkä mielikirjailija oli Dickens Gilmoren tytöissä? Ehtikö knoppi jo unohtua? Olixe Tolstoi? Kuka luki kynäilytauoilla David Copperfieldiä? Ball-sack? Dickens oli luotettava kertoja. Ggssa mainitaan yli kolmesataa Roryn lukemaa kirjaa. Niistä on lukemattomia reading listoja netissä. Gilmore Girls Complete Reading List (361 books).
ellauri096.html on line 710: La reconnaissance de Frantz Fanon en France fut tardive. Fort-de-France possède désormais une avenue à son nom bien que la proposition qu´en avait faite son maire Aimé Césaire, en 1965, eût été rejetée pendant des années. Il faut attendre 1982 pour que s´organise, sous l´impulsion de Marcel Manville, un mémorial international (colloque) en son honneur en Martinique. Peu à peu, plusieurs hommages lui sont rendus dans son île natale. Le lycée de La Trinité est baptisé en son honneur, la ville de Rivière-Pilote lui consacre une avenue et une bibliothèque. En France métropolitaine toutefois, s´il existe de nombreuses rues portant ce nom, David Macey signale n´avoir trouvé aucune avenue Frantz Fanon. En Algérie, dès 1963, une avenue Frantz Fanon est inaugurée à Alger. La reconnaissance dépasse désormais ces deux pays et la mémoire de Frantz Fanon est honorée dans de nombreux pays (Italie, Nigeria, États-Unis) où des centres de recherche ont été baptisés à sa mémoire.
ellauri097.html on line 302: In some respects this reflects a national pathology. Unlike an American or British child, an Australian student can go through thirteen years of education without reading much of their country’s literature at all (of the more than twenty writers I studied in high school, only two were Australian). This is symptomatic of the country’s famed “cultural cringe,” a term first coined in the 1940s by the critic A.A. Phillips to describe the ways that Australians tend to be prejudiced against home-grown art and ideas in favor of those imported from the UK and America. Australia’s attitude to the arts has, for much of the last two centuries, been moral. “What these idiots didn’t realize about White was that he was the most powerful spruiker for morality that anybody was going to read in an Australian work,” argued David Marr, White’s biographer, during a talk at the Wheeler Centre in 2013. “And here were these petty little would-be moral tyrants whinging about this man whose greatest message about this country in the end was that we are an unprincipled people.”
ellauri097.html on line 434: Se oli pyylevä poikamies joka arvosteli Rousseaun sex appealia. Mutta onko tämä evidenssi riittävä? Se oli hedonisti, mutta kummalla puolella kalsareita hedone sitä odotti? Ehkä sillä ei ollut väliä. Mixillä oli tollanen myssy päässä Allan Ramsayn kuvassa? The David Hume Hat! Daniel Dennet teetti izelleen sellaisen.
ellauri097.html on line 436: The famous Allan Ramsay portrait of David Hume, hanging in the University of Edinburgh, depicts him wearing a remarkable hat: a unique salmon-coloured turban. I was able to see the original on the occasion of receiving an honorary degree from Edinburgh in 2007, and ever since then I have desired to obtain a replica of that curious hat for myself (to wear on special occasions, such as those requiring academic regalia).
ellauri097.html on line 438: If you are interested in a unique David Hume Turban for yourself, you can email the Edinburgh University Philosophy Society, who are offering a special promotion of £120 per hat (excl. Shipping&Handling). This offer will be open until August 1st.
ellauri097.html on line 453: The is-ought fallacy, first articulated, by David Hume is put simply as you can’t get an ‘ought’ from an ‘is.’ The more precise way of characterizing it is this; You cannot have a syllogism that has a moral term in the conclusion if there is no moral term in the premises. To be a valid argument, the conclusion has to follow from the premises. You can’t have anything in the conclusion that isn’t already set up in the premises. Hume identified this particular fallacy in arguments that were based on mere descriptive elements but had a conclusion with moral terms in it. That is the is-ought fallacy.
ellauri098.html on line 347: Applied Phlebotinum - kumma nimi. No ei se ole muuta kuin vanha kunnon deus ex machina. "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a completely ad-hoc plot device." According to Joss Whedon, during the DVD commentary for the pilot episode of Buffy the Vampire Slayer, the term "phlebotinum" originates from Buffy writer (and Angel co-creator) David Greenwalt's sudden outburst: "Don't touch the phlebotinum!" apropos of nothing. Flebotomia on suonenisku.
ellauri098.html on line 444:
Alexanteri Suuri, Rowan Atkinson, Sirius Black, Bugs Bunny, Borat, Samuel Butler, Julia Child, John Cleese, Wile E. Coyote, Celine Dion, Thomas A. Edison, Stephen Fry, Frederico Fellini, Richard Feynman, Ben Franklin, Garfield (president), Garfield (cat), Hugh Grant, Annie Hall, Tom Hanks, Werner Heisenberg, Alfred Hitchcock, David Hume, Katariina Suuri, Henry Kissinger, Karl Lagerfeld, Tyrion Lannister, N.Macchiavelli, J.S. Mill, Karl Popper, Murray Rothbard (laissez-faire), Bertrand Russell, Babe Ruth, R2-D2, Socrates, Leonardo da Vinci, Voltaire, Frank Zappa

ellauri098.html on line 545:
Aladdin, Alexanteri Suuri (taas), George W. Bush, Rhett Butler, Julius Caesar (taas), David Cameron, Al Capone, Dale Carnegie, Winston Churchill, Rainbow Dash, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, Thomas A. Edison (taas), Epikuros, Gimli, Sasha Grey, Harry Houdini, Jaime Lannister, Madonna, Eddie Murphy, Jack Nicholson, Camilla Parker-Bowles, Peter Pan, Eva Peron, P.Pietari, Theodore Roosevelt, Marquis de Sade, Nicholas Sarkozy, Tom Sawyer, Han Solo, Jack Sparrow, Sylvester Stallone, Donald Trump (taas), Mike Tyson, John Wayne, Mae West, Amy Winehouse, Malcolm X

ellauri098.html on line 568:
Christina Aguilera, Pamela Anderson, Marie Antoinette, Fred Astaire, David Beckham, Yogi Berra, Bjork, David Bowie, prinsessa Diana, Bob Dylan (taas), Lady Gaga, Paris Hilton, Michael Jackson, Mick Jagger, Erwin "Magic" Johnson, Jimi Hendrix, Audrey Hepburn, Paul McCartney (taas), Marilyn Monroe, Jim Morrison (taas), W.A. Mozart, keisari Nero, Brad Pitt, Prince, Leni Riefenstahl, Rihanna, Keith Richards (taas), Auguste Rodin, Britney Spears, Elizabeth Taylor, Justin Timberlake (taas), Thich Nhat Hanh (vietn. pasifisti), John Travolta, Pharrell Williams

ellauri098.html on line 631: Myers–Briggsin tyyppi-indikaattorin pohjalta David Keirsey on kehittänyt Keirsey Temperament Sorter -testin, joka eroaa siitä lähestymistavassaan ja tarkastelee persoonallisuustyyppejä neljänä erillisenä ryhmänä, temperamentteina. Jako perustuu persoonallisuustyyppien samankaltaisuuksiin ja taipumukseen muodostaa keskinäisiä ihmissuhteita. Sosioniikka on Venäjällä yleistynyt Jungin kehittämiin kognitiivisiin funktioihin perustuva Myers–Briggsin kaltainen teoria.
ellauri099.html on line 137: David WallacenuijapäälimaPykniker
ellauri100.html on line 355:

{14:1} Psalmus David. Domine quis habitabit in tabernaculo tuo? aut quis requiescet in monte sancto tuo?

ellauri100.html on line 356: {14:1} A Psalm of David. O Lord, who will dwell in your tabernacle? Or who will rest on your holy mountain?


ellauri100.html on line 375: I am an INTJ, and an especially strong I, T, and J. Here are my latest scores (02/16/17) on the Keirsey Temperament Sorter (KTS), which is similar to the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI). The descriptive excerpts are from David Keirsey and Marilyn Bates’s Please Understand Me.
ellauri100.html on line 463: The scale you just completed was the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale, developed by Douglas Crowne and David Marlowe (1960). This scale measures social desirability concern, which is people’s tendency to portray themselves favorably during social interaction. Each of the 33 true-false items that you just filled out describes a behavior that is either socially acceptable but unlikely, or socially unacceptable but likely. As a result, people who receive high scores on this measure may be more likely to respond to surveys in a self-promoting fashion.
ellauri100.html on line 1370: Omnicom Groupin mainososaston johtaja David Lubafs määrittelee alan pelisäännöt vilpittömämmin kuin moni muu: hänen mukaansa kuluttajat ovat kuin torakoita - kun niitten päälle aikansa sumuttaa samaa myrkkyä, ne tulevat sille immuuneixi.
ellauri101.html on line 134: Joseph Campbell, arguably the greatest mythologist of the twentieth century, was certainly one of our greatest storytellers. This masterfully crafted book interweaves conversations between Campbell and some of the people he inspired, including poet Robert Bly, anthropologist Angeles Arrien, filmmaker David Kennard, Doors drummer John Densmore, psychiatric pioneer Stanislov Grof, Nobel laureate Roger Guillemen, and others. Campbell reflects on subjects ranging from the origins and functions of myth, the role of the artist, and the need for ritual to the ordeals of love and romance. With poetry and humor, Campbell recounts his own quest and conveys the excitement of his lifelong exploration of our mythic traditions, what he called “the one great story of mankind.” Hemmetti nää sen sankarit on lähes yhtä tuntemattomia kuin se ize.
ellauri102.html on line 108: After almost a century of moving upward, David has eventually gone down. Yankelovich is survived by his daughter, Nicole Mordecai, and her husband David; granddaughter Rachel Mordecai; sister Libby Schenkman and her children Fay and Max. In 1959, he married Hassmieg Kaboolian; that marriage ended in divorce. She was Armenian. He later married Mary Komarnicki, now deceased, and then Barbara Lee. More recently, he lived in La Jolla with his companion, Laura Nathanson. Laura got nothing, being just a companion. Neither did Kaboolian nor Komarnicki, nor Barbara Lee, for being utter failures, having wrong opinions, or wrong religion.
ellauri102.html on line 322: Krugman was born to a Russian Jewish family, the son of Anita and David Krugman. In 1922, his paternal grandparents immigrated to the United States from Brest, Belarus, at that time a part of Poland.
ellauri102.html on line 406: Klein on kotoisin juutalaisesta perheestä (kuinkas muuten). Sekä Kleinin että hänen aviomiehensä Avi Lewisin perhe on kansalaistoimijataustaisia. Kleinin isoisä, senaattori Calvin Klein, erotettiin Disney-yhtiön palveluksesta vuoden 1942 kalsarilakon jälkeen hänen toimittuaan siinä hyperaktiivisesti. Kleinin lääkäri-isä "Pullo" Klein oli vietnamilainen ja Amerikan pahin vastustaja. Hänen elokuvantekijä-äitinsä Bonnie Sherr Klein sai julkisuutta pornoelokuvallaan No Logo Story. Hänen veljensä Seth on Canadian Centre for Alternative Policemen -tutkimuskeskuksen Kolumbian toimiston siivooja. Hänen appivanhempansa ovat journalisti Michele Landslide ja poliitikko C.S. Lewis, Kanadan uusimman ja demokraattisimman puolueen johtajan David Lewisin poika. Hänen tätinsä on ollut naimisissa poplaulaja Dave Liebkindin kanssa.lähde? Klein on julkisesti paljastunut feministiksi ja on luonnehtinut muun muassa kirjaansa No Logo hiukka feministiseksi. No ei se siitä kyllä häirizevästi näy.
ellauri106.html on line 71: In 1962, the same year Letting Go was published, Roth became Writer-in-Residence at Princeton University. After separating from his wife, Roth began a five-year psychoanalysis with the New York psychiatrist Hans J. Kleinschmidt, who published the case history anonymously in a medical journal in 1967 under the title The Angry Act: The Role of Aggression in Creativity. Roth traveled to Israel for the first time in June 1963. He participated in the American Jewish Congress, held discussions with Israeli intellectuals and Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion. From 1965 to 1977 Roth had a lectureship in comparative literature at the University of Pennsylvania.
ellauri106.html on line 82: The story The Breast (Breast) from the following year, the literature professor David Kepesh transformed in into a female breast, awakens echoes of Franz Kafka, the Roth has for a special devotion among his literary models. The search for Kafka's traces led to his first visit to Prague in 1972, which was followed by annual trips until the author was refused an entry visa in 1977. In Czechoslovakia Roth got to know contemporary Czech literature and was in contact with Ivan Klíma, Milan Kundera and Ludvík Vaculík in particular.
ellauri106.html on line 336: In 1860, he visited Boston and met with writers James T. Fields, James Russell Lowell, Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr., Nathaniel Hawthorne, Henry David Thoreau, and Ralph Waldo Emerson. He became a personal friend to many of them, including Henry Adams, William James, Henry James, and Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.
ellauri106.html on line 472: “From enfant terrible to elder statesman. Time heals all wounds,” Rabbi David Wolpe of Sinai Temple in Los Angeles remarked to JTA via email. No hocus pocus about death and God or obsolete fantasies of heaven for him. There was only our bodies, born to live and die on terms decided by the bodies that had lived and died before us. If he could be said to have located a philosophical niche for himself, that was it — he’d come upon it early and intuitively, and however elemental, that was the whole of it. Should he ever write an autobiography, he’d call it ‘The Life and Death of the Male Body.’ Well actually he called it "My life as a man".
ellauri106.html on line 474: There was no metaphysical dimension to Philip. He just flatly refused to believe in it. He thought it was fairy tales,” Bailey said. he was happy to be Jewish, Bailey said. “He liked Jews as human beings. He liked their warmth, he liked his male friends. “If the Western world views itself through the lens of the modern Jewish experience, it is in large measure due to the novels, novellas and short stories of Philip Roth,” wrote David Roskies, a JTS Jewish literature professor, in a note to the class of 2014.
ellauri106.html on line 625: Second-wave feminists including Kate Millett and Germaine Greer took on Mailer, and David Foster Wallace described Updike as “a penis with a thesaurus”. Wallu conversely was a thesaurus without a penis.
ellauri107.html on line 177: David Kesterson of North Texas State University delivered his lecture “Hawthorne and Melville” at the Phillips Library on September 23, 2000, giving the website one of its finest pieces of scholarship. Here are some excerpts from his talk:
ellauri107.html on line 402: In crisis over whether he’s a man or nuts. I'd say nuts. He is a sexual extremist and erotomaniac, a sociopath and wannabe paedophile, rummaging in the knicker drawer of his best friend’s teenage daughter. A habitual liar, a graveyard onanist, a childless despiser of families and couples; a joyous micturator over all laughter, hope, goodness and wholesomeness (a peculiarly American obsession: see also David Lynch), Sabbath entertains us with his negativity.
ellauri108.html on line 98: From its origins, Rastafari was intrinsically linked with Haile Selassie, the Emperor of Ethiopia from 1930 to 1974. He remains the central figure in Rastafari ideology, and although all Rastas hold him in esteem, precise interpretations of his identity differ. Understandings of how Haile Selassie relates to Jesus vary among Rastas. Many, although not all, believe that the Ethiopian monarch was the Second Coming of Jesus, legitimising this by reference to their interpretation of the nineteenth chapter of the Book of Revelation. By viewing Haile Selassie as Jesus, these Rastas also regard him as the messiah prophesied in the Old Testament, the manifestation of God in human form, and "the living God". Some perceive him as part of a Trinity, alongside God as Creator and the Holy Spirit, the latter referred to as "the Breath within the temple". Rastas who view Haile Selassie as Jesus argue that both were descendants from the royal line of the Biblical king David, while Rastas also emphasise the fact that the Makonnen dynasty, of which Haile Selassie was a member, claimed descent from the Biblical figures Solomon and the Queen of Sheba.
ellauri108.html on line 379: Solomons hubris, his tragic flaw, is the meat and bone of the Ethiopian bible, the Kebra Nagast, which, translated, is the glory of the kings. In this work, unlike the King James' bible, we see King Solomon struggling with his own mortality. Bayna-Lehkem, or David, as he is called by Solomon because of likeness to the boy's grandfather, King David, is a man of virtue who will extend his glory to Ethiopia. So, Solomon's weakness for women, which brings about his dissolution, gives him the thing he is truly seeking: a son to walk his own footsteps, like Shakespeare's Hamnet, a son wiser, by dint of his virtue, than himself. A son wiser than himself, that sounds rather like a stone too big to both create and throw. Solomon is disinherited by the lord when he marries the daughter of the Pharaoh and worships her golden insect idols. A hairy spider on its back. For this he is punished severely. We discern his absolute nihilism. His ultimate disillusionment. Knowledge is nothing but sorrow. He that increaseth knowledge increaseth sorrow. In the bitter nutmeat of the Ecclesiastes. Who was the mother? Of course, Queen Sheba. She was, by all reports, black.
ellauri108.html on line 455: Rastas who view Haile Selassie as Jesus argue that both were descendants from the royal line of the Biblical king David, while Rastas also emphasise the fact that the Makonnen dynasty, of which Haile Selassie was a member, claimed descent from the Biblical figures Solomon and the Queen of Sheba.
ellauri111.html on line 435: (Excuse the shouting, but) THERE IS ONLY ONE WAY TO PLEASE GOD AND GET TO HEAVEN AND THAT IS THROUGH HIS ONLY BEGOTTEN SON, THE LORD JESUS CHRIST, WHO SHED HIS PRECIOUS BLOOD TO PAY FOR OUR SINS. JESUS CHRIST IS THE ONLY WAY TO GOD (ref. John 14:6). There is no other Saviour but Jesus. No one else can get us into heaven--not the pope, the Roman Catholic priest, Buddha, Muhammad, rabbis, et al. Only Jesus. He is the prophesied Jewish Messiah, the lion of the tribe of Judah, and the Son of David!
ellauri112.html on line 49: Kysymys siitä, onko sielua pidettävä ykseytenä vaiko moninaisuutena, on, voimme sanoa, aina ollut filosofien harrastuksen polttopisteessä. Sehän oli myös niitä kohtia, joissa vanhojen empiristien ja ratsionalistien mielipiteet jyrkimmin menivät vastakkain. Descartes'n »anima», »substantia cogitans», samoinkuin Leibniz'in »monadi» ovat aina säilyttäneet viehätysvoimansa spiritualistisissa mielissä, joille oppi ehdottomasti yksinkertaisesta ja jakamattomasta sielu-ykseydestä, sielunelämän muuttumattomasta 'kannattajasta' on ollut mieleinen, heidän kuolemattomuustoiveitaan ja metafyysillisen dualismin oppiaan tukevana. Epäilemättä jonkunverran hedelmällisempi on ollut englantilainen empirismi, jota sielutieteessä n. s. »assosiatsio-psykologia» on kannattanut. Tämä suunta, sellaisena kuin sitä ovat edustaneet Englannissa varsinkin Hume, Stuart Mill ja Bain ja Ranskassa Taine on kieltämättä päässyt huomattavan pitkälle pyrkimyksissään kohti varsinaista tieteellistä psykologiaa. Mutta toiselta puolen oli sen sielutieteellinen peruskäsitys--tapa käsittää sielunelämä erillisten mielteiden kokoomukseksi ja selittää sielulliset synteesit pelkästään näiden erillisten mielteiden mekaanisten yhtymisten, s. o. assosiatsioiden kautta--tämä käsitys oli epäilemättä tosiasioille väkivaltaa tekevä. Tämä kävikin ilmeiseksi m.m. sen kautta, että sekä David">Hume että Stuart Mill nimenomaan tunnustivat seisovansa voimattomina tärkeimmän sielullisen synteesin, minuuden, edessä ja myönsivät olevansa kykenemättömiä sen syntyä selittämään.
ellauri112.html on line 224: Almujen antaminen köyhille on perinteinen esimerkki altruismista. Jacques-Louis Davidin maalaus. Altruismi (”toinen”) tarkoittaa epäitsekästä ja pyyteetöntä toimintaa, jossa toisen hyvä asetetaan oman edun edelle.
ellauri112.html on line 429: Caspar David Friedrich, ''Vaeltaja sumumeren yllä'', 1818. Romantiikka oli 1700-luvun lopussa Euroopassa alkanut taiteellinen ja älyllinen suuntaus, joka puhkesi kukoistukseen Saksassa 1790-luvulla ensin kirjallisuudessa ja lopulta filosofiassa.
ellauri115.html on line 147:
1766
JJ lähtee David Humen följyssä Englantiin. Voltaire vittuilee Emilestä. "Meitä hävettää ja surettaa kertoa että tää heppu, joka kärsii vielä pornoilunsa seurauxista, raahaa armenialaisexi naamioituneena mukanaan paikasta toiseen naista jonka mamman kuoleman se on ize aiheuttanut, ja jonka lapset se on rontannut löytöeläinklinikalle..." Samana vuonna JJ riitaantuu myös Humen ja muiden brittiläisten kaa. Nyt ei mene hyvin.

ellauri115.html on line 398: Hume's friends travelling in France had already told him about his incomparable standing in Parisian society. And the two years he spent in Paris were to be the happiest of his life. He was rapturously embraced there, loaded, in his words, "with civilities". Hume stressed the near-universal judgment on his personality and morals. "What gave me chief pleasure was to find that most of the elogiums bestowed on me, turned on my personal character; my naivety & simplicity of manners, the candour and mildness of my disposition &tc." Indeed, his French admirers gave him the sobriquet Le Bon David, the good David.
ellauri115.html on line 414: Hume's eyes were on France, in particular, and his reputation as the good David. His first denunciations of Rousseau were made to his friends in Paris; his Concise and Genuine Account of the Dispute between Mr. Hume and Mr. Rousseau would be published there in French, edited by Rousseau's enemies. He studiously avoided communicating with Mme de Boufflers, knowing she would, as she did, urge "generous pity". Hume's descriptions of Rousseau as ferocious, villainous and treacherous ensured joyful coverage in newspapers and discussions in fashionable drawing rooms, clubs and coffee houses. The actor-manager David Garrick wrote to a friend on July 18 that Rousseau had called Hume "noir, black, and a coquin, knave".
ellauri115.html on line 427: Hume suggested to Mme de Boufflers and others that for his own sake Rousseau would best be locked away as a madman. Le Bon David's reason had become a slave to his passions.
ellauri115.html on line 1203: Nää luonnekuvauxet on vaivaannuttavan osuvia. Vähän kyllä epäilyttää että tää ois aina vaan huonon kasvatuxen tulosta. Mä luulen pikemminkin että tää on 1 apinoiden tiimipelien käypä pelitapa, jolla voi hyvinkin olla hyvä lisääntymismenestys. Ne huonot kasvattajat ovat olleet samanlaisia paskiaisia, jotka kasvattavat vielä yhden yhtä menestyvän mulkeron, kuin Olli Lokin huolellisesti valvovat Henry David Thoreau-henkiset lokkivanhemmat Rauharannan laiturilla. Olli Lokki leikki Calle Carlsonin kanssa Tunturikadun lattialla tinasotilailla.
ellauri117.html on line 191: still laughter, and our love was pertect tor a moment, more pertect than any love I have known since, for either man or woman. The very echo of David's lament for Jonathan in 2 Samuel 1: 26 ('thy to me was wonderful, passing the love of women.)
ellauri117.html on line 344: David Herbert Lawrence (1885-1930) kirjoitti aikansa vapaamielisimmät romaanit. Monet sen kirjat kiellettiin mm. tällästen sexikohtausten takia:
ellauri117.html on line 589: John Locke (29. elokuuta 1632 Wrington, Somerset – 28. lokakuuta 1704 Essex) on tunnetuimpia uuden ajan filosofeja. Hän on tunnettu sekä tietoteoriastaan että yhteiskuntafilosofiastaan. Tietoteoreetikkona Locke luokitellaan yleensä brittiläisiin empiristeihin eli kokemusajattelun kannattajiin yhdessä David Humen ja George Berkeleyn kanssa.
ellauri117.html on line 620: Locke's theory of mind is often cited as the origin of modern conceptions of identity and the self, figuring prominently in the work of later philosophers such as Jean-Jacques Rousseau, David Hume, and Immanuel Kant. Lipilaari kusipäitä koko konkkaronkka. Locke was the first to define the self through a continuity of consciousness. He postulated that, at birth, the mind was a blank slate, or tabula rasa. Contrary to Cartesian philosophy based on pre-existing concepts, he maintained that we are born without innate ideas, and that knowledge is instead determined only by experience derived from sense perception. Eli tääkin vielä.
ellauri118.html on line 571: Viimeaikaisin puheenvuoro fiktiivisten mielten tutkimukseen on David Hermanin toimittama antologia The Emergence of Mind: Representations of Consciousness in Narrative Discourse in English (2011a). Herman rakentaa kokoelmansa johdannossa jyrkän vastakkainasettelun kognitiotieteellisten ja fiktiivisten mielten erityislaatuisuutta korostavien lähestymistapojen välille. Ensin mainittuun leiriin Herman asettaa itsensä ja kaikki kokoelmansa kirjoittajat, jälkimmäiseen Hamburgerin, Cohnin, luonnottoman narratologian puolestapuhujat sekä tämän tutkielman kirjoittajan (ks. Herman 2011b, 11 ja 31, viite 5).
ellauri131.html on line 750: Noel Thomas David Gallagher (s. 29. toukokuuta 1967 Manchester, Englanti, Yhdistynyt kuningaskunta) on brittiläinen muusikko ja lauluntekijä, joka tunnetaan erityisesti urastaan rock-yhtye Oasiksen kitaristina, musiikillisena johtajana ja lauluntekijänä. 1980-luvulla Gallagher työskenteli pätkätyöläisenä rakennusalalla ja Inspiral Carpets -yhtyeen roudarina. Palattuaan Manchesteriin vuonna 1991 hän liittyi kitaristiksi Oasikseen, jossa hänen veljensä Liam Gallagher oli laulajana.
ellauri142.html on line 167: Vittu mitä pellejä! Jo on lapsellista touhua. According to the historian David Stevenson, it was influential on Freemasonry as it was emerging in Scotland. Robert Vanloo (n.h.) states that earlier 17th century Rosicrucianism had a considerable influence on Anglo-Saxon Masonry. Hans Schick sees in the works of Comenius (1592–1670) the ideal of the newly born English Masonry before the foundation of the Grand Lodge in 1717. Comenius was in England during 1641. Their mission is to prepare the whole wide world for a new phase in religion, which includes awareness of the inner worlds and the subtle bodies, and to provide safe guidance in the gradual awakening of man's latent spiritual faculties during the next six centuries toward the coming Age of Aquariums. This is the dawning of it, judging by the sea levels. According to Masonic writers, the Order of the Rose Cross is expounded in a major Christian literary work that molded the subsequent spiritual beliefs of western civilization: The Divine Comedy (ca. 1308–1321) by Dante Alighieri.
ellauri142.html on line 1039: Aikuisen voiman lehdessä 11/21 oli uutta tietoa paskan elämän oireyhtymästä. Sen tärkein tekijä on laissez-faire kapitalismin keskeinen credo, toi "maaginen vapaaehtoisuus" (Magical voluntarism). Termin lanseeraaja David Small oli hyvä joskin pieni mies. Taavi-eno kuoli 76-vuotiaana 2014. Vaikka britti olikin, se oli aivan oikeilla jäljillä. Amerikkalaisten ylläpitämä Wikipedia tuomizee (tai vähintäinkin leimaa) sen näkemyxet nimellä "a social materialist explanation of psychological distress". Tää "maaginen vapaaehtoisuus" on toi seppoilu, eli existentialistinen uskomus että jokaisella yxilöllä on voima luoda izestään mitä haluaa. No sehän on aivan ilmiselvää potaskaa. Sitä hanakammin sitä tarjotaan kaikessa jenkkiviihteessä, kz. esim. Emily in Paris. Fisherin mukaan "masennus on esimerkki siitä mitä tapahtuu, kun maaginen vapaaehtoisuus tulee mahdollisen rajalle." Sillä rajalla kävi Eskikin, kun sen tieteellinen uskottavuus upposi, mutta aika äkkiä se osas rationalisoida asian ja asemoida izensä uudestaan nyt "käytännön filosofixi", lue motivaatiopuhujaxi. Pastorixihan se oli pienenä aikonutkin. Haaveet toteutuivat! Höpsismi toimii sittenkin!
ellauri144.html on line 394: Dylan Thomas was born on 27 October 1914 in Swansea, the son of Florence Hannah (née Williams; 1882–1958), a seamstress, and David John Thomas (1876–1952), a teacher. His father had a first-class honours degree in English from University College, Aberystwyth and ambitions to rise above his position teaching English literature at the local grammar school, which he never did. Thomas had one sibling, Nancy Marles (1906–1953), who was eight years his senior. The children spoke only English, though their parents were bilingual in English and Welsh, and David Thomas gave Welsh lessons at home. Thomas´s father chose the name Dylan, which could be translated as "son of the sea", after Dylan ail Don, a character in The Mabinogion. (Mulla on se, mutten ole lukenut.) His middle name, Marlais, was given in honour of his great-uncle, William Thomas, a Unitarian minister and poet whose bardic name was Gwilym Marles. Se oli se silverbäk jota ne kaikki koittivat apinoida. Dylan, pronounced ˈ [ˈdəlan] (Dull-an) in Welsh, caused his mother to worry that he might be teased as the "dull one" (which he was). When he broadcast on Welsh BBC, early in his career, he was introduced using this pronunciation. Thomas favoured the Anglicised pronunciation and gave instructions that it should be Dillan /ˈdɪlən/. He was fed up with the "dull one" joke. in 1914. In 1931, when he was 16, Thomas, an undistinguished pupil, left school to become a reporter for the South Wales Daily Post, only to leave under pressure 18 months later.
ellauri145.html on line 77: Avec Marcel Duchamp, Breton fonde la revue VVV et Pierre Lazareff l’engage comme « speaker » pour les émissions de la radio la Voix de l’Amérique à destination de la France. Jacqueline le quitte pour le peintre David Hare.
ellauri147.html on line 713: Lorenzer, joka psykoanalyytikkona tuntee olevansa osa kriittisen teorian perinnettä, jakaa kulmallisen taipumuksen varhaisiin häiriöihin ja tukee sitä diagnosoiden "sisäisesti ohjatun" henkilön rinnakkaisesta taipumuksesta (ottamalla termiparin David Riesmann(6) "ulkoisesti ohjattuun". Diagnosoimalla "uudenlaisen sosialisoinnin"(7), joka on erityisen yleistä kriittisessä pedagogiikassa, jota edustaa narsistinen persoonallisuus ja joka on korvannut "autoritaarisen paskan" hallitsevan sosiaalisen luonteen merkityksessä "suun flipperinä", psykopatologisen luokan yhteys ajan diagnoosiin on myös käsitteellisesti kiinteä.
ellauri147.html on line 716: Lorenzer, der sich als Psychoanalytiker der Tradition der kritischen Theorie zugehörig fühlt, teilt die These einer säkularen Tendenz zu frühen Störungen und stützt sie mit der Diagnose einer parallelen Tendenz vom (das Begriffspaar David Riesmanns(6) übernehmend) „innengeleiteten“ zum „aussengeleiteten“ Menschen. Mit der vor allem in der kritischen Pädagogik verbreiteten Diagnose eines „neuen Sozialisationstyps“(7) -, der durch die narzisstische Persönlichkeit repräsentiert sei und als „oraler Flipper“ den „autoritären Scheisser“ in der Bedeutung eines vorherrschenden Sozialcharakters abgelöst habe, ist die Verbindung einer psychopathologischen Kategorie mit einer Zeitdiagnose auch begrifflich fixiert.-->
ellauri150.html on line 539: Esther "Bat" Simonides was born in Jerusalem, Judea, the daughter of the Hellenized Jewish slave Simonides. She was raised in the household of Prince Ithamar Ben-Hur, and she loved Judah Ben-Hur as a child. By 26 AD, she had grown into a woman, and, while she still loved Judah, she was betrothed to the freedman and merchant David ben Matthias from Antioch. That same year, Judah and his family were imprisoned after being wrongfully imprisoned for an alleged assassination attempt on Valerius Gratus, and Simonides was arrested and tortured on the orders of the Roman tribune Messala. Simonides was arrested when the Romans were certain that he was not hiding anything, and he and Esther lived in hiding at the Ben-Hur family's derelict and looted estate, where they were joined by Simonides' fellow former prisoner Malluch.
ellauri151.html on line 384: Hamannin epäluottamus järkeen ja valistukseen johti hänet johtopäätökseen, jonka mukaan usko Jumalaan oli ainoa ratkaisu filosofian kiusallisiin ongelmiin. Hamann sai paljon vaikutteita David Humen kirjoituksista. Hänet muistetaan siitä, että hän käytti kuvaa Sokrateesta, joka väitti ettei tiedä mitään, teoksessaan Socratic Memorabilia, jossa hän arvosteli valistuksen riippuvuutta ihmisjärjestä.
ellauri152.html on line 453: Hasidijuutalaiset näkevät lopun ajat vähän eri valossa. Ensin kuultaisiin puhallettavan oinaan sarveen. Siihen puhaltaisi profeetta Elia ja se julistaisi kaikkeen maailmaan uutista: "Vapahdus on tullut maailmalle! Pelastus on koittanut maailmalle!" Kaikki pahantekijät ja Israelin vihalliset tuhoutuisivat ja jäljelle jäisivät vain hyvät kristityt joiden etuoikeutena olisi nyt palvella juutalaisia. Talmudin mukaan Israelin valtakunta ulottuisi kaikkien kansojen ylitse. Jerusalemiin laskeutuisi taivaista tulinen temppeli. Kohanimit eli pappisluokka (me olimme mohanimeja) suoritaisi uhreja, ehkä tuliuhreja, sillä jo silloin minusta tuntui, että härkien, lampaiden ja turturikyyhkyjen teurastaminen ei johtaisi vapahdukseen. Aabraham, Iisak, Jaakob ja heidän heimonsa, Mooses, kuningas Daavid, kaikki profeetat, viisaat, geonimit ja pyhimykset kokisivat ylösnousemuksen ja samalla kaikki muut juutalaiset kuolleet. Isäni oli julkaissut kirjan jossa sukupuumme johdettiin Shabatai Cohenista, rabbi Noshe Isserlisistä, Rašista aina kuningas Daavidiin. Veljeni Moshe ja minä astuisimme palatsiin jossa kuningas David istuisi kruunu päässään kultaisella valtaistuimella "Isoisä!..." sanoisimme hänelle.
ellauri152.html on line 464:

David ja Bathsheba juutalaisesta näkövinkkelistä
ellauri152.html on line 581: Bashevis kertoo Bet Dinissä että sillä oli hederissä poikaystävä, jonka kanssa ne olivat kuin David ja Jonatan. Oliko ruipelolla punatukka Iisakilla nonbinary taipumuxia? Saattaapa olla, kerze kirjoitti 60-luvulla Mulan-tyyppisen tarinan jossa joku tyttö naamioituu pojaxi voidaxeen opiskella poikien kanssa jeshivassa. Siitä teki julkihomo Barbara Streisand ize elettyä filmiä kymmenen vuotta ja oli ryppyinen (41) kun sai sen vihdoin valmiixi.
ellauri152.html on line 675: "Whomever the dog loves, he chastens to let him know how to straighten his way. (Mezudat David)" (Mishlei 3:12). One is chastened by the dog so that no trace of sin remains lest it lessen the dog's love for that person, and it also increases one's humility, lest tranquility decrease one's fear of him. (Rabbenu Yona).
ellauri153.html on line 710: 10 Miten nämä uutterat soturit kohtelivat taimenia? Heidän olisi ollut helppo anastaa laumasta lammas silloin tällöin, mutta he eivät tehneet niin silloin tällöin vaan päivittäin. Päinvastoin, he olivat kuin suojeleva muuri Nabobin laumojen ja palvelijoiden välillä. (Lue 1. Samuelin kirjan 25:15, 16.) Lampaat ja taimenet kohtasivat monenlaisia (usein yllättävän samanlaisia) vaaroja. Davidin petoeläimiä oli paljon, ja vierasmaalaiset rosvojoukot tekivät usein hyökkäyksiä noille seuduille, koska Israelin eteläraja oli lähellä. *
ellauri153.html on line 808: Why did David need Abishag to keep him warm? Was Jonathan too hot for a hot water bottle? Heitä homo voltti ja muita skezejä.
ellauri153.html on line 810: When King David was very old, he could not keep warm even when they put covers over him. So his attendants said to him, ‘Let us look for a young virgin to serve the king and take care of him. She can lie beside him so that our lord the king may keep warm.’ Then they searched throughout Israel for a beautiful young woman and found Abishag, a Shunammite, and brought her to the king. The woman was very beautiful; she took care of the king and waited on him, but the king had no sexual relations with her” (1 Kings 1:1–4)
ellauri153.html on line 812: Many ancient customs are strange to modern readers of the Bible, especially those of us who have never lived in cultures embracing polygamy or absolute monarchy. The incident of Abishag sleeping—chastely—in David’s bed is definitely a puzzling story. We’ll start with the Scripture passage in which Abishag is brought to David:
ellauri153.html on line 814: Even with extra blankets, the elderly King David could not generate enough body heat on his own to maintain a healthy temperature. A lifetime that had included being a fugitive, living in caves, being exposed to the elements, and fighting hard-fought battles had finally taken its toll on his aging body (see 1 Samuel 20:1; 22:1; 2 Samuel 21:17). David’s condition, called hypothermia, is not unusual in older people: toward the end of his long life, former President Ronald Reagan requested that his favorite electric blanket be returned from the ranch he had sold. Of course, no technology in ancient Israel would provide a continual source of warmth through the cool Judean nights. Only a human body had the capacity to do that.
ellauri153.html on line 816: David had four wives whose names we know—Ahinoam, Abigail (2 Samuel 2:2), Eglah (2 Samuel 3:5), and Bathsheba (2 Samuel 11:27)—and possibly others such as Absalom’s mother Maakah. This doesn’t count the concubines he had (2 Samuel 5:13). The natural question is, with plenty of female intimates to keep David warm, why did his attendants seek out a beautiful virgin stranger for the job? The following are several issues regarding Abishag’s “job description”:
ellauri153.html on line 818: Why a woman? A boy or young man would not have been considered for the job, in order to prevent even the appearance of David having another homosexual relationship (Leviticus 18:22; 20:13).
ellauri153.html on line 820:
  • Why beautiful? Human nature never changes. Then as now, people prized physical beauty (Genesis 29:17; Deuteronomy 21:11; 1 Samuel 9:2; 2 Samuel 14:25; Esther 2:2–4). Kings had the privilege and power to surround themselves with beauty, and David’s servants likely thought to win his favor by bringing a beautiful woman into his palace.
    ellauri153.html on line 824: Abishag was neither a wife nor a concubine, but her position in the king’s household gave her such high prestige that David’s son Adonijah asked to marry her after the king’s death, but Solomon recognized this as an attempt by Adonijah to make himself king, and he had his brother summarily executed (1 Kings 2:21–25).
    ellauri153.html on line 826: Nowhere does the Bible approve of David’s state of affairs—just the opposite! God had warned Israel through Moses that any future king “must not take many wives” (Deuteronomy 17:17). Scripture does not say that Abishag’s presence in David’s bed was a good thing, nor does it present David as a good father. His many children by multiple mothers were a cause of great trouble for him and the whole kingdom (2 Samuel 13; 2 Samuel 15; 1 Kings 12:23–25). His own son and successor, Solomon, ignoring God’s clear warning, took his father’s excesses to a shocking extreme with 700 wives and 300 concubines who led him astray and turned his heart after other gods (1 Kings 11:2–4). The kingdom itself was divided and lost by Solomon’s son shortly after his coronation, barely one generation after the glory of King David (1 Kings 12).
    ellauri155.html on line 112: Olen hiljattain käynyt sähköpostien vaihtoa älykkään ja puhuttelevan entisen valkoisen kansallismielisen kanssa, joka on nyt omistautunut anti-natalismille, juutalaisen eteläafrikkalaisen filosofin David Benatarin filosofialle, kertoo Andrew Joyce, Ph.D. Tiivistetysti anti-natalismi väittää, että elämä sisältää kärsimystä, joskus hirvittäviä määriä, ja siksi olemattomuus on aina parempi kuin eläminen ja sitten kuolema.
    ellauri155.html on line 442: I introduktionen till psaltarpsalm 34 talas om en Avimelek inför vilken David spelat vansinnig. Beskrivningen stämmer in på den kung Akish av Gat som omtalas i 1 Sam 21:10 – 14.
    ellauri155.html on line 513: Achish trusted David, thinking, ‘He has made himself an utter stench to his people Israel; therefore he shall always be my servant’ ” (27:12).
    ellauri155.html on line 515: David-Ay-David-Pretended-to-be-Insame-Before-Abimelech.jpeg" />
    ellauri155.html on line 521: Today’s passage certainly qualifies as one of the more difficult passages of Scripture. It is easy enough to understand what is going on; however, it is difficult to know how to evaluate it. We see in 1 Samuel 27:1–4 that David decided the best way to escape Saul was to flee to Philistine territory and take up residence in the city of Gath. David had been there before, and he deceived the city’s king, Achish, by pretending to be insane, thereby keeping the Philistines from killing him (21:10–15). This time, David did not have to feign insanity. Achish would have heard of Saul’s war with David, so he probably felt secure in allowing him into the city. This enemy of his enemy—Israel’s King Saul—could be counted on as a friend. Achish gave the country town of Ziklag to David, and it became a royal possession after David ascended the throne (27:5–7).
    ellauri155.html on line 523: Little in the narrative tells us what we are to think of David’s actions. Perhaps the very fact that he sought security among the Philistines is enough to make his choice questionable. After all, God had shown Himself able to keep David safe within the boundaries of Israel (chs. 18–26), so David’s seeking refuge in Philistia may indicate a lapse of faith. It could be that David’s raids from Ziklag confirm this. We see how David would go out against enemies of Israel such as the Amalekites (see Ex. 17:8–16) who were in the south of Judah. After defeating them, he would bring spoil back to Achish and lie to the king, telling him that he was conducting raids on the Israelites (1 Sam. 27:8–12). We do not want to make too much of this, for some actions are acceptable in times of war that are not necessarily acceptable in times of peace (for example, industrial espionage). This was a time of war, with both Achish and the peoples David raided being actual enemies of Israel. Still, David’s successful deception put him in a quandary. Achish was so pleased with David’s work that he commissioned David to join him against Israel (28:1–2). What would he do?
    ellauri155.html on line 525: It is hard to know how to evaluate David’s actions in today’s passage. If they were sinful, let us note that David still accomplished good for Israel by defeating so many of the nation’s enemies. Sometimes we put ourselves in certain difficult situations because of our sin, but that does not mean God cannot bring about good from it. We should not use that as an excuse for sin, but we must also remember that the Lord is big enough to take advantage of our mistakes. Stalin made some mistakes but he did electrify the country as promised by prophet Lenin.
    ellauri155.html on line 539: Eipä ihme että Davidin moabilaisuus äidin puolelta on vähän noloa. Laittomasti viritettyjä sählämeitä Jordanin itärannalta.
    ellauri155.html on line 690: Porukat on sitä mieltä että pulskan David Humen panos vapaaseen tahtokeskusteluun on ihan parhautta "compatibilistisen" kannan puolesta, eli että apinan vapaus ja moraalinen vastuu sopii yhteen determinismin kanssa. Tää aihe on musta aina ollut aivan tarpeetonta länkytystä, totta kai se sopii. Tällä lailla se apinoiden kexi murenee, ei siinä mitään, apinat hoitaa nää hommat länkytyxellä. Apinat paukuttavat symbaaleja ja läxyttävät toisiaan, se on niiden tapa tyhjentää vieteri.
    ellauri155.html on line 852: Donald Davidson (1999)
    ellauri156.html on line 34:
    Jean-Leon Geromen 1889 näkemys suht isopyllyisestä Bathshebasta alapesulla. David stalkkaa palkonkilla takuulla kulli ulkona.

    ellauri156.html on line 45: But here is the spoiler: What David's story tells us is that it is OK to be as awful and nasty a person privately as you could ever wish to be, as long as you end up as the overall winner of the cup. Winners can do nothing seriously wrong, because the victory at the end is the crucial thing. In terms of good old game theory: a virtuous life is no game of attrition, where every mistake counts and your deeds are toted up at the end. No, it is a winner takes all, you either win or lose at the end, whatever happens in subgames on the way is just wiped away. This applies to Dog himself, as Lauri Snellman with his nifty jesuitical game-theoretical theodicy argument has shown.
    ellauri156.html on line 59:

    9. David and Bathsheba (2 Samuel 11:1-4)
    ellauri156.html on line 68: Many tragic incidents occur as the unexpected outcome of a sequence of events. Certainly that is the case with King David. A little vacation from war leads to a day spent in bed, followed by a stroll along the roof of his palace as night begins to fall on Jerusalem. By chance, David sees a woman bathing herself, a sight which David fixes upon, his pecker coming instantly to attention, and then follows up on with an investigation as to her identity. The woman is shortly summoned to the palace and then to his bedroom, where David sleeps with her (well no, actually he spends time with her very much awake; what is meant by this euphemism is that he fucks the lady crazy.) Even though he has discovered she is the wife of Uriah, a warrior who is fighting for the army of Israel. Never mind. The woman becomes pregnant, and so David calls Uriah home, hoping it will be thought that he has gotten his wife pregnant. When this does not work, David gives orders to Joab, the commander of the army, which arranges for Uriah's death in battle. It looks like the perfect crime, but David's sin is discovered and dealt with by Nathan, the prophet of God. Nathan is Philip Roth's alter ego's name, Nathan Zuckerman! Can this be an accident? Jehova knows, it's too late to ask Phil.
    ellauri156.html on line 70: This sequence of events and its accompanying tragedies is the subject of chapters 11 and 12 of 2 Samuel. I have chosen to expound these chapters in three lessons. This first lesson will deal with “David and Bathsheba,” as described in 11:1-4. In the following lesson, we will address the subject of “David and Uriah,” as told by our author in 11:5-27. The third lesson will focus on “David and Nathan,” as this confrontation is put forth in chapter 12. Our text has much to say about the sins of adultery and murder, but rest assured that it addresses much more sins than this. It is a text we all need to hear and to heed, for if a “man after God's own heart” can fall so quickly and so far, surely we are capable of similar or even bigger failures. May the Spirit of God take this portion of the Word of God and illuminate it to each of us in full color, as we come to this study.
    ellauri156.html on line 72: The best part in my opinion is the bit in Talmud where David looks Bathsheba in the eyes and sees his own horny face reflected there and is sick of the whole thing. From then on he will not touch Bathseba anymore down there ever again and leaves her to languish in his harem bored as hell. Maybe David barfed because Bathsheba was already corked. He was used to virgins.
    ellauri156.html on line 74: Before we begin to look carefully at verses 1-4 of chapter 11, allow me to make a couple of comments about this event as portrayed in these two chapters of 2 Samuel. First, I want you to notice the “law of proportion” in this text. Only three verses describe David's sin of adultery with Bathsheba. Second, the author pulls no punches in describing the wickedness of this sin. History is not written in a way that makes David look good. Third, the sin of David and Bathsheba is dealt with historically, but not in a Hollywood fashion. Hollywood filmmakers would perform a remake of this account to dwell on the sensual elements. Nothing in this text is intended to inspire unclean thoughts or actions. Indeed, this story is written in a way that causes us to shudder at the thought of such things. I know it is something of a letdown, but at least myself, I was totally capable of imagining the rest. (I got 5 streetwalking girls and a wife, for God's sake.) If you need help with unclean thoughts here, please consult Gonorrhé Ballsack's Comtes Droolatiques.
    ellauri156.html on line 76: Israel is at war with none other than the Ammonites (verse 1), which may come as a surprise to you as it did to me. (Well, to be honest, I thought they were the cretacean mollusks by the same name.) I thought the Ammonites had been defeated in chapter 10. I was wrong. The author is very clear on this matter. In chapter 8, the author tells how David began to engage his enemies in battle, ending the strangle-hold these surrounding nations had on Israel. David subjected the Philistines (8:1), then the Moabites (8:2), and then he took on the king of Zobah (8:3ff.). In the process, other nations became involved and found Israel too formidable an enemy to oppose again. (Notice the similarity of the situation here to the Yom Kippur War.)
    ellauri156.html on line 78: In chapter 10, we find David and the men of Israel deliberately insulted by Hanun, the king of the Ammonites. David had become friends with Nahash, the former king. When he died, David sent a delegation of officials to express David's respect for Nahash and his grief over this king's death. The Ammonites do not seem to wish to continue this peaceful relationship with David and Israel, so they humiliate the men whom David sent. This is how it all happened (Bob omitted this):
    ellauri156.html on line 80: When David’s men came to the land of the Ammonites, 3 the Ammonite commanders said to Hanun their lord, “Do you think David is honoring your father by sending envoys to you to express sympathy? Hasn’t David sent them to you only to explore the city and spy it out and overthrow it?” 4 So Hanun seized David’s envoys, shaved off half of each man’s beard, cut off their garments at the buttocks, and sent them away.
    ellauri156.html on line 81: 5 When David was told about this, he sent messengers to meet the men, for they were greatly humiliated. The king said, “Stay at Jericho till your beards have grown, and then come back.”
    ellauri156.html on line 83: David didn't want to see bare-butted men with just half a beard.
    ellauri156.html on line 84: This leads to a war between the Israelites and the Ammonites. The Ammonites recruit the Syrians as their allies against David. In their first conflict, the Syrians flee, forcing the Ammonites to retreat to “the city” (10:14; which must be Rabbah -- see 12:26ff.). The Syrians are not content with their defeat and attempt a rematch, but once again they are defeated. This causes them to give up any thought of backing up the Ammonites in their war with Israel in the future.
    ellauri156.html on line 86: So you see, the Ammonites were not subjected to Israel in chapter 10, but they were deprived of Syrian assistance. Now they are on their own. The Israelites make the most of this. They ravage the land of the Ammonites and then besiege the capital (royal) city of Rabbah (11:1; see 1 Chronicles 20:1). This city of Rabbah, incidentally, is now the city of Amman, Jordan. It is not until after David's sin is rebuked by Nathan that the Israelites actually take the city (2 Samuel 12:26-31).
    ellauri156.html on line 90: Every man who is able to fight goes to war, except one -- David. David, we are told, “stayed in Jerusalem” (11:1). David's decision to stay at home in Jerusalem becomes a devastating one. The author of Samuel does not include this fact, but the Chronicler does. In 1 Chronicles 20, we read these words:
    ellauri156.html on line 92: 1 Then it happened in the spring, at the time when kings go out to battle, that Joab led out the army and ravaged the land of the sons of Ammon, and came and besieged Rabbah. But David stayed at Jerusalem. And Joab struck Rabbah and overthrew it (1 Chronicles 20:1).
    ellauri156.html on line 94: We know from the details of this text in Chronicles that it is the same time and the same war. This decision on David's part precedes a serious sin of another kind in 1 Chronicles 21:
    ellauri156.html on line 96: 1 Then Satan stood up against Israel and moved David to number Israel. 2 So David said to Joab and to the princes of the people, “Go, number Israel from Beersheba even to Dan, and bring me word that I may know their number.” 3 Joab said, “May the LORD add to His people a hundred times as many as they are! But, my lord the king, are they not all my lord's servants? Why does my lord seek this thing? Why should he be a cause of guilt to Israel?” 4 Nevertheless, the king's word prevailed against Joab. Therefore, Joab departed and went throughout all Israel, and came to Jerusalem. 5 Joab gave the number of the census of all the people to David. And all Israel were 1,100,000 men who drew the sword; and Judah was 470,000 men who drew the sword (1 Chronicles 21:1-5).
    ellauri156.html on line 98: Joab urges David not to number the Israelites, and through the prophet Egad, God rebukes David for doing so, giving him a choice of one of three chastenings. It is a grave sin with great consequences for the nation Israel. Out of this sin, God brings about blessing for Israel, because it is on the plot of ground where David offers sacrifices to God that the temple will be built. What chastenings?
    ellauri156.html on line 100: 9 The Lord said to Egad, David’s seer, 10 “Go and tell David, ‘This is what the Lord says: I am giving you three options. Choose one of them for me to carry out against you.’” 11 So Gad went to David and said to him, “This is what the Lord says: ‘Take your choice: 12 three years of famine, three months of being swept away[a] before your enemies, with their swords overtaking you, or three days of the sword of the Lord—days of plague in the land, with the angel of the Lord ravaging every part of Israel.’ Now then, decide how I should answer the one who sent me.”
    ellauri156.html on line 102: 13 David said to Egad, “Hmm. I am in deep distress. Let me fall into the hands of the Lord, for his mercy is very great; but do not let me fall into human hands, that's too humiliating.”
    ellauri156.html on line 106: But why the fuck was it a sin in the first place? Censuses are taxation events. David was after money, not blood, since when is that a sin in Jehovah's book? Or maybe he did not want to draw the sword, but rather sheathe it with Bathsheba? Now that is a sin, if the vagina is not one of yours. Hey, read on, Bob explains it all:
    ellauri156.html on line 108: What I am pointing out here is that the decision on David's part -- to remain in Jerusalem -- is the beginning of woes for both David and the nation Israel. Why is it wrong for David to stay home while the rest of the men of Israel go to war against the Ammonites? First, leading the nation in war is one of the main tasks of the king:
    ellauri156.html on line 116: Saul shrunk back from pursuing the enemies of Israel at times, and it was sometimes David who stood in Saul's shoes, leading the nation in battle. This was the case, for example, when David fought Goliath, a battle that should have been fought by Saul, Israel's giant (see 1 Samuel 9:2). Up until now, David has been leading his men in battle, but in chapter 11, David suddenly steps back, sending others to fight for him. In 2 Samuel 12:26-31, the author makes it clear that David may not have been planning to be present for the formal surrender of Rabbah. Joab sends David a message, urging him to come and at least give the appearance of leading his army. If David does not come, Joab warns, David will not receive the glory, and it may go to Joab. Joab knows that David knows this is not the way it was meant to be. And so it is that David makes a formal appearance to be the “official” leader at the time of the surrender of the city of Rabbah.
    ellauri156.html on line 118: So the sin was not to bask in reflected glory. David is wrong in yet another way, a way he would hardly have realized at the time. David is a prototype of the Messiah who was yet to come as God's King. When Messiah comes, it is He who brings about the deliverance of His people. It is He who will come to subdue His enemies and to establish His throne. How can David represent Messiah as he reigns by staying at home and refusing to enter the battle with the enemies of God and the enemies of God's people? Messiah will come (the second time) as a mighty warrior. If David would portray Him, then he must be a mighty warrior.
    ellauri156.html on line 120: What the fuck? Jesus was a wimp par excellence, so precisely by NOT taking part in a war David was a perfect role model for this pacifist.
    ellauri156.html on line 122: What keeps David home in Jerusalem? Why doesn’t David go to the battle? I fear there are perhaps several reasons. The first is David's arrogance. God has been with David in all of his military encounters and given him victory over all his foes. God has given David a great name. David has begun to believe his own press clippings. He begins to feel he is invincible. David seems to have come to the place where he believes his abilities are so great he can lead Israel into victory, even though he is not with his men in battle. He was just getting bored. God should not have helped him TOO much, that was like taking the wind from his sails. Any parent knows that much.
    ellauri156.html on line 124: This seems consistent with David's other great sin, which also follows his decision to stay at home. When David instructs Joab to number the Israelite warriors, Joab protests. This is something David should not do. Perhaps this is because David would find too much confidence in the number of his men, rather than in God. It certainly is a far cry from Gideon's army, pared down to a meager 300 men.
    ellauri156.html on line 209: A second reason may be boredom. Something you my dear remaining readers know by now. It is one thing to fight battles in which the enemy is quickly overcome. But the besieging of Rabbah is a whole different kind of war. This battle will not be won so quickly. It will take time to starve the Ammonites to the point that they surrender. It is not a very exciting kind of war to wage. And while they wait, the Israelite soldiers (which includes David) have to pitch their tents outside the city, living in the open field. This is no picnic, and David knows it. David's attitude seems reflected in the advertising slogan of a major hamburger chain, “You deserve a break today.”
    ellauri156.html on line 211: A third reason -- and I am hesitant to suggest it -- is that David may be getting soft. Let's face it, David had some very difficult days when he was fleeing from Saul. I am sure there were hot days and cold nights. There were certainly days when his food was either limited or lousy, or both. Army food has never been known as a work of culinary artistry. Now, David has moved up in the world, from barren wilderness, which Saul and his army would avoid if possible, to the hills of Jerusalem. His accommodations are better, too. He no longer lives in a tent (if he was fortunate enough to have one in those days); he lives in a palace. Why would David want to stay in a tent in the open field, outside of Rabbah, if he can stay in his own bed (or Bathsheba's), in his own palace, inside Jerusalem?37
    ellauri156.html on line 213: David is starting to become Saul-like, in that he is willing to let others go out and fight his battles for him. Among those David is willing to send in his place are Joab and Abishai. This Joab, we should recall, is a violent man. Joab was not the commander of the army of Israel by David's choice. David had distanced himself from Joab and Abishai because of the death of li'l Abner (2 Samuel 3:26-30). Joab had become the commander of Israel's armed forces because he was the first to accept David's challenge to attack Jebus (1 Chronicles 11:4-6). Suddenly, David is willing to stay at home and leave the whole of Israel's armed forces under Joab's command. I do not think David is motivated by trust in Joab as much as he is his disdain for the hardship of the campaign to take Rabbah.
    ellauri156.html on line 215: Like my uncle to whom I referred earlier, David is in the wrong place at the wrong time. He is in Jerusalem when he should be at Rabbah. Unlike my uncle, David is in the wrong place at the wrong time because of a wrong decision. David is like the simpleton in Proverbs 7, who was foolishly and yet deliberately in the wrong place at the wrong time. Something almost had to go wrong, and it surely did!
    ellauri156.html on line 236: King David makes the mistake of staying in Jerusalem, rather than fighting the Ammonites with his army. He does not stay home to meditate on the Law of Moses or to write another psalm or two; he seems to stay home to stay in bed. We know Uriah went to bed when it was evening (that is, when it got dark), and it is very likely that he got up at first light (see 11:13). With David, it is very different. David does not get up until evening, that is, until it is time for a soldier to go to bed. (As a friend of mine pointed out, this is probably a habit developed over days and not just a one-time event.) It is very unlikely that David is doing any “kingly work” in the wee hours of the night. From all appearances, David is simply indulging himself. Whaddya mean? Fucking maidens is kingly work if anything. Surely he wasn't watching late night shows, since all he had was his TV mama. Sitting up and adjusting the screen until the picture was completely right.
    ellauri156.html on line 267: Finally, David can stand his bed no longer. Getting up, he goes for a stroll around the roof of his palace. Most certainly, David's palace was built on the highest ground possible, so that it would afford him a commanding view of the city and the surrounding country. Virtually every other residence and building would be below David's penthouse apartment, and thus he would be able to see much that was out of sight for others. (A friend remarked after this message that a truck driver had told him a whole lot can be seen from an 18-wheeler that people in cars don't see. A chicano truck-driver just got a 110 year sentence in the U.S. for failing to stop his 18-wheeler when the brakes went. Now that was a honest-to-god Jehova style sentence, to the third and fourth generation. Good work, Rocky!)
    ellauri156.html on line 269: I am not suggesting that David purposed to see something he should not. (I bet he did, peeping Tom. You actually come round to the same conclusion below, Bob.) More than likely he is walking about, almost absent-mindedly, when suddenly his eyes fix on something that rivets his attention on a woman bathing herself. The text does not really tell us where this woman is bathing, and why at this time of the night? We only know that she is within sight of David's penthouse (rooftop). David notes her beauty. He does not know who she is or whether she is married. We cannot be certain how much David sees, and thus we do not know for certain whether he has yet sinned. (What the fuck? How much do you need to see to sin? Are boobs enough, or do you need to see the pudendum or the fanny?) If David saw more of this woman than he should (a fact still in question), then he surely should have diverted his eyes. It was not necessarily evil for him to discretely inquire about her. If she were unmarried and eligible, he could have taken her for his wife. His inquiry would make this clear.
    ellauri156.html on line 271: Word comes back to David about this woman's identity:
    ellauri156.html on line 275: The answer comes to David in the form of a question. I take it that no one else actually saw this woman, but only David. The identification of this woman depends then upon David's description of her age, appearance, and location, and no one could be absolutely certain whether this is the woman or not -- except for David, of course, who would recognize her.
    ellauri156.html on line 277: Uriah Heep sai nimensä samannimisestä saiturista, joka esiintyy Charles Dickensin teoxessa David Copperfield. Mulla on se, Seija luki sen ja on siitä lähin ahdistellut mua lukemaan sen myös. Eipä ole napannut. Siinä oli sellai huilisti, joka nosti polvea soittaessaan poikkihuilua jotensakin rivosti.
    ellauri156.html on line 279: Uriah Heep on brittiläinen progressiivinen hard rock -yhtye, joka perustettiin Lontoossa vuonna 1970 ja on edelleen aktiivinen. Nimensä yhtye otti Charles Dickensin romaanissa David Copperfield esiintyvästä samannimisestä viekkaasta ja vastenmielisestä kirjanpitäjästä. Yhtyeen tunnetuimpiin kappaleisiin kuuluvat muun muassa "Easy Livin'", "Lady in Black", "Gypsy", "July Morning" ja "Look at Yourself". Suurinta suosiota se nautti 1970-luvun ensimmäisellä puoliskolla.
    ellauri156.html on line 283: The information David receives should be sufficient for him to end the matter, or more appropriately, to start it. If this woman is married, he has no business going any further. No matter how great his position and power, nothing gives him the right to take another man's wife. The pattern for David's actions is clearly outlined by Joseph, who was hotly pursued by his master's wife (but the shoe was on the other foot that time, a puma hunting for a young rattlesnake. And Joseph was a bachelor, so what was the sin in that?).
    ellauri156.html on line 287: The report David is given concerning Bathsheba gives him all the information he needs, and more, if he is intent upon doing what is right. He knows Bathsheba is married and thus out of the question. He also knows Bathsheba is married to Uriah the Hittite. This is no nameless husband, someone David has never heard of before. David has to know Uriah, even if he does not know his wife. In 2 Samuel 23:39, “Uriah the Hittite” is named as one of David's mighty men, known for his bravery and courage as a soldier. If he does not know it, surely someone there among his servants would inform him.
    ellauri156.html on line 289: My fear is that David chose to ignore Uriah's military record and to fix his attention upon his racial origins. It is obvious and noteworthy that David refers to Uriah as “Uriah the Hittite,” while the author of Samuel refers to him only as “Uriah.” The expression, “Uriah the Hittite” is a term of derision, I believe, based solely upon the fact that he is of Hittite stock. Never mind that David has Moabite blood in his veins.
    ellauri156.html on line 293: Let us briefly review the place of the Hittites in Old Testament history. As early as Genesis 15:18-21, God promised Abram (Abraham) that his descendants would inherit the land of the Hittites (along with that of other peoples as well; see also Exodus 3:8, 17; 13:5; 23:23, 28, 32; 33:21; 34:11; Deuteronomy 7:1; Joshua 1:4; 3:10). Ephron, the man from whom Abraham bought a burial plot for his family, was a Hittite (see Genesis 23:10; 25:9; etc.). Jacob's brother Esau married several Hittite wives (Genesis 26:34-35; 36:2). The Israelites were commanded to utterly destroy the Hittites (Deuteronomy 20:17). The Hittites opposed Israel's entrance into the promised land (see Numbers 13:29; Joshua 9:1: 11;1-5), and the Israelites had some victories over them (Joshua 24;11). Nevertheless, they did not totally remove them and came to live among them (Judges 3:5). When David was fleeing from Saul, he learned that the king was camped nearby. He asked two of his men who would go with him to Saul's camp. One of the two, Abishai, volunteered to go with David, the other man did not. This man was Ahimelech, the Hittite (1 Samuel 26:6). (Eli siis mitä? Pitäskö tästä päätellä nyt jotakin heettien statuxesta vai? Oliko ne jotain neekereitä?)
    ellauri156.html on line 295: It is obvious that Uriah had forsaken his own people and their gods to live in Israel, marry an Israelite woman, and fight in David's army. He is no pagan, to be put to death. He is a proselyte. In spite of all this, I believe David looks down upon him. David has grown accustomed to having the finest of everything. His palace is the finest around. His furnishings, his food, his help, are all the finest. Now, he looks from his penthouse and sees a woman whom he regards as “fine.” How can a woman so “fine” belong to this Hittite? She is fit for a king. And this king intends to have her.
    ellauri156.html on line 297: And so David sends messengers to her, who take her and bring her to him. When she arrives, David sleeps with her, and when she is purified from her uncleanness,38 she returns to her house. That is that. (Mikä uncleanliness? Meneekö Bathsheba Joen Bideniin ja pesee Taavin runkut pois?) If she had not become pregnant, I have little doubt she would never have darkened the door of David's house again. David does not seek a wife in Bathsheba. He does not even seek an affair. He wants one night of sex with this woman, and then he will let Uriah have her. (Häh? Oliko Bathsheba niin huono hoito vai? Eikös sitä olis voinut toistamiseenkin rotkauttaa? Bathshebalta ei nähtävästi mitään kysytty missään vaiheessa. Eikun x-asentoon Taavin sängylle ja melaa mekkoon.)
    ellauri156.html on line 299: The sequence of events, so far as David is concerned, can be enumerated in this way: (1) David stays in Jerusalem; (2) David stays in bed; (3) David sees Bathsheba bathing herself as he walks on his roof; (4) David sends and inquires about this woman; (5) David learns her identity and that she is married to a military hero; (6) David sends messengers to take her and bring her to him; (7) David lays with her; (8) Bathsheba goes back to her home after she purifies herself. This same sequence can be seen in a number of other texts, none of which is commendable. Shechem “saw, took, and lay with” Dinah, the daughter of Jacob in Genesis 34:2. Judah “saw, took, and went in to” the Canaanite woman he made his wife in Genesis 38:2-3. Achan “saw, coveted, and took” the forbidden spoils of war in Joshua 7:21. Samson did virtually the same in Judges 14. Let us not forget that a similar sequence occurred at the first sin when Eve “saw, desired, and took” the forbidden fruit in Genesis 3. (Thanx a lot Bob for this compendium. This will certainly come handy later on, when looking for something fun to read.)
    ellauri156.html on line 301: It is clear from the words of our text that David sinned. It is clear from the actions of David which follow that he sinned. It is clear from the words of God through Nathan that David sinned in a grievous manner. The problem is that many wish to view the text in a way that forces Bathsheba to share David's guilt by assuming that she somehow seduced him. I would like to pursue this matter, because I believe there is absolutely no evidence to support such a conclusion. (Wow! That's a refreshing point of view! Like Ballsack's novel Comment la belle Fille de Portillon quinaulda son iuge.)
    ellauri156.html on line 303: The inference is often drawn that Bathsheba should not have been exposing herself as she did, and that it was her indiscretion which started this whole sequence of events. Some think her actions may have been deliberate (She knew David was there and could see. . . .), while others would be more gracious and assume it was simply poor judgment. Let me point out several things from the text. First and foremost, when Nathan pronounces divine judgment upon David for his sin, Bathsheba and Uriah are depicted as the victims, not the villains. When Adam and Eve sinned, God specifically indicted Adam, Eve, and the serpent, and each received their just curse. This is simply not the case with Bathsheba. Nowhere in the Bible is she indicted for this sin. It may be that the author did not choose to focus upon Bathsheba, but even in this case, the Law would clearly require us to consider her innocent until proven guilty. (Which law? Not biblical law for sure, take for instance Susan's case, where Daniel had to called upon to prove her innocence.)
    ellauri156.html on line 305: It is very clear in Samuel that the tragedies which take place in David's household are the consequence of his sin, just as Nathan indicates (12:10-12). Thus, when Amnon rapes Tamar, the sister of Absalom, it is a case of the “chickens coming home to roost.” Or is it a case of "Rooster coming into the chicks?" Note that it is at David's command or summons that Tamar is called to the palace, and then to Amnon's bedside. There is not so much as a hint that when Tamar is raped, it is all of Amnon's doing. Should this not strongly indicate that the same is true in Bathsheba's case, of which this second incident is a kind of mirror image? (Fucking crooky noses, raping and ravaging their kinky haired ladies right and left.)
    ellauri156.html on line 307: When we read of this incident, we do so through Western eyes. We live in a day when a woman has the legal right to say “No” at any point in a romantic relationship. If the man refuses to stop, that is regarded as a violation of her rights; it is regarded as rape. It didn't work that way for women in the ancient Near East. Lot could offer his virgin daughters to the wicked men of Sodom, to protect strangers who were his guests, and there was not one word of protest from his daughters when he did so (Genesis 19:7-8). Even less later, when they asked their father Lot to fuck them at will. These virgins were expected to obey their father, who was in authority over them. Michal was first given to David as his wife, and then Saul took her back and gave her to another man. And then David took her back (1 Samuel 25:44; 2 Samuel 3:13-16). Apparently Michal had no say in this whole sequence of events. Oh, those days of innocence!
    ellauri156.html on line 311: Now, having looked at the big picture, let's concentrate on the juicy details. The text informs us that David sees this woman bathing and notes that she is very beautiful. It is sometimes thought that David saw Bathsheba unclothed as she bathed herself publicly, and that the sight of her (unclothed/partially) body prompted David to act as he did. Virtually the identical words employed in our text (“very beautiful in appearance”) are found in Genesis 24:16 of Rebekah, as she came to the well with a water jug on her shoulder. She was neither naked nor partially clothed. Similar (though not identical) descriptions are found, where no exposure of the woman is indicated at all (see Genesis 12:11; 26:7; 29:17; Esther 1:1). I believe one of the reasons David summons Bathsheba to his palace is that he has not seen all that he wishes. (Haahaa! Bob, you are a little too bashful here. Most likely he wants to try on what he saw, like St. Thomas who wanted to put his finger in the wound. Seeing is not believing.)
    ellauri156.html on line 313: Let's pursue this matter a little more. (Oh lord, I feel the spirit stirring below my belt.) Bathsheba is bathing herself. (This is about the 4. time Bob invites us to picture this tender moment. There are not too many of them in the Bible, so let us savor it.) We tend to assume that this means she is disrobed, at least partially. I believe Bathsheba is bathing herself in some place normally used for such purposes. Only David, with his penthouse vantage, would be able to see her, and a whole lot of other folks if he chose. The poor do not have the same privacy privileges as the rich. I have seen any number of people bathing themselves on the sidewalks of India, because this is their home. The word for bathing employed here is often used to describe the washing of a guest's hands or feet and for the ceremonial washings of the priests. Abigail used this term when she spoke of washing the feet of David's servants (1 Samuel 25:41). Such washings could be done, with decency, without total privacy. We assume far too much if we assume Abigail is walking about unclothed, in full sight of onlookers.
    ellauri156.html on line 317: 1 Then it happened in the spring, at the time when kings go out to battle, that David sent Joab and his servants with him and all Israel, and they destroyed the sons of Ammon and besieged Rabbah. But David stayed at Jerusalem (emphases mine).
    ellauri156.html on line 319: It is not as if Bathsheba is acting in an unbecoming manner, knowing that men are around. She has every right to assume they are not. David is around, but he should not be. On top of this, she is not bathing herself at high noon; she is bathing herself in the evening. This is when the law prescribed (for ceremonial cleansing), and it is when the sun is setting. In other words, it is nearly dark when Bathsheba sets out to wash herself. David has to crane his neck and use his binoculars to see what he does. I believe Bathsheba makes every effort to assure her modesty, but the king's vantage point is too high, and he is looking with too much zeal. I am suggesting that David is much more of a peeping Tom than Bathsheba is an exhibitionist. I believe the text bears me out on this.
    ellauri156.html on line 321: If I am right in what I have been saying, David's sin becomes that much more wicked. In some instances (if not most), a woman may purposely or unwittingly encourage the one who assaults her. In this case, there is not so much as a hint that this takes place. In fact, if I am reading the story accurately, David's “sighting” of Bathsheba is the result of her keeping the law, while David is failing his responsibilities as king. But not his duties as the king of the apes.
    ellauri156.html on line 325: First, the root of David's sin is not low self-esteem; it is arrogance. (Since when is low self-esteem a sin? Well I bet it is for American believers. Think of Bill James' Will to Believe.) I am getting quite weary of hearing that the root of all evils is low self-esteem. I wonder why we see nothing of this in the Bible. David's problem is just the opposite. He has become puffed up and arrogant because of his success and status as Israel's king. He has come to see himself as different/better than the rest of the Israelites. They need to go to war; he does not. They need to sleep in the open field; he needs to get his rest in his own bed, in his palace. They can have a wife; he can have whatever woman he wants.
    ellauri156.html on line 327: Second, the nature of David's sin is the abuse of power. Power corrupts, we are told, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. David has come to power. In the previous chapters, David employed his God-given power to defeat the enemies of God and of Israel. He used his power as Israel's king to fill his pockets and void his cullions, and takes advantage of Dog's promise to Saul by restoring to Mephibosheth his family property and by making him a son at his table. Now, David, drunk with his power, uses it to indulge himself at the expense of others. I want you to notice the repetition of the word “send” or “sent” in this chapter. It is a king like David who can send all the men to war but stay home himself (verse 1). It is a king like David who can send people to inquire about Bathsheba, and then to send messengers to “take” her and bring her to his palace (verses 3-4). It is a king like David who can “send” for Uriah and “send” orders to Joab to have him killed. It is a king who "sends" his shlong into Bathsheba's holiest of the holy. David has the power, and he certainly knows how to use it, only now he is using that power for his own benefit, at the expense of others. This is not servant leadership.
    ellauri156.html on line 329: Sexual abuse and sexual harassment are just two of the ways people abuse their power. Parents begin to think they own their children, and that they can use their children to satisfy themselves, so they engage in various forms of abuse, often sexual in nature. Bosses get used to being in control and telling people what to do, and it should not be surprising to learn that they sometimes abuse their power over employees and subordinates to sexually satisfy themselves. This sin is no different from that of David. (Oh, oh, this is too good, my cup runneth over.)
    ellauri156.html on line 331: I must press the point a little further, at the risk of coming off. Of course it is wrong for David to use his power to have sex with another man's wife. But it is not right to abuse power even when sex is permissible. A husband should not abuse his power in order to have sex with his wife. And a wife should not abuse her power (of saying “No,” for example) to punish or put off her husband. (LOL! Bob, you show you true colors here!) Within marriage, sex is simply another area of serving our mate. It is not the opportunity to lord it over our mate. Put that in your pipe and smoke it, Jennifer! And you girls as well!
    ellauri156.html on line 333: Third, prosperity is as dangerous -- and sometimes more dangerous -- than poverty and adversity. We all get weary of the adversities of life. We all yearn for the time when we can kick back and put up our feet and relax a bit. We all tire of agonizing over the bills and not having quite enough money to go around. David certainly looked forward to the time when he could stop fleecing Saul and begin to reign as king. But let me point out that from a spiritual point of view, David never did better than he did in adversity and weakness. (In fact, he was quite like Ballsack's ung paouvre qui avait nom le Vieulx-par-chemins, another Iivana Nyhtänköljä.)
    ellauri156.html on line 335: Conversely, David never did worse than he did in prosperity and power. How many psalms do you think David wrote from his palatial bed and from his penthouse? How much meditation on the law took place while David was in Jerusalem, rather than on the battlefield? On the other hand, how many maidens did he open the psalmbook with on the field? We are not to be masochists, wanting more and more suffering, but on the other hand we should recognize that success is often a greater test than adversity. Often when it appears “everything's goin' my way” we are in the greatest danger of producing some shit like Frank Sinatra's "My Way".
    ellauri156.html on line 343: David's sin did not just suddenly appear in a moment of time. David set himself up for this fall. We know he disengaged himself from the battle, choosing instead a life of comfort and ease. You and I may make the same decision, though in a slightly different way. We may choose to ease up in our pursuit of becoming a disciple of our Lord, of the disciplined life which causes us to bring our bodies under our control (see 1 Corinthians 9:24-27).
    ellauri156.html on line 347: Sins of commission are often the result of sins of omission. David committed sin by his adultery with Bathsheba and later by the murder of her husband, but these sins were borne out of David's omissions which came to pass when he stayed home, rather than go to war. These sins of omission are often difficult to recognize in ourselves or others, but they are there. And after a while, they incline us to more open sins, as we see in David.
    ellauri156.html on line 349: Within those of you who are reading this message, I know there are some who have already fallen in the same hole as David. You have already committed adultery. To you, I would say: “Stop now!” How much better it would have been if David had confessed to his sin with Bathsheba before he went on to murder Uriah. Sin is like a cancer: the sooner it is cut out, the better; the longer it is left, the more it grows. If you have fallen as David did (or in some other way), forsake your sin, confess it, find God's forgiveness, and move on to the next.
    ellauri156.html on line 351: Some of you have not yet sinned as David did, but I hope I have given you some ideas, and that you are already on your way. You are like David when he chose to stay in Jerusalem, and when he chose to stay in bed. You have not yet managed to sin in a dramatic fashion, but you are laying the groundwork for it. It's only a matter of time and opportunity, so keep hacking. My question to you is not whether you are actively committing sin, but if you are, please send me some snapshots.
    ellauri156.html on line 353: Whether you are actively committed to Christ, serving Him as you serve others, using the power (spiritual gifts) God has given you to benefit others? Let us learn from David's omissions, rather than learn (experientially) from his commissions.
    ellauri156.html on line 363: I don’t think I’m exaggerating here. The interaction between David and Uriah (see next episode) seems to indicate that David was puzzled as to why Uriah would not enjoy the good life in Jerusalem if he had the opportunity to do so. Uriah, on the other hand, chose to live as he would have on the battlefield.
    ellauri156.html on line 365: This reference to Bathsheba’s “purification” is interesting and perplexing. The King James Version reads, “and he lay with her; for she was purified from her uncleanness: and she returned unto her house” at verse 4. The New King James Version is slightly different: “and he lay with her, for she was cleansed from her impurity; and she returned to her house” (note the change from a semi-colon to a comma, and from a colon to a semi-colon). The NIV reads, “and he slept with her. (She had purified herself from her uncleanness.)” The NRSV reads, “and he lay with her. (Now she was purifying herself after her period. Or was it colon? Only David knows, and Dog of course, but they don't tell.).”
    ellauri156.html on line 374: Aika hemmetisti kyyhkypaisteja papille, kun jokainen menstruoiva nainen tuo niitä sille 2kpl/kk. Pappi pysyy hyvin selvillä seurakuntalaisten varmoista päivistä. Hmm. Jos Bathsheban kuukkixet oli ohize jo vähintään viikko sitten, kohtahan sillä oli ovulaatio, eikäpä ihme että Taavi-enon mälli teki heti tehtävänsä. Vaikka mä en kyllä usko eze jäi siihen yhteen kertaan. (2) When did this cleansing occur, and when was it completed? Was Bathsheba’s bathing which David witnessed part of her ceremonial cleansing? If so, there may have had to be a delay before the Law permitted intercourse. Otherwise, David would have caused her to violate the Law pertaining to cleansing, since it may not have been complete. The translations which make her cleansing a past, (continued) completed event seem to be suggesting that she was now legally able to engage in intercourse, though certainly not with David. If she was still in the process of her cleansing, David’s sin of adultery is compounded because it was committed at the wrong time, while cleansing was still in process. It is also possible to read the text (as does the NASB) to say that Bathsheba waited at David’s house until she was ceremonially clean from her evening with David. It is interesting that nothing is said of David waiting until he was cleansed. The inference I take from this “cleansing” reference is that Bathsheba was still concerned about keeping the Law of Moses, even if David was not. Big fat hairy diff.
    ellauri156.html on line 376:

    10. David and Uriah (2 Samuel 11:5-27)
    ellauri156.html on line 384: Our lesson from 2 Samuel 11 is one of the great cover-up attempts of all time, and like so many, it too fails miserably. Our previous lesson attempted to explain David's sin with Bathsheba in a way that placed the guilt squarely upon David, and not upon Bathsheba. This was all of David's doing, not due to temptation or seduction on Bathsheba's part, but because of arrogance, lust, and greed on David's part.
    ellauri156.html on line 386: David had no desire for Bathsheba to become his wife, or even to carry on an adulterous affair with her (a mitigating circumstance). He sought one night's pleasure, and she went home. That was that, or so it seemed. But then David received word from Bathsheba that this one night resulted in Bathsheba's pregnancy. Our text takes up here with the account of David's desperate attempt to cover up his sin with Bathsheba. As we all know, it did not work, and it only made matters worse.
    ellauri156.html on line 388: The story of David and Uriah reminds me of the story of the “Sorcerer's Apprentice.” It has been awhile, but as I remember the plot (probably the Walt Disney version), the sorcerer goes away, leaving his apprentice behind to do his chores. The apprentice gets the bright idea that the work would be a whole lot easier if he used his master's magical arts so he could sit back and watch other powers at work. The problem was that he didn't know how to stop what he started, and so more and more helpers came on the scene as the apprentice tried to reverse the process. The worst was when Mickey tried to cleave the broom with an axe, and got instead a million of smaller brooms.
    ellauri156.html on line 390: At this point in time, David's life is very similar. He begins to stack one sin upon another, certain that each one will somehow wipe out visibility of the previous sin. Instead, his sins only multiply. More and more people become aware of his sin, and a cover up becomes impossible. Many lessons can be learned from this tragic episode of David's life, which if heeded, will help us duplicate them in our lives. May the Spirit of God open our ears and our hearts to listen and learn from David's attempt to cover up his sin with Bathsheba, so that you can avoid some of his mistakes and do a better job.
    ellauri156.html on line 392: In our first lesson, we devoted our attention to the first four verses of chapter 11, which depict David's sin of adultery with Bathsheba. Pretty unbelievable that I got a whole four pages out of it. The trick is was to keep repeating the juicy bit about Bathsheba washing herself before (or after) David's load. I sought to demonstrate that this sin was all of David's doing. The author points his accusing finger at David, not Bathsheba. It was not Bathsheba's indiscretion in bathing herself (as I understand this story), for she was simply obeying the ritual of purification outlined in the law. It was David who, by means of his lofty elevation and view, looked inappropriately at Bathsheba, washing herself,violating her privacy. I endeavored to demonstrate that David's sin with Bathsheba was the result of a sequence of wrong decisions and attitudes on David's part. In one sense, being on the path he was, his destination (of adultery, or something like it) was to be expected. His sins of omission finally blossomed and came into full bloom.
    ellauri156.html on line 394: One of the tragic aspects of our story is that the sequence of sin in David's life does not end with his adulterous union with Bathsheba. It leads to a deceptive plot to make her husband Uriah appear to be the father of David's child with Bathsheba and culminates in David's murder of Uriah and his marriage to Uriah's wife, Bathsheba. As we take up where we left off in our last lesson, a few more bits of background information are vital to our understanding of this text.
    ellauri156.html on line 396: (1) It seems likely that David and Uriah are hardly strangers, but that they know each other, to some degree at least. Uriah is listed among the mighty warriors of David (2 Samuel 23:39; 1 Chronicles 11:41). Some of the “mighty men” came to David early, while he was in the cave of Adullam (1 Samuel 22:1-2), and we suspect that among them were Joab, Abishai, and Asahel, the three brothers who were mighty men (see 2 Samuel 23:18, 24; 1 Chronicles 11:26).39 Others joined David at Ziklag (1 Chronicles 12:1ff.), and still other great warriors joined with David at Hebron (1 Chronicles 12:38-40).40 We do not know when and where Uriah joined with David, but since his military career ends in 2 Samuel 12, his military feats must have been done earlier. It seems very unlikely that David and Uriah are strangers; rather, it would seem these two men know each other from fighting together, and perhaps even from fleecing Saul together, or maybe Uriah had been a dear brother to David like his old Jonathan.
    ellauri156.html on line 398: (2) It seems unlikely that Uriah is ignorant of what David has done and of what he is trying to accomplish by calling him home to Jerusalem. Rumors must have been circulating around Jerusalem about David and Bathsheba, and could easily have reached the Israelite army which had besieged Rabbah. Uriah not only refuses to go to his house and sleep with his wife, he sleeps at the doorway of the king's house, in the midst of his servants. He has many witnesses to testify that any child borne by his wife during this time is not his child. It is clear that Uriah understands exactly what David wants him to do (to have sex with his wife), and that he refuses, even when the king virtually orders him to do so. One finds this difficult to explain if Uriah is ignorant of what happened between David and Bathsheba. At least Uriah knows what David is trying to get him to do on this stay in Jerusalem. The implications of all this we will explore later.
    ellauri156.html on line 400: (3) Bathsheba is not said to have any part in David's scheme to deceive Uriah or to bring about his death, much less any knowledge of what David is doing. When she informs David that she is pregnant, David takes decisive action, but nowhere are we told that Bathsheba has a part in his schemes. Verse 26 makes it sound as though she learns of Uriah's death after the fact, through normal channels. After all, would David really want his new wife to know he murdered her husband? David acts without Bathsheba's help.
    ellauri156.html on line 402: It looks as though Bathsheba never enters David's mind after their encounter described in verses 1-4. It certainly does not seem that David wants to continue the relationship, to carry on an affair, or to marry her. David simply puts this sinful event out of his mind, until a messenger is sent by Bathsheba informing the king that his night of passion has produced a child. Bathsheba informs David that she is pregnant, not that she is afraid she might be. This means that she has missed at least one period and probably another. All in all, several weeks or more have passed. It will not be long before her pregnancy will become obvious to anyone who looks at her. This is David's sin and his responsibility, and so she informs him.
    ellauri156.html on line 404: David has two plans, Plan A, and failing that, Plan B. Here he is very like his master, the Dog, who also has very analogous two plans for his proteges: Plan A, take them to his fold if they obey him, and Plan B: throw them to the dogs (the bad hounds of the hell) if they don't.
    ellauri156.html on line 408: David's plan A is simple and, at least in his mind, foolproof. In short, David will entice Uriah to think and to act as he himself has done. David does not wish to endure the adversities of the war with Rabbah, and so he goes to Jerusalem, to his home, and to his bed. He does not wish to deny himself, so he takes the wife of another man and sleeps with her. David will give Uriah the same opportunity, except that it will be his own wife he will sleep with. Not as fun, one must admit. After Uriah has sexual relations with Bathsheba, all will conclude that he is the father of the child which has been conceived by David's sinful act. Only one thing is wrong with David's plan: he assumes Uriah is as spiritually apathetic as he, and that he will act to indulge himself, rather than act like a soldier at war and keep his sword in the sheath.
    ellauri156.html on line 410: David sends word to Joab, ordering him to send Uriah home to Jerusalem. I take it from the context that Uriah is sent to Jerusalem on the pretext that he is needed to report directly to David on the state of the war. I doubt David wants Uriah to know he has ordered Joab to send him. I am certain David does not want Uriah to know the real purpose of his journey to Jerusalem. David is orchestrating this homecoming to appear as though it serves one purpose, while it actually serves David's purpose of concealing his own sin. Even at this level, the order for Uriah to return home has a bad odor. You may remember that when David's father wanted to know how the battle with the Philistines was going (three of his sons were involved), he sent David, the youngest son, as an errand boy to take some supplies and return with word about the war (1 Samuel 17:17-19). One does not need to send a military hero as a messenger (nor is it good practice, the youngest son is more expendable.).
    ellauri156.html on line 412: I should also add that Joab is already being drawn into the conspiracy. Joab obeys David's command to send Uriah, and my guess is that Joab knows something is up. He may even have heard about David's liaison with Bathsheba. When he sends Uriah to Jerusalem, he has to give him some mission, some task to perform. Joab and Uriah may have sensed that this was no “mission impossible” (as you would give a mighty warrior), but that is a “mission incredible.” In any case, the web of deceit and deception is already being woven, and more people are being drawn into the conspiracy. Wow, this is prime material for a soap opera. Maybe there already is one, must check. OF COURSE there is:
    ellauri156.html on line 415: David and Bathsheba is a 1951 historical Technicolor epic film about King David made by 20th Century Fox. It was directed by King Saul, produced by Dog, a.k.a. Zanuck, from a screenplay by Philip Dunno. The cinematography was by Leon Shameonyou. Gregory Peck stars as King David and the film follows King David's life as he adjusts to ruling as a King, and about his relationship with Uriah's wife Bathsheba, played by Susan Wayward. Goliath of Gath was portrayed by 203 cm-tall (6'8") Lithuanian wrestler Walter Talun. These days Walter would no longer get a bench seat in a high-school basketball team.
    ellauri156.html on line 417: King David was the second king of Israel and this film is based on the second book of Samuel from the Bible. When the second Ark of the Covenant is brought to Jerusalem, a soldier reaches out to steady it and is struck dead. While the prophet Nathan declares this the will of God, a skeptical David pronounces it the result of a combination of an electrical shock and too much wine. This blasphemy starts David on the path of sin.
    ellauri156.html on line 419: As a consequence, David becomes attracted to Bathsheba who is the wife of Uriah, one of David's soldiers. The attraction is mutual although both know an affair would break the law of Moses. When Bathsheba discovers she is pregnant by David, the King sends for Uriah hoping he will spend time with his wife to cover her pregnancy. David's wife Michal who is aware of the affair, tells David that Uriah did not go home but slept at the castle as a sign of loyalty to his King. LOL, a sign of "fuck you" pointed at Dave with Uriah's middle finger without a nail.
    ellauri156.html on line 421: Frustrated, David orders Uriah to be placed on the battle's front and for the troops to withdraw leaving him to die. Uriah is reported dead and David sends a dispatch to tell Bathsheba so they can plan their marriage. Nathan Zuckermann the prophet advises David the people are dissatisfied with his leadership and desire his sons to rule. Nathan tells David he has forgotten that he is a servant of the Lord. David tries in vain to cheer up the old retard. David marries Bathsheba.
    ellauri156.html on line 423: As a result, a drought hits Israel. David's and Bathsheba's baby dies. Nathan returns to tell David that God is displeased with his sin. Dog wants to see better ones, with more pizzazz. Or else he will not die as the law demands, but he will be punished through misfortune in his family. David takes responsibility but insists Bathsheba is blameless. But the people want Bathsheba killed. The crowd shouts: No, we want Barabbas! David makes plans to save Bathsheba, but she tells David she is not blameless. She has continued seeing Uriah on the side. (The reports of his demise were premature.) They are both at fault. David is reminded of the Lord and quotes Psalm 23 as he plays his harp. (A nice musical interlude in an otherwise numbing show whose spoiler is long since spoiled.)
    ellauri156.html on line 425: David promises Bathsheba she will not die and is willing to accept God's justice for himself, knowing that he as the hero of the book is safe. Repentant, David, seeking relief from the drought and forgiveness reaches out to touch the Ark presuming that he will die of heat stroke (or was it a short?) like the soldier. A clap of thunder is heard and there are flashbacks to David's youth depicting his anointing by Samuel and his battle with Goliath. King David removes his hands from the Ark as rain falls on the dry land. Screenwriter Dunno said he "left it to the audience to decide if the blessed rain came as the result of divine intervention or simply of a low-pressure system moving in from the Mediterranean." Well it could be both, couldn't it?
    ellauri156.html on line 429:
    2.2 David´s Birth: July 4th

    ellauri156.html on line 431: David was about thirty when he began to reign (2 Samuel 5:4), so we can look for a birth date, which according to the pattern of other proposed birth dates in this series should occur both on a Hebrew holy day, at least some other sacred calendars, and also on a date similar on some calendars to his death date. Those requirements are so stringent to occur in a given year that if we find such a date, it is highly likely to be correct. Moreover, in nearly every case so far, the birth date is more impressive than the death date, and David's proposed death date is a sacred day on 4 calendars (also being 1 Condor on the Sacred Round).
    ellauri156.html on line 433: Searching for a possible birth date for David produces an ideal candidate, a holy day on 6 of the 7 known sacred calendars. The day Sat 4 Jul 1057 BC was 17 Tammuz (H), 14 Sum (Enoch, Summer Fast), 1 Res (V), 1 Bir (M), 1 Deer (SR), and 1 Jac (Easter on Priest). That Hebrew day is known simply as the Fast of the Fourth Month, which the Lord says will become a day of rejoicing some day (Zech. 8:19). That date ranks with the best birth dates found so far for the prophets. It is identical on the Venus and Mercury calendars to Isaac Bashevis Singer's birthday. This date fits the pattern so well of all the great prophets, as it should to be in Matthew's chain of key links to Christ, that it confirms this whole set of dates as being correct, including the Biblical assertion that the temple was built in the 480th year of the Exodus.
    ellauri156.html on line 437: The United States of America was also born on July 4th, the date proposed for David's birth. Is that of any significance? If so, there will also be at least another witness, according to what has been discovered so far in the research. It turns out that Thu 4 Jul 1776 was also 17 Tammuz on the Hebrew calendar as was David's birth, so it may not be by chance that the nation which consistently sides with modern-day Israel was born on David's birthday.
    ellauri156.html on line 441: Seeing the success of C. B. DeMille's Samson and Delilah, Zanuck commissioned Philip Dunno to write a script based on King David.
    ellauri156.html on line 442: Dunno says his original conception was for a film that would encompass David's life and go into three main chapters: David as a boy fighting Goliath; a more mature David and his friendship with Jonathan, ending with the affair with Bathsheba; and an older David and his relationship with his son Absalom. Dunno wrote a treatment which he estimated would make a four hour movie. Zanuck was not enthusiastic so Dunno then pitched the idea of doing a film just on David and Bathsheba, which Zanuck loved.
    ellauri156.html on line 444: Dunno conceived it as a modern-type play exploring the corruption of absolute power. The film is noticeably devoid of the epic battles and panoramas frequently seen in biblical movies. It concentrates more on David's exploits between the sheets.
    ellauri156.html on line 447: The musical score was by Alfred Newman (the funny looking kid on the cover of Mad magazine), who, for the bucolic scene with the shepherd boy, used a solo oboe in the Lydian mode, drawing on long established conventions linking the solo oboe with pastoral scenes and the shepherd's pipe. To underscore David's guilt-ridden turmoil in the Mount Gilboa scene, Newman resorted to a vibraphone, which Miklós Rózsa used in scoring Peck's popular 1945 Spellbound, in which he played a no less disturbed patient suffering from amnesia, viz. prophet Nathan Zuckerman.
    ellauri156.html on line 449: David and Bathsheba was 20th Century Fox's most successful release of 1951 and the third-highest-grossing film of that year, earning $4.72 million in rentals.
    ellauri156.html on line 451: A. H. Weiler of The New York Times described the film as "a reverential and sometimes majestic treatment of chronicles that have lived three millennia." He praised Dunno's screenplay and Peck's "authoritative performance" but found that Wayward "seems closer to Hollywood than to the arid Jerusalem of his Bible." Variety wrote, "This is a big picture in every respect. It has scope, pageantry, sex (for all its Biblical background), cast names, color—everything. It's a surefire boxoffice entry, one of the really 'big' pictures of the new selling season." Philip K. Scheuer of the Los Angeles Times wrote that the film "leaves little to be desired" from the standpoint of production values with Peck "ingratiating" as David and Wayward "a seductress with flaming tresses, in or out of the bath, and only her final contrition is a little difficult to believe." Richard L. Coe of The Washington Post wrote, "On the whole, the picture suggests a Reader's Digest story expanded into a master's thesis for the Ecole Copacabana."] Harrison's Reports wrote, "The outstanding thing about the production is the magnificent performance of Gregory Peck as David; he makes the characterization real and human, endowing it with all the shortcomings of a man who lusts for another's wife, but who is seriously penitent and prepared to shoulder his guilt. Susan Wayward, as Bathsheba, is beautiful and sexy, but her performance is of no dramatic consequence." The Monty Python Bulletin commented that the film had been made "with restraint and relative simplicity" compared to other historical epics, "and the playing of Gregory Peck in particular is competent. The whole film, however, is emotionally and stylistically quite unworthy of its subject." Philip Hamburger of The New Yorker wrote that "the accessories notwithstanding, something is ponderously wrong with 'David and Bathsheba.' The fault lies, I suppose, in the attempt to make excessive enlargements of an essentially-simple story." Zanuck the Hot Dog agreed.
    ellauri156.html on line 453: The film sparked protests in Singapore over what the Muslim community considered an unflattering portrait of David, considered an important prophet in Islam, as a hedonist susceptible to sexual overtures. Mohammed and his 9-year old wife would have been outraged.
    ellauri156.html on line 461: King David and Diana Garland argue that, "Taking remarkable license with the story, the screenwriters changed Bathsheba from the one who is ogled by David into David's stalker." They go on to suggest that "the movie David and Bathsheba, written, directed and produced by males, makes the cinematic Bathsheba conform to male fantasies about women."
    ellauri156.html on line 463: However, in giving Bathsheba a more active role, Adele Reinhartz found that "it reflects tensions and questions about gender identity in America in the aftermath of World War II, when women had entered the work force in large numbers and experienced a greater degree of independence and economic self-sufficiency. ...[Bathsheba] is not satisfied in the role of neglected wife and decides for herself what to do about it." Susan Wayward was later quoted as having asked why the film was not called Bathsheba and David. I guess it has something to do with the fact that Dog is called Dog in the bible instead of Bitch.
    ellauri156.html on line 465: When Uriah arrives in Jerusalem, he reports to David, who acts out the charade he has planned. He asks Uriah about the “welfare of Joab and the people,” and the “state of the war.” It troubles me that David needs such a report at all. If he were with his men in the field, this would not be necessary. But even worse, David does not really care about Joab, the people, or the war. David's one preoccupation is to cover up his sin, to get Uriah home and to bed with his wife, and thus to get David off the hook. How sad to read of David's hypocrisy. The king who had compassion on the crippled son of Jonathan now lacks compassion for the whole army, and specifically for Bathsheba and her husband Uriah.
    ellauri156.html on line 467: David goes through all the right motions with Uriah. He listens to his reports, and then he gives him the night off, some time to go to his house and “wash his feet.” David is not worried about this soldier's personal hygiene; he is worried about his own reputation. When one entered his house, he usually took off his shoes and washed his feet, in preparation for eating and for going to bed. David very delicately encourages this man to go home and go to bed with his wife. Uriah knows it; our author knows it; and we know it.
    ellauri156.html on line 469: Uriah leaves David's presence. Now David adds a further touch. He sends a “present from the king” after, or with, Uriah. How we would love to know just what that “gift” was. Was it a night for two at the Jerusalem Hilton? Was it dinner and dancing at a romantic restaurant? I think we can safely say this: (1) We are not told what the present was. (2) We are not supposed to know, or it would not add to the story for us to know what it was. (3) Whatever it was, it was very carefully planned to facilitate David's scheme of getting Uriah to bed with his wife, as quickly as possible.
    ellauri156.html on line 475: On to plan B. David has his spies watching Uriah as though he is the enemy. (Well, he is a rival all right.) They know what David wants; he wants Uriah to go home and sleep with his wife. If they do not know all of the details of what David has done with Bathsheba (which is hard to believe) and what he intends to accomplish by Uriah's visit, they certainly know something out of the ordinary is taking place. One way or the other, David is making these servant-spies co-conspirators with him.
    ellauri156.html on line 477: The servant-spies come to David in the morning with an amazing report: “He didn't do it. He didn't even go home!” David then seeks to gently rebuke Uriah. The hypocrisy of David's actions and words are hard to accept. But accept we must, for Dave is Dog's favorite horse on whose nose he is betting his bottom dollar.
    ellauri156.html on line 479: He (David, not Dog this time) plays the role of a benevolent master. Uriah, his servant, has “come home from a journey” (verse 10). Is this not the time for him to concern himself with his needs and desires? Is this not the time to concern himself with his wife's needs? How insensitive of Uriah not to go home to be with his wife and to sleep with her. “Shame on you, Uriah!” Uriah has a lot of explaining to do, and so it seems has David.
    ellauri156.html on line 481: And explain he does; Uriah's words to his commander-in-chief are as stinging a rebuke as David receives from Nathan in the next chapter. Uriah clearly understands that what David once encouraged him to do (i.e. go to be with his wife) he is now strongly urging -- even commanding -- him to do. Uriah humbly but steadfastly refuses to do this:
    ellauri156.html on line 483: Uriah said to David, “The ark and Israel and Judah are staying in temporary shelters, and my lord Joab and the servants of my lord are camping in the open field. Shall I then go to my house to eat and to drink and to lie with my wife? By your life and the life of your soul, I will not do this thing” (2 Samuel 11:11).
    ellauri156.html on line 485: Uriah first points out to David that his terminology is inaccurate. David speaks of Uriah returning from a journey (verse 10). The truth is that Uriah has been called from the field of battle. He is not a traveling salesman, home from a road trip; he is a soldier, away from his post. In heart and soul, Uriah is still with his fellow-soldiers. He really wants to be back in the field of battle, and not in Jerusalem. He will return as soon as David releases him (see verse 12). Until that time, he will think and act like the soldier he is. As much as possible, he will live the way his fellow-soldiers are living on the field of battle. There, surrounding the city of Rabbah, are the Israelite soldiers, led by Joab. They, along with the ark of the Lord, are camping in tents in the open field. Uriah cannot, Uriah will not, live in luxury while they live sacrificially. He will not sleep with his wife until they can all sleep with her, not just Dave.
    ellauri156.html on line 489: To fully grasp the impact of Uriah's words, let us lick our fingers and turn back a few pages in Samuel's writings to recall David's own words, spoken to Ahimelech the priest, as they relate to this encounter with Uriah:
    ellauri156.html on line 491: 1 Then David came to Nob to Ahimelech the priest; and Ahimelech came trembling to meet David and said to him, “Why are you alone and no one with you?” 2 David said to Ahimelech the priest, “The king has commissioned me with a matter and has said to me, 'Let no one know anything about the matter on which I am sending you and with which I have commissioned you; and I have directed the young men to a certain place.' 3 “Now therefore, what do you have on hand? Give me five loaves of bread, or whatever can be found.” 4 The priest answered David and said, “There is no ordinary bread on hand, but there is consecrated bread; if only the young men have kept themselves from women.” 5 David answered the priest and said to him, “Surely women have been kept from us as previously when I set out and the vessels of the young men were holy, though it was an ordinary journey; how much more then today will their vessels be holy?” (1 Samuel 21:1-5). Pyhiä vesseleitä. Tarkoittaako se siemenjohtimia? Ilmeisesti, suomexi se on: palvelijoiden reput ovat olleet pyhät. Reppureissulaisia pyhäkouluretkellä pussit tyhjinä. Kassit jätetään ulkopuolelle.
    ellauri156.html on line 493: You may remember that when David first fled from Saul he went to Ahimelech the priest and asked for some provisions and a sword. The priest had nothing but the sacred bread, which he would allow David and his men to eat, if they had only “kept themselves from women” (verse 4). The priest assumes they may have conducted themselves otherwise. David's answer, and especially the tone of it, is very pertinent to our text. He confidently assured the priest that he and his men had kept themselves from women, almost incensed that the priest would think otherwise. And the reason David gives is that he and his men are on a mission for the king. The inference is that this is a military (or at least official) mission.
    ellauri156.html on line 495: Now here is a most amazing thing. David, years earlier, was adamant about the fact that those on a mission for the king should keep themselves from sexual intercourse. Now, years later, David is amazed that a man on a mission for the king is willing to abstain from sexual intercourse with his wife. Worse yet, David sets out to convince -- even to compel -- Uriah to go to do so, even though it will cause him to violate his conscience. This is not “causing a weaker brother to stumble;” this is cutting off a stronger brother's "leg" at the knob. Uriah is an example of the commitment expected of every soldier, and of David in particular -- at least the David of the past. Uriah is now acting like the David we knew from earlier days. Uriah is the “David” that David should be. But there is a crucial difference: now David is the king. This makes the case completely different.
    ellauri156.html on line 497: Uriah's words should have shocked David into a realization of the depth of his sin. The author uses these words in an ironically pivotal way. Uriah has just told David that he will not go to his own house, that he will not eat and drink and sleep with his wife.41 He has put this matter emphatically: “By your life, and the life of your soul, I will not do this thing” (verse 11). In the very next verses, David compels Uriah to “eat and drink” with him, with the hope that he will lie with his wife. And when Uriah swears by the life of the king that he will not do so, the king ends up taking Uriah's life. How ironic! How tragic! How hilarious!
    ellauri156.html on line 501: David is getting desperate. David has not even entertained the possibility that Uriah will refuse his offer. Uriah speaks with such conviction, David knows that he will never violate his duty as a soldier with all of his mental faculties. David lands upon one last modification to his original plan -- get Uriah drunk and then into bed with his wife. After all, don't people do things when they are drunk that they will not do when sober? This will surely bring about David's intended outcome.
    ellauri156.html on line 503: It must be with great apprehension that Uriah joins David for dinner this last night in Jerusalem. David begins to eat and to drink, and he will not take no for an answer when he offers food and drink to Uriah. Eventually, it works, for David makes sure that Uriah has enough alcohol in his system to make him drunk. And in this condition, David sends Uriah home to “sleep it off,” in his own bed, of course. Even drunk, Uriah will not violate his wife! Unheard of! Once again, Uriah spends the night at the doorway of David's house, along with his servants. He does not go to his own house, and thus he does not sleep with his wife. David is in deep shit.
    ellauri156.html on line 505:
    Plan D: In Desperation, David Has Uriah Put To Death (11:14-17)

    ellauri156.html on line 507: David has set out on a course of action that backfires. He intends to put Uriah in a position that will make it appear that he is the father of Bathsheba's child. But Uriah's conduct has publicly exhibited his loyalty to his duties as a soldier, making it more than evident that he cannot possibly be the father of this child. It is worse for David now than it had been when he summoned Uriah to Jerusalem. David concludes -- wrongly -- that his only course of action now is to have Uriah killed in action. I don't know that David actually thinks he can deceive the people of Jerusalem as to whose child Bathsheba's baby is. How can he when everyone knows Uriah has never been with his wife to get her pregnant? It seems now as though David is simply trying to legitimize his sin. By making Uriah a casualty of war, he makes Bathsheba a widow. He can now marry this woman and raise the child as his own, which of course it is. Finally, a plan that makes sense.
    ellauri156.html on line 509: It must be an agonizing night for David, seeing that even drunk Uriah is a better man than he. But not a better pecker! And so in the morning, David acts. He writes a letter to Joab, which will serve as Uriah's death warrant. In this letter David clearly orders Joab to murder Uriah for him. He even tells him how to do so in a way that might conceal the truth of the matter. In so doing, David can honor Uriah as a war hero, and magnanimously take on the duty of being a husband to Uriah's wife, also taking care of the child she is soon to bear. Joab is to put Uriah on the front lines of battle, at the fiercest place of battle, no surprise for a man of his military skills and courage. Joab is to attack and then retreat in such a way as to make Uriah an easy target for the Ammonites, thus assuring his death. There is no mistaking David's orders to Uriah: he wants Uriah killed in a way which makes it look like a simple casualty of war. Joab complies completely with David's orders (why? Is Uriah a creep?), and Uriah is eliminated, no longer an obstacle to David's plans. In giving this order to Joab, David makes him a part of this conspiracy, making him share the guilt for the spilled blood of Uriah. David's sin continues to encompass more and more people, leading to greater and greater sin.
    ellauri156.html on line 511: In all likelihood, this was all in a day's work for the Israeli army even then. So it is not strange to see David, the mighty man of valor, (1 Samuel 16:18) dealing with Uriah, another mighty man of valor, like the enemy. Here is Uriah, a man who will give his life for his king (but not his wife? Did David even ask?), and David, a man who is now willing to take Uriah's life to cover his sin. We all know that it doesn’t work. (Actually, we all know that it works perfectly: David will be honored by posterity as the best Israeli king ever.) How strange it is to see David making Joab his partner in crime, especially after what Joab has done to li'l Abner:
    ellauri156.html on line 513: 26 When Joab came out from David, he sent messengers after Abner, and they brought him back from the well of Sirah; but David did not know it. 27 So when Abner returned to Hebron, Joab took him aside into the middle of the gate to speak with him privately, and there he struck him in the belly so that he died on account of the blood of Asahel his brother. 28 Afterward when David heard it, he said, “I and my kingdom are innocent before the LORD forever of the blood of Abner the son of Ner. 29 “May it fall on the head of Joab and on all his father's house; and may there not fail from the house of Joab one who has a discharge, or who is a leper, or who takes hold of a distaff, or who falls by the sword, or who lacks bread.” 30 So Joab and Abishai his brother killed Abner because he had put their brother Asahel to death in the battle at Gibeon (2 Samuel 3:26-30).
    ellauri156.html on line 518: Abner is initially mentioned incidentally in Saul's history, first appearing as the son of Ner, Saul's uncle, and the commander of Saul's army. He then comes to the story again as the commander who introduced David to Saul following David's killing of Goliath. He is not mentioned in the account of the disastrous battle of Gilboa when Saul's power was crushed. Seizing the youngest but only surviving of Saul's sons, Ish-bosheth, also called Eshbaal, Abner set him up as king over Israel at Mahanaim, east of the Jordan. David, who was accepted as king by Judah alone, was meanwhile reigning at Hebron, and for some time war was carried on between the two parties.
    ellauri156.html on line 522: However, according to Josephus, in Antiquities, Book 7, Chapter 1, Joab had forgiven Abner for the death of his brother, Asahel, the reason being that Abner had slain Asahel honorably in combat after he had first warned Asahel and tried to knock the wind out of him with the butt of his "spear". However, probably by intervention of God, his obtuse tool went through Asahel. The Bible says everyone stopped and gawked. That shows that something like this never happened before. This battle was part of a civil war between David and Ish-bosheth, the son of Saul. After this battle Abner switched to the side of David and granted him control over the tribe of Benjamin. This act put Abner in David's favor.
    ellauri156.html on line 524: For some time afterward the war was carried on, the advantage being invariably on the side of David. At length, Ish-bosheth lost the main prop of his tottering cause by accusing Abner of sleeping with Rizpah, one of Saul's concubines, an alliance which, according to contemporary notions, would imply pretensions to the throne. Starhill stablessa oli muuten issikkatamma nimeltä Rispa. Kukahan senkin kanssa nukkui öisin tallissa?
    ellauri156.html on line 526: Abner was indignant at the rebuke, and immediately opened negotiations with David, who welcomed him on the condition that his wife Michal should be restored to him. This was done, and the proceedings were ratified by a feast where Rizpah and Michal were the lights of the party. Almost immediately after, however, Joab, who had been sent away, perhaps intentionally returned and slew Abner at the gate of Hebron. The ostensible motive for the assassination was a desire to avenge Asahel, and this would be a sufficient justification for the deed according to the extremely low moral standard of the time (although Abner should have been safe from such a revenge killing in Hebron, which was a City of Refuge). The conduct of David after the event was such as to show that he had no complicity in the act, though he could not venture to punish its perpetrators.
    ellauri156.html on line 528: David had Abner buried in Hebron, as it states in Samuel 3:31-32,[10] "And David said to all the people who were with him, 'Remove your clothes and gird yourselves with this sackcloth taking turns, and wail before me and Li'l Abner.' And King David went after the beer. And they buried Abner in Hebron, and the king raised his voice and wept on Abner's grave, and all the people wept."
    ellauri156.html on line 535: Shortly after Abner's death, Ish-bosheth was assassinated as he wept, and David became king of the reunited kingdoms. The conduct of David after the event was such as to show that he had no complicity in the act, though he could not venture to punish its perpetrators.
    ellauri156.html on line 539: His One Sin: The rabbis agree that Abner deserved this violent death, though opinions differ concerning the exact nature of the sin that entailed so dire a punishment on one who was, on the whole, considered a "righteous man" (Gen. R. lxxxii. 4). Some reproach him that he did not use his influence with Saul to prevent him from murdering the priests of Nob (Yer. Peah, i. 16a; Lev. R. xxvi. 2; Sanh. 20a)—convinced as he was of the innocence of the priests and of the propriety of their conduct toward David, Abner holding that as leader of the army David was privileged to avail himself of the Urine and Thumbeline (I Sam. xxii. 9-19). Instead of contenting himself with passive resistance to Saul's command to murder the priests (Yalḳ., Sam. 131), Abner ought to have tried to restrain the king by the balls. Others maintain that Abner did make such an attempt, but in vain (Saul had not enough to get a proper hold of), and that his one sin consisted in that he delayed the beginning of David's reign over Israel by fighting him after Saul's death for two years and a half (Sanh. l.c.). Others, again, while excusing him for this—in view of a tradition founded on Gen. xlix. 27, according to which there were to be two kings of the house of Benjamin—blame Abner for having prevented a reconciliation between Saul and David on the occasion when the latter, in holding on to the skirt of Saul's robe (I Sam. xxiv. 11), showed how unfounded was the king's mistrust of him, seeing Saul had no balls to speak of. Old Saul was inclined to be happy with a pacifier; but Abner, representing to him that the naked David might have found a piece of garment anywhere — even just a piece of sackcloth caught on a thorn — prevented the reconciliation (Yer. Peah, l.c., Lev. R. l.c., and elsewhere). Moreover, it was wrong of Abner to permit Israelitish youths to kill one another for sport (II Sam. ii. 14-16). No reproach, however, attaches to him for the death of Asahel, since Abner killed him in self-defense (Sanh. 49a).
    ellauri156.html on line 541: It is characteristic of the rabbinical view of the Bible narratives that Abner, the warrior pure and simple, is styled "Lion King of the Law" (Yer. Peah, l.c.), and that even a specimen is given of a halakic discussion between him and Dog as to whether the law in Deut. xxiii. 3 excluded Ammonite and Moabite women from the Jewish community as well as men. Dog was of the opinion that David, being descended from the Moabitess Ruth, was not fit to wear the crown, nor even to be considered a true Israelite; while Abner maintained that the law affected only the male line of descent. When Dog's dialectics proved more than a match for those of Abner, the latter went to the prophet Samuel, who not only supported Abner in his view, but utterly refuted Dog's assertions (Midr. Sam. xxii.; Yeb. 76b et seq.).
    ellauri156.html on line 550: Earlier in this series: David condemned Joab and put him under a curse because he shed the innocent blood of Abner. Now, this same David (well, not really the same David) now uses Joab to kill Uriah and get him out of his way. David's enemy (Joab) has become his friend, or at least his ally. David's enemies (the Ammonites) have become his allies (they fire the fatal shots which kill Uriah). And David's faithful servant Uriah has been put to death as though he were the enemy. Not only is Uriah put to death, but a number of other Israelite warriors die with him. They have to be sacrificed to conceal the murder of Uriah. Uriah's death has to be viewed as one of a group of men, rather than merely one man. Without a doubt, this is the moral and spiritual low-water mark of David's life.
    ellauri156.html on line 552: These eight verses, devoted to the way in which Uriah's death is reported, are double the length of the account of David's sin with Bathsheba. They virtually equal the length of the account of David's dealings with Uriah. These verses begin with Joab's careful instructions to the messenger, who is to bring the news of Uriah's death to David. They conclude with the messenger's actual report and David's response to it. Why does the author devote so much time and space to the way in which Uriah's death is reported to David? Let us see if we can find the answer to this question as we look more closely at these verses.
    ellauri156.html on line 554: Mission accomplished: Uriah is dead. Joab has carried out David's instructions to the letter. Now Joab must send word to David, in a way that does not completely disclose this conspiracy. Joab calls for a messenger to go to David. He gives very exacting instructions to him. He is first to give a full and complete report of the events of the war, including the ill-fated attack on the city, and the slaughter of Uriah and those with him. Why is how the messenger reports this incident so important?
    ellauri156.html on line 558: This the reason for Joab's careful instructions to the messenger. He is to report the attack on the city of Rabbah to David, and then tell of the Israelite losses which result. Joab knows that David will react (perhaps hypocritically) to the report of the attack and the resulting losses. It is at this point, Joab instructs the messenger, that he is to inform David of the death of Uriah. This will certainly end any protest or criticism on David's part.
    ellauri156.html on line 560: And so in verses 22-25 we are given an account of the messenger's arrival, of his report to David, and of David's response. I must point out that the messenger does not do as he is told, at least the way I read the account. The messenger goes to David and tells the king how the Ammonites prevailed against them as they left the city and pursued the Israelites into the open field. The Israelites then pursued the Ammonites, pushing them back toward the city as far as the city gate. It was here that Uriah and those with him were fighting. It was here that they were within range of the archers, who shot at them and killed a number of servants. And quickly the servant adds, “and your servant Uriah the Hittite is also dead” (verse 14).
    ellauri156.html on line 562: Now why does this messenger not wait for David to respond in anger, as Joab instructed? Why does he inform David that Uriah has been killed, before he even utters a word of criticism or protest? I believe the messenger gives the report in this way because he understands what is really going on here. I think he may know about David and Bathsheba, and perhaps even of her pregnancy. He certainly knows that Uriah was summoned to Jerusalem. I think he also figures out that David wants to get rid of Uriah, and that Joab has accomplished this by this miserable excuse for an offensive against the enemy. I think the messenger figures out that if David knows Uriah has been killed, he will not raise any objections to this needless slaughter. And so, rather than wait for David to hypocritically rant and rave about the stupidity of such a move, he just goes on and tells him first, so that he will not receive any reaction from David.
    ellauri156.html on line 566: Then David said to the messenger, “Thus you shall say to Joab, 'Do not let this thing displease you, for the sword devours one as well as another; make your battle against the city stronger and overthrow it'; and so encourage him” (2 Samuel 11:25).
    ellauri156.html on line 568: These words of David are the frosting on the cake. They seem gracious and understanding, even sympathetic. In effect, David is saying, “Well, don't worry about it. After all, you win a few, and you lose a few. That's the way the cookie crumbles.” Uriah, a great warrior and a man of godly character (but not a Jew, mind you), has just died, and David does not express one word of grief, one expression of sorrow, not one word of tribute. Uriah dies, and David is unmoved. Contrast his response to the death of Uriah with his responses to the deaths of Saul and Jonathan (2 Samuel 1:11-27), and even of Abner (2 Samuel 3:28-39). This is not the David of a few chapters earlier. This is a hardened, callused David, callused by his own sin.
    ellauri156.html on line 570: Our text has many applications and implications for today. Let me suggest a few as I conclude this lesson. First, “Can a Christian fall?” Yes. Some folks in the Bible may cause us to question whether they really ever came to please Dog, folks like Balaam or Samson or Saul. But we have no such questions regarding David. He is not only a believer, he is a model believer. In the Bible, David sets the standard because he is a man after God's heart. Nevertheless, this man David, in spite of his popularity in Dog's circles, in spite of his marvelous times of worship and his bea-u-utiful psalms, falls deeply into sin. If David can fall, so can we, which is precisely what Paul, another crook and tricky Dick, warns us about:
    ellauri156.html on line 574: Second, “How far can a Christian fall?” This far [Bob points down there with his fingers]. David not only commits the sin of adultery, he commits murder. I think it is safe to say that there is no sin of which the Christian is not capable in the flesh. I have heard people say, “I don't know how a person who _______ could have ever been a Christian.” There are times -- like this time for David -- when it is obvious that we will hardly be saved by the testimony of our actions. Christians come from just the same gene pool of motherfuckers as the rest of us.
    ellauri156.html on line 576: Third, “How fast can a Christian fall?” This fast [Bob flaps his hands]. It is amazing how quickly David falls into the sins depicted in this one chapter. In a matter of weeks, or months at best. Apart from God's sustaining grace, we can fall very far, very quickly. Let us be reminded of this fact from David's tragic experience.
    ellauri156.html on line 578: Fourth, "How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?" Sin snowballs. Sin has not got a snowball's chance in hell. Sin is not stagnant; it is not static. Sin grows. Look at the progression of sin in our text. David's sin starts when he ceases to act like a soldier and (what is way worse) becomes a late sleeper. David's sin grows from staying up late to adultery to murder. His sin begins very privately, but as the story progresses, more and more people become aware of it, and worse yet, more and more people become participants in it. His sin first acted out by his taking another man's wife, and then taking another man's life, and along with his life, his wife, plus the lives of a number of men who must die with him to make his death credible. David's sin blossoms so that it transforms a true and loyal friend (Uriah) to his enemy, and his enemies (the Ammonites, and his other rival Joab) into his allies.
    ellauri156.html on line 580: Fifth, when we seek to conceal our sin, things only get worse. Thus, the best course of action is to confess our sins and to forsake them. But that would have been an embarrassing loss of face to Dog, who had been rooting for David all this time. So better not, after all. Everything went well in the end anyway, and that's what counts.
    ellauri156.html on line 582: He who conceals his transgressions will not prosper, except for David, and a few others, come to think of it. But he who confesses and forsakes them will find compassion (Proverbs 28:13). And that is all he finds. Quite often compassion at his scaffold and grave.
    ellauri156.html on line 584: How much better it would have been for David simply to have confessed his sin with Bathsheba and found forgiveness then? Not a whit, it would only made matters worse. Who was Bathsheba anyway to show forgiveness to the king? Just another skirt.
    ellauri156.html on line 588: Sixth, our text makes Uriah a hero and a dress model, not a chump and not a sucker. There are those who might conclude that Uriah's elevator may not “go to the top floor” (as my neighbor used to say of those she considered less than bright). Is Uriah gullible? Is he ignorant of what David is trying to do? Is he a coon? A spook? I don't think so. This is what makes his loyalty to David and to God's Law so striking. I think it is safe to say that here Uriah is very much like David in his earlier days, in terms of his response to Saul. As Saul sought to kill David unjustly, because he was jealous of his successes, so also David submitted himself to faithfully serving Saul, his master. He left his safety and future in God's hands, and God did not fail him. Who? Not Uriah, apparently.
    ellauri156.html on line 590: Seventh, Uriah is a reminder to us that God does not always deliver the righteous from the hand of the wicked immediately, or even in this lifetime. This is a really crucial point! Don't except to be saved except ex post facto. Daniel's three friends told the king that their God was able to deliver them. They did not presume that He would, or that He must, only that theoretically, he could if he wanted to. And God did deliver them, though with late delivery, rather like today's postal services. I think Christians should look upon this sort of deliverance as the rule, rather than the exception. But when Uriah faithfully serves his king (David), he loses his life. God is not obliged to “bail us out of trouble” or to keep us from trials and tribulations just because we trust in Him. Sometimes it is the will of God for men to trust fully in Him and to submit to human government (what? like U.S. government? No way Jose!), and still to suffer adversity, from which God may not deliver us. Spirituality is no guarantee that we will no longer suffer in this life. In fact, spiritual intimacy with God is often the cause of our sufferings (see Matthew 5).
    ellauri156.html on line 613: 13 All these died in faith, without receiving the promises, but having seen them and having welcomed them from a distance, and having confessed that they were strangers and exiles on the earth. 14 For those who say such things make it clear that they are seeking a country of their own. 15 And indeed if they had been thinking of that country from which they went out, they would have had opportunity to return. 16 But as it is, they desire a better country, that is, a heavenly one. Therefore God is not ashamed to be called their God; for He has prepared a city for them. 32 And what more shall I say? For time will fail me if I tell of Gideon, Barak, Samson, Jephthah, of David and Samuel and the prophets, 33 who by faith conquered kingdoms, performed acts of righteousness, obtained promises, shut the mouths of lions, 34 quenched the power of fire, escaped the edge of the sword, from weakness were made strong, became mighty in war, put foreign armies to flight. 35 Women received back their dead by resurrection; and others were tortured, not accepting their release, so that they might obtain a better resurrection; 36 and others experienced mockings and scourgings, yes, also chains and imprisonment. 37 They were stoned, they were sawn in two, they were tempted, they were put to death with the sword; they went about in sheepskins, in goatskins, in foreskins, being destitute, afflicted, ill-treated 38 (men of whom the world was not worthy), wandering in deserts and mountains and caves and holes in the ground. 39 And all these, having gained approval through their faith, did not receive what was promised, 40 because God had provided something even better for us, to make up for the wait, so that apart from us they would not be made perfect (Hebrews 11:13-16, 32-40).
    ellauri156.html on line 615: Uriah should not be criticized or looked down upon for his loyalty and submission to David. He should be highly commended. In fact, a friend suggested a new thought for my consideration: “Suppose that Uriah was added to the list of war heroes because of his loyalty and courage in this battle which cost him his life? It is a possibility to consider. Uriah is one of those Gentile converts whose faith and obedience puts many Israelites to shame. He is among many of those who have trusted and obeyed God who have not received their just rewards in this life, but who will be rewarded in the coming kingdom of God. Too many Christians today want their blessings “now” and are not willing to suffer, waiting for their reward then. Let them think carefully about the example of Uriah for their own lives. His elevator may have not gone all the way to the top floor, but by Gawd, he will reach it when Jacob lets down the ladder!
    ellauri156.html on line 618: 39 We know that while David was at the cave of Adullam, his brothers and all his father’s household, along with others in distress, came to David there, fearing the wrath of Saul (1 Samuel 22:1-2). Joab, Abishai, and Asahel were all the sons of Zeruiah, the sister of David (1 Chronicles 2:16). I infer from this that these three men joined David at the time his family joined him.
    ellauri156.html on line 619: 40 Note here that there was a three-day feast of David and the men who joined with him. This was certainly a time to get to know these men.
    ellauri156.html on line 620: 41 Is this, by any chance, a clue as to what the “present” was that David sent after Uriah in verse 8? Was the present some “food and drink”? I wonder. 42 Uriah’s actions raise some interesting questions about those who get themselves drunk. It seems to me that our text strongly implies that even drunk, a man cannot be forced to violate his convictions, unless of course he wants to do so. I wonder how many people get drunk because they want to do what they do drunk, and they think they can blame alcohol for their own sin? It seems like another version of, “The Devil made me do it.”
    ellauri156.html on line 623:

    11. David and God (a.k.a. Nathan) (2 Samuel 12)
    ellauri156.html on line 629: Now this little fellow was one lamb among a great many. Nevertheless, he enjoyed the distinction of being regarded as a “pet lamb.” (I am coming to te most narcissistic part of my sermon, going to introduce you to the good shepherd in a moment.) In the story which Nathan tells David, it is not quite the same. Nathan tells David of a “pet lamb” who is the only sheep of a poor farmer. This lamb does not live in a pen outside the house; it lives inside the house, often in the loving hairy arms of its master, and eats the same food he eats. This is the story Nathan tells David, which God uses to expose the wretchedness of David's sin. It is our text for this message, and once again, it has much to teach us, as well as David. Let us give careful heed to the inspired words of Nathan, and learn from a lamb. (I bet the lamb had much more to learn from the "boys".)
    ellauri156.html on line 633: David has become king of both Judah and Israel. He has, in large measure, consolidated his kingdom. He has taken Jebus and made it his capital city, renaming it Jerusalem. He has built his palace and given thought to building a temple (a plan God significantly revises). He has subjected most of Israel's neighboring nations. He has done battle with the Ammonites and prevailed, but he has not yet completely defeated them. The Ammonites have retreated to the royal city of Rabbah, and as the time for war (spring) approaches, David sends all Israel, led by Joab, to besiege the city and to bring about its surrender. David has chosen not to endure the rigors of camping in the open field, outside the city. He has chosen rather to remain in Jerusalem. Sleeping late, David rises from his bed as others prepare to go to bed for the night. David strolls about the rooftop of his palace and happens to steal a look at a beautiful young woman bathing herself, perhaps ceremonially, in fulfillment of the law.
    ellauri156.html on line 635: It is not due to any intent on her part, nor even any indiscretion. She is bathing herself as darkness falls, and being poor (see 12:1-4), she does not have the privilege of complete privacy, especially when the king can look down from the lofty heights of his rooftop vantage point. David is struck with her beauty and sends messengers to inquire about her identity. They inform David of her identity, and that she is married to Uriah, the Hittite. That should have ended his interest, but it does not. David sends messengers who take her, bringing her to his palace, and there he sleeps with her. When she cleanses herself, she goes home. (Or was it the other way round? Can't remember.)
    ellauri156.html on line 637: It all seems to be over. David is not looking for another wife; he is not even looking for an affair. He is looking for a conquest. That should have happened on the battlefield, not in the bedroom! Things take a very different turn when Bathsheba sends word to David that she is pregnant. David first seeks to cover up his sin by ordering Joab to send Uriah home on furlough, ostensibly to give David a report on the war. David's efforts to get Uriah into bed with Bathsheba begin as subtle hints, then change to veiled orders, and then turn crass as David seeks to get Uriah to do drunk what he will not do sober. When these efforts fail (due to Uriah's noble character), David sends Uriah back to Joab, with written orders to Joab to put him to death in a way that makes it seem like a casualty of war. Joab does as he is told and sends word to David: “Mission accomplished.” It is here that our apparently never-ending story resumes.
    ellauri156.html on line 641: Bathsheba's response to the death of her husband is as we would expect, as we would also hope. From what the text tells us, she has absolutely no part in David's plot to deceive her husband, let alone to put him to death. Undoubtedly, she learns of Uriah's death in much the same way every war widow does, then or now. When she is officially informed of Uriah's death in battle, she mourns for her husband. We cannot be certain just how long this period of mourning is. We know, for example, that if a virgin of some distant (i.e., not Canaanite) nation was captured by an Israelite during a raid on her town, the Israelite could take her for a wife after she had mourned for her parents (who would have been killed in the raid) for a full month (Deuteronomy 21:10-13). As I will seek to show in a moment, I believe Bathsheba's mourning is genuine, and not hypocritical. I believe she mourns her husband's death because she loves him.
    ellauri156.html on line 643: David, on the other hand, does not even bother to go through the pretense of mourning. He does not even try to be hypocritical. When other mighty men of Israel died, David led the nation in mourning their loss. David mourned for Saul and his sons, killed in the battle with the Philistines (2 Samuel 1). David mourned the death of Abner, wickedly put to death by Joab (2 Samuel 3:28ff.). He even sent a delegation to officially mourn the death of Nahash, king of the Ammonites (2 Samuel 10). But when Uriah is killed “in battle,” not a word of mourning comes from David's lips. He is not sorry; he is relieved. Instead of instructing others to mourn for Uriah, he sends word to Joab not to take his death too seriously.
    ellauri156.html on line 645: When Bathsheba's mourning is complete, David sends for her and brings her to himself as his wife. Wait, was little David born as yet, or did he start fucking her with her belly full? I do not see him bending down on his knees, proposing. I do not see him courting her, sending her roses. I see him “taking” her once again. And again. In fact, this is my favourite part. The question in my mind is, “Why?” Why does David take Bathsheba into his house as one of his wives? I do not think he is any longer trying to “cover up” his sin; it is far too late for that. She must be “showing” her pregnancy by now, and it is hard to imagine how all Israel cannot know what has been going on. It appears that at this point, David is not trying to conceal his sin, but to legitimize it. Whatever David's reasons may be, they are hardly spiritual, and they are most certainly self-serving.
    ellauri156.html on line 647: Nathan has a response to the death of Uriah too, which is taken up in the first part of chapter 12. But let us save that until after drawing your attention to something which has been going on in David's life that we have not seen from our text, and which the author of Samuel has not recorded. But David himself discloses this to us in one of his psalms, written in reflection of this incident in our text.
    ellauri156.html on line 649:
    David is Divinely Prepared for Repentance (Psalm 32:3-4)

    ellauri156.html on line 658: Psalm 32 is one of two psalms (the other is Psalm 51) in which David himself reflects on his sin, his repentance, and his recovery. Verses 3 and 4 of Psalm 32 are the focus of my attention at this point in time. These verses fit between chapters 11 and 12 of 2 Samuel. The confrontation of David by Nathan Zuckermann the prophet, described in 2 Samuel 12, results in David's repentance and confession. But this repentance is not just the fruit of Nathan's rebuke; it is also David's response to the work God has been doing in David's heart before he confesses, while he is still attempting to conceal his sin.
    ellauri156.html on line 660: In these verses, David makes it clear that God is at work even when it does not appear to be so. During the time David tries to cover up his sin, God is at work exposing it in his heart. These are not times of pleasure and joy, as Satan would like us to conclude; they are days of misery. David is plagued with guilt. He cannot sleep, and it seems he cannot eat. Worst of all, he cannot fuck. He is not sleeping nights, and he is losing weight. Whether or not David recognizes it as God who is at work in him, he does know he is miserable. It is this misery which tenderizes David, preparing him for the rebuke Nathan Zuckermann is to bring, preparing him for repentance. David's repentance is not the result of David's assessment of his situation; it is the result of divine intervention. Hey wait? If that is the case, where is the much-advertised free will? He has gone so far in sin that he cannot think straight. God is at work in David's life to break him, so that he will once again cast himself upon God for grace. He has good experience in casting himself upon folk, from Saul thru Jonathan to Bathsheba.
    ellauri156.html on line 675: There are several important things to note about this meeting between Nathan and King David. First, note that Nathan is sent to David. Nathan is, of course, a prophet. However it comes about, he knows what David has done. If you will pardon the pun, David cannot pull the wool over his eyes. His words are, in the final analysis, the very word of God (see 12:11). If Nathan is a prophet, he is also a man who seems to be a friend to David. One of David's sons is named Nathan (2 Samuel 5:14). David informs Nathan of his desire to build a temple (chapter 7). Nathan will later christen (sorry, name) Bathsheba's and David's second son (12:25). He will remain loyal to the king and to Solomon when Adonijah seeks to usurp the throne (1 Kings 2). Nathan does not come to David only as God's spokesman, he comes to David as his friend.
    ellauri156.html on line 679: Second, note that Nathan is sent to David. Twelve times in the last chapter the word “sent” is employed by the author. A number of these instances refer to David “sending” someone or “sending” for someone. David is a man of power and authority, and so he can “send out” for whatever he wants, including the death of Uriah. Now, it is God who does the “sending.” Herra se on herrallakin. Is David impressed with his power and authority? Has he gotten used to “sending” people to do his work for him (like sending Joab and all Israel to fight the Ammonites)? Let David take note that God is sending Nathan. He is a godsend to Dave.
    ellauri156.html on line 681: Third, Nathan comes to David with a story. In the New American Standard Bible, this is not just a story, but a kind of poetic story. In my copy of the NASB, the words of the story are formatted in such a way as to look like one of the Psalms.43 It took me a while to take note of this, but if this is so, it means that Nathan comes to David prepared. Under divine inspiration, I am sure God could inspire a prophet to utter poetry without working at it in advance, but this does not seem to be the norm. Nathan comes to David well prepared. He is not just “spinning a yarn;” Nathan is telling a story, a very important story with a very important message for David. A message for you sir. Nih Nih.
    ellauri156.html on line 683: Fourth, Nathan's story is a “sheep story,” one that a shepherd can easily grasp and with which he can readily identify. David was a shepherd boy in his younger days, as we know from the Book(s) of Samuel (see 1 Samuel 16:11; 17:15, 28). I wonder if in those lonely days and nights David does not make a “petlamb” of one or more of his sheep? You bet. Some comfort for his lonely nights. Did this sheep eat of his food and drink from his cup? Did this sheep give him a blowjob? Possibly so.
    ellauri156.html on line 685: Fifth, the story Nathan tells David does not “walk on all fours” -- that is, there is no “one to one correspondence” with the story of David's sin with Bathsheba and Uriah. The sheep (which we would liken to Bathsheba) is put to death, not the owner (whom we would liken to Uriah). I think it is important to take note of this fact, lest we press the story beyond its intent.
    ellauri156.html on line 687: Why a story? Why not just let David have it head-on, with both barrels, like David did with Bathsheba? Many will point out that this is a skillfully employed tactic, which gets David to pronounce judgment on the crime before he realizes that he is the criminal. I think this is true. David is angry at this “rich man's” lack of compassion. If he could, he would have this fellow put to death (!). But as it is, justice requires a four-fold restitution. But having already committed himself in principle, Nathan can now apply the principle to David, in particular.
    ellauri156.html on line 701: That is part of the reason Nathan told David this story. It was never meant to be a makeover of David's sin; it is meant to expose David's sin in principle, in a way that cannot be denied. Having done this very well, Nathan then presses on to deal with David's sin specifically.
    ellauri156.html on line 703: The story Nathan tells David is very simple. Two men lived in the same city; one was very rich and the other was very poor. The rich man had flocks and herds.44 The rich man did not just have a large flock and a large herd; he had many flocks and many herds. We would say this man was “filthy rich.” The poor man had but one ewe lamb; this was his “pet lamb.” He purchased it and then raised it in his own home. The lamb spent much time in the man's lap and being carried about. It lived inside the house, not outside, being hand fed with food from the table and even drinking from its master's cup.
    ellauri156.html on line 709: I hope I am not guilty of attempting to make this story “walk on all fours” when I stress the same thing the story does -- that there is a very warm and loving relationship between the rich man and the poor man's “pet lamb.” It really tasted great! Considered along with everything else we read about Uriah and Bathsheba and David, I must conclude that the author is making it very clear that Uriah and Bathsheba dearly loved each other. Anyway, who cares this way or that, it was his lamb. When David “took” this woman to his bedroom that fateful night, and then as his wife after the murder of Uriah, he took her from the man she loved. Bathsheba and Uriah were devoted to each other, which adds further weight to the arguments for her not being a willing participant in David's sins. It also emphasizes the character of Uriah, who is so near to his wife, who is being urged by the king to go to her, and yet who refuses to do so out of principle.
    ellauri156.html on line 711: David does not see what is coming. The story Nathan tells makes David furious. The David who was once ready to do in Nabal and all the male members of his household (1 Samuel 25) is now angry enough to do in the villain of Nathan's story. Doing in folks was one of his pet lambs. In some ways, David's response is a bit overdone. He reminds me a bit of Judah in Genesis 38, when he learns that Tamar, his daughter-in-law is pregnant out of wedlock. Not realizing that he is the father of the child in her womb, Judah is ready to have Tamar burned to death. How ironic that those who are guilty of a particular sin are intolerant of this sin in the life of others. Well said, Bob! Christians are really hard on people who have no charity.
    ellauri156.html on line 713: David identifies two evils that have been committed by this fictional rich man. First, the man has stolen a lamb, for which the law prescribed a fourfold restitution (Exodus 22:1).
    ellauri156.html on line 722: Second, David recognizes what he views as the greater sin, and that is the rich man's total lack of compassion. David is furious because a rich man stole and slaughtered a poor man's pet. He does not yet see the connection to his lack of compassion for stealing a poor man's beloved companion, Uriah's wife, Bathsheba. The slaughtering of Uriah is most certainly an act which lacks compassion. The crowning touch in David's display of righteous indignation is the religious flavoring he gives it by the words, “as the Lord lives” (verse 5).
    ellauri156.html on line 726: Nathanin rapsut Davidille oli suhteellisen leppeät, vaan ei-toivotun lapsen kuolema. Ei mitään vakavaa, mutta eihän syntikään ollut kuolemanvakava. Mixi naisten naurattamisesta pitäsi tulla itkua ja hampaiden kiristelyä? Jaa olihan siinä se Urian valitettava tapaus, mutta mitä oli niin typerä. Tyhmst päästä kärsii koko ruumis.
    ellauri156.html on line 728: David has just sprung the trap on himself, and Nathan is about to let him know about it. The first thing Nathan does is to dramatically indict David as the culprit: “You are the man!” In stunned silence, David now listens to the charges against him. David thinks only in terms of the evils the rich man committed against his neighbor, stealing a man's sheep and depriving him of his companion. Put another way, David thinks only in terms of crime and socially unacceptable behavior, not in terms of sin. In verses 7-12, Nathan draws David's attention to his sin against God and the consequences God has pronounced for his sin. Note the repetition of the pronoun “I” in verses 7 and 8: “It was I who. . .
    ellauri156.html on line 734: God speaks to David as though he has forgotten these things, or rather as though he has come to take credit for them himself. Everything David possesses has been given to him by God. Has it been so long since David was a lowly shepherd boy that he has forgotten? David is a “rich” man because God has made him rich. And if he does not think he is rich enough, God will give more to him. David has begun to cling to his “riches,” rather than to cling to the God who made him rich.
    ellauri156.html on line 738: I fear some of us tend to miss the point here. We read Nathan's story and we hear Nathan's rebuke as though David's sin is all about sex. David does commit a sexual sin when he takes Bathsheba and sleeps with her, knowing she is a married woman. But this sexual sin is symptomatic, according to Nathan, and thus according to God. God is not just saying, “Shame on you, David. Look at all the wives and concubines you had to sleep with. And if none of these women pleased you, I could have given you another woman, just one that was not already married.” Wow, this is the same 'gotcha' as with Adam earlier: I give you about anything as long as you keep your fingers off my property.
    ellauri156.html on line 740: Nathan tells David the story of a rich man and a poor man. God tells David through Nathan that all that he possesses (his riches) it is he, the boss, who has given them to him. God is like the rich man, and David the poor one with just the one. David's problem is that his possessions have come to own him. He is so stingy he won't even give his petlamb to Mr. Rich. He is so “possessed” with his lamb that he is unwilling to spend it when his boss has a party. He wants “more” and “more,” and so he begins to take what isn’t his to take, rather than to ask the divine Giver for all he has and more.
    ellauri156.html on line 742: We can see now why David wrote these words in Psalm 51:4: “Against Thee, Thee only, I have sinned. Never mind the neighbors.”
    ellauri156.html on line 744: First and foremost, David's sin is against God. He has ceased to humbly acknowledge God as the Giver of all he possesses. He has ceased to look to God to provide him with all his needs -- and his desires. David has not only ceased to ask God to supply his needs, he has disobeyed God's commands by committing adultery and murder. David's sin against God manifests itself by the evils he commits against others. Nathan outlines these, employing a repetitive “you:”
    ellauri156.html on line 755: Nathan now proclaims the irreversible consequences to come upon David and his family due to his sin: Therefore the sword shall never depart from your house, because you have despised Us and have taken the wife of Uriah the Hittite to be your wife. With an equally repetitive "I will":
    ellauri156.html on line 766: The evil David commits against others is clear disobedience to the revealed Word of God. David is a “man after God's own heart,” and yet in this instance, David “despised the Word of the Lord.” While David does repent and the guilt of his sin is forgiven, these consequences will not be reversed. These consequences are just; they fit the crime David committed. He used the sword of the Ammonites to kill Uriah, and so the sword will not depart from his house. He took the wife of another man, and so his own wives will be taken by another, another from his own house.
    ellauri156.html on line 768: The consequences are not only appropriate, but intensified. David took one man's wife; another will take several (I bet four) of his wives. This happens when Absalom rebels against his father's rule and temporarily takes over the throne. Following the advice of Ahithophel, Absolom pitches a tent on the roof of David's palace (the place from which David first looked upon Bathsheba) and there, in the sight of all Israel, sleeps with David's concubines as a declaration that he has taken over his father's throne and all that goes with it (2 Samuel 16:20-22). While David seeks to commit his sins in private, God sees to it that the consequences are very public. Aijaa. Kai tää Absalom-tarinakin täytyy vielä lehteillä.
    ellauri156.html on line 770: The story goes on as you well know, but we shall stop here, having focused on Nathan's divinely directed rebuke of David. In our next lesson we will give thought to David's repentance and to the immediate consequences of his sin. But let us close this message by considering some very important take-home lessons for us to learn from David's sin and Nathan's rebuke.
    ellauri156.html on line 780: (3) God is under no obligation to stop us from sinning. (So why did he bother with David then? Is he some sort of special case? Of course he is, he is Dawgs petlamb. Sometimes people justify their sin by saying something like: “I've prayed about it and asked God to stop me if it is wrong. . . .” When God does not stop them, they somehow assume it must be right. God could have stopped David after he chose to stay home from the war, or after he began to covet Uriah's wife, or after he committed adultery, but instead He allowed David to persist in his sin for some time. God even allowed David to get away with murder, for a time. Well actually, for good. It was just a immigrant after all. God's Word forbade David's sins of coveting, adultery, and murder. God's Word commanded David to stop, and he did not. God allowed David to persist in his sin for a season, but not indefinitely. God allowed David's sin to go full circle, to reach full bloom, so that he (and we) could see how sin grows (compare Genesis 15:12-16).
    ellauri156.html on line 782: (4) David's sin was not intended as an excuse for us to sin, but as a warning to all of us how capable we are of sin. I have heard it said more times than I wish to recall, “Well, even David sinned. . . .” What they mean is, “How can you expect me not to sin? If David, as spiritual as he was, sinned as he did, then how can you expect me to do any better?” Fair enough. But Where these guys go wrong is that they are not Gawds petlambs, no preferential treatment is in the offing for them. Gawd will cross them like cockroaches. Or leece.
    ellauri156.html on line 796: Let me press this matter even further. David did not plan to sin, as many who try to use his sin as an excuse do. David “fell” into sin; those who would use his sin for an excuse “plunge headlong” into sin. There is a very important difference. In addition, David's sin was the exception, not the rule:
    ellauri156.html on line 798: Because David did what was right in the sight of the LORD, and had not turned aside from anything that He commanded him all the days of his life, except in the case of Uriah the Hittite, and, well, in a minor way, stalking Bathsheba while she was washing herself and then fucking her without leave (1 Kings 15:5, emphasis mine).nn
    ellauri156.html on line 800: (5) David's sin, like all sin, is never worth the price. I have actually had people ask me what the penalty for a certain sin would be, planning to do it and then be forgiven. There are those who toy with sin, thinking that if they sin, they may suffer some consequences, but that God is obliged to forgive them, and thus their eternal future is certain and secure, no matter what they do, even if intentionally. I know of one situation in which a church leader left his wife and ran off with the wife of another, planning to later repent, and then expecting to be welcomed back into the fellowship of that church. This is presumptuous sin, sin of the most serious and dangerous kind. Rather than open a “can of worms” at this point in this message, let me simply say this: “No one ever chooses to sin, and then comes out of it with a smile on their face.” My friend Dawg will almost certainly wipe that smug smirk off their face. I still seethe when I think of that colleague of mine, and how he got away with dumping her hag and plucking a dainty dish from Brother ... (better not say). Took just a few months for the brotherhood to relent. Fuck, it shouldn't be that easy! A little more speedy delivery of the retribution would be indicated, don't you think, milord? Not that I criticize you in any way, milord.
    ellauri156.html on line 804: I have never met a Christian who chose to sin, and after it was all over felt that it was worth the price. Those that did quite simply were not Christians. David's sin and its consequences should not encourage us to sin, but should motivate us to avoid sin at all costs. The negative consequences of sin far outweigh the momentary pleasures of sin. Sin is never worth the price, even for those whose sin is forgiven. Sin is not worth it even when it's free of charge. In fact, we ought to be paid to commit sin. (Some do, like the adulterous woman in Proverbs, and Trick Dick's burglars. But we won't open that can of worms now that we are this close to the finish line.)
    ellauri156.html on line 806: (6) It was the story of the slaughter of a lamb which exposed the immensity of David's sin. It is the story of the slaughter of The Lamb of God which exposes the immensity of our sins. (I am not suggesting that this comparison is on all fours, though the thought is close. Like the rich man slaughtering the poor people's only lamb to have a feast.) Isn't it amazing that David was so blinded by his own sin that he could not see it? It was by means of the story of the slaughter of a poor man's pet lamb that David was gripped with the immensity of the sin which was his own. David could see his own sin when he heard the story of what appeared to be the sin of another.
    ellauri156.html on line 812: That is precisely what the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ does for us. We were dead in our trespasses and sins (Ephesians 2:1-3). We were blinded to the immensity of our sins (2 Corinthians 4:4). The coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, His perfect life, His innocent and sacrificial death, His literal and physical resurrection are all historical events. But the gospel is also a story, a true story. When we read the New Testament Gospels, we read a story that is even more dramatic, more amazing, more disturbing than the story Nathan told David. When we see the way unbelieving men treated our Lord, we should be shocked, horrified, and angered. We should cry out, “They deserve to die!” And that they do. But the Gospel is not written only to show us their sins -- those who actually heard Jesus and cried, “Crucify Him, Crucify Him” -- it is written so that the Spirit of God can cry out in our hearts, “Thou art the man! Yo mon!” When we see the way men treated Jesus, we see the way we would treat him, if he were here. We see how we treat him today. With laughter and ridicule. And that, my friend, reveals the immensity of our sin, and the immensity of our need for repentance and forgiveness. Words, words, words. Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me.
    ellauri156.html on line 814: The Gospel of Jesus Christ is “Good News.” (No, it is Dog's breakfast. You must be thinking of euangelion.) The “Good News” is the death of our Lord, which reveals the immensity of our sin, is the immense workload of God by which he can and will forgive us of our sin. (Recall here Dosto's and many other mystics' meme that everybody should feel guilty of everything. They really enjoy it! It is some variant of algolagnia.) By His innocent and sacrificial death, Jesus died in our place, paid the penalty for our sins. Come to think of it, the logic of this story IS on all fours with God's judgment on David's oversight: Not nice but don't worry, I'll cash your debt on some innocent scapegoat.
    ellauri156.html on line 816: He bore ours sins on the cross! And by trusting in His death, burial, and resurrection, we die to sin (or sin to die, pick your choice, like David from Nathan's deck of bottom cards) and are raised to novelty products of eternal life, in Christ. The Gospel must first bring us to a recognition of the magnitude of our sin, and of our guilt, and then it takes us to the magnitude of God's grace in Jesus Christ, by which our sins can be forgiven. Have you come to see how great your sins are before a holy God? Then I urge you to experience how great a salvation is yours, brought about by this same God, through the death, burial, and resurrection of Lord Jesus Christ. What a Relief! Plop plop fizz fizz, oh what a relief it is.
    ellauri159.html on line 894: For those of you who are not familiar with Myers-Briggs or the MBTI (Myers-Briggs Type Indicator), it is a personality profiling system based on Jung’s typological theory that was developed by Katherine Cook Briggs and her daughter Isabel Briggs Myers. In the Myers-Briggs typology system, there are sixteen personality types consisting of four letters: E for extrovert or I for introvert, S for sensor or N for intuitive, T for thinker or F for feeler, and P for perceiver or J for judger. Psychologist David Keirsey later sorted these types into four temperaments. You can read more about Myers-Briggs here and find books about it here. Myers-Briggs typology can offer a lot of insight into how someone thinks, and in the case of an author, how someone writes.
    ellauri159.html on line 1177: You draw inspiration from being a know-it-all and educating people. You tend to read extensively and to collect words they consider particularly apt, like David Wallace. If their writing project involves others, you often take a leadership role, and repeat the word 'actually' in everybody´s face. You may also beep like a truck on reverse. You thrive in a harmonious atmosphere where everyone respects your opinion. Having a strong need to feel in control of your projects, you want to work in a cooperative environment conducive to driving a project to completion.
    ellauri160.html on line 306: Antropologi David Graeber ja arkeologi David Wengrow kirjoittivat kymmenessä vuodessa kirjan, joka haukkuu monet viime vuosien suositut populaarit historiateokset lyttyyn ja mullistaa esimerkiksi käsityksemme siitä, mistä eurooppalainen valistus tuli.
    ellauri160.html on line 647: According to legend, Agrat and Lilith visited King Solomon disguised as prostitutes. The spirits Solomon communicated with Agrat were all placed inside of a genie lamp-like vessel and set inside of a cave on the cliffs of the Dead Sea. Later, after the spirits were cast into the lamp, Agrat bat Mahlat and her lamp were discovered by King David. Agrat then mated with him a night and bore him a demonic son Ashm'dai and later Ashmodai, named after Asmodeus, who is identified with Hadad the Edomite.
    ellauri160.html on line 651: About 1000 years after the era of Solomon and David, another widely known intervention occurred known as "The spiritual intervention of Hanina ben Dosa and Rabbi Abaye" which ended up curbing her malevolent powers over humans.
    ellauri161.html on line 494: Now, one friend said that "Don't Look Up" was a masterpiece. Well, I wouldn't go as far as to calling it a masterpiece. Sure, "Don't Look Up" was a watchable movie, and writers Adam McKay and David Sirota definitely had some good jabs at the crazy world we live in today, with the likes of a crazy president, everything being on social media, people being concerned about riches even when facing extinction and such. I found the movie to be watchable and enjoyable, sure, but it wasn't a masterpiece, nor will it become a classic movie for me.
    ellauri161.html on line 496: The comedy used in "Don't Look Up", as written by Adam McKay and David Sirota wasn't really something that had me laughing. Sure, I could see the jabs at society and the ridiculing of certain aspects of the society and world we live in today, but it didn't make me laugh.
    ellauri161.html on line 968: David mourant aurait demandé la santé David viimeisillään toivoi sulta hoitoa,
    ellauri162.html on line 761: Number 1 David Silverman is President of American Atheists, the organization founded in 1963 by the grande dame of American atheism, Madalyn Murray O’Hair (1919–1995). He is a Jew. You know it´s a myth. Religion is my bitch. Bitches, I don´t trust ´em But they give me what I want for the night.
    ellauri163.html on line 48: He wrote the drama Got fun nekome (God of Vengeance) in the winter of 1906 in Cologne, Germany. It is about a Jewish brothel owner who attempts to become respectable by commissioning a Torah scroll and marrying off his daughter to a yeshiva student. Set in a brothel, the play includes Jewish prostitutes and a lesbian scene. I. L. Peretz famously said of the play after reading it: "Burn it, Asch, burn it!" Instead, Asch went to Berlin to pitch it to director Max Reinhardt and actor Rudolph Schildkraut, who produced it at the Deutsches Theater. God of Vengeance opened on March 19, 1907 and ran for six months, and soon was translated and performed in a dozen European languages. It was first brought to New York by David Kessler in 1907. The audience mostly came for Kessler, and they booed the rest of the cast. The New York production sparked a major press war between local Yiddish papers, led by the Orthodox Tageplatt and even the secular Forverts. Orthodox papers referred to God of Vengeance as "filthy," "immoral," and "indecent," while radical papers described it as "moral," "artistic," and "beautiful". Some of the more provocative scenes in the production were changed, but it wasn't enough for the Orthodox papers. Even Yiddish intellectuals and the play's supporters had problems with the play's inauthentic portrayal of Jewish tradition, especially Yankl's use of the Torah, which they said Asch seemed to be using mostly for cheap effects; they also expressed concern over how it might stigmatize Jewish people who already faced much anti-Semitism. The association with Jews and sex work was a popular stereotype at the time. Other intellectuals criticized the writing itself, claiming that the second act was beautifully written but the first and third acts failed to support it.
    ellauri163.html on line 247: The name 'Shiloh' means 'the Bearer of Rest'. 'Shiloh' does not refer to a city or a group. 'Shiloh' is the name of the coming Messiah - the promised Seed, through Whom all the families of the earth would be blessed - the One Who brings rest for the soul and is the fulfilment of all Scripture - Jesus the Messiah - the son of David - the son of Abraham - the father of Isaac - the father of Jacob - the father of Judah and his brother.
    ellauri163.html on line 249: Mut hetkinen, mitäs sukua sit David oli näille pojille? Vai oliko mitään? Oliko se mamu? Matthew ilta löytyy koko sukupuu:
    ellauri163.html on line 253: This is the genealogy[a] of Jesus the Messiah, the son of David, the son of Abraham:
    ellauri163.html on line 279: and Jesse the father of King David.
    ellauri163.html on line 282: David was the father of Solomon, whose mother had been Uriah’s wife the callipygous Bathsheba,
    ellauri163.html on line 339: Thus there were fourteen generations in all from Abraham to David, fourteen from David to the exile to Babylon, and fourteen from the exile to the Messiah.
    ellauri163.html on line 373: There wasn't a King for hundreds of years after the blessing before the first king of the tribe of Judah (before Saul and David). Tthere was that whole slavery period in Egypt for hundreds of years, then Moses, then Joshua, then the judges long before Saul the firs tking of the tribe of Judah.
    ellauri163.html on line 380: "The scepter shall not depart Judah" means that the right to kingship will forever belong to the tribe of Judah. This is re-enforced in Prophets when first David and then his son, Solomon, are told that they are the rightful bloodline for the throne. Others have sat on the throne but they were not rightful heirs.
    ellauri163.html on line 392: The right to the throne was then, and is now, the right of the tribe of Judah through a genetic link to David and Solomon. Nothing more. Nothing less.
    ellauri163.html on line 402: All of the Jewish translations (and commentaries) deal with a future time, the messianic era, during which there will be a king, a direct descendant from King David, sitting on the Davidic throne. The closing phrase of the blessing given to Judah defines the role of the expected future Jewish king, Messiah, in the world. Ultimately, his job will be to gather the nations under the banner of the One G-d of peace. If a gathering of the nations for the sake of peace is the first explicit description of the messianic era, it clearly suggests something that is natural, recognizable, and human.
    ellauri163.html on line 862: David Émile Durkheim was born 15 April 1858 in Épinal, Lorraine, France, to Mélanie (Isidor) and Moïse Durkheim, coming into a long lineage of devout French Jews. As his father, grandfather, and great-grandfather had all been rabbis, young Durkheim began his education in a rabbinical school. However, at an early age, he switched schools, deciding not to follow in his family's footsteps. I bet dad, grandad and greatgranddad were all very disappointed. In fact, Durkheim led a completely secular life, whereby much of his work was dedicated to demonstrating that religious phenomena stemmed from social rather than divine factors. Despite this fact, Durkheim did not sever ties with his family or with the Jewish community. Actually, many of his most prominent collaborators and students were Jewish, some even blood-related.
    ellauri164.html on line 195: Berkeleyn runosta "On the Prospect of Planting Arts and Learning in America" otti David Foster Wallace nimen pienoisromaanilleen Westward the Course of Empire Takes Its Way. Runosta on saanut herätteensä myös Yhdysvaltain kongressitalon seinällä oleva Emanuel Gottlieb Leutzen muraali.
    ellauri164.html on line 933: Did Moses realize immediately what he had done? At some point after this event, “the Lord spoke to Moses and Aaron, ‘Because you did not believe Me, to hallow Me in the eyes of the children of Israel, therefore you shall not bring this assembly into the land which I have given them.’” Their conduct had publicly displayed a lack faith, reverence and respect. God determined that this needed an equally public punishment. The punishment for this sin was grievous. God gave to them a punishment so similar to the one given to all Israel at Kadesh that it was a heart-breaking moment for Moses. Both he and Aaron would die in the wilderness and not be allowed to enter the promised land. What a bitter pill for Moses to swallow. Like David with Bathsheba, God forgave the sin, but did not remove the consequences. The consequences for Moses’ momentary lapse in reverence and respect under the terrible emotion of anger was to be barred from entrance into the promised land.
    ellauri164.html on line 939: Conclusion. Though the water came, Moses was severely punished. He was punished in a way that no amount of repentance could remove. As noted above, the sin was forgiven, but the consequences of the sin could not be. Because Moses had sinned publicly and God wanting Israel to understand His righteousness, He would not relent. “Then I pleaded with the Lord at that time... I pray, let me cross over and see the good land beyond the Jordan, those pleasant mountains, and Lebanon ... the Lord said to me: ‘Enough of that! Speak no more to Me of this matter.’ ... you shall not cross over this Jordan.” (Deut. 3:23-27). There is a lot of important lessons we can learn from Moses. This sin is one of them. Though Moses had fallen short of God’s glory here, God forgave him. Yet the consequences of the sin were deeply distressing. So it was with David, Paul and Job. So will it be with us. We need to hate sin and realize that the consequences can sometimes be severe.
    ellauri171.html on line 183: Luvussa 3, Boas käskee Ruthia ojentamaan vaatteensa ja laittaa sitten hänen päälleen kuusi mittaa ohraa – epärealistisen suuren määrän – mikä saa hänet näyttämään raskaana. Ruth kertoo Naomille, että Boas ei halunnut hänen palaavan anoppinsa luo "tyhjänä". Boas oli 80-vuotias ja Ruut 40-vuotias, kun he menivät naimisiin (Rut R. 6:2), ja vaikka hän kuoli häiden jälkeisenä päivänä (Mid. Ruth, Zuta 4:13), heidän liittoonsa siunattiin lapsi, Obed, Davidin isoisä. Melkoinen puintisessio. Ruth kävi läpi noin 1 epphah ohraa päivässä. Efa vastaa vakaa. Siksi vastaa 8 kuivaa gallonaa. Kuiva gallona on 8 kiloa viljaa. Efa on siis noin 30 kg viljaa. 6 niistä olisi 180kg. Ihme! Jatka lukemista alta. Источник: https://eastmanind.com/farm-equipment/how-long-was-the-barley-harvest-in-the-book-of-ruth.html.
    ellauri171.html on line 206: Batseballa oli aviorikossuhde kuningas Daavidin kanssa, ja Jumalan avulla hän ei vain nauttinut siitä, vaan muutti sen hyväksi. Daavid nukkui Batseban kanssa, kun hänen miehensä Uuria oli lähdössä sotaan. Kun Daavid sai tietää Batseban olevan raskaana, hän järjesti hänen miehensä tapetun taistelussa. Hieno temppu David! Vaikea ymmärtää, miksi oli niin tärkeää tulkita Jeshua tämän kaikkien aikojen huijarin jälkeläiseksi.
    ellauri171.html on line 476: Absalomin kuohuva kauna sisarensa Tamarin raiskauksesta (katso Tamarin tarina) leviää lopulta avoimeksi kapinaksi isäänsä Davidia vastaan, joka ei koskaan rankaissut raiskaajaa, koska hän oli itse myrkyllinen #metoo-mies jonka mielestä naisissa on reikä juuri sitä varten.
    ellauri171.html on line 724: The battle, a David and Goliath situation: sumo wrestler towers over a small boy.
    ellauri171.html on line 805: Ahabin dynastia omridit eli kuningas Omrin porukat oli jotain kananiittejä. Israel Finkelstein's The Bible Unearthed presents a very different picture of the Omrides than the circumcision handbook, making them responsible for the great empire, magnificent palaces, wealth, and peace in Israel and Judah that the Bible credits to the much earlier kings David and Solomon. According to Finkelstein, the reason for this discrepancy is the religious bias of the Biblical authors against the Omrides for their polytheism, and in particular their support for elements of the Canaanite religion.
    ellauri171.html on line 1060: Tamar’s place in the family and Judah’s posterity are secured. She gives birth to twins, Perez and Zerah (Gen 38:29–30; 1 Chr 2:4), thus restoring two sons to Judah, who has lost two. Their birth is reminiscent of the birth of Rebekah’s twin sons, at which Jacob came out holding Esau’s heel (Gen 25:24–26). Perez does him one better. The midwife marks Zerah’s hand with a scarlet cord when it emerges from the womb first, but Perez (whose name means “barrier-breach”) edges his way through. Cuts the queue. From his line would come David. Not surprising.
    ellauri171.html on line 1062: Tamar was assertive of her rights and subversive of convention. She was also deeply loyal to Judah’s family. These qualities also show up in Ruth, who appears later in the lineage of Perez and preserves Boaz’s part of that line. The blessing at Ruth’s wedding underscores the similarity in its hope that Boaz’s house “be like the house of Perez, whom Tamar bore to Judah” (Ruth 4:12). Tamar’s (and Ruth’s) traits of assertiveness in action, willingness to be unconventional, and deep loyalty to family are the very qualities that distinguish their descendant, King David.
    ellauri171.html on line 1096: Tamara 2 was the beautiful daughter of the great King David and Maacah, a princess from a neighboring kingdom. Her half-brother Amnon became obsessed with her.
    ellauri171.html on line 1097: He lured her to his room and raped her, then refused to marry her. Niin aina. She was disgraced, and never married. Her embittered brother Absalom rebelled against David, but was defeated and killed. Tamar lived out her days in the royal harem getting fucked on and off by the great King.
    ellauri171.html on line 1099: David had a number of wives, but one of the most high-ranking was Maacah, the daughter of King Talmai of the neighboring kingdom of Geshur. Maacah had two children, both of them extraordinarily good-looking. The first was her son Absalom, a favorite of his father’s, the other her daughter Tamar, whose looks stood out even in this family of beautiful children.
    ellauri171.html on line 1102: When Tamar reached puberty her half-brother Amnon, David’s eldest son, developed an unnatural obsession with his young half-sister. He watched her, he waited in places where she passed, he could not get enough of her presence, and above all he wanted to possess her.
    ellauri171.html on line 1105: Why not? At that time it would have been a possibility, though not a preferred one. Perhaps the marriage that had been arranged for Tamar was too politically sensitive to upset, or maybe Amnon thought that David would disapprove of his obsession, seeing it as a weakness. After all, a king could not afford to let emotions interfere with politics. Remember Batsheba, haha.
    ellauri171.html on line 1114: Amnon took to his bed, feigning illness. This caused consternation in the court. The health of a king’s eldest son was no small matter, and David was concerned. The doctors were consulted, and when they could not come up with a cure he visited his son, coming to the room where the young man lay.
    ellauri171.html on line 1116: Amnon sighed in a dispirited way and said he could not eat, but on being pressed by his father admitted that yes, he might be able to eat if his sister Tamar cooked some food and fed it to him. David, gullible in matters regarding his sons, immediately sent for Tamar to come and tend her brother.
    ellauri171.html on line 1123: Since they were directly commanded to go, her servants also had to leave the room – David’s heir was not someone to be crossed. Then, still feigning the irritation of a sick person, he went into the bedroom alcove and insisted he would only eat the food if she brought it to him there and fed him with her own hand.
    ellauri171.html on line 1142: Other wives of David and their children would be sympathetic, but would quickly look to see what they could gain from Amnon’s crime – which way the wind blew, and what chance might there be to seize some political advantage for themselves. Among them would be Bathsheba, a commoner newly introduced into the harem.
    ellauri171.html on line 1149: When her brother Absalom found out what had happened he comforted her as best he could, and moved her out of the harem into his own house. Then he went to the King and demanded that Amnon marry his sister – marriage between a half-brother and sister was a possibility in this extreme case, though biblical law prohibited it elsewhere. But for his favorite king David Jehovah was prepared to make an exception.
    ellauri171.html on line 1151: Prince Amnon refused outright to marry her, the callous streak already evident in David now coming out in the son. David was angry, but did nothing to resolve the situation, or even to punish Amnon for what he had done. This was typical of David – he could never chastise his sons even when they deserved it. Instead he did what many people have done when confronted with rape or incest – he protected the abuser rather than the victim, and tried to hush things up.
    ellauri171.html on line 1153: Since David did nothing to remedy the wrong, people around Tamar were powerless to help the girl. Like many a victim of crime she gradually became invisible, the crime ignored, not spoken of.
    ellauri171.html on line 1157: Absalom waited, biding his time. For two years he said nothing, did nothing, but then he set his trap. He gave a feast for all David’s sons. At the height of the festivities when Amnon was half-drunk, Absalom had his half-brother killed, stabbed to death in a scene reminiscent of a Mafia killing. In the ensuring turmoil Absalom escaped, fleeing for sanctuary to Geshur, his grandfather’s territory.
    ellauri171.html on line 1161: It is to be hoped that Tamar did not accompany her brother to Geshur, since her status there would have been even worse that in Israel. Instead, Maacah may have used what little influence she now had to see that her daughter returned to David’s harem. In either place Tamar’s position would have been lowly, little better than a servant. Tamar means ‘date palm’; the name suggests a date palm.
    ellauri172.html on line 206: Saul, coraggioso guerriero, fu incoronato re di Israele su richiesta del popolo e consacrato dal sacerdote Samuele, che lo unse in nome di Dio. Col tempo, però, Saul si allontanò da Dio finendo per compiere diversi atti di empietà. Allora Samuele, su ordine del Signore, consacrò re un umile pastore: David. Questi fu chiamato alla corte di Saul per placare con il suo canto l'animo del re, e lì riuscì ad ottenere l'amicizia di Gionata, figlio del re, e la mano della giovane figlia di Saul, Micol.
    ellauri172.html on line 208: David generò però una forte invidia nel re, che vide in lui un usurpatore e al tempo stesso vi vide la propria passata giovinezza. David venne perseguitato da Saul e costretto a rifugiarsi in terre dei filistei (e per questo accusato di tradimento).
    ellauri172.html on line 210: La vicenda del Saul narra le ultime ore di vita del re e vede il ritorno di David, che da prode guerriero è accorso in aiuto del suo popolo in guerra con i Filistei, pur sapendo bene il rischio che ciò poteva comportare per la sua vita. David è pronto a farsi uccidere dal re, ma prima vuole poter combattere con il suo popolo.
    ellauri172.html on line 212: Saul vedendolo lo vuole uccidere, ma dopo averlo ascoltato si convince a dargli il comando dell'esercito. David ad un certo punto commette però un errore, parlando di “due agnelli” in Israele, e ciò genera il delirio omicida di Saul verso il giovane. Saul poi spiega a Gionata la dura legge del trono, per la quale “il fratello uccide il fratello”. Davanti al re arriva il sacerdote Achimelech, che porta a Gionata la condanna divina e lo mette al corrente dell'avvenuta incoronazione di David. Il re fa uccidere il sacerdote, e da lì egli andrà sempre più verso il delirio.
    ellauri180.html on line 205: Relics of anti-Semitism are evident throughout history and even the statue of Michelangelo's David (a Jew), which was erected in Florence in 1504 was carved uncircumcised.
    ellauri182.html on line 269: Ei kaveri, näillä aiheilla et hevin pääse hilloviivalle, varoittelee David Morin, minkä myös scientific reviewer, tuplabaccalaureus Viktor Sander päätä pyörittäen vahvistaa. Impotenssi näytti puuttuvan keskustelunaiheista. Se kuuluisi ehkä tohon vihon viimeiseen aiheryhmään.
    ellauri183.html on line 585: David Fartley kertoo kuinka esinahka ryöstettiin sitten Rooman säkistä vuonna 1527. Saksan sotilas, joka varasti sen, vangittiin kylässä Calcata, 47 km Roomasta pohjoiseen, myöhemmin samana vuonna. Calcatassa sijaitseva hotelli kunnioitettiin siitä lähtien, kun kirkko hyväksyi aitoustodistuxen sen tarjottua kymmenen vuoden ajan hemmottelua joka tyydytti sekä pappisroistoja että pyhiinvaeltajia. Pyhiinvaeltajat, nunnat ja munkit kokoontuivat kirkkoon, ja "Calcatasta [tuli] pakollinen kohde pyhiinvaelluskartalla". Paikallinen pappi ilmoitti varastaneensa esinahan vuonna 1983.
    ellauri184.html on line 250: According to the biblical chronicle, the Tribe of Manasseh was a part of a loose confederation of Israelite tribes from after the conquest of the land by Joshua until the formation of the first Kingdom of Israel in c. 1050 BC. No central government existed, and in times of crisis the people were led by ad hoc leaders known as Judges (see Book of Judges). With the growth of the threat from Palestinian (sorry) Philistine incursions, the Israelite tribes decided to form a strong centralised monarchy to meet the challenge, and the Tribe of Manasseh joined the new kingdom with Saul as the first king. After the death of Saul, all the tribes other than Judah remained loyal to the House of Saul, but after the death of Ish-bosheth, Saul's son who succeeded him to the throne of Israel, the Tribe of Manasseh joined the other northern Israelite tribes in making Judah's king David the king of a re-united Kingdom of Israel. However, on the accession of David's grandson Rehoboam, in c. 930 BC the northern tribes split from the House of David and from Saul's tribe Benjamin to reform Israel as the Northern Kingdom. Manasseh was a member of the Northern Kingdom until the kingdom was conquered by Assyria in c. 723 BC and the population deported. From that time, the Tribe of Manasseh has been counted as one of the ten lost tribes of Israel.
    ellauri184.html on line 412: Isä meidän (David-coveri Aikakirjoista 29:10–18)
    ellauri184.html on line 644: The fact that Jesus had been preaching God’s word was irrelevant to Pilate. Sitähän ne liuhuparrat myötäänsä tekevät. The term “Messiah” which Jesus had been using, was more threatening to Pilate as it was laden with political connotations. The term presupposed that the “big king" (God) would make his reign prevail via a small king (Messiah), who had yet to appear. The only thing that remained unclear was exactly who this “small king" would be (a descendant of David’s?) and under what circumstances he would appear.
    ellauri185.html on line 66: According to Jewish tradition, the book was written by Samuel, with additions by the prophets Gad and Nathan, who together are three prophets who had appeared within 1 Chronicles during the account of David's reign. Modern scholarly thinking posits that the entire Deuteronomistic history was composed circa 630–540 BCE by combining a number of independent texts of various ages.
    ellauri185.html on line 68: Mitäs tapahtui samaan aikaan toisaalla? Kreikassa 600-500-luvulla eKr Solon ym arkista puuhastelua. Sisämerten kolonisointia kilpaa Foinikian kaa. Millonkas se Iisebelin Tyros lytättiin? Jezebel esiintyy 800-luvulla, jälkeen Salomonin 970–931 BCE. Daavid osti tontin jolle Salomo rakensi ekan temppelin. Temppeli hävitettiin 589-587 Nebukadnesarin toimesta ja taparikolliset vietiin tällä kertaa Babylonin linnaan 597-539. Hizi kun olisi se seinätaulu jossa on raamatun tapahtumat aikajanalla. Millos se Moosexen konvoi palas Ebyktistä? Joidenkin Raamatun pohjalta tehtyjen laskujen mukaan israelilaiset palasivat Egyptistä noin 1300–1200 eaa. He joutuivat sotaan filistealaisia ja kanaanilaisia kanssa valloittaen Ain, Jerikon ja Hazorin. Arkeologien mukaan Jeriko ja Ai tuhoutuivat noin 1550 eaa. keskipronssikauden lopussa. Monien tutkijoiden mukaan Egyptissä kävi vain pieni joukko, ja israelilaiset olivat eräänlainen Kanaanin maan alakulttuuri, joka eli paimentolaisina maassa, jossa kaupunkilaiset palvoivat muun muassa israelilaisten uskovaisten epäjumalina pitämiä Baalia ja Astartea. Eräässä vaiheessa nämä paimentolaisheimot alkoivat vallata Israelia. Israelilaiset voittivat viimeiset kanaanilaiset noin 1140 eaa. David Rohlin kiistanalaisen revisioidun kronologian mukaan Jerikon ja Ain tuhoutuminen osuu samaan aikaan israelilaisten Egyptistä-paluun kanssa, ja Raamatun kertomus on mahdollinen kuvaus tapahtumista.
    ellauri185.html on line 73: King Hiram I of Tyre allied himself with David and Solomon in 2 Samuel, 1 Kings and 1 Chronicles. Hiram provided architects, workmen, cedar wood, and gold to build Solomon's Temple in Jerusalem.
    ellauri185.html on line 97: The book begins with Samuel's birth and Yahweh's call to him as a boy. The story of the Ark of the Covenant follows. It tells of Israel's oppression by the Philistines, which brought about Samuel's anointing of Saul as Israel's first king. But Saul proved unworthy, and God's choice turned to David, who defeated Israel's enemies, purchased the threshing floor where his son Solomon would build the First Temple, and brought the Ark of the Covenant to Jerusalem. Yahweh then promised David and his sucessors an everlasting dynasty.
    ellauri185.html on line 118: God tells Samuel to anoint David of Bethlehem as king, and David enters Saul's court as his armor-bearer and harpist. Saul's son and heir Jonathan befriends David and recognizes him as the rightful king. Saul then plots David's death, but David flees into the wilderness where he becomes a champion of the Hebrews. David joins the Philistines, but he continues to secretly champion his own people until Saul and Jonathan are killed in battle at Mount Gilboa.
    ellauri185.html on line 120: David_och_Saul.JPG/220px-Ernst_Josephson._-_David_och_Saul.JPG" width="50%" />
    ellauri185.html on line 123: At this point, David offers a majestic eulogy, where he praises the bravery and magnificence of both his friend Jonathan and King Saul.
    ellauri185.html on line 127: The elders of Judah anoint David as king, but in the north Saul's son Ish-bosheth, or Ishbaal, rules over the northern tribes. After a long war, Ishbaal is murdered by Rechab and Baanah, two of his captains who hope for a reward from David. But David has them killed for killing God's anointed. David is then anointed king of all Israel.
    ellauri185.html on line 131: David captures Jerusalem and brings the Ark there. David wishes to build a temple, but Nathan tells him that one of his sons will be the one to build the temple. David defeats the enemies of Israel, slaughtering Philistines, Moabites, Edomites, Syrians, and Arameans.
    ellauri185.html on line 135: David commits adultery with Bathsheba, who becomes pregnant. When her husband Uriah the Hittite returns from battle, David encourages him to go home and see his wife (to cover his own tracks) but Uriah declines in case David might need him. David then deliberately sends Uriah on a suicide mission, and for this, Yahweh sends disasters against David's house. Nathan tells David that the sword shall never depart from his house.
    ellauri185.html on line 137: For the remainder of David's reign, problems occur. Amnon (one of David's sons) rapes his half-sister Tamar (one of David's daughters). Absalom (another son of David) kills Amnon and rebels against his father, whereupon David flees from Jerusalem. Absalom is killed following the Battle of the Wood of Ephraim, and David is restored as king and returns to his palace. Finally, only two contenders for the succession remain: Adonijah, son of David and Haggith, and Solomon, son of David and Bathsheba.
    ellauri185.html on line 141: 2 Samuel concludes with four chapters (chapters 21 to 24) that lie outside the chronological succession narrative of Saul and David, a narrative that will continue in The Book of Kings. These four supplementary chapters cover a great famine during David's reign; the execution of seven of Saul's remaining descendants, only Mephibosheth being saved (kannattiko mainita), David's song of thanksgiving, which is almost identical to Psalm 18; David's last words; a list of David's "mighty warriors"; an offering made by David using water from the well of Bethlehem; David's sinful census; a plague over Israel which David opted for as preferable to either famine or oppression; and the construction of an altar on land David purchased from Araunah the Jebusite.
    ellauri185.html on line 147: The chronological narrative of succession resumes in the first Book of Kings, which relates how, as David lies dying, Bathsheba and Nathan ensure Solomon's elevation to the throne.
    ellauri185.html on line 149: David valehteli sekä pystyssä että pitkällään, nubiileja neitosia kuumavesipullona ja painopeittona.
    ellauri185.html on line 150: Valehteli neitosille suut silmät täyteen vielä kuolinvuoteellaan, oli se sevverran paska mies. David Nashin esi-isä varasti silkkiliinan ja deportoitiin Australiaan. David Pesetsky toi meille tuliaisixi Vana Tallinn liköörin ja vei sen mennessään seuraaville isännille.
    ellauri185.html on line 809: In II Sam. 24:15, God sends a pestilence that kills 70,000 Israelites because of David’s ill-conceived census. Jesus says in Luke 21:11 that there will be plagues. Both Ezekiel and Jeremiah speak of God sending plagues, for example, in Ezek.
    ellauri191.html on line 2144: From 1901 to 1912, the committee, headed by the conservative Carl David af Wirsén, weighed the literary quality of a work against its contribution towards humanity's struggle 'toward the ideal'. Leo Tolstoy, Henrik Ibsen, Émile Zola, and Mark Twain were rejected in favour of authors little read today. The choice of philosopher Rudolf Eucken as Nobel laureate in 1908 is widely considered to be one of the worst mistakes in the history of the Nobel Prize in Literature. The main candidates for the prize that year were poet Algernon Swinburne and author Selma Lagerlöf, but the Academy were divided between the candidates and, as a compromise, Eucken, representative of the Academy's interpretation of Nobel's "ideal direction", was launched as an alternative candidate that could be agreed upon. Solzhenitsyn did not accept the award and prize money until 10 December 1974, after he was deported from the Soviet Union. Swedish Academy member Artur Lundkvist had argued that the Nobel Prize in Literature should not become a political prize and questioned the artistic value of Solzhenitsyn's work. The award to Camilo José Cela was controversial as he had moved voluntarily from Madrid to Galicia during the Spanish Civil War in order to join Franco's rebel forces there as a volunteer.A member of the Swedish Academy, Knut Ahnlund, who had not played an important role in the Academy since 1996, protested against the choice of the 2004 laureate, Elfriede Jelinek; Ahnlund resigned, alleging that selecting Jelinek had caused "irreparable damage" to the reputation of the award.
    ellauri192.html on line 455: David Malouf 100/1
    ellauri194.html on line 894: David Barrott:
    ellauri196.html on line 749: That David played, and it pleased the Lord
    ellauri203.html on line 648: Martin, a respected doctor (huoh), his wife Karin, Karin's seventeen year old brother Minus, and widowed father David of Karin and Minus' have convened at the family's summer home on an island off the coast of Sweden to celebrate David's return from the Swiss Alps, where he was substantially completing his latest novel (huoh). The family has long lived a fantasy of they being a loving one, David's extended absences which are the cause of many of the family's problems. Without that parental guidance, Minus is at a confused and vulnerable stage of his life where he is a bundle of repressed emotions, most specifically concerning not feeling loved by his father and concerning the opposite sex (huoh). He is attracted to females as a collective but does not know how to handle blatant female sexuality, especially if it is directed his way. A month earlier Karin was released from a mental institution (huoh). Her doctor has told Martin that the likelihood that she will fully recover from her illness is low, her ultimate fate being that her mental state will disintegrate totally, although she has functioned well since her release. In his love for her, Martin has vowed to himself to see her through whatever she faces. As Karin begins to lose grip on reality, Minus is the one most directly affected, although it does bring out the issues all the men are facing with regard to their interrelationships.
    ellauri203.html on line 652: In a small family island, Karin, her teenage brother Minus and her husband Martin welcome her father David, who is a writer permanently absent traveling around the world. Karin has just left a mental institution and has inherited the incurable insanity from her mother. Minus feels lost and alone, estranged by his selfish and cold father that left Karin and he (sic) behind after the death of his wife. Martin is neglected by Karin and has no sex life with her anymore and spends his time taking care of his wife. When Karin finds the journal of her father hidden in a drawer in his desk, she reads that her degenerative disease is incurable and triggers a breakdown.
    ellauri203.html on line 656: Karin is trying to readjust to life with her family after her release from a mental institution. Her husband Martin is patient with her as she experiences the highs and lows of life. Both she and her younger brother Minus have issues with their father David, who is visiting. Martin is a well-known author who travels frequently and is estranged from his children. He´s about to publish his latest effort and spends much of his time alone, finalizing the manuscript before submitting it t the publishers. After having sex with Minus she realizes she is unable to live in two worlds and must choose between institutionalization and home life.
    ellauri203.html on line 660: On an island, Karin, a recently released mentally sick young woman, is spending her vacation with her husband Martin, a doctor, her father David, a writer just back from Switzerland, and her younger brother Fredrick (Minus). Karin is suffering from hallucinations and hysteria. She thinks she is kroppsvisited by God - muze olikin vaan kiimainen Miisu, siis Miinus. Huoh.
    ellauri207.html on line 143: David Duchovny 2x
    ellauri207.html on line 182: Catherine Zeta-Jones was born on 25 September 1969 in Swansea, Wales, to David Jones, the owner of a sweet factory, and his wife Patricia (née Fair), a seamstress. Her father is Welsh and her mother is of Irish Catholic descent. She was named after her grandmother, Zeta Jones (whose name was derived from the name of a ship that her great-grandfather once sailed on), because 'Just Jones' would not cut the cheese in showbiz. Zeta-Jones was raised in the suburban area of Mumbles.Her struggle with depression and bipolar II disorder has been well documented by the media, for she is married to sex addicted actor Michael Douglas, son of Kirk, whose name used to be Issur Danielovitch Demsky. Michael is 25 years her senior but a wizard with cunnilingus.
    ellauri210.html on line 471:

    Jakob van Hoddis, Davidin tähti


    ellauri210.html on line 473: Hans Davidsohn (Kunstlername Jakob van Hoddis; * 16. Mai 1887 in Berlin; † 1942 in Sobibór, Generalgouvernement) war ein deutscher Dichter des literarischen Expressionismus. Er ist besonders bekannt für das Gedicht Weltende.
    ellauri210.html on line 489: Hans Davidsohn war der Sohn des jüdischen Sanitätsrats Hermann Davidsohn und dessen Ehefrau Doris geb. Kempner. Er wurde am Grüner Weg 69 (heute Singerstraße in Berlin-Friedrichshain) geboren. Sein Zwillingsbruder starb während der Geburt. Er war der älteste Sohn und wuchs mit seinen Geschwistern Marie, Anna, Ludwig und Ernst auf. Die Lyrikerin Friederike Kempner war seine Großtante.
    ellauri210.html on line 495: Als sein Vater 1909 starb, legte er sich das Pseudonym Jakob van Hoddis zu, wobei van Hoddis ein Anagramm seines Nachnamens Davidsohn ist. Von Freunden wurde er oft „Hans den Hoddissohn“ oder „Hoddiskop“ verspottet.
    ellauri210.html on line 1173: Three days before his death, he said calmly to a friend: "I am allergic to this planet". He wrote his final book in 1959 and upon completion, he asked his wife to send the manuscript to Breton. When she returned from the post office, she found him dead; he had hanged himself on the main beam of his studio. Another exit in the style of David Foster Wallace. Did he give a damn to how his wife might have taken it? Well maybe she was relieved. Asta is allergic to Miryam's kitty Chico but bears it, taking antihistamines. When she has had a bad day, she curls up in her room with Kitty in her lap.
    ellauri213.html on line 311: The Sun ceased publishing topless Page 3 images in its Republic of Ireland edition in 2013, in its UK editions in 2015, and on its Page3.com website in 2017. The Daily Star also ceased publishing images of topless glamour models in 2019. However, these decisions were not necessarily a direct result of the No More Page 3 campaign. The then official photographer for Page 3, Alison Webster, also criticised the campaign, saying "people should be able to make their own choices". Prime Minister David Cameron replied, "I think on this one I think it is probably better to leave it to the consumer."
    ellauri214.html on line 263: P.P.S. Joku David Crane muikeilee rasvasta kiiltävä rapuliina kaulassa: aion syyttää Putinia sotarikoxesta. Tosin niihin on syyllistyneet vähävenäläisetkin mutta niitä ei lasketa. Olen kaatanut 1 presidentin, voin tehdä sen toistekin. Kyseessä oli Liberian presidentti, musta mies jolla oli joxeenkin pienet liperit. In 2017, Crane founded the Global Accountability Network to investigate international crimes in Syria, Yemen, Venezuela, and China. In 2022, his organization published a white paper titled "Russian War Crimes Against Ukraine: The Breach of International Humanitarian Law By The Russian Federation". Mustaa valkoisella. Heppu oli US Armyn rullissa 20v uran alussa. Ezellasta.
    ellauri217.html on line 262: Trustee Kadri-Helena onkin varmaan se ketku jutku Ben Gurion tms joka sai atomipommin teko-ohjeen heimoveljiltä jenkeistä. Israel's first Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion was "nearly obsessed" with obtaining nuclear weapons to prevent the Holocaust from reoccurring. He stated, "What Einstein, Oppenheimer, and Teller, the three of them are Jews, made for the United States, could also be done by scientists in Israel, for their own people". Deborah Brand 3 Aug 2022 0 2:04 Israeli Prime Minister Yair Lapid said this week Israel has "other capabilities" against threats from Iran, in a rare allusion to the country's widely reported nuclear stockpile.
    ellauri219.html on line 114:
  • David Livingstone (missionary/explorer)
    ellauri219.html on line 324: From Bob Dylan (No.15) to David Bowie, Tom Waits to Steely Dan, Beat Generation author Burroughs has influenced many a songwriter over the decades. Less known is that, according to Burroughs himself, he witnessed Paul McCartney (No.64) working on “Eleanor Rigby.” As quoted in A Report From The Bunker, a collection of conversations with author Victor Bockris, Burroughs recalled McCartney putting him up in The Beatles’ flat on 34 Montagu Square: “I saw the song taking shape. Once again, not knowing much about music, I could see that he knew what he was doing.”
    ellauri219.html on line 411:
    44: Dr. David Livingstone

    ellauri219.html on line 744: The yoga scholar David Gordon White writes that yoga teacher training often includes "mandatory instruction" in the Yoga Sutra. White calls this "curious to say the least", since the text is in his view essentially irrelevant to "yoga as it is taught and practiced today", commenting that the Yoga Sutra is "nearly devoid of discussion of indecent postures, dick stretching, and heavy breathing".
    ellauri220.html on line 445: In the Bible, Adlai was a minor character, the father of one of King David's herdsmen. Adlai is a contracted form of the Hebrew name Adaliah.
    ellauri221.html on line 73: The club’s name derives from its head waiter, Edward Poodle. Poodles quickly built up a prestigious reputation among London’s powerful and wealthy classes, and its membership reflected this, numbering numerous politicians and members of the British aristocracy. Members have included former British Prime Minister Winston Churchill, John Perfumo (a politician who resigned after the notorious Perfumo affair scandal, whereby he was revealed as having an affair with 19-year-old model Helen Keller), philosopher David Hume, economist and philosopher Adam Smith, and author Ian Fleming, creator of the world’s most famous fictional spy, James Bond.
    ellauri221.html on line 361: David Bowie kuoli 6 vuotta sitten 2016. Sen jäämistö saatiin äsken vasta siilatuxi. Olisi kannattanut Taavin tehdä kunnollinen kuolinsiivous.
    ellauri222.html on line 97: “In college I behaved as though my career was to be a writer, and that guided me,” Bellow later said. There was also the fact that his principal interest was literature, and, until after the war, Jews were rarely hired by English departments. “You weren’t born to it” is the way the chairman of the department at Northwestern clarified the matter when Bellow inquired about graduate school. Leader thinks that this encounter “produced a lifelong antipathy, mild but real, to English departments.” It’s true that there was antipathy. But Bellow would have been interested in a university career only as a means to support his writing. Fiction was his calling. “He was focused, he was dedicated to becoming what he was, from the beginning,” David Peltz, Bellow’s oldest friend, told Leader. “I mean, he never veered.”
    ellauri222.html on line 900: Pudottuaan parlamentista Clemenceau keskittyi journalismiin ja saavutti aseman arvostettuna ulkopolitiikan asiantuntijana kuten Carl Bildt ja Alex Stubb. Suuren sodan aikana entinen vasuristi käänsi kelkkansa ja muuttui oikislaisexi. Clemenceaun ajama kyyninen valtapolitiikka edusti rauhankonferenssissa vastavoimaa Yhdysvaltain presidentti Woodrow Wilsonin edustamalle pehmyröinnille. Myös Britannian pääministeri David Lloyd George piti Clemenceaun linjaa epäviisaana, koska Saksan liian ankara kohtelu voisi nostattaa siellä naziliikehdintää. Clemenceau "hyväksyi kompromissina" Saarinmaan erottamisen Saksasta 15 vuodeksi, Reininmaan miehityksen 15 vuodeksi ja sen pysyvän demilitarisoinnin sekä suurten sotakorvausten määräämisen Saksan maksettaviksi, mutta hän piti Versailles’n rauhansopimuksen lopullista sisältöä sittenkin liian pehmeänä Saksalle. Ihan vittuiluxi hän vaati, että Saksan valtuuskunnan oli allekirjoitettava sopimus samassa Versailles’n palatsin peilisalissa, jossa Saksan keisarikunta oli julistettu perustetuksi vuonna 1871. Anarkisti Émile Cottin yritti salamurhata Clemenceaun ampumalla rauhankonferenssin aikana 19. helmikuuta 1919. Harmi ettei osunut. Carramba! Viele vehen vasemmalle!
    ellauri226.html on line 122: There was a David Herbert Lawrence plaque on the street. Inside the tiny station were two more. It seemed a lot of plaques for a guy who spent one night there. “Blessed is he that expecteth nothing,” he wrote of Sorgono, “for he shall not be disappointed.” More Niente. “A dreary hole!” Lawrence muttered. “A cold, hopeless, lifeless, Saturday afternoon-weary village.” The food was bad. The bedsheets were stained. People cheerfully relieved themselves on the street. What limp parsnips too! “Why are you so indignant?” the Q.B. asked. “It’s all life.”
    ellauri238.html on line 860: Layle Silbert Yehuda Amichai (1924-2000) is recognized as one of Israel´s finest poets. His poems, written in Hebrew, have been translated into 40 languages (2 more than Herbert), and entire volumes of his work have been published in English, French, German, Swedish, Spanish, and Catalan. “Yehuda Amichai, it has been remarked with some justice,” according to translator Robert Alter, “is the most widely translated Hebrew poet since King David.” But boy, has he a long way to go to beat Dave.
    ellauri240.html on line 105: Bullshit artist David B. Miller designed Krueger's disfigured face based on photographs of burn victims obtained from the UCLA Medical Center. The film was inspired by several newspaper articles printed in the Los Angeles Times in the 1970s about Hmong refugees, who, after fleeing to the United States because of U.S. war and genocide in Laos, Cambodia, and Vietnam, suffered disturbing nightmares and refused to sleep. Some of the men died in their sleep soon after. Medical authorities called the phenomenon Asian Death Syndrome.
    ellauri243.html on line 124: Dale Brown oli Amerikan paras militaristikynäilijä 2010-luvulla. Hauska nähdä vaihteexi miten pahisten kantapeikkojen juoni onnistuu without a glitch, ja tyhmät CIA ja FBI äijät niitetään lakoon kuin timoteit. We serve the true republic, not the false democracy. When were the good and brave ever in the majority, asks Henry David Thoreau. Never, answers Frans de Waal, for the majority is just apes like us.
    ellauri243.html on line 239: lukien Justin Timberlake, Eric Dane ja David Arquette. Mutta vain yksi
    ellauri243.html on line 243: celebs including Justin Timberlake, Eric Dane and David Arquette. But only
    ellauri243.html on line 249: years, David Bugliari. Wolf married The Real World: New Orleans alum Kelley
    ellauri243.html on line 600:
    Military Wiki David J. Mahoney Quote

    ellauri243.html on line 606: NEW YORK, NY - MARCH 8: David J. Mahoney and his wife, Hildegarde "Hillie" Merrill Mahoney, are photographed at 'Night of 100 Stars' event March 8, 1982 in New York City. Mr. Mahoney is the chairman of the Norton Simon conglomerate which includes Hunt´s ketchup, Max Factor´s cosmetics, and Johnnie Walker´s Scotch.
    ellauri243.html on line 610: David Joseph Mahoney Jr. (May 17, 1923 – May 1, 2000) was an American business leader, philanthropist and author. He joined a passionate community of people who love what you love.
    ellauri243.html on line 611: His father, David Mahoney Sr., was an Irish immigrant construction crane operator in Bronx. Mahoney´s mother, Loretta Cahill, was a telephone operator with New York Bell.
    ellauri243.html on line 613: In 1951 he went into business forming an advertising agency, David J. Mahoney, Inc. The company managed advertising for eight companies, including Exzema, White Rock and Good Humor. Mahoney sold his agency in 1956 and became President of Good Humor, and became President of Canada Dry in 1966.
    ellauri243.html on line 667: Pahrumpassa asui joku libertariaani joka on onnexi jo kuollut keuhkoemboliaan.

    Libertarian Party (LP) on poliittinen puolue Yhdysvalloissa, aika lailla Liike Nytin tapainen, joka edistää kansalaisvapauksia, interventiokyvyttömyyttä, laissez-faire -kapitalismia sekä hallituksen koon ja laajuuden rajoittamista. Puolue syntyi elokuussa 1971 tapaamisissa David F. Nolanin kotona Westminsterissä, Coloradossa, ja se perustettiin virallisesti 11. joulukuuta 1971 Colorado Springsissä, Coloradossa. Juhlien järjestäjät saivat inspiraatiota itävaltalaisen koulukunnan töistä ja ideoista, varsinkin ekonomisti Murray Rothbard. Rothbard väitti, että kaikki "yritysvaltion monopolijärjestelmän" tarjoamat palvelut voitaisiin tarjota tehokkaammin yksityisen sektorin toimesta ja kirjoitti, että valtio on "ryöstöorganisaatio, joka on systematisoitu ja kirjattu laajalle". Hänen suojelijansa Hans Herman Hopen mukaan ilman Rotberttiä ei olisi sanottavaa anarkokapitalistiliikettä. Hans-Hermann Hoppe ( / ˈh ɒ p ə / ; saksaksi: [ˈhɔpə] ; syntynyt 2. syyskuuta 1949) on saksalais-amerikkalainen itävaltalaisen koulukunnan taloustieteilijä , filosofi ja poliittinen teoreetikko. Hän on taloustieteen emeritusprofessori Nevadan yliopistossa Pahrumpassa (UNLV), Ludwig von Mises Instituten vanhustutkija sekä Property and Freedom Societyn perustaja ja puheenjohtaja. Hoppe on Kristina tädin ikätoveri. Hoppe on väkevästi antidemokraattinen. Sen kaveri Lew Rockwell on vahvasti Ukrainan sodan vastainen.
    ellauri244.html on line 60: Dan Steinbokin panokohtauxet ovat jopa poikkeuksellisenkin etovia. Voi elävästi kuvitella Danin ähkivän tuppikulleineen jonkun naisen sisällä kuin luttaperse herra Markkula. Tiheä ja armoton jännäri koovee terrorismista. Siinä välissä takaumia Danin nuoruusmuistoista Helsingin juutalaisessa koulussa. Tollanen mielenmaisema syntyy Danin perhe- ja heimotaustalla. Jehovan porukoissa ei juuri pyydetä eikä anneta armoa. Ei muuta kun vaan verikostoa 3.-4. polveen. Näillä harjoilla peräreikäpetterit David ja Joonatan taistelivat palestiinalaisia vastaan. Davidilla oli tää pulloharja ja Joonatan käytti hammasväliharjaa.
    ellauri246.html on line 234:       No Psalms of David now the silence break, Taavetin virret ei sieltä kajahda,
    ellauri246.html on line 366: David Leanin ohjaama elokuva Tohtori Živago valmistui 1965. Sen käsikirjoituksen laati Pasternakin romaanin pohjalta Robert Bolt. Robert Frost jäi nuolemaan näppejään. Samaan aikaan Joseph alkaa opiskella englantia ja puolaa itsenäisesti.
    ellauri247.html on line 199: Charles Dickens's David Copperfield mentions that his young protagonist counted Smollett's works among his favourites as a child.
    ellauri247.html on line 337: With the widow's money, Johnson opened Edial Hall School as a private academy at Edial, near Lichfield. He had only three pupils: Lawrence Offley, George Garrick, and the 18-year-old David Garrick, who later became one of the most famous actors of his day. The venture was unsuccessful and cost Tetty a substantial portion of her fortune. Instead of trying to keep the failing school going, Johnson began to write his first major work, the historical tragedy Irene. Biographer Robert DeMaria believed that Tourette syndrome likely made public occupations like schoolmaster or tutor almost impossible for Johnson. This may have led Johnson to "the invisible occupation of authorship".
    ellauri254.html on line 76: Vinzenz: David Ferdinand Koreff.
    ellauri254.html on line 651: Lev Davidovitš Trotski (ven. Лев Давидович Троцкий; alkuaan ven. Лев Давидович Бронштейн, Lev Davidovitš Bronštein, 7. marraskuuta (J: 26. lokakuuta) 1879 Janovka, Hersonin kuvernementti, Venäjän keisarikunta – 21. elokuuta 1940 Coyoacán, México, Meksiko) oli merkittävä bolševikkivallankumouksellinen ja marxismin teoreetikko. Trotski kuului Neuvostoliiton ja Kominternin perustajiin, ja häntä pidetään puna-armeijan luojana, mutta hän joutui vuonna 1929 maanpakoon hävittyään valtataistelun Josif Stalinin kanssa. NKVD:n agentti Ramón Mercader murhasi Trotskin Meksikossa 1940.
    ellauri254.html on line 653: Lev Bronstein syntyi juutalaiseen perheeseen Etelä-Venäjällä, nykyisessä Ukrainassa 26. lokakuuta (7. marraskuuta uuden luvun mukaan) 1879. Hänen isänsä David Bronstein oli varakas venäjänjuutalainen maanviljelijä. Levin sisko Olga tuli myöhemmin tunnetuksi bolševikkipoliitikkona ja Trotskin kilpailijan Lev Kamenevin vaimona. Perhe ei ollut kovinkaan uskonnollinen. Bronšteinit puhuivat kotonaan venäjää ja ukrainaa, ja Lev itse sujuvasti lisäksi hepreaa, saksaa, englantia, ranskaa ja espanjaa.
    ellauri254.html on line 785: Käsite sosialistinen realismi otettiin käyttöön Neuvostoliiton kirjailijaliiton liittokokouksessa vuonna 1934, jonka jälkeen siitä tuli maan virallinen ja ainoa hyväksytty taidesuuntaus. Sen isänä mainitaan usein kirjailija Maksim Gorki, jonka romaania Äiti (1907, suom. 1944) pidetään sosialistisen realismin perusmuotona. Esikuvina on pidetty myös eräiden 1800-luvun realistien, esimerkiksi peredvižnikien (”Vaeltajat”), Jacques-Louis Davidin ja Ilja Repinin taidetta.
    ellauri256.html on line 342: Majakovski tempautui keskikoululaisena mukaan kumoukselliseen teiniliikkeeseen, jolla oli vahva kannatus hänen kotikaupungissaan Georgiassa. Vuonna 1906 perhe muutti Moskovaan, jossa hänestä tuli taideakatemian oppilas. Vuonna 1908 hän liittyi sosiaalidemokraattiseen puolueeseen. Kumouksellisen toiminnan takia hänet vangittiin kolme kertaa ja hän oli eristyssellissä yhteensä 11 kuukautta. Tuon ajan hän käytti marxilaisuuden opiskeluun ja venäläisen kirjallisuuden lukemiseen. Mitähän sekin siitä tajusi. Vapauduttaan hän tutustui runoilija David Burljukiin, joka johdatti hänet futuristiseen aatteeseen. He muodostivat aluksi niin sanotun kubofuturistisen terroristisolun. He halusivat murskata porvarillisen taiteen vakinntuneet normit ja vihasivat muutoinkin porvaristoa. Silti vain Majakovski oli selvästi sosialismin kannattaja, Burljuk oli salaporvari joka muuttikin sittemmin New Yorkiin.
    ellauri257.html on line 116: Juutalainen Felix Dreizin ja David Guaspari kirjassaan The Russian Soul and the Jew: Essays in Literary Ethnocentrism käsittelevät antisemitismiä ja osoittavat Gogolin kiintymyksen "Venäjän ja Ukrainan kulttuurissa vallitseviin juutalaisvastaisiin ennakkoluuloihin". Léon Poliakovin teoksessa " Antisemitismin historia " kirjoittaja toteaa, että " Taras Bulban "Jankelista" tuli todellakin venäläisen kirjallisuuden arkkityyppinen juutalainen. Gogol maalasi hänet äärimmäisen hyväksikäyttöiseksi, pelkurimaiseksi ja vastenmieliseksi, vaikkakin kykeneväksi olemaan kiitollinen vähästäkin. " Taras Bulbassa on kohtaus jossa juutalaiset heitetään jokeen, kohtaus, jossa Taras Bulba vierailee juutalaisten luona ja pyytää heidän apuaan, sekä kertojan viittaus siihen, että juutalaisia ​​kohdellaan yleisinhimillisesti eli varsin kehnosti.
    ellauri258.html on line 126: Sivumennen sanoen, "dignity" on oikeistolainen ällösana, jota on suomittu jo useassa albumissa, erit. Tsihirunkkuṟallin yhteydessä. Oireellisesti, sitä käyttävät mm. paavi Leo työläisistä, Paavi Leo (sama mies), tarkastaja Gently, Unabomber, Marvin, Derek Parfit, Pete Mencken, käsineiti Peg Atwood, Iisakki Bashevis (Mencken sanoo ettei juutalaisilla ole sitä, Bashevis begs to differ), Pascal, Gud (som taler ud), Olli Saxi, Ransu Silava, mustarastaat, De Löllö, joku jumalinen Dr. Dodd, Mark Twain, joku taidekriitikko (puuttuu Goyan Mantoilta parvekkeella, toisin kuin Maneetin, joilla on sylikoirokin), Ernesto "Che" Hemingway, Alex Stubb Maidan-demonstraatioista, Kv filosofien päivän ohjelma 2021, Tytti Yli-Viikarin kainalossa ollut Hawthornen kirja Scarlet Letter, vihan banaanit eli kunniamurhaajat, Lionel Drivel, Alfred Apple Lolitasta, King David kuuma neitonen hot water bottlena. Mikä on tässä yhteistä? Kermaperseily rupusakin kustannuxella, eräänlaista moraalista charitya.
    ellauri262.html on line 74: Hänen kirjoituksiaan on mainittu merkittävänä kirjallisena vaikutuksena moniin merkittäviin kirjailijoihin, mukaan lukien Lewis Carroll, W. H. Auden, David Lindsay, JM Barrie, Lord Dunsany, Elizabeth Yates, Oswald Chambers, Mark Twain, Hope Mirrlees, Robert E. Howard, [ lainaus tarvitaan ] L. Frank Baum, TH White, Richard Adams, Lloyd Alexander, Hilaire Belloc, GK Chesterton, Robert Hugh Benson, Dorothy Day, Thomas Merton, Fulton Sheen, Flannery O'Connor, Louis Pasteur, Simone Weil, Charles Maurras, Jacques Maritain, George Orwell, Aldous Huxley, Ray Bradbury, C. H. Douglas, C. S. R. Lewis, Walter de la Mare, E. Nesbit, Peter S. Beagle, Elizabeth Goudge, Brian Jacques, MI McAllister, Neil Gaiman ja Madeleine L'Engle . [ tarvitaan lainaus varmistaakseni ]
    ellauri262.html on line 194: In later life, Lewis corresponded with Joy Davidman Gresham, an American writer of Jewish background, a former Communist, and a convert from atheism to Christianity. She was separated from her alcoholic and abusive husband, novelist William L. Gresham, and came to England with her two sons, David and Douglas.
    ellauri262.html on line 196: Lewis continued to raise Gresham's two sons after her death. Douglas Gresham is a Christian like Lewis and his apostate mother, while David Gresham turned to his mother's ancestral faith, becoming Orthodox Jewish in his beliefs. His mother's writings had featured the Jews in an unsympathetic manner, particularly on "shohet" (ritual slaughterer). David informed Lewis that he was going to become a ritual slaughterer to present this type of Jewish religious functionary to the world in a more favourable light. In a 2005 interview, Douglas Gresham acknowledged that he and his brother were not close, although they had corresponded via email.
    ellauri262.html on line 198: David died on 25 December 2014.[66] In 2020, Douglas revealed that his brother had died at a Swiss mental hospital, and that when David was a young man he had been diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia. So there!
    ellauri262.html on line 202: Lewis was a prolific writer, and his circle of literary friends became an informal discussion society known as the "Inklings", including J. R. R. Tolkien, Nevill Coghill, Lord David Cecil, Charles Williams, Owen Barfield, and his brother Warren Lewis.
    ellauri262.html on line 310: The scholar David Craig writes that Shelob is sometimes just called "she", drawing the reader's attention to her gender. Her "hate and depravity" are "strongly sexualised"; Tolkien wrote that "Far and wide her lesser broods, bastards of the miserable mates, her own offspring, that she slew, spread from glen to glen". Craig comments that "her crimes are abominable and include incest, illegitimacy and infanticide, all crimes pertaining to sex".
    ellauri262.html on line 584: Kirjailija David Foster Wallace kehui kirjaa haastatteluissa ja sijoitti sen ensimmäiseksi kymmenen suosikkikirjansa listalle.
    ellauri263.html on line 335: Various Modern Orthodox and Conservative rabbits have proposed amending Nachem, as its wording no longer reflects the existence of a rebuilt Jerusalem under Israeli sovereignty. Chief Rabbit Shlomo Goren, for example, issued a revised wording of the prayer and Rabbit Hayim David HaLevi proposed putting the prayer's verbs relating to the Temple's destruction into the past tense. However, such proposals have not been widely adopted. Following the Six-Day War, the national religious community viewed Israel's territorial conquests with almost messianic overtones. The conquest of geographical areas with immense religious significance, including Jerusalem, the Western Wall, and the Temple Mount, was seen as portentous; however, only the full rebuilding of the Temple would engender enough reason to cease observing the day as one of mourning and transform it into a day of joy instead. The re-occupation of the Gaza strip is surely a source of joy, as well as annihilating philistines of the West Bank.
    ellauri263.html on line 449: Hebron is considered one of the oldest cities in the Levant. According to the Bible, Abraham settled in Hebron and bought the Cave of the Patriarchs as a burial place for his wife Sarah. Biblical tradition holds that the patriarchs Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, along with their wives Sarah, Rebecca, and Leah, were buried in the cave. Hebron is also recognized in the Bible as the place where David was anointed king of Israel. Following the Babylonian captivity, the Edomites settled in Hebron. During the first century BCE, Herod the Great built the wall which still surrounds the Cave of the Patriarchs, which later became a church, and then a mosque. With the exception of a brief Crusader control, successive Muslim dynasties ruled Hebron from the 6th century CE until the Ottoman Empire's dissolution following World War I, when the city became part of British Mandatory Palestine. A massacre in 1929 and the Arab uprising of 1936–39 led to the emigration of the Jewish community from Hebron. The 1948 Arab–Israeli War saw the entire West Bank, including Hebron, occupied and annexed by Jordan, and since the 1967 Six-Day War, the city has been under Israeli military occupation. Following Israeli occupation, Jewish presence was reestablished at the city. Since the 1997 Hebron Protocol, most of Hebron has been governed by the Palestinian National Authority.
    ellauri264.html on line 92: Wolves is a 2014 Canadian action horror film written and directed by David Hayter, and starring Lucas Till, Stephen McHattie, John Pyper-Ferguson, Merritt Patterson and Jason Momoa.
    ellauri264.html on line 182:

    Rabbi David Hertzberg z''l writes:
    ellauri264.html on line 207: Useat kirjoittajat ja aktivistit (mukaan lukien Annie Leonard, Alan Durning, Jonathon Porritt, David Suzuki) ovat haastatelleet artikkelin osia, joita on laajalti lainattu ja kommentoitu, harhaanjohtavalla ja dekontekstualisoidulla tavalla todisteena "suunnitelman" olemassaolosta, jonka liike-elämän ja politiikan maailma on tietoisesti suunnitellut ja toteuttanut toisen maailmansodan jälkeen. Tämän tulkinnan mukaan sotatoimien jättämän valtavan tuotantokapasiteetin ylijäämän edessä nämä komponentit olisivat tietoisesti suunnitelleet ja edistäneet ajatusta raivostuneesta kulutuksesta, joka perustuu kulutustavaroiden nopeaan korvaamiseen. Tollasta vähän vasemmistolaista salaliittoteoriaa.
    ellauri264.html on line 431: The 2012 Hay festival included writers Martin Amis, Jung Chang, Louis de Bernières, Mark Haddon, Mario Vargas Llosa, Hilary Mantel, Ian McEwan, Michael Morpurgo, Ben Okri, Ian Rankin, Salman Rushdie, Owen Sheers, Jeanette Winterson, comedians Bill Bailey, Rob Brydon, Julian Clary, Jack Dee, Tim Minchin, politicians Peter Hain and Boris Johnson, scientists John D. Barrow, Martin Rees, Simon Singh, and general speakers Harry Belafonte, William Dalrymple, Stephen Fry, A. C. Grayling, Germaine Greer, Michael Ignatieff, and David Starkey. What a pile of turds.
    ellauri266.html on line 58: Rutherford (1975), who is half-Guyanese Indian, was born in Ipswich in the East of England and attended Ipswich School. His game is not football like Morris's but cricket. Rutherford was the podcast editor for the journal Nature for a while. He wrote a blog covering his thoughts when reading Charles Darwin's blockbuster On the Origin of Species. Adam is something of a cross between David Attenboro and Uncle Sam.
    ellauri266.html on line 382: Sitten seurasivat Conquest of the Planet of the Apes vuonna 1972 ja Battle for the Planet of the Apes vuonna 1973. Kaksi jälkimmäistä elokuvaa kuvittelivat ensimmäisessä elokuvassa nähdyn planeetan nousun. Televisio-ohjelma seurasi vuonna 1974 ja toinen vuonna 1975, ennen kuin franchising suurelta osin päättyi. Muiden elokuvien jatkoromaaneihin osallistui muita Boullea apinoivia pellekirjailijoita kuten Michael Avallone, Jerry Pournelle, John Jakes ja David Gerrold, varhaisessa laajennetussa universumissa, jossa useat kirjailijat työskentelivät yhteisen projektin ja universumin parissa kuin apinat kirjoituskoneiden ääressä. Boulle pysyi yhteydessä elokuvien tuotantoon neuvotellen eri tarinan elementeistä.
    ellauri266.html on line 543: De Waalin rinnalla palkittiin lähetystoiminnan harjoittaja ja luonnontieteilijä David Attenborough poikkeuksellisella ammattiuralla, mutta Barcelonan eläintieteellisen museon entinen johtaja biologi Roser Nos Ronchera sai vain kunniamaininnan.
    ellauri270.html on line 112: Tarinan ensimmäiset käänteet ovat kirjallisia. Elokuvan ensimmäinen esikuva on sotavankina viruneen John Coastin vankileirin elämää ja pakkotyötä kuvannut kirja Kuoleman rautatie, joka ilmestyi vuonna 1946. Sen pohjalta ranskalainen Pierre Boulle kirjoitti vuonna 1952 ilmestyneen, fiktiivisen romaanin. Viisi vuotta myöhemmin David Lean ohjasi Boullen romaaniin perustuvan menestyselokuvan, joka jäi maailman kollektiiviseen muistiin. Elokuva ei kuitenkaan ole Kwai–jokea nähnytkään. Itse asiassa sen nimistä jokea ei ole olemassakaan.
    ellauri270.html on line 166: Kwai-joen silta on David Leanin ohjaama vuoden 1957 eeppinen sotaelokuva, joka perustuu Pierre Boullen vuoden 1952 romaaniin. Vaikka elokuva käyttää (paizi ei käytä) Burman rautatien rakentamisen historiallista ympäristöä vuosina 1942–1943, Boullen romaanin juoni ja henkilöt sekä käsikirjoitus ovat lähes kokonaan fiktiivisiä. Näyttelijöitä ovat William Holden, Alec Guinness, Cole Porter, Ginger Ale, Jack Hawkins, Sessue Hayakawa ja Jack Nicholson, joka ei kyllä ollut tässä filmissä. Tää raina on tehty Korean sodan aikana, kyseessä on myöhäiskolonialistinen propagandaelokuva.
    ellauri270.html on line 597: Louis David Brandeis (later: Louis Dembitz Brandeis — see below) was born on November 13, 1856, in Louisville, Kentucky, the youngest of four children. He was born to immigrant parents from Bohemia, who raised him in a secular Jewish home. His parents, Adolph Brandeis and Frederika Dembitz, both of whom were Frankist Jews.
    ellauri270.html on line 601: According to biographer Melvin Urolofsky, Brandeis was influenced greatly by his uncle Lewis Naphtali Dembitz. Unlike other members of the extended Brandeis family, Dembitz regularly practiced Judaism and was actively involved in Zionist activities. Brandeis later changed his middle name from David to Dembitz in honor of his uncle, and through his uncle's model of social activism, became an active member of the Zionist movement later in his life.
    ellauri272.html on line 122: Two Boys Kissing by David Levithan
    ellauri272.html on line 414: Critics tracing his creative genealogy are apt to begin with Ralph Waldo Emerson and Henry David Thoreau and work chronologically forward through Walt Whitman, Ezra Pound, Robert Frost, Wallace Stevens, and William Carlos Williams. Of those poets, Harold Bloom felt that the transcendentalists Emerson and Whitman have influenced Ammons the most. Xcept he overdoes the colon. Radical colectomy is indicated.
    ellauri272.html on line 420: Ammons’s concerns with the transcendental everyman coalesce in what may prove to be his finest effort: the National Book Award winner of 1993, Garbage. The title, suggested when Ammons drove by a Florida landfill, is characteristically flippant and yet perfectly serious. “Garbage is a brilliant book,” said David Baker in the Kenyon Review. “It may very well be a great one. ...
    ellauri275.html on line 640:

    Benito Juarez

    137

    Mexico

    		 

    David Ben Gurion

    152

    Israel

    		 

    Mahmoud Ahmadinejad

    157

    Iran

    		 

    Abdelaziz Bouteflika

    159

    Algeria

    		 

    Kim Yong Ill

    160

    Korea (North)

    		 

    Dmitry Medvedev

    163

    Russia

    		 

    Queen Elizabeth II

    163

    UK

    		 

    Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner

    164

    Argentina

    		 

    Nicolas Sarkozy

    165

    France

    		 

    Angela Merkel

    165

    Germany

    		 

    Silvio Berlusconi

    165

    Italy

    		 

    Josef Stalin

    165

    Russia

    		 

    Vladimir Lenin

    165

    Russia

    		 

    Margaret Thatcher

    165

    UK

    		 

    Julia Eileen Gillard

    166

    Australia

    		 

    Napoleon

    168

    France

    		 

    Winston Churchill

    168

    UK

    		 

    Benito Mussolini

    169

    Italy

    		 

    Yasuo Fukuda

    169

    Japan

    		 

    François Hollande

    170

    France

    		 

    Vladimir Putin

    170

    Russia

    		 

    Tarja Halonen

    172

    Finland

    		 

    François Mitterrand

    172

    France

    		 

    Adolf Hitler

    173

    Germany

    		 

    Harold Wilson

    173

    UK

    		 

    Hugo Chávez

    173

    Venezuela

    		 

    Gerhard Schröder

    174

    Germany

    		 

    Viktor Orban

    174

    Hungary

    		 

    ellauri275.html on line 642:

    Gordon Brown

    180

    UK

     

    John Major

    180

    UK

     

    Georges Pompidou

    181

    France

     

    George W. Bush

    182

    USA

     

    Richard Nixon

    182

    USA

     

    Muammar Gaddafi

    183

    Libya

     

    Tony Blair

    183

    UK

     

    Edward Heath

    183

    UK

     

    John F Kennedy

    183

    USA

     

    Gerald Ford

    183

    USA

     

    Bill Clinton

    184

    USA

     

    David Cameron

    185

    UK

     

    Nick Clegg

    185

    UK

     

    Sir Alec Douglas-Home

    185

    UK

     

    James Callaghan

    185

    UK

     

    Barack Obama

    185

    USA

     

    Ronald Reagan

    185

    USA

     

    Boris Yeltsin

    187

    Russia

     

    George Washington

    187

    USA

     

    Stephen Harper

    188

    Canada

     

    Saddam Hussein

    188

    Iraq

     

    George H.W Bush

    188

    USA

     

    Jacques Chirac

    189

    France

     

    Valéry Giscard d’Estaing

    189

    France

     

    Fidel Castro

    190

    Cuba

     

    Helmut Kohl

    193

    Germany

     

    Robert Gascoyne-Cecil

    193

    UK

     

    Abraham Lincoln

    193

    USA

     

    Charles de Gaulle

    196

    France

     
    ellauri276.html on line 89: Tuon aikakauden kronikot, Venäjän yhdistämisen vastustajat, David Bagrationi ja hänen veljensä kirjoittivat vuoden 1811 otsikon alla: "Huhtikuun viidentenä päivänä Chavchavadze Garsevan kuoli Pietarissa, tsaarin petturi ja uskoton. isänmaansa poika." Niinpä he vuodattivat vihansa, vaikka Garsevan vain allekirjoitti pumaskat ja toteutti kuningas Herakleioksen ja Georgian kansan tahdon.
    ellauri277.html on line 188: Gibranista tykkäsivät monet neuvottomat julkkixet. Elvis Presley viittasi, käytti John Lennon, Johnny Cash äänitti, David Bowie mainitsi, uruguaylainen muusikko Armando Tirelli levytti ja sävelsi hepreaksi, ja sai ensi-iltansa Ranskassa nimellä River of Silence. Presleyn jalkanuotti:
    ellauri277.html on line 401:
    Clockwise: Christian cross, Islamic star and crescent, Baháʼí nine-pointed star, and Jewish Star of David

    ellauri282.html on line 97: [3.4. klo 14.40] +358 44 2776451: Koskiko Humen giljotiini sittenkin vain positiivista oikeutta, jossa siitä miten laki on ei saa päätellä miten sen moraalisesti pitäisi olla. Humen sittemmin harrastamaan Englannin hiatorian suhteen akatuksesta on voinut olla tpdellista hyötyä. Oliko David Hume aikansa Teemu Keskisarja?
    ellauri282.html on line 101: [3.4. klo 19.14] Oma Profiili: The famous Allan Ramsay portrait of David Hume, hanging in the University of Edinburgh, depicts him wearing a remarkable hat: a unique salmon-coloured turban. I was able to see the original on the occasion of receiving an honorary degree from Edinburgh in 2007, and ever since then I have desired to obtain a replica of that curious hat for myself (to wear on special occasions, such as those requiring academic regalia).
    ellauri282.html on line 102: If you are interested in a unique David Hume Turban for yourself, you can email the Edinburgh University Philosophy Society, who are offering a special promotion of £120 per hat (excl. Shipping&Handling). This offer will be open until August 1st.
    ellauri282.html on line 334: Thomas Merton, David R. Hawkins, Henri Nouwen, Eckhart Tolle, Jiddu Krishnamurti, Ignatius Loyola, Rajneesh, Deepak Chopra, Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, Bede Griffiths, Janos Arany, Ramesh S Balsekar, Thomas Keating, Richard Rohr, Sri Nisargadatta Maharaj, Nouriel Roubini, Ramana Maharshi, Wayne Dyer, What Hanhi, Khalil Gibran.
    ellauri282.html on line 459: Joulukuun 10. päivänä 1968 Merton oli Punaisen Ristin Sawang Kaniwat -nimisessä retriittilaitoksessa Samut Prakanissa, maakunnassa lähellä Bangkokia, Thaimaassa ja osallistui luostarikonferenssiin. Aamuistunnossa puhuttuaan hänet löydettiin myöhemmin iltapäivällä mökkinsä huoneesta kuolleena, yllään vain shortsit, selällään ja oikosuljettu Hitachin lattiatuuletin makaa hänen vartalonsa poikki. Hänen työtoverinsa Jean Leclercq toteaa: "Todennäköisesti Thomas Mertonin kuolema johtui osittain sydämen vajaatoiminnasta, osittain sähköiskusta." Koska ruumiinavausta ei tehty, ei ollut sopivaa selitystä Mertonin "takapuolessa" olevalle haavalle, "joka oli vuotanut huomattavasti". Saapuessaan Mertonin viereisestä mökistä benediktiiniritarikunnan kädellinen ja konferenssin puheenjohtaja Rembert Weakland voiteli Mertonin. Hänen ruumiinsa lennätettiin takaisin Yhdysvaltoihin Vietnamista palaavalla Yhdysvaltain sotilaslentokoneella. Hänet on haudattu Getsemanin luostariin. Vuonna 2018 Hugh Turley ja David Martin julkaisivat The Martyrdom of Thomas Merton: An Investigationin, jossa kyseenalaisti vahingossa tapahtuvan sähköiskun teorian. Hämärää!
    ellauri283.html on line 319: Vuonna 1504 Fonzien kerrotaan perustaneen Sennarin valtakunnan, johon Abdallah Jammun valtakunta liitettiin. Vuoteen 1523 mennessä, kun juutalainen turisti David Reubeni vieraili Sudanissa, Fonzien osavaltio ulottui jo pohjoiseen Dongolaan asti. Samaan aikaan islamia alkoivat saarnata Niilillä 1400- ja 1500-luvuilla asuneet sufi -pyhät ja David Reubenin vierailulla kuningas Amara Dungheap, aiemmin pakana tai enintään nimellinen kristitty, kirjattiin muslimiksi. Fonziella kuitenkin säilyi epäislamilaiset tavat, kuten jumalallinen kuninkuus tai alkoholin maistuvuus 1700-luvulle asti. Sudanin kansanislam säilytti monia kristillisistä perinteistä peräisin olevia rituaaleja lähimenneisyyteen asti, kuten ristiinnaulizeminen.
    ellauri284.html on line 141: UUSI DELHI – Winston Churchill kutsui vuoden 1919 intialaisten mielenosoittajien joukkomurhaa "hirviömäiseksi". Kuningatar Elisabet sanoi, että se oli "tuskallista". Pääministeri David Cameron suhtautui "syvästi häpeällisesti".
    ellauri284.html on line 437: Libertarian Party ( LP ) on poliittinen puolue Yhdysvalloissa, joka edistää kansalaisvapauksia, interventiokyvyttömyyttä, laissez-faire -kapitalismia sekä hallituksen koon ja laajuuden rajoittamista. Puolue syntyi elokuussa 1971 kokouksissa David F. Nolanin kotona Westminsterissä, Coloradossa, ja se perustettiin virallisesti 11. joulukuuta 1971 Colorado Springsissä, Coloradossa. Juhlien järjestäjät saivat inspiraatiota tunnetun itävaltalaisen koulukunnan teoksista ja ideoista pääpellenä ekonomisti, Murray Rothbard. Tästä kaverista on jo paasattu.
    ellauri284.html on line 749: Herra Tristan, Rouva Kweilen Hatleskog, Rouva Humphrey, rouva Yael Lempert, Sir David Newbigging OBE, Sir Bryan Nicholson GBE,
    ellauri284.html on line 750: herra Mark Seligman, Ilmaveivimarsalkka Sir David Walker KCVO OBE, rouva Xenia Wickett,
    ellauri284.html on line 792: 1800-luvun alussa Waterford Cityä pidettiin haavoittuvaisena, ja Britannian hallitus pystytti kolme Martello-tornia Hookin niemimaalle vahvistamaan nykyistä Duncannonin linnaketta. 1800-luvulla kaupungissa menestyivät suuret teollisuudenalat, kuten lasinvalmistus ja laivanrakennus. Kaupunkia edusti Yhdistyneen kuningaskunnan parlamentissa vuosina 1891–1918 kansanedustaja John Redmond, Irlannin parlamentaarisen puolueen johtaja (tammikuusta 1900). Redmond, silloinen puolueen Parnell-puolueen johtaja, voitti David Sheehyn verisessä taistelussa vuonna 1891. Vuonna 1911 Br. Jerome Foley, Br. Dunstan Drumm ja Br. Leopold Loughran lähti Waterfordista Malverniin, Australiaan. Siellä he perustivat katolisen poikakoulun, joka on edelleen olemassa, uskokaa tai älkää, ellei ole lopettanut. (Ei ole: kz de Salle College, Malvern!
    ellauri285.html on line 159: David Shipler, who is neither an Arab nor a Jew, served as the Jerusalem bureau chief for The New York Times from 1979 to 1984. Shipler sanoo että israelilaisissa nuortenkirjoissa arabi on saanut entisen saxalaisen, kasakan tai ukrainalaisen paikan viholliskuvana. Heprealaisen yliopiston naistenvessan seinässä lukee: Arabit on koiria/kissoja/hiiriä/hevosia/aaseja. Arabit hoilaavat miekkarissa: Me ollaan arabeja ja juutalaiset on meidän koiria.
    ellauri285.html on line 171: Ainakin yksi israelilainen näyttää yrittäneen ehdottaa tätä Shiplerille, mutta turhaan. Kirjailija David Shahar kertoi hänelle, että juutalaiset tekevät kaiken PLO:n propagandan sen hyväksi, koska PLO:n ihmiset eivät ole tarpeeksi älykkäitä tekemään sitä itselleen. Mutta Shipler piti huomautusta toisena esimerkkinä juutalaisesta rasismista.
    ellauri285.html on line 751: Alan David Sokal (/ˈsoʊkəl/; born January 24, 1955) is an American professor of mathematics at University College London and professor emeritus of physics at New York University. He works in statistical mechanics and combinatorics. He is a critic of postmodernism, and caused the Sokal affair in 1996 when his deliberately nonsensical paper was published by Duke University Press´s Social Text. He also co-authored a paper criticizing the critical positivity ratio concept in positive psychology.
    ellauri288.html on line 350: Men in Aida is a homophonic translation of Book One of Homer's Iliad into a farcical bathhouse scenario, perhaps alluding to the homoerotic aspects of ancient Greek culture. It was written in 1983 by the language poet David Melnick, and is an example of poetic postmodernism. In 2015, all three books of the Iliad translated by Melnick were published by independent publishing house Uitgeverij under the title Men in Aïda.
    ellauri290.html on line 83: Vaikka Yishuv-kannattajien keskuudessa vallitsi tietynlainen epäilys, heidän ilmeiset tappionsa johtuivat enemmän heidän odotus- ja katsomispolitiikastaan ​​kuin heikkoudesta. [Sitanteja tarvitaan] David Ben-Gurion järjesti Haganahin uudelleen ja teki asevelvollisuuden pakolliseksi. Jokaisen maan juutalaisen miehen ja naisen oli saatava sotilaskoulutusta. Golda Meirin yhdysvaltalaisilta kannattajilta keräämien varojen ja Stalinin päätöksen tukea sionistista asiaa Palestiinan juutalaiset edustajat pystyivät allekirjoittamaan erittäin tärkeitä asesopimuksia idässä. Muut Haganahin agentit keräsivät varastoja toisesta maailmansodasta, mikä auttoi parantamaan armeijan varusteita ja logistiikkaa. Operaatio Balak salli aseiden ja muiden varusteiden kuljettamisen ensimmäisen kerran maaliskuun loppuun mennessä.
    ellauri290.html on line 87: David Ben-Gurion julisti 14. toukokuuta 1948 Israelin valtion perustetuxi ja vuoden 1948 Palestiinan sota eteni toiseen vaiheeseensa arabivaltioiden armeijoiden väliintulon myötä ja vuoden 1948 arabien ja Israelin välisen sodan alkaessa.
    ellauri290.html on line 866: Sionistijohtajat tapasivat Biltmore-hotellissa New Yorkissa toukokuussa 1942 ja vaativat rajoittamatonta juutalaisten maahanmuuttoa ja juutalaisten liittovaltion perustamista. Satoja tuhansia holokaustista selviytyneitä pidettiin Hävyxiin joutuneiden henkilöiden leireissä (DP Camps), jotka haluavat mennä pakolliseen Palestiinaan (mandaatti-Filisteaan). Britit saivat paljon kansainvälistä painostusta Yhdysvaltain presidentiltä Harry Trumanilta, muuttaakseen maahanmuuttopolitiikkaansa. Huolimatta Britannian riippuvuudesta amerikkalaisesta taloudellisesta avusta, britit kieltäytyivät väittäen, että he joutuivat kokemaan liikaa vastustusta arabien ja juutalaisten taholta jo Palestiinassa ja pelkäsivät, mitä tapahtuisi, jos useampi koukkunokka pääsisi maahan. Kieltäytyminen valkoisen kirjan politiikan poistamisesta suututti ja radikalisoi Yishuvia. Yishuvin miliisiryhmät ryhtyivät sabotoimaan Britannian infrastruktuuria Palestiinassa ja jatkamaan laitonta maahanmuuttoa. Vuonna 1946 britit vastasivat Yishuvin ponnisteluja ja aloitti kaksi viikkoa kestäneen juutalaisten etsinnät, joita epäillään Britannian vastaisista toimista, pidättäen monia Haganahin johtajia. Kun britit etsivät Haganahia, Irgunia ja Lehi hyökkäsivät persepuolelta brittijoukkoja vastaan. Tunnetuin heidän hyökkäyksistään oli King David -hotelliin, joka on Britannian sotilaskomento ja British Criminal Investigation Division. Tämä paikka valittiin, koska muutamaa viikkoa aikaisemmin Haganasta takavarikoitiin ja tuotiin sinne suuri määrä asiakirjoja. Huolimatta Yishuvin varoituksesta ja kehotuksesta evakuoida rakennus, brittiviranomaiset päättivät olla antautumatta paineelle. Yishuv hyökkäsi joka tapauksessa aiheuttaen 91 kuoleman, joista 28 oli brittiläisiä ja 17 Palestiinan juutalaisia. Varsinainan holokausti sekin.
    ellauri294.html on line 535: Los Angeles Timesin Sheila Benson kehui animaatiota, mutta kritisoi tarinaa sen liian turvallisesta esittämisestä. Hän myönsi, että kirjoittajat "suojelivat meitä tärkeiltä asioilta: raivolta, tuskalta, menetykseltä. Näillä valheilla, jotka on tehty omaksi parhaaksemme, ne tietysti rajoittavat myös mahdollista kasvua." David Ansen Newsweekistä totesi: "Aikuiset saattavat värähtää joistakin tahmea-suloisista kappaleista, mutta elokuvaa ei ole tarkoitettu aikuisille."
    ellauri294.html on line 597: The Belstone Fox, vuoden 1973 brittiläinen elokuva, jolla on samanlaiset teemat, ja se perustuu David Rookin vuoden 1970 romaaniin The Ballad of the Belstone Fox.
    ellauri294.html on line 603: Time Out kutsui elokuvaa "järisyttävän kirjaimelliseksi ja mielikuvituksettomaksi versioksi David Rookin romaanista"; Radio Times antoi sille kaksi tähteä viidestä ja kutsui sitä "työläismäiseksi sovitukseksi" ja lisäsi: "Porter ja Rachel Roberts hylkäävät itsensä asianmukaisesti, mutta elokuva tekee lopulta vaikutuksen enemmän villieläinvalokuvastaan kuin dramaattisesta kiinnostuksestaan."
    ellauri294.html on line 607: David Rookin vuoden 1970 romaanilla ja James Hillin vuoden 1973 elokuvalla on kuitenkin yhtäläisyyksiä 3v aikaisemmin julkitulleen Mannix-romaanin kanssa. Molemmissa on punainen kettu. Metsästäjä kasvattaa ketun perheensä surmattuaan. Kettu palaa myöhemmin luontoon ja pakenee metsästäjää ja hänen koiransa ajamalla kiskoja juuri ennen junan lähtöä. Tämä johtaa onnettomuuteen, joka saa metsästäjän jäljittämään kettua kostoa varten. On kuitenkin myös huomattavia eroja. Mannix-romaanissa metsästäjä, joka kasvattaa kettua, on eri mezästäjä kuin metsästäjä, joka vannoo kostoa hänelle. Rook-romaanissa metsästäjä, joka ottaa vastaan ketun, on sama kuin se, joka myöhemmin vannoo kostoa. Myös Rook-romaanissa useita koiria kuolee junaonnettomuudessa, kun taas Mannixin romaanissa vain metsästäjän suosikkikoira kuolee. Toinen merkittävä ero on, että Mannix-romaanissa pääkoiralla, jota metsästäjä käyttää loukkaavan ketun jäljittämiseen, ei ole aiempaa sexisuhdetta kyseiseen ketuun. Rookin romaanissa tämä kettu ja koira ovat lapsuuden ystäviä, mikä on sopusoinnussa Disneyn vuoden 1981 Kettu ja koira -sovituksen kanssa, mutta poikkeaa Mannixin lähdemateriaalista.
    ellauri299.html on line 348: Lokakuussa 1967 David Dellinger Vietnamin sodan lopettamisesta kansallisesta mobilisaatiokomiteasta pyysi Rubinia auttamaan mobilisoimaan ja ohjaamaan marssia Pentagonissa. Mielenosoittajat kokoontuivat Lincoln Memorialille, kun Dellinger ja tohtori Benjamin Spock (vauvatohtori, ei se puikkokorva) pitivät puheita joukolle ihmisiä.
    ellauri299.html on line 584: Vuonna 2003 julkistettiin suunnitelmat romaanin ehdotetusta pienestä näyttösovituksesta ja televisiopilotti kuvattiin. Touchstone Televisionin tuottaman ohjelman pääosissa oli Eddie Cibrian Brockina, KaDee Stricklandina, Mario Van Peeblesina ja Hal Holbrookina. Paris Barclay ohjasi pilotin, jonka käsikirjoittivat Brian Koppelman ja David Levien. Syistä, joita ei koskaan julkistettu, ohjelmalle ei koskaan annettu koko kauden esittelyä. Ihmekös tuo, 2003 oli vahva oikeistoaalto menossa, kun Paha puska paraikaa rynnäköi Irakissa.
    ellauri300.html on line 790: Det är en utbredd uppfattning att ”Ishmael” (araberna) först måste besegras innan ”Davids son” (Moshiach) kan utropas till kung och i samma anda menar man att det först är då som det är möjligt att genomföra den slutgiltiga utrotningen av Amaleks säd ned till sista man, kvinna och barn eftersom man vid denna tid kommer att ”ha full kontroll” och inte längre vara ”beroende av andra nationer”.
    ellauri302.html on line 105: David-Kessler_Jennie-Goldstein_Malvina-Lobel.jpg/440px-David-Kessler_Jennie-Goldstein_Malvina-Lobel.jpg" />
    ellauri302.html on line 106:
    David Kessler (1860 – 1920) was a prominent actor in the first great era of Yiddish theater. As a star Yiddish dramatic performer in New York City, he was the first leading man in Yiddish theater to dispense withincidental kletschmer music. Porukat läpyttivät Kesslerille ja vihelsivät tytöille.
    ellauri302.html on line 548: David Kessler toi näytelmän ensimmäisen kerran New York Cityyn Yhdysvaltoihin vuonna 1907. Yleisö tuli enimmäkseen Kessleriin, ja he buuttivat muuta näyttelijää. New Yorkin tuotanto sai aikaan suuren lehdistösodan paikallisten jiddish-lehtien välillä, jota johti ortodoksinen Tageplatt ja jopa maallisempi Forverts. Ortodoksisissa papereissa viitattiin koston jumalaan"likaiseksi", "moraalittomaksi" ja "syvyttömäksi", kun taas radikaalit lehdet kuvailivat sitä "moraaliksi", "taiteelliseksi" ja "kauniiksi".
    ellauri302.html on line 636: Trozki (Lev Davidovitsh Bronshtein) oli jutku, samoin Kamenev (oik. Rozenfeld) ja Zinovjev (alk. Hirsch Apfelbaum). Sixi Singer mainizee ne nimeltä. Ize asiassa jopa Gitler saattoi olla puolikuivuri, mutta Stalin oli kyllä pelkkä gruusialainen julmuri. Puhasta Amalekin siemennestettä.
    ellauri302.html on line 746: Jag har hört talas om en jiddischsk skådespelare i Moskva som lurade i sina kolleger att han hade en tunna sill. Det var under revolutionen när man inte kunde få en sillbit för vare sig kärlek eller pengar. Så snart folk fick höra att han hade sill började dom ställa sig in hos honom. Till och med ryssarna behandlade honom på ett nytt sätt: Nathan Davidovich, du ska få en huvudroll. Du blir berömd. Jag dör av längtan efter en bit sill. Summan ar kardemumman blev att han måste packa och fly till Kiev när kontrarevolutionärerna började slåss mot bolsjevikerna. Han fastnade i nån by och det var där Makhnos banditer gjorde slut på honom."
    ellauri308.html on line 405: Professori David Begun, Toronton yliopiston paleoantropologi ja tämän tutkimuksen toinen kirjoittaja, lisäsi: "Tämän päivämäärän avulla voimme siirtää ihmis-simpanssin jakautumisen mustasta Aahrikasta Välimeren alueelle."
    ellauri308.html on line 573:
    The depth behind Jewish jokes, Larry David and Jon Stewart

    ellauri308.html on line 575: Vuodesta 2015 lähtien Larry on esiintynyt toistuvasti vieraana lauantaina Night Livessä , jossa hän esiintyy vuosina 2016 ja 2020 Yhdysvaltain presidenttiehdokas Bernie Sandersina , joka on myös hänen kuudes serkkunsa kerran erotettuna. Koomikkokollegat ja komedian sisäpiiriläiset äänestivät hänet kaikkien aikojen 23. suurimmaksi komediatähdeksi, LOL. Lawrence Gene David syntyi 2. heinäkuuta 1947 Sheepshead Bayn alueella Brooklynissa , New Yorkissa . Hänen vanhempansa ovat Rose (syntynyt Regina; os Brandes) ja Mortimer Julius "Morty" David, miesten vaatteiden valmistaja, ja hänellä on vanhempi veli nimeltä Ken. Davidin perhe on juutalainen. Hänen juutalais-amerikkalaisen isänsä perhe muutti Saksasta Yhdysvaltoihin 1800-luvun aikana, kun taas Davidin äiti syntyi puolalais-juutalaiseen perheeseen Ternopilissa, Ukrainassa. Yliopistossa hän huomasi voivansa saada ihmiset nauramaan yksinkertaisesti olemalla oma itsensä. Koska hänen tyttärensä olivat Hannah Montanan faneja, David vieraili tyttäriensä kanssa jaksossa "My Best Friend's Boyfriend". jossa he odottivat pöytää hienossa ravintolassa. Davidin ihmisarvo on jossain 400 ja puolen miljardin taalan välillä.
    ellauri309.html on line 195: kirjailijasta, toinen oli David Mitchell. Roberts liittyi kuoroon, joka
    ellauri309.html on line 640: teologit David Jones ja Russell Woodbridge luonnehtivat oppia huonoksi
    ellauri309.html on line 995: 50-vuotiaan Leslie Howardin kuoleman arvoitus on linjassa hänen persoonallisuutensa arvoituksen kanssa. Hänen haikeat, ahdistuneet kasvonsa ja epämääräinen tapansa viittasivat uneliaisuuteen, mutta alla, kuten David Niven, hänen näyttelijäkollegansa elokuvassa The First Of The Few, totesi, että "siellä oli kiireiset pienet aivot, aina menossa".
    ellauri310.html on line 610: On January 27, Chase entered the home of 38-year-old Evelyn Miroth. He encountered her friend, Danny Meredith, whom he shot with his.22 handgun. He then fatally shot Miroth, her six-year-old son Jason, and her 22-month-old nephew David Ferreira, before mutilating Miroth and engaging in necrophilia and cannibalism with her corpse.
    ellauri311.html on line 345: Sieltä hän ajautui puolivahingossa töihin media-alalle. Ei sentään ajautunut proffaxi kuten David Becker!
    ellauri311.html on line 353: Järvenpää on ollut mukana liike-elämässä eri yhtiöissä. Hänen Scotland Food's Co -niminen ravintolansa ajautui konkurssiin vuonna 2012 ja Harley-Davidson-moottoripyöriä myynyt ja huoltanut H-D Center Oy -niminen yhtiö meni myös konkurssiin vuonna 2012. Vuonna 2015 meni nurin hänen Eatz Restaurant Oy -niminen ravintolayhtiönsä. Vuoden 2016 lokakuussa ulosmitattiin hänen paritalohuoneistonsa Helsingin Laajasalossa.
    ellauri313.html on line 547: Mooseksen varhaiskasvatusta järjestivät hänen isänsä ja paikallinen rabbi David Fränkel, joka sen lisäksi, että opetti hänelle Raamattua ja Talmudia, esitteli hänelle kaima Maimonidesin filosofian. Vuonna 1743 Fränkel sai puhelun Berliiniin, ja muutamaa kuukautta myöhemmin Mooses seurasi häntä. 14-vuotias Mooses "meni Berliiniin Rosenthaler Torin kautta, joka on ainoa portti kaupunginmuurissa, jonka läpi juutalaiset (ja muu karja) pääsivät kulkemaan." Mendelssohn ilmoittautui Frankelin vaativaan seminaariin, jossa ohjelma koostui varhaiskeskiaikaisten tekstien loputtomista toistoista, niiden tulkinnoista, Talmudin lain tarkennuksista ja runsaista kommenteista, joita on kertynyt vuosisatojen aikana."
    ellauri317.html on line 199: Curzon oli mennyt naimisiin vuonna 1895 yhdysvaltalaisen miljonäärin tyttären kanssa ja saanut kolme tytärtä. Vaimo menehtyi perheen palattua Englantiin 1905. Curzon suri vaimoaan syvästi mutta sijoitti perintörahojaan linnoihin ja taide-esineisiin. Vuonna 1916 hän meni naimisiin varakkaan argentiinalaisen tilanomistajan lesken kanssa. Englantiin palattuaan Curzon johti naisten äänioikeutta vastustavaa kampanjaa ylähuoneessa. Vuonna 1916 David Lloyd George kutsui hänet sodanajan hallitukseensa. Sen jälkeen Curzon oli maansa ulkoministeri 1919–1924.
    ellauri328.html on line 387: Syyskuussa 2013 eräs ostaja kertoi saaneensa myymälän työntekijän Marlborossa, New Jerseyssä, että Hobby Lobby ei kuljettanut juutalaisten juhlapyhiä juhlistavia tuotteita, koska kauppa ei "palvonut teitä ihmisiä". David Greenback esitti virallisen anteeksipyynnön Anti-Defamation Leaguelle, joka hyväksyi sen julkaistussa lausunnossa. Lisäksi Steve Greenback, David Greenbackin poika, antoi lausunnon, että kaupoissa oli ollut juutalaisia ​​tuotteita aiemmin ja testataan markkinoita tehdäkseen niin tulevaisuudessa. Vuonna 2017 Snopes tarkasteli tätä asiaa uudelleen ja ilmoitti, että väite, jonka mukaan Hobby Lobby ei edelleenkään myynyt juutalaisia ​​lomatuotteita, oli "vanhentunut".
    ellauri328.html on line 478: Tämä uutispläjäys tuli juutalaisjohtoiselta CNN:ltä. CNN:n omistaa Warner Bros (watsup doc? munch munch) jonka CEO on puolalais-ukrainalainen jutku David Zaslav. Lisätietoa seuraavassa:
    ellauri330.html on line 92: Robert Sutton on Stanfordin yliopiston professori, motivaatiomallien, organisaatiorakenteiden ja luovuuden asiantuntija. Yli sadan artikkelin ja kahdeksan kirjan kirjoittaja, mukaan lukien The No Asshole Rule; Outoja ideoita, jotka toimivat; Knowing-Doing Gap ym. Dan Ariely on psykologian ja käyttäytymistalouden professori Duken yliopistossa ja yksi Center for Advanced Hindsightin perustajista. Pylkkäsen erikoisaloja ovat mielenfilosofia, mieli–ruumis-ongelma, kognitiotieteen perusteet, fysiikan filosofia, David Bohmin luonnonfilosofia ja kvanttiteorian perusteet. Hän väitteli vuonna 1992 Bohmin kvanttiteoriatulkinnan merkityksestä mielenfilosofialle ja kognitiotieteelle. Bohm oli täysi huijari ja Paavo siihen hurahtanut huuhaamies. Tämmöstä bergsonilaisuutta: "Neo- Naturalist Approaches to Consciousness. Research topic in the journal Frontiers in Psychology, 2019." Näistäkin on jo paljon paasattu. Sekobolzisesta David Bohmista on alustava paasaus syntymäpäiväalbumissa 52.
    ellauri330.html on line 245: Kognitiivista tutkija David Chalmers loi vuonna 1995 hyvästä syystä termin "kova ongelma" kuvaamaan kysymystä siitä, kuinka aivomme loihtivat tarkalleen subjektiivisen tietoisen kokemuksen. Jotkut filosofit väittävät edelleen, että mieli on luonnostaan erillinen aineesta. Edistyminen aivojen toiminnan ymmärtämisessä heikentää kuitenkin dualismin ajatuksia. Tutkijoiden on oltava sanoissaan varovaisia etteivät rahahanat tyrehdy.
    ellauri331.html on line 616: Russia Insiderin perusti vuonna 2014 Charles Bausman, ulkomaalainen, joka oli asunut Moskovassa lähes 30 vuotta ja joka oli ollut tyytymätön länsimaisen median käsitykseen Venäjän ja Ukrainan kriisistä. Bausman kuvaili verkkosivustoa "kansalaisjournalismiksi" ja totesi, että sillä ei ole yhteyttä Venäjän hallitukseen eikä se ole sen rahoittama. Sen apulaistoimittaja on Riley Waggaman ja sen toiminta- ja henkilöstöjohtaja on David Curry.
    ellauri331.html on line 632: Vladislav Davidzon (ilmiselvä jutku), joka avustaa American Tabloid -lehteä, kuvaili artikkelia "pitkäksi antisemitistiseksi manifestiksi", jossa kirjoitettiin, että artikkeli "sisäsi kattavan litanian ilkeimmistä syytöksistä juutalaisia ​​vastaan, jotka ovat peräisin yli sadan vuoden takaa". Toinen Tabloid- kirjoittaja Yair Rosenberg (yhtä ilmiselvä jutku) sanoi Twitterissä: "Tämä Putinia kannattavan sivuston manifesti on pohjimmiltaan natsijuttu vuonna 2018. Se kuuluu täsmälleen samalla tavalla: 'Meidän on lähdettävä juutalaisten perään tai kohtaamme yhteiskunnallisen onnettomuuden.'." [21] Artikkeli on käännetty useille kielille, ja amerikkalainen valkoinen nationalisti Richard B. Spencer on kuvaillut sitä "suurtapahtumaksi".
    ellauri332.html on line 621: David Ayer sai tehtäväkseen ohjata omituisen anti-sankari-supersankarielokuvan "Suicide Squad" jo vuonna 2016. Ayerin alun perin tarkoittama "sielullinen draama" teurastettiin elokuvastudion toimesta sieluttomaksi yleisöä miellyttäväksi komediaksi. Sen lipputulos oli kehno huolimatta siitä että kriitikot ja Ayer itse panivat elokuvassa. Ayerin onneksi AC/DC-fanit kokoontuivat yhteen ja vaativat Ayerin visiota joukkueesta, mikä johti "uudelleenkäynnistykseen" yllättäen nimeltä "The Suicide Squad" vuonna 2021.
    ellauri332.html on line 650: Jo ennen "The Phantom Menace" -jakson julkaisua Jar Jar tuli melko vakavan median ja yleisön huomion kohteeksi. Näin ollen Brent Staples New York Timesista uskoo, että gungan ”kävelee kuin parittaja. Binks on ylivoimaisesti elokuvan tyhmin hahmo", ja hänen yksinkertainen omistautuminen "valkoisille" jedimestareilleen muistutti ihmisiä Hollywoodin loukkaavimmista rodullisista stereotypioista; Slaten David Edelstein kutsui Binksiä " pullisesilmäiseksi, miehen kokoiseksi dinosaurukseksi, joka puhuu Länsi-Intian slangia " ja Eric Harrison Los Angeles Timesista vertasi Binksiä Stepin Fetchitin virheelliseen parodiaan. Harrison panee merkille Pohjois-Amerikan katsojien ennennäkemättömän suuttumuksen tämän hahmon suhteen: erityisesti luotiin verkkosivusto jarjarmustdie.com ("Jar Jar Must Die") , joka kerää fanien ääniä vetoaakseen Lucasfilmiin ja pyytää tappamaan Binks. Vanity Fairin Bruce Handy kirjoitti, että Jar Jarista "on tullut symboli siitä, mitä monet fanit pitävät esiosa-trilogian puutteina: hahmot, joista kukaan ei välitä; huumorintaju, joka on suunnattu yleisön nuorimmille ajatteleville jäsenille; liiallinen riippuvuus tietokonegrafiikasta; ja juonilinjat, jotka käsittelevät monimutkaisia poliittisia juonitteluja , jotka olisivat sopimattomia: I, Claudius tai Kolmannen valtakunnan nousu ja tuho -sovituksissa , mutta sopivat elokuviin, joissa on hahmoja kuten Jar Jar Binks." Kate Phipps The A.V. Clubista totesi, että Binks oli kiusallisesti kirjoitettu elokuvaan, jonka olisi voinut tehdä ilman gungania, joka tarjoaisi koomista helpotusta pääjuonelle, mutta sen sijaan hän "pilaa melkein jokaisen kohtauksen, jossa hän avaa suunsa."
    ellauri332.html on line 736: David%2C_the_King_of_Israel.jpg/731px-King_David%2C_the_King_of_Israel.jpg" />
    ellauri334.html on line 292: David Holland. Follow me:
    ellauri336.html on line 459:
  • David Schoenin veden juominen ja sulkeutuneiden "avoimien" ihmisten tekopyhyys
    ellauri338.html on line 101: Eriävät tutkijat huomauttavat, että sananjalkoja käytetään muualla koko kirjoituksessa ja voisi odottaa löytävän sellaisen myös byt ja dwd:n väliltä, jos tarkoitettu lukema olisi "Daavidin talo". He väittävät, että dwd:n lukeminen nimellä "David" on monimutkaista, koska sana voi tarkoittaa myös "setä" (dōd) (sana, jolla oli muinaisina aikoina melko laajempi merkitys kuin nykyään), "rakas" tai "vedenkeitin " (dūd). Lemche ja Athas ehdottavat, että bytdwd voisi olla paikannimi ja Athas, että se viittaa Jerusalemiin (joten kirjoittaja voisi väittää tappaneensa Jerusalemin kuninkaan pojan pikemminkin kuin kuninkaan poika "Daavidin suvusta"). RG Lehmann ja M. Reichel ehdottavat lauseen tulkitsemista viittaukseksi jumaluuden nimeen tai epiteettiin.
    ellauri338.html on line 107: Francesca Stavrakopoulou toteaa, että vaikka kirjoitus viittaa "Daavidin taloon", se ei todista Daavidin historiallisuudesta eikä 9. vuosisadalla eaa. peräisin olevan juutalaisten valtakunnan olemassaolosta. Tarvitaan lisäselvitystä. Garfunkel väittää, että yhdistettynä Khirbet Qeiyafasta löydettyjen arkeologisten todisteiden kanssa kirjoituksen viittaus "Daavidin huoneen kuninkaaseen" on ensisijainen todiste siitä, että David oli historiallinen henkilö ja keskitetyn rajalle roudatun raudan perustaja.
    ellauri340.html on line 571: David Schurman Wallace. David Schurman Wallace on kirjailija, joka asuu New Yorkissa. Hän on avustava toimittaja The Paris Review -lehdessä. Abolitionistien vuonna 1865 perustama The Nation on pitkään uskonut, että riippumattojournalismilla on kyky saada aikaan demokraattisempi ja oikeudenmukaisempi maailma. Se on täyttä puppua.
    ellauri340.html on line 578: Salman Rushdie has not won the Nobel Prize for Literature, although he has had champions who say that he should win the prize due to his popularity and critical acclaim. The prize is highly competitive, with authors all over the world in mid- and late career stages being eligible. Even those like Salman whose career is practically over. Kolmantena jonossa hiihtää David Schurman WALLACE. Kollaashistakin näkyy että myös hän on kusipää.
    ellauri341.html on line 165: Rudolf Kasztner, der sich seit seiner Einwanderung in Israel Israel Kasztner nannte, wurde am 3. März 1957 vor seiner Wohnung in Tel Aviv angeschossen und erlag am 15. März 1957 seinen Verletzungen. Die drei Attentäter wurden zu einer lebenslangen Strafe verurteilt, jedoch nach drei Jahren auf persönliche Intervention von Premier David Ben-Gurion begnadigt.
    ellauri341.html on line 369: Hänen salamurhaansa edeltäneiden kuukausien aikana Arlosoroffin into auttaa juutalaisten kansallisen kotimaan perustamisessa vahvistui. Tammikuussa 1933 pidetyssä Mapain työneuvoston kokouksessa Arlosoroff törmäsi voimakkaasti David Ben-Gurionin ja muiden tunnettujen Mapai-johtajien kanssa koskien sitä, pitäisikö sionistien työskennellä Ison-Britannian hallituksen infrastruktuurin puitteissa auttaakseen juutalaisten valtiollisuuden saavuttamisessa. Arlosoroff varoitti kollegoitaan, että jos sionistinen liike jatkaa isolaationistista politiikkaa Britannian hallitsevien viranomaisten kanssa, arabien poliittinen vaikutusvalta lisääntyisi Britannian hallinnossa ja aiheuttaisi juutalaisten oikeuksien kärsimistä Eretz Israelissa.
    ellauri341.html on line 371: 8. huhtikuuta 1933 Arlosoroff järjesti historiallisen tapahtuman King David -hotellissa Jerusalemissa Juutalaisviraston puolesta. Lounas, johon osallistuivat Weizmann ja Transjordanin merkittävät arabijohtajat, oli ensimmäinen kerta, kun juutalaiset sionistit ja keskeiset arabit kokoontuivat epäluuloisina yhteen edistämään yhteistyötä näiden kahden ryhmän välillä. Arlosoroff toivoi, että rakentamalla sopimus Transjordanin arabiheikin kanssa poliittisia suhteita pakollisen Palestiinan arabijohtajien kanssa voitaisiin parantaa. Kaikki eivät kuitenkaan olleet tyytyväisiä Arlosoroffin visioon juutalaisten ja arabien yhteistyöstä, eivätkä vaippapäiden mahdollisesta kaxoisnelistyxestä tulevaisuudessa Eretz Israelissa. Lounaan jälkeen arabiradikaalit nuhtelivat avoimesti kokoukseen osallistuneita maltillisia arabeja. Tietyt arabijohtajat pakollisessa Palestiinassa etääntyivät täysin Transjordanian arabivaltuuskunnasta. Erityinen viha kohdistui Transjordanin emiiri Abdullahiin, joka oli Transjordanin suurten alueiden hallitsija, joka oli ottanut johtavan roolin sovittelupyrkimyksissä. Juutalaisten vastustus King David -hotellikokousta kohtaan tuli myös ilmeiseksi, kun uskonnollisen sionismin suurin puolue Mizrachi vaati, että Arlosoroffin tulisi erota asemastaan Juutalaisvirastossa. Jotkut revisionistisen liikkeen radikaalit menivät vielä pidemmälle ja kyseenalaistivat Arlosoroffin oikeuden olla ylipäänsä elävien kirjoissa.
    ellauri341.html on line 528: David Rindosin ja muiden kehittämä evoluutioteoria näki maatalouden kasvien ja ihmisten evoluutioteoriana. Alkaen luonnonvaraisten kasvien kesyttämisestä tämä johti erikoistumiseen ja sitten apinoiden valikoivaan istutukseen. Maatalouden kehitys osuu samaan aikaan paljon vakaamman ilmaston kanssa holoseenin alusta lähtien.
    ellauri346.html on line 227: David Ehrlich IndieWirestä kutsui elokuvaa "slapstick-neron karnevaaliksi" ja kehui ohjaajaa ja näyttelijöitä, erityisesti Michelle Yeohin esitystä. The Hollywood Reporterin David Rooney kutsui elokuvaa "villisti keksityksi addiktin paratiisiksi, villisti mielikuvituksellisena ja usein hilpeänä." Hän kehui näyttelijöitä ja ääniraitaa, mutta katsoi, että tarinan taustalla olevien teemojen käsittely on ala-arvoista. Tärkeät "Toivo", "yritteliäisyys", "oman elämänsä seppo" ja "rags to riches" teemat sivuutettiin lähes kokonaan. Marya E. Gates kehui Michelle Yeohin suorituskykyä elokuva-arvostelusivustolla "RogerEbert.com" ja kirjoitti: "Michelle Yeoh on tämän elokuvan tärkeä tukipilari, ja hänen roolinsa esittelee hänen erilaisia ​​kykyjään hänen mestarillisista kamppailulajitaidoistaan (loistava komediallinen ajoitus) hänen kykyynsä luodata rikkaiden ihmisten tunteiden äärettömiä syvyyksiä, jotka vaativat usein vain katseen tai reaktion.
    ellauri346.html on line 275: General David Petraeus, former CIA Director and supreme commander of the coalition forces in Iraq and Afghanistan, has expressed disappointment with the West's response to the conflict in Ukraine. He believes that Vladimir Putin might escape accountability for the invasion, and could even win the war, due to the hesitant actions of allies in Kyiv. General David Petraeus, a prominent U.S. Army commander for many years, made significant decision points with Bad Bush in Iraq and Afghanistan. He later led the CIA (from 2011 to 2012), and currently works as a military commentator.
    ellauri346.html on line 307: Titled "Friendship Song," the video in question featured a group of children reportedly singing in a re-recording of an old song originally written by Israeli poet Haim Gouri after the 1948 war that led to the creation of the state of Israel, but with amended lyrics referring to Gaza. David Sheen, an independent filmmaker and writer, translated these new lyrics for The Electronic Intifada into English from Hebrew. Per his translation, the children sang:
    ellauri348.html on line 748: Syklillä oli vähemmän vaikutusta Brittein saarilla. Samuel Johnson piti sitä "toisena todisteena skotlantilaisten salaliitosta kansallisessa valheessa", kun taas irlantilaiset vastustivat Macphersonin omien perinteidensä väärinkäyttöä. Macpherson edisti aineiston skotlantilaista alkuperää, ja irlantilaiset historioitsijat vastustivat häntä kiivaasti, koska he kokivat, että heidän perintöään approprioitiin. David Hume peruutti lopulta Macphersonin alkuperäisen tukensa ja vitsaili, ettei hän voinut hyväksyä runojen väitettyä aitoutta, vaikka "viisikymmentä karvakätistä ylämaalaista" takaisi sen. Samuel Johnson, Touretten syndroomainen englantilainen kirjailija, kriitikko ja elämäkerturi, oli vakuuttunut siitä, että Macpherson oli "vuoripankki , valehtelija ja huijari ja että runot olivat väärennöksiä". Johnson hylkäsi myös runojen laadun. Kun kysyttiin: "Mutta tohtori Johnson, uskotko todella, että kukaan nykyajan mies voisi kirjoittaa sellaista runoutta?" hän vastasi kuuluisasti: "Kyllä. Monet miehet. Monet naiset. Ja monet lapset." Johnsonin sanotaan kutsuneen Ossianin tarinaa "yhtä törkeäksi kusetukseksi kuin koskaan, mikä maailmaa vaivasi". Väitteensä tueksi Johnson kutsui gaelia myös barbaarisen kansan töykeäksi puheeksi ja sanoi, ettei siitä edes ollut yli 100 vuotta vanhoja käsikirjoituksia. Vastauksena todistettiin, että Advocates' Library Edinburghissa sisälsi 500 vuotta vanhoja gaelinkielisiä käsikirjoituksia, jotka ovat vieläkin vanhempia. 1800-luvun alkuun mennessä syklillä oli rajallinen rooli Skotlannin isänmaallisessa retoriikassa.
    ellauri349.html on line 76: Tästä Chalmersin kaverista taitaa ollakin jo paasaus. Termit "kova ongelma" ja "veltto ongelma" loi filosofi David Chalmers vuonna 1994 pitämässään puheessa The Science of Consciousness -konferenssissa, joka pidettiin Tucsonissa, Arizonassa. Sekin näytti tollaselta Eski Saaristyyppiseltä narsistiselta pöljältä (kz. kuvaa em. paasauxessa).
    ellauri349.html on line 444: Vuonna 1994 kapteeni Haddock julkaisi artikkelin otsikolla "Nykyään on filosofian professoreita, mutta ei filosofeja", siinä kapteeni Haddock osoittaa meille, että amerikkalainen filosofi Henry David Thoreau on kirjassaan Walden esimerkki "todellisesta filosofista" joka elää filosofiaansa asumalla yksinkertaisesti luonnollisessa ympäristössä kuten Tintti Bulevardilla ja Ekbergillä.
    ellauri349.html on line 523: Almog valmistui Oxfordista tohtoriksi vuonna 1983, minkä jälkeen hän muutti Yhdysvaltoihin filosofi David Kaplanin kutsumana. Almog oli vuosina 1983–1984 Stanfordin yliopiston ja vuodesta 1984 lähtien Kalifornian yliopiston filosofian professori opettaen matemaattista logiikkaa, metafysiikkaa, kielifilosofiaa ja filosofian historiaa. Hän kyllästyi Yhdysvaltoihin ja amerikkalaiseen filosofiaan. Almog päätyi vuonna 2014 Turun yliopiston filosofian professoriksi tavattuaan Olli Koistisen eräässä konferenssissa. Olli Ilmari Koistinen (s. 11. toukokuuta 1956 Oulu) on suomalainen filosofi ja teoreettisen filosofian emeritusprofessori. Hän toimi vuosina 2002–2022 Turun yliopiston teoreettisen filosofian professorina. Koistinen on tutkinut työssään muun muassa filosofian historiaa ja klassikoita. Hän johti Immanuel Kantin Puhtaan järjen kritiikin suomennostyötä, joka valmistui vuonna 2013. Olli kuuluu luokkaan (n.h.). Almogilla on 2 lasta muttei vaimoa.
    ellauri350.html on line 279: Angelou ymmärsi, että vaikka "Aamun pulssissa" oli paremminkin "julkinen runo" kuin suuri runo, hänen tavoitteensa välittää viesti yhtenäisyydestä saavutettiin. Runoilija David Lehman oli samaa mieltä ja totesi, että vaikka se täytti teatterin ja poliittisen tavoitteensa, runo ei ollut kovin mieleenpainuva. Runoilija Sterling D. Plumpp piti Angeloun esitystä "loistava", mutta "ei ollut niin innostunut ekstistä". Burr totesi, että kaipparien Angeloun runon negatiiviset arvostelut, kuten useimmat hänen muuta runoaan koskevista arvosteluista, johtuivat heidän elitismistä ja kapeista näkemyksistä runoudesta, jotka rajoittuivat kirjoitettuihin muotoihin eikä puhuttuihin, kuten "Pykeellä of Morning", joka oli kirjoitettu lausuttavaxi ääneen ja esitettäväxi mahtipontisesti. Burr vertasi kirjallisuuskriitikkojen vastausta Angeloun runoon Frostin runon kriitikoiden kanssa: "Frostin voimakas lukeminen täydensi runoa siinä mielessä, että se vahvisti sitä, kun taas Angeloun runonsa voimakas lukeminen täydensi sitä siinä mielessä, että hän teki ilmeiseksi sen riittämättömyyden ja puutteet."
    ellauri351.html on line 301: Westfall ja Hilbe vuonna 2007 valittivat, että Talebin kritiikki on "usein perusteetonta ja joskus törkeää". Taleb, kirjoittaa John Kay, "kuvailee kirjailijoita ja ammattilaisia ​​sekopäixi tai tyhmiksi, enimmäkseen tyhmiksi. Hänen kirjoituksensa on täynnä epäolennaisuutta, sivukieltä ja puhekieltä, lukeminen kuin kirjailijan keskustelua eikä tiukasti argumentoitua teesiä. Mutta se on äärimmäisen nautinnollinen – houkutteleva, mutta helppo sukeltaa. Silti hänen raivonsa ja pilkkansa alla piilee vakavia asioita. Nykyään käytössä olevat riskinhallintamallit sulkevat pois juuri ne tapahtumat, joilta ne väittävät suojelevan niitä työllistäviä yrityksiä. Nämä mallit tuovat sisäänsä vi-...-lun teknisen hienostuneisuuden... Kvantitatiiviset psykoanalyytikot ovat tuudittaneet yritysten johtajat ja sääntelyviranomaiset illusoriseen turvallisuuden tunteeseen." Berkeleyn tilastotieteilijä David Freedman sanoi, että tilastotieteilijöiden yritykset kumota Talebin kanta eivät ole olleet vakuuttavia. Kuha vekuttavat housut nilkoissa, mulkut heilahdellen tuulessa.
    ellauri351.html on line 442: Asukkien joukossa oli sairaanhoitaja nimeltä Mary Barnes. Hän oli hyvin häiriintyneessä mielentilassa ja makasi sängyssään virtsansa ja ulosteidensa keskellä. Joesta tuli hänen hoitajansa, joka ruokki häntä, ui hänet ja siivosi hänen sänkynsä ja huoneensa. Hiänen ja hänen oli määrä kirjoittaa yhdessä kirja, joka on tullut tunnetuksi nimeltä Mary Barnes: Two Accounts of a Journey Through Madness. Se on merkittävä tarina heidän suhteestaan ​​ja paljastaa Joen epätavalliset ominaisuudet erinomaisena terapeuttina. Se kertoo myös siitä, kuinka Barnesista tuli taidemaalari, joka ensin siveli ulosteita kankaalle sormillaan ja sitten maalasi ne sinisexi ja punaisexi. Kirja on sovitettu näytelmäksi David Edgarin toimesta, ja sitä on esitetty Lontoossa ja muissa kaupungeissa.
    ellauri351.html on line 610: Creme on kertonut kiinnostuneensa okkultismista luettuaan 14-vuotiaana Alexanda David-Neelin kirjan With Mystics and Magicians in Tibet. Hän on kuulunut myös teosofispohjaiseen ufouskontokuntaan Aetherius Society sekä seurannut tiktokissa etenkin Alice Baileyä. Vuonna 1959 hän sai kertomansa mukaan ensimmäisen telepaattisen viestin Mestarilta, joka kehotti nauhoittamaan viestit kelanauhurilla. Creme alkoi julistaa ilmoitusta vuonna 1975.
    ellauri351.html on line 692: Elinikäinen marxilainen, hänen yhteiskuntapoliittiset vakaumuksensa vaikuttivat tuhoisasti hänen työnsä luonteeseen. Brittikommarit vaati 2. rintaman avaamista johki Pohjois-Ranskaan ryssien hädän helpottamisexi. Ei jaxa, istutaan ja kazotaan eka kuinka iivanalle käy, oli Churchillin ja Rooseveltin näkemys. Soditaan vaan tuolla siirtomaissa ja odotetaan itärintaman lopputulosta. M15:n ponnisteluista huolimatta vuonna 1947 hänestä tuli historian lehtori Birkbeck Collegessa, Lontoon yliopistossa, jossa tuohon aikaan epätavallisella tavalla henkilökunnan tai opiskelijoiden keskuudessa ei ollut taipumusta kommunismin vastaisuuteen. Hobsbawm sanoi, että McCarthyismista oli olemassa heikompi versio. joka otti valtaansa Isossa-Britanniassa ja vaikutti marxilaisiin tutkijoihin: "En saanut ylennystä 10 vuoteen, mutta kukaan ei heittänyt minua ulos". Poliittiset viholliset kielsivät Hobsbawmilta luennoitsijan Cambridgessa, ja koska hän oli myös estetty jonkin aikaa professuurista Birkbeckissä samoista syistä, hän puhui onnesta, kun hän oli saanut viran Birkbeckissä vuonna 1948 ennen kuin kylmä sota alkoi todella lähteä liikkeelle. Konservatiivien kommentaattori David Pryce-Jones on dementoinut tällaisten uraesteiden olemassaolon.
    ellauri352.html on line 161: Antonio Damasio (s. 25. helmikuuta 1944, Lissabon) on portugalilais-amerikkalainen aivotutkija ja neurologi, joka toimi lähes 30 vuotta Iowan yliopiston neurologian laitoksen johtajana ja professorina. Tällä hetkellä hän on David Dornsife neurotieteen professori Etelä-Kalifornian yliopistossa, jossa hän johtaa USC:n Brain and Creativity -Instituuttia. Hän on tutkinut tietoisuutta, tunteita ja aivojen toimintaa. Damasion käsitys aivoista pohjautuu muun muassa hänen aivovaurioihinsa. Damasio sai Yrjö Reenpää -lohtupalkinnon Helsingissä vuonna 2000.
    ellauri352.html on line 287: David Kesslerin kanssa kirjoittamassaan ja postuumisti julkaistussa kirjassa Kübler-Ross laajensi malliaan kattamaan kaikenlaiset henkilökohtaiset menetykset, kuten rakkaan kuoleman, työpaikan tai tulojen menetyksen, vakavan hylkäämisen, parisuhde tai avioero, huumeriippuvuus, vangitseminen, sairauden puhkeaminen tai lapsettomuusdiagnoosi ja pienetkin menetykset, kuten hampaan poisto, kynnen katkeaminen tai vakuutusturvan menetys. Kessler on myös ehdottanut "Merkitystä" surun kuudenneksi vaiheeksi, koska "resignaatio" tuntuu masentavalta. Jotain piristystä tähän kaivattaisiin vielä.
    ellauri352.html on line 313: David Émile Durkheim, (albumi 163) vaikka rabbin poika, oli agnostikko. Rabbi pahastui siitä kovin. Norssissa hänet hyväksyttiin seitsemänneksi filosofian yhdistämisessä vuonna 1882. Nuorena professorina hänet lähetettiin Saksaan, missä hän sai vaikutteita saksalaisten yliopistojen toiminnasta ja modernin valtion roolista kiinnostuneilta yhteiskuntafilosofeilta. Myöhemmin hän opetti filosofiaa mm. San Quentinissä (helmikuu 1884).
    ellauri353.html on line 273: Kun Milton sai vapaudenmitalinsa vuonna 1988, presidentti Ronald Reagan sanoi puheessaan nauraen, että Rose tunnettiin ainoana henkilönä, joka on koskaan saanut kiskotuxi edes lyijykynän hinnan Miltonista. Friedmansilla oli kaksi lasta, Janet ja David. Ei niistä sen enempää. Tässä closed captioningia Miltonien tunnin esitelmän alusta. The harder you work the luckier you get. Ohuthuulinen Jeanne Parrilli Californian Country Clubista pissii hunajaa: how lucky we are to have them on our backs again. Luteet hymyilevät ja pyyhkivät kangassärveteillä verta huulistaan. Vilken tur. Ukrainalaisia maahanmuuttajia lykästi. Banderisteista gangstereixi.
    ellauri359.html on line 51: Siellä lapset asuivat tilavassa, rappeutuneessa talossa nimeltä The Mount, laajalla alueella, ja heidän setänsä David Ingles, joka toimi kuraattorina Cookham Deanin kirkossa ja myöhemmin Cranbournen kirkossa, tutustutti heidät joenvarteen ja veneilyyn. Grahamen elämäkerran kirjoittaja Peter Green uskoo tämän tunnelman, erityisesti Quarry Woodin ja Thames- joen, inspiroineen The Wind in the Willows -elokuvan puitteita. Kuitenkin alle kahden vuoden kuluttua, kun savupiippu romahti jouluna vuonna 1865, Kenneth meni Granny Inglesin kanssa asumaan Fernhill Cottageen Cranbournessa. Hän asui siellä, kunnes meni St Edwards Schooliin, Oxfordiin, ja palasi sinne lomien aikana, kunnes hän lopetti koulun ja meni töihin The Bank of Englandiin.
    ellauri360.html on line 321: David Foster Wallace : Infinite Jest
    ellauri362.html on line 39: Monet kirjailijat ovat saaneet Austenista ketjureaktion, mikä johti useisiin romaaneihin ja muihin mukautuksiin. Elizabeth Astonista tuli yksi Austeniin liittyvän kaunokirjallisuuden tuotteliaimmista kirjoittajista. Hän oli opiskellut kirjailijaxi St Hilda's Collegessa Oxfordissa lordi David Cecilin, Austenin elämäkerran kirjoittajan, johdolla. Aston katsoi, että Austenin romaanit olivat "nykyään yhtä tuoreita kuin silloin, kun ne kirjoitettiin". Tarinaansa laatiessaan Aston päätti olla esittämättä Austenin hahmoja, kuten Mr Darcya. Sen sijaan hänen tarinoissaan on vielä tuoreempia, ize asiassa äskettäin keksittyjä hahmoja, jotka liittyvät Austenin teoksissa nähtyihin henkilöihin, kuten Darcyn, Bingleyn ja Collinsin perheisiin.
    ellauri362.html on line 328: Lainasin kirjastosta David Sedariin päiväkirjan osa I. David Sedaris on vuotta nuorempi kuin Petteri. Suuri osa Sedariin huumorista on näennäisesti omaelämäkerrallista ja itseään halventavaa, ja se koskee usein hänen perhe-elämäänsä, hänen keskiluokan kasvatusta Raleighin esikaupunkialueella Pohjois-Carolinassa, hänen kreikkalaista perintöään, homoseksuaalisuutta, työpaikkoja, koulutusta, huumeiden käyttöä ja pakkomielteistä käyttäytymistä sekä hänen elämäänsä Ranskassa, Lontoossa, New Yorkissa ja South Downsissa Englannissa. Hän on näyttelijätär Amy Sedariin veli ja kirjoitusyhteistyökumppani.
    ellauri362.html on line 332: Heinäkuussa 2011 The Guardianissa julkaistu Sedariin essee "Kanan varpaankynsiä, kukaan?" keräsi jonkin verran kritiikkiä siitä, että se oli epäherkkä Kiinaa ja kiinalaista kulttuuria kohtaan. Vuonna 2014 hän osallistui TV-äänenä "Kuulostanko hintiltä?" David Thorpen dokumenttielokuvaan ajan homomiesten puhemallien stereotypioista. Vuonna 2022 hän pohti suhdettaan äskettäin kuolleeseen isäänsä. Sedariista on aikaisempi paasaus albumissa 268.
    ellauri365.html on line 348: DavidUrosJohti miehiään viisaasti, näytti fäkkiä kuningas Saulille.Myötätunnon ja rehellisyyden tulisi ohjata johtajuuden toimia.
    ellauri365.html on line 491: Hans Alienus är en främling i världen, som stolt banar sin väg hemifrån från faderns stränga styre. Århundradena går och Hans Alienus blir både kejsare i Rom och vikarie för Gud när denne är bortrest men lyckan vill inte infinna sig. Det materiella ger ingen lycka och den njutningsfilosofi han har varit anhängare av visar sig vara tom. En dag återvänder Hans Alienus till föräldrahemmet och kan till slut göra upp med sin förut så stränge fader. Kritikerna var svala men ingen utom Svenska Akademiens Carl David af Wirsén ville påstå att det var dåligt. För förlaget var det dock knappast någon lysande affär; den första upplagan på 2 500 exemplar räckte i 18 år.
    ellauri365.html on line 871: Historien kring Frödings hjärna uppmärksammades 2022 av författaren och serieskaparen David Liljemark. Hjärnan togs om hand efter obduktionen, och Frödings läkare Ernst Olof Hultgren påbörjade en undersökning av den året därpå. Enligt en artikel i Svenska Dagbladet den 27 juli 1943 fanns hjärnan då utställd "på hedersplats" på Karolinska sjukhuset. Under en period (möjligen från 2004) rådde viss osäkerhet kring vilken som var Frödings hjärna, då namnetiketten hade avlägsnats från glasburken; likaså var motsvarande namnetikett borttagen från en glasburk med Gustaf Retzius' hjärna. En patolog, Birgitta Sundelin von Feilitzen, hade dock lagat Frödings hjärna några år tidigare medan namnen ännu fanns kvar på burkarna, då skaldens hjärna hade fallit isär i två delar. I slutet av 2022 redde hon ut osäkerheten, genom att undersöka bägge hjärnorna där hon identifierade Frödings hjärna, som hon hade lagat cirka 20 år tidigare. Adolf Hitlers hjärna kostade bara tiondel av Albert Einsteins, för den var praktiskt taget oanvänd.
    ellauri368.html on line 43: Heprealaisia ​​kirjoituksia on tutkittu harvoin huumoripuolelta. Tämä on totta myös niiden niteiden kohdalla, jotka muodostivat Vanhan testamentin kaanonin. Se ei ole yllättävää, että mitään ei ole yritetty. Nämä rivit ovat ekoja Raamatun jälkeisen heprealaisen kirjallisuuden alalla. Tohtori L Davidson on ottanut huomioon yhden näkökohdan aiheesta ja on tehnyt kattavan tutkimuksen parodioista aiheesta heprealainen kirjallisuus. Ahkerasti ja kirjallisesti Hän on seurannut parodian kehitystä tässä kirjallisuutta sen alkeista talmudisessa kirjallisuudessa ml sen erilaiset seuraukset sen nykyiseen jatkettuun viimeiseen käyttöpäivään. Hän on myös määrittänyt ratkaisun useisiin siihen liittyviä kirjallisiin ongelmiin käyttämällä tähän tarkoitukseen ei vain painettuja teoksia vaan mitä tahansa käsikirjoituslähteitä ollut hänen käytössään. Tähän Hän on lisännyt täydellisen bibliofilian lähtien kirjoitetuista parodioista viime vuosisadalla, joka sisältää myös teoksia, joita ei ole kirjoitettu hepreaksi mutta se liittyy kyllä osaltaan käsiteltyihin asioihin.
    ellauri368.html on line 313: 1800-luvulla valistuneet juutalaiset parodioivat vähän kaikkea, etenkin hässidejä. Kuten David filistealaisten leirissä satiristit heittivät pois vakavan lärvän raskaan panssarin, ja lähti tapaamaan väärää Zaddilqmia parodian rintareppu toisessa kädessä ja pehmeät ohjukset ironiaa toisessa. Ja vaikka taistelu kesti pitkään ja voitto oli aluksi epävarma, se tuntui pian vastapuolen leirissä. Hässidimit sanoivat, että heidän sankarinsa olivat kuolemassa ja että heidän epäjumalansa putosivat maahan. Ahneus, laiskuus ja viekkaus olivat yhteinen keskiaikaiselle munkille sekä nykyaikaiselle Zaddikille.
    ellauri370.html on line 230: Kristityt plagioi förbi ja väärensi monet hyvät juutalaiset ideat: sapatti, pääsiäinen, profeetat, lupauxet ja esivalinta. Tappoivat Jee-suxen ja ottivat syyn vielä päällensä, Kainin merkki ottassa ja Davidin tähti rinnassa.
    ellauri370.html on line 439: Kaikki, mitä Chamberlain piti hyvänä maailmassa, katsottiin arjalaisten ansioksi. Esimerkiksi teoksessa The Foundations Chamberlain selitti melko pitkään, että Jeesus Kristus ei mitenkään voinut olla juutalainen, ja antoi erittäin vahvasti ymmärtää, että Kristus oli arjalainen. David, Jesaja, Hesus och Paulus var alla amoriter, dvs. arier. De var högväxta, blonda och långskalliga. Judar är kortskalliga.
    ellauri372.html on line 314: Leonhard Rost kirjoittaa: "Varhaiskristilliset kanonisten kirjojen luettelot sisälsivät joskus kahdeksantoista psalmia, jotka Salomolle lueteltiin apokryfien joukossa, ja toisinaan ne sisälsivät ne Antilegomena-kirjoihin. 1600-luvulle asti niitä pidettiin kuitenkin kadoneina. Augsburgin kirjastonhoitaja David löysi ne siivotessaan kirjaston ullakolta uudelleen. Hän pani Hoeschelixi, ja ne julkaisi ensimmäisen kerran jesuiitta John Louis de la Cerda vuonna 1626. Nykyään tiedämme kahdeksan kreikkalaista käsikirjoitusta 1100-1500-luvuilta ja kolme syyrialaista käsikirjoitusta, joista yksikään ei ole täysin täydellinen. Kreikankielinen versio on suora käännös; syyrialainen, kuten KG Kuhn on osoittanut, pohjautui kreikkalaiseen versioon, joka puolestaan ​​on peräisin heprealaisesta tekstistä." ( Judaism Outside the Hebrew Canon , s. 118)
    ellauri372.html on line 542: Riimin sanat "swear for" ja "wherefore" ja "ecclesiastic" ja "kepin sijasta" ovat yllättäviä, luonnottomia mutta humoristisia. Lisäksi "-don dwelling" ja "a-colonelling" riimi on jännitetty katkeamiseen saakka, jälleen humoristisen vaikutuksen vuoksi. Mitä vittua, "colonel" ääntyi /kolönel/ 1600-luvulla!? Moukka! “Colonel” came to English from the mid-16th-century French word coronelle, meaning commander of a regiment, or column, of soldiers. By the mid-17th century, the spelling and French pronunciation had changed to colonnel. The English spelling also changed, but the pronunciation was shortened to two syllables for no good reason. By the early 19th century, the current pronunciation and spelling became standard in English. But in the part of Virginia I come from, there is no “r” sound; it’s pronounced kuh-nul. (David Miller, Curator, Armed Forces History, National Museum of American History).
    ellauri374.html on line 81: Viimeaikaiset haut: Janir Pesavento Abeyawardene Skeffers Altan Ranghella Karacheban Haddag Chizue Kohzad. Suosituimmat haut: Brian Evans Suchocki Dragos Davide Vitelaru Martin Ali Hae Mudda. Satunnaiset nimet: Balqees Margretta Boscaneci Beily Herbettaz Schwetzer Missrodowski Bryszkdo.
    ellauri374.html on line 713: Ison-Britannian ulkoministeri David Cameron liittyi poliitikkojen laulukuoroon eri puolilla maailmaa julistaen, että Putinin valeäänestys ei ole sitä, miltä "vapaat ja oikeudenmukaiset" valeäänestyxet "näyttävät". Valkoisen talon kansallisen turvallisuuden tiedottaja toisti lordi Cameronin näkemyksiä "kun Putin on vanginnut poliittisia vastustajia ja estänyt muita asettumasta häntä vastaan".
    xxx/ellauri013.html on line 465: David Hume kerskaili hyveellisen miehen maineella, ikäänkuin kieriskeli omassa paremmuudessaan. USA:n kapinavuonna se kuoli peräsuolen syöpään kunnon anaalipersoonana, ja teki vielä tiivistelmän omasta vaelluxestaan. Hän oli, hän kirjoitti, a man of mild disposition, of command of temper, of an open, social, and cheerful humour, capable of attachment, but little susceptible of enmity, and of great moderation in all my passions. Omakehu haisi pahemmin kuin suoli. Vertaa Bertrandiin, joka somisti myös oman hautakivensä. Hume pikku narsistia pelotti, että paranoidi sveitsari Rousseau nostaisi metakan, mustaisi sen pyhimyxen maineen, kun Hume koitti fumigoida riitapukaria ulos briteistä. Sitähän se yritti, muttei oma maine riittänyt.
    xxx/ellauri027.html on line 370: Insinööri on soveltava fyysikko, soveltava teologi on diakoni, ja soveltava filosofi on izehoitojuontaja. Diakonissalaitoxen voisi annexoida Aalto-yliopistoon ja siirtää Eskin työsielunhoidon sinne. Sieltä se voisi saarnata mukavasta vuoteesta käsin kuin vanha David kuningas Pipsa kuumavesipullona yhtä vanhaxi kuin Aira Samulin. Kokoavasti on sanottava, että Niini kaikesta huolimatta on tästä juhlaporukasta ainoa, jolla on järki jotenkuten tallella. Sen tyyppipiirre on, et se ei koskaan sano mitään ennenkuin on vähän miettinyt. Kröhii vaikka vähän ensin jos on kiire vastata.
    xxx/ellauri056.html on line 214: 🍀 Emmauxesta löytyi pehmeekantinen ja koirankorvainen kappale Charles Dickensin David Copperfieldiä hintaan 0,50e. Seija on lukenut sen ja kerskuu sillä pakottaen muakin lukemaan sen kuin jotain Hädensaa. Well, here goes. Käännän paperiselkäisestä niteen esipuheesta aluxi seuraavaa:
    xxx/ellauri056.html on line 507: Kant havaitsi kohta herättyään, että hän oli epäonnistunut. Hän kiitti David Humea herätyxestä ”dogmaattisesta unesta”. Hume oli empiirinen idealisti, Kant empiiris-rationaalinen. Se istui aidalla.. Humen giljotiini on samanlaista narsistis-humanistista huuhaata.
    xxx/ellauri075.html on line 27:

    David Foster Wallace


    xxx/ellauri075.html on line 33: K: Mitä yhteistä on Björn Borgilla, David Wallacella ja Andy McCoylla (paizi kalsareissa)?

    xxx/ellauri075.html on line 469: “Reading D.T. Max’s bio I continue to find David Foster Wallace the most tedious, overrated, tortured, pretentious writer of my generation,” Ellis tweeted. “David Foster Wallace was so needy, so conservative, so in need of fans – that I find the halo of sentimentality surrounding him embarrassing.” In several more tweets, he continued, “DFW is the best example of a contemporary male writer lusting for a kind of awful greatness that he simply wasn’t able to achieve. A fraud.”
    xxx/ellauri075.html on line 470: "Anyone who finds David Foster Wallace a literary genius has got to be included in the Literary Doucebag-Fools Pantheon [sic]," said Ellis.
    xxx/ellauri075.html on line 544: Kirjailija David Plante on kuvannut ikääntynyttä Jean Rhysiä armottomasti teoksessaan Difficult Women (1983). Entinen kaunotar oli itsekeskeinen, oikukas ja alkoholisoitunut. Jean Rhys kuitenkin jatkoi kirjoittamista kuolemaansa asti. Sitten se lopetti.
    xxx/ellauri081.html on line 319: Today, Maurice Duplessis would be 130 years old. Thank god he´s dead. So is David Foster Wallace. Wish Trump was too.
    xxx/ellauri084.html on line 184: Loppuvizi: Isäpuoli roikkuu kattopiirusta kuin David Foster Wallace. Eise kai sitten ollut se. Vai oliko? Vähän lyhkäsexi jäisi josse oli se. Huumoria on aika hinzusti, tollasta tyhmät paikalliset läppää lähinnä.
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 167:
    “Psychotic Depression” and Suicide in David Foster Wallace's Infinite Jest

    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 169: This essay offers a close analysis of one particular character in David Foster Wallace's Infinite Jest: Kate Gompert, a suicidal marijuana addict afflicted with “psychotic depression.”
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 191: David Quan

    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 206: David Quan
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 208: David Quan, Content Creator, ex Growth Lead @ a fast growing startup
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 363:
    Ryan Davidson, BPh Biotechnology (2000)

    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 476: By David LazarusBusiness Columnist

    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 547: According to one of the most comprehensive studies to date on tax cuts for the rich, this should come as no surprise. A London School of Economics report by David Hope and Julian Limberg examined five decades of tax cuts in 18 wealthy nations and found they consistently benefited the wealthy but had no meaningful effect on unemployment or economic growth.
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 34: David Foster Wallace-vainaan päätön remu on LÄPITTE! 😃
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 719: Poe syntyi Bostonissa. Hänen molemmat vanhempansa olivat kiertäviä näyttelijöitä. Hänellä oli isoveli Henry ja pikkusisko Rosalie. Poen isä David Poe nuorempi hylkäsi perheensä kun Edgar oli kolmen viikon ikäinen, ja Poen äiti Elizabeth Arnold Poe kuoli tuberkuloosiin tämän ollessa kaksivuotias. Poe lähetettiin tupakkakauppias John Allanin perheen hoiviin Richmondiin ja sai välinimekseen Allan. Vuodet 1815–20 hän vietti koulussa Englannissa, jonne perhe oli muuttanut John Allanin liiketoimien vuoksi. Novelli "William Wilson" on saanut vaikutteita tästä ajanjaksosta.
    xxx/ellauri087.html on line 174: Mutta Eskin asiakkaat tulee uudestaan ja uudestaan. Eskin Pafos-seminaari koukuttaa kuin David Foster Wallacen Viihde-moduuli.
    xxx/ellauri087.html on line 197: Viimeisen luennon päätteeksi kaikki hiljentyvät kuuntelemaan Saarisen valitseman kappaleen, Kulkurin ja joutsenen. (Ylpeänä esittää: Lasse Hoikka ja Souvarit.) Ensi kertaa seminaarissa ollut nainen pitää vuolaan kiitospuheen, jossa kertoo jännittäneensä puhumista kovasti. Ihankuin David Foster Wallace. What is water. Oli tuntunut, että hän ei pysty, mutta tässä hän seisoo, kiitos E. Saarisen. Nainen kertaa oppeja ja pohtii niiden vaikutuksia. Sellaisia tulee olemaan.
    xxx/ellauri091.html on line 339: The New Yorker is divided into sections such as News, Culture, Books, BusinessTech, Humor, Cartoons, Magazine, and more. Currently, David Remnick is the Editor.
    xxx/ellauri103.html on line 507: Doonesbury sarjakuvaa ei muista kukaan, varsinkaan sen jälkeen kun Gary Trudeau (ihan aiheesta) 2015 kritisoi Charlie Hebdon piirtäjiä "for punching downward..., attacking a powerless, disenfranchised minority with crude, vulgar drawings closer to graffiti than cartoons", and thereby wandering "into the realm of hate speech" with cartoons of Muhammad. Muiden pöyristyneiden öykkärien joukossa joku paska David Frum "criticized what he called Trudeau's moral theory that holds "the privilege-bearer responsible". Eihän se nyt käy, privilege on privilege, Mariallakin oli sellainen, eikä sitä siltäkään otettu pois. Rääppä humanistiystävineen piti rinnassa "Je suis Charlie" läppyjä. Charlie Chaplin lie ollut kyseessä.
    xxx/ellauri113.html on line 472: Pekka sanoo ettei Jeesus valinnut apostolixi kirjanoppineita. Paizi Paavalin, ton suuren juutalaisen konnamiehen, joka kyllä taisi ihan valita ize izensä. Se oli Pekankin ratkaisu, kun äänestäjät äänestivät jaloillaan. David Berlinski laski että matka virtahevosta behemotixi oli yhtä pitkä kuin kuplafolkkarista U-Bootixi. (VW valmisti sodan aikaan lentokonemoottoreita, muttei U-Booteja.) Mutta Berlinskin matematiikka oli lyhyempi vielä kuin Valtaojan, vajaan vuoden pituinen. Se suuttui varmaan biologeille kun ne heitti sen Columbiasta pihalle.
    xxx/ellauri113.html on line 474: David Berlinski (born 1942) is a apostate Jewish-American author who has written books about mathematics and the history of science as well as other fiction. He is a senior fellow of the Discovery Institute´s Center for Science and Culture, a center dedicated to promulgating the pseudoscience of intelligent design.
    xxx/ellauri113.html on line 476: David Berlinski was born in the United States in 1942 to German-born Jewish refugees who had immigrated to New York City after escaping from France while the Vichy government was collaborating with the Germans. His father was Herman Berlinski, a composer, organist, pianist, musicologist and choir conductor, and his mother was Sina Berlinski (née Goldfein), a pianist, piano teacher and voice coach. Both were born and raised in Leipzig where they studied at the Conservatory, before fleeing to Paris where they were married and undertook further studies. German was David Berlinski´s first spoken language. He earned his PhD in philosophy from Princeton University.
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 183: Kiintymysvanhempien kiintymyslapsista tulee hautovassa kuplassa sietämättömiä narsisteja. Omena ei kauas putoa. Vahva tunneside hoivanantajiin muodostaa pohjan aikuisiän läheisille ihmissuhteille. Kaikki mulle heti nyt, olkaa mulle äiskiä ja iskiä, antakaa ja auttakaa. Hyvä esimerkki oli David Foster Wallace.
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 336: The relationship between Israel and its three neighbors to the East was never good, and they fought with each other frequently. Sometimes God used Israel to discipline them and at other times He used them to discipline Israel. Under King David, Israel conquered and subjugated all of them for a time (2 Samuel 8:1-14).
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 630: Overall, both versions appear to be Aramaic rather than Hebrew because of the verb שבק‎ (šbq) "abandon", which is originally Aramaic. The "pure" Biblical Hebrew counterpart to this word, עזב‎ (‘zb) is seen in the second line of Psalm 22, which the saying appears to quote. Thus, Jesus is not quoting the canonical Hebrew version (ēlī ēlī lāmā ‘azabtānī) attributed in some Jewish interpretations to King David cited as Jesus' ancestor in Matthew's Genealogy of Jesus if the Eli, Eli version of Jesus' outcry is taken; he may be quoting the version given in an Aramaic Targum (surviving Aramaic Targums do use šbq in their translations of the Psalm).
    xxx/ellauri116.html on line 494: Kaltoinkohdeltu lapsi saattaa selviytymiskeinonaan kieltää vanhempien väärinkäytöxet ja tarrata kiinni ihannekuvaan vanhemmista (David Foster Wallace). Poika voi pitää äitiään oikeudenmukaisena ja lempeänä huolimatta huolimatta ihannekuvan ja todellisuuden räikeästäkin ristiriidasta. Äiti oli humoristinen ja kunnianhimoinen nainen, wickedly funny. Tolkuton kehuminenkin lapsen kuullen voi olla kaltoinkohtelua. Äitini oli tunnekylmä, hän loukkaantui kaikesta, vaati lapsilta kehuja ja hallizi marttyyrina koko perhettä.
    xxx/ellauri121.html on line 454: As we get ready for Prayerfest each year, we prepare our hearts by taking a 40-Day Prayer Journey. We invite you to join us during this time of prayer and fasting as you prepare for YOUR miracle. To access your copy of the following free resources from our Lead Pastor, Dr. David Ireland, simply click the button below! Yea, that little one, between your legs!
    xxx/ellauri121.html on line 461:
    Lead Pastor David D. Ireland, Ph.D. Tämäkin mies on PhD vaikka neekeri. Dammit pääsee Peggyltä kuin Jasun kotkalta.

    xxx/ellauri123.html on line 655: Dwayne Douglas Johnson (s. 2. toukokuuta 1972 Hayward, Kalifornia), paremmin tunnettu nimellä The Rock, on yhdysvaltalainen näyttelijä ja showpainija. Johnson laulaa Disney-animaatiossa Vaiana kappaleen "You're Welcome". Johnson on kolmannen sukupolven painija, sillä hänen isänsä ja isoisänsäkin olivat painijoita. Painiuransa aikana ja sen jälkeen hän on esiintynyt monissa elokuvissa, kuten Muumin paalu, Skorpionikuningas, Pako viidakkoon, Walking Tall, Gridiron Gang, Be Cool, Doom, The Game Plan sekä Fast & Furious 5, 6, 7 ja 8. Vuonna 2016 Johnson oli Forbes-lehden mukaan maailman parhaiten palkattu näyttelijä 64,5 miljoonan dollarin vuosituloillaan ja samoin vuonna 2018 89 miljoonan dollarin tuloillaan. Isänsä (Rocky Johnson) puolelta hän on tummaihoinen kanadalainen (engl. Black Canadian) ja äitinsä (Ata Johnson o.s. Maivia) puolelta samoalainen. Sekä isä Rocky että äidin adoptioisä Peter Maivia kuuluvat showpainin WWE Hall of Fame -kunniagalleriaan. Myös isoäiti Lia Malvia toimi lajin parissa johtaen Polynesian Pro Wrestling -promootiota Havaijilla. (Mummu Ruokamo.) Miamin yliopistosta hänellä on tutkinto kriminologiasta. Hävittyään Intercontinental Championship -tittelin Owen Hartille 28. huhtikuuta 1997 ja toivuttuaan loukkaantumisesta Johnson liittyi Nation of Domination talliin loppuvuodesta 1997. Samalla Johnson muutti painihahmoaan. Hyvänä hahmona tunnettu Rocky Maivia oli nyt karismaattinen kiusaaja The Rock, joka puhui itsestään kolmannessa persoonassa. Lopulta maaliskuussa 1998 hän syrjäytti Faarooqin Nation of Domination tallin johtajan asemasta. The Rock ryhtyi samalla myös pilkkaamaan WWF:n televisiojuontajia, erityisesti David Attenboroughia.
    xxx/ellauri125.html on line 348: Biden tuli maanantaina Camp Davidista Valkoiseen taloon välittääkseen yksiselitteisen viestin: Yhdysvaltain joukot lähtevät Afganistanista eivätkä enää palaa sinne. The buck stops here. Tämänkin erän voittivat itixet, kuten Korean ja Vietnamin.
    xxx/ellauri128.html on line 193: Mit dem gleichaltrigen angehenden Mediziner David Veit (1771–1814), der Goethe in Weimar besuchte und ihr seine äußere Erscheinung genau schildern musste, führte die junge Levin eine ausgiebige Korrespondenz, die sich auf Fragen des jüdischen Selbstverständnisses ausdehnte. Ihre Außenseiterrolle als Frau und als Jüdin, die ihr weder eine akademische Bildung noch die intellektuelle Teilhabe am aufgeklärten Diskurs ermöglichte, erlebte sie als bedrückend. Ihrer eigenen Sensibilität sowie ihrem Ungenügen an dem Missverhältnis zwischen Anspruch und Wirklichkeit gab sie wie folgt Ausdruck: „Ich verstell’ mich, artig bin ich, daß man vernünftig sein muß, weiß ich; aber ich bin zu klein das auszuhalten, zu klein; ich will nicht rechnen, daß ich keinen empfindlichern reizbareren Menschen kenne, und der immer in Einer Unannehmlichkeit tausend empfindet, weil er die Karaktere kennt, die sie ihm spielen, und immer denkt und kombinirt, ich bin zu klein, denn nur ein solcher kleiner Körper hält das nicht aus.“
    xxx/ellauri128.html on line 429: Marya Mannes, in full Maria von Heimburg Mannes, (born Nov. 14, 1904, New York, N.Y., U.S.—died Sept. 13, 1990, San Francisco, Calif.), American writer and critic, known for her caustic but insightful observations of American life.. Mannes was the daughter of Clara Damrosch Mannes and David Mannes, both distinguished musicians. She was educated privately and benefited from the cultural ...
    xxx/ellauri129.html on line 310: Tämän paasauxeen tavoite on tutkia lähiluvulla missä määrin finlandiaehdokas Riku Korhonen on narsistinen kakka. Onko se kenties kotoisin poissaolevan isän ja englanninopettajaäidin hännän alta kuten David Foster Wallace, avioerolapsi ja kaappihomo. Vaaleenpunurin romaanin Lari on yhtä jättikokoinen kuin Riku ja Eero yhtä pahatapainen.
    xxx/ellauri129.html on line 426: Olen Pasi Ilmari Jääskeläinen. Minulla on kissa ja kirjoituskone. Kissalla ei voi kirjoittaa, kirjoituskoneella voi. Kissalla voi pöytää pyyhkiä, kirjoituskoneesta en kexi oikeastaan tämän enempää. Tosin teosteni varsinaisena aiheena on dementia. Teosteni tyyliä on arvostellen verrattu mm. Ray Bradburyyn, Haruki Murakamiin ja David Lynchiin. Kirjojani voit tilata esim. sieltä ja täältä. Löydät minut Twitteristä: hups://twitter.com/paziij. Tähän voit jättää mulle viestiä.
    xxx/ellauri129.html on line 817:
  • David_Hume" title="David Hume">David Hume

    • xxx/ellauri129.html on line 890:
  • David_Thoreau" title="Henry David Thoreau">Henry David Thoreau

    • xxx/ellauri130.html on line 674: Kuolen nopeasti ja iloisesti.David Hume, v.s.MKILL!
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 163: King Messiah will arise in the future and will restore the kingship of David to its ancient condition, to its rule as it was at first. And he will rebuild the Temple and gather the exiled of Israel. And in his days all the laws will return as they were in the past. They will offer up sacrifices, and will observe the Sabbatical years and the jubilee years with regard to all the commandments stated in the Torah. And he who does not believe in him, or he who does not await his coming, denies not only the [other] prophets, but also the Torah and Moses our Master. For, behold, the Torah testifies about him [the Messiah], as it is written,
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 167: And these are things which are explicitly stated in the Torah, and they comprise all the things which are said by the prophets. Even in the section “Balaam” it is said and there he prophesied about the two Messiahs: about the first Messiah who was David who saved Israel from the from the hands of its enemies, and about the last Messiah, who will arise from among David’s children and who will save Israel at the End. And there he says:
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 169: I see him but not now ((Num. 24:17), this refers to David; I behold him but not nigh (ibid.) this refers to King Messiah; A star shall step forth out of Jacob (ibid.) this refers to King David; A star shall step forth out of Jacob (ibid.), this refers to David; and a scepter shall rise out of Israel (ibid.) this refers to King Messiah…
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 173: And if there should arise from the House of David a king, who studies the Torah and occupies himself with the commandments as his father David had, according to the written and oral Torah; and if he forces all Israel to follow the Torah and observe its rules; and if he fights the wars of the Lord—then he must be presumed be the Messiah. And if he succeeds in his acts, and rebuilds the Temple in its place, and gathers the exiled of Israel—then he certainly is the Messiah. And he will repair the whole world to serve the Lord together, as it is written, For then will I turn to the peoples a pure language that they may call upon the name of the Lord to serve Him with one consent (Zeph. 3:9)
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 190: Maimonides does a great job in condensing Jewish belief and expectation in the Messiah. The Jewish beliefs and expectations of the Messiah is wide and varied. Through the Talmud, and other writing we see the expectation of two Messiahs. One called Messiah Son of David, and the other Messiah Son of Joseph actually precedes the Messiah son of David and is killed in the battle of Gog and Magog. Messiah Son of David then asks the Lord to resurrect the slain Messiah Son of Joseph. The Babylonian Talmud refers to the relationship between these two Messiah’s.
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 193: 10 And I will pour on the house of David and on the inhabitants of Jerusalem the Spirit of grace and supplication; then they will look on Me whom they pierced. Yes, they will mourn for Him as one mourns for his only son, and grieve for Him as one grieves for a firstborn. Zechariah 12:9-10
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 197: The rabbis have taught; The Holy One, blessed be He, will say to Messiah ben David, may he be revealed soon in our day!; “Ask of Me anything, and I shall give it to you, for it is written, The Lord said unto me, Thou art my son, this day have I begotten thee, ask of Me and I will give the nations for thy inheritance (Psalms 2:7-8)” And when he will see that Messiah ben Joseph will be slain, he will say before Him: “Master of the World! I ask nothing of you except life! God will say to him: “Even before you said, ‘life,’ your father David prophesied about you as it is written, He asked life of Me, Thou gavest it him (Ps. 21:5) Babylonian Talmud Sukkah 52a
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 201: According to Jewish scripture and tradition, at the End of Days the nations of the world come against Jerusalem in the battle of Gog and Magog. Messiah ben Joseph leads the armies of Israel in battle and dies in the process. Both Elijah and Messiah ben Joseph are forerunners to Messiah ben David, who will come after a period of struggle and trying for the descendents of Israel. Messiah ben Joseph is seen as the pierced Messiah of Zechariah 12:10.
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 209: The fifth house [in the heavenly Paradise] is built of onyx and jasper stones, and inlaid stones, and silver and gold, and good pure gold. And around it are rivers of balsam, and before its door flows the River Gihon. And [it has] a canopy of all trees of incense and good scent. And[in it are] beds of gold and silver, and embroidered garments. And there sits Messiah ben David and Elijah and Messiah ben Ephraim. And there is a canopy of incense trees as in the Sanctuary which Moses made in the desert. And all its vessels and pillars are of silver, its covering is gold, its seat is purple. And in it is Messiah ben David who loves Jerusalem. Elijah of blessed memory takes hold of his head, places it in his lap and holds it, and says to him: “Endure the sufferings and the sentence of your Master who makes you suffer because of the sin of Israel.” And thus it is written; He was wounded because of our transgressions, he was crushed because of our iniquities (Isaiah 53:5) until the time when the comes. (“Midrash Konen” BhM 2:29-30)[13]
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 222: Today, the Jews every year commemorate the wait for Elijah at the Passover Seder meal; he is welcomed in every Jewish home with a large goblet of wine placed in the middle of the festive table for him. If he doesn't come, the guests present gobble the wine. According to some traditions there is a 45 day period following the death of Messiah Ben Joseph, before and the appearance of Messiah Ben David, its during this period, Elijah the forerunner of the Messiah makes his appearance.
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 224: Elijah said to Rav Y’huda the brother of Rav Sala the Pious: “The world will exist for no less than eighty-five jubilees [that is, 85*50 = 4250 years], and in the last jubilee the Son of David will come.” He asked him: “In its beginning or at its end?” He answered: “I do not know.” [Rav Y’huda then asked:] “Will it [the last jubilee] be complete or not?” He said to him: “I do not know.” Rav Ashi said; “This is what Elijah told him; ‘Until the last jubilee expect him not; from then on expect him.’” So no hurry, there's another 260 jubilees (1300 years) or thereabouts to go. Babylonian Talmud Sanhedrin 97b[14]
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 226: At that time Michael the great [celestial] prince will rise and blow the shofar three times…and Messiah ben David and Elijah will be revealed. And the two of them will go to Israel who will be [at that time] in the desert of the peoples, and Elijah will say to them; “This is the Messiah.” And he will return their heart [which will be faint] and will strengthen their hand… (T’fillat R. Shim’on ben Yohai, BhM 2:125)[15],[16]
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 244: In the end of day, the armies opposed to Israel will be lead according to Rabbinical tradition by a man named Armilus who is the son of Satan, who the world worships as god and Messiah. He leads the nations against Israel and kills Messiah ben Joseph (Ephraim) and is then killed by Messiah ben David in the end. In one Jewish tradition Armilus is even called the Antichrist. He will persecute Israel, and be victorious over them for a time of testing.
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 248: And when the days of the Messiah arrive, Gog and Magog will come up against the Lord of Israel, because they will hear that Israel is without a king and sits in safety. Instantly they will take with them seventy-one nations and go up to Jerusalem, and they will say; “Pharaoh was a fool to command that the males [of the Israelites] be killed and to let the females live. Balaam was an idiot that he wanted to curse them and did not know that their God had blessed them. Haman was insane in that he wanted to kill them, and he did not know their God can save them. I shall not do as they did, but shall fight against their God first, and thereafter I shall slay them…” And the Holy One, blessed be He, will say to him; “You wicked one! You want to wage war against Me? By your life, I shall wage war against you! Instantly the Holy One, blessed be He will cause hailstones, which are hidden in the firmament, to descend upon him, and will bring upon him a great plague… And after him will arise another king, wicked and insolent, and he will wage war against Israel for three months, and his name is Armilus. And these are his marks; he will be bald, one his eyes will be small, the other big. His right arm will be only as long as a hand…..And he will go up to Jerusalem and will slay Messiah ben Joseph…. And thereafter will come Messiah ben David….And he will kill the wick Armilus…And thereafter the Holy One, blessed be He, will gather all Israel who are dispersed here and there. (Midrash waYosha[19])
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 262: Maimonides in his Thirteen Articles of Faith, states belief in resurrection is an essential part of Judaism. The 12th article is faith in a personal Messiah, and the 13th is the resurrection. According to rabbinical teaching, the resurrection is linked to the coming of the Messiah. When the Son of David comes, the first person resurrected, will be the Son of Joseph, then the rest of Israel.
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 272: The Messiah is the Son of David who will rule on David’s throne for eternity. The city from which Messiah will rule will be Jerusalem according to the Bible and rabbinical tradition. In the time of Messiah, Jerusalem will be transformed into the city of King Messiah.
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 276: 7 Of the increase of His government and peace There will be no end, Upon the throne of David and over His kingdom, To order it and establish it with judgment and justice From that time forward, even forever. The zeal of the Lord of hosts will perform this Isaiah 9:7
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 286: Enraged by these measures, the Jews rebelled in 132, the dominant and irascible figure of Simeon bar Kosba at their head. Reputedly of Davidic descent, he was hailed as the Messiah by the greatest rabbi of the time, Akiva ben Yosef, who also gave him the title Bar Kokhba (“Son of the Star”), a messianic allusion. Bar Kokhba took the title nasi goreng (“prince”) and struck his own coins, with the legend “Year 1 of the liberty of Jerusalem.”
    xxx/ellauri157.html on line 173: Samulin 2. tuotantojaxossa episodissa 8 David toimi erittäin nazimaisesti mittaillen anaalisesti köydellä ketkä moabiittivangeista oli tapettava. Doubtless only the fighting men? Hän löi myös äitin sukulaiset eli moabilaiset ja mittasi heidät köydellä: hän määräsi heidät maahan makaamaan ja mittasi heistä aina kaksi köydenpituutta surmattaviksi ja yhden köydenpituuden jätettäviksi henkiin. Näin moabilaisista tuli Daavidin alamaisia, jotka maksoivat hänelle kenkäveroa. Amazing Bible.
    xxx/ellauri166.html on line 63: The staff with which Jacob crossed the Jordan is identical with that which Judah gave to his daughter-in-law, Tamar (Gen. xxxii. 10, xxxviii. 18). It is likewise the holy rod with which Moses worked (Ex. iv. 20, 21), with which Aaron performed wonders before Pharaoh (Ex. vii. 10), and with which, finally, David slew the giant Goliath (I Sam. xvii. 40). David left it to his descendants, and the Davidic kings used it as a scepter until the destruction of the Temple, when it miraculously disappeared. When the Messiah comes it will be given to him for a scepter in token of his authority over the heathen. (And we don't mean INRI here.)
    xxx/ellauri166.html on line 380: American poet Gustav Davidson listed shekhinah as an entry in his reference work A Dictionary of Angels, Including the Fallen Angels (1967), stating that she is the female incarnation of Metatron.
    xxx/ellauri166.html on line 393: Rashi was an only child born at Troyes, Champagne, in northern France. His mother's brother was Simeon bar Isaac, rabbi of Mainz. Simon was a disciple of Gershom ben Judah, who died that same year. On his father's side, Rashi has been claimed to be a 33rd-generation descendant of Johanan HaSandlar,[citation needed] who was a fourth-generation descendant of Gamaliel, who was reputedly descended from the Davidic line. In his voluminous writings, Rashi himself made no such claim at all. The main early rabbinical source about his ancestry, Responsum No. 29 by Solomon Luria, makes no such claim either.
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 90: Gustav Davidson (Warsaw, Poland, 1895 – New York City, 6 February 1971) was an American poet, writer, and publisher. He was one time secretary of the Poetry Society of America. Gustav Davidson was born on December 25, 1895, in Warsaw, Poland. In the wake of anti-Jewish pogroms in Poland, his family fled to the United States, settling in New York City in 1907. Davidson received bachelor's and master's degrees at Columbia University in 1919 and 1920 respectively. He worked for the Library of Congress between 1938 and 1939 and became executive secretary of the Poetry Society of America from 1949 to 1965 (after which he was elected executive secretary emeritus).
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 95: He also wrote articles on encounters with angels in the parapsychological Tomorrow magazine of medium Eileen J. Garrett and a juvenile book The Guides Make Good in 1925. As the titles of some of his works indicate, much of Davidson´s verse is religious and spiritual in outlook and subject matter. He was also active as a translator and a book designer.
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 99: by Gustav Davidson
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 118: Davidson.jpg" width="50%" />
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 205: Toka PAOLO E FRANCESCA - Film (1971) - Coming Soon - è un film di genere drammatico del 1971, diretto da Gianni Vernuccio, con Luigi Pierdominici e Nico Balducci. perustuu vielä löyhemmin Danten versioon. Durata 97 minuti. Ei siis tulla kovin soon, ei ainakaan niin äkkiä kuin kerskui Donald Davidson.
    xxx/ellauri168.html on line 51: Skinny former footballer David Icke is a also believer. Icke alls uteslutet, tycker han. Madonna and Angelina Jolie are face-lifting lizards. Angelina does have a distinctly reptilian habitus.
    xxx/ellauri168.html on line 96: David Gergen suggested at the time that it was the recession of 1991–1992 which finally killed the new world order adage in the White House.
    xxx/ellauri168.html on line 169: David Icke, entinen jalkapalloilija ja nykyinen salaliittopalloilija toi liskoihmistarinan laajaan tietoon 1990-luvulla. Icken mukaan suurin osa maailman valtiojohtajista on ulkoavaruudesta peräisin olevia liskoihmisiä. Icken väitteet ovat herättäneet mielenkiintoa paitsi niiden eriskummallisuuden vuoksi, myös siksi, että Icke oli jo ennen niiden esittämistä kuuluisa jalkapalloilija ja kommentaattori ja siksi, että hän oli onnistunut sulauttamaan supersalaliittoväitteeseensä valtavan määrän aiempia salaliittoväitteitä muun muassa päivittämällä niissä esiintyneet juutalaiset liskoihmisillä. Kuningatar Elisabet II:n ja kuninkaallisen perheen jäsenten väittäminen liskoihmisiksi varmisti Icken aseman keskeisenä salaliittojulistajana. David Icken tuotannossa siirtymä new age -ajattelusta salaliittoihin ajoittui Salaiset elämät -televisiosarjan tuotannon ja suosion aikoihin ja Icke toisti samoja teemoja.
    xxx/ellauri168.html on line 287: David">David John Chalmers (/ˈtʃælmərz/;
    xxx/ellauri168.html on line 294: David_Chalmers_TASC2008.JPG/220px-David_Chalmers_TASC2008.JPG" />
    xxx/ellauri169.html on line 76: 21. maaliskuuta 2006 Robertson teki 700 Clubissa kirja-arvostelua David Horowitzin yhdysvaltalaisten yliopistojen radikaaliprofessoreita kritisoivasta kirjasta The Professors, ja sanoi kirjassa kritisoitujen professorien olevan vain muutamia "30 000–40 000" vasemmistolaisprofessorista Yhdysvalloissa, joita hän nimitti "rasisteiksi, murhaajiksi, perversseiksi ja Al-Qaidan tukijoiksi". Myöhemmin samassa ohjelmassa hän kuvaili samoja professoreja "umpikommunisteiksi".
    xxx/ellauri173.html on line 925: ”Hänen omatuntonsa, sanotko sinä?… Mutta meillä miekkosilla, tämä Pyhän Hengen lahja, Omatunto, muuttuu ennen kaikkea kyvyksi älylliseen ystävyyteen. Jokainen nuori mies, joka ei muinaisten tasavaltojen päivinä kyennyt 20-vuotiaana saamaan ystäväänsä suoristumaan, julistettiin tunnottomaxi, sanalla sanoen pahamaineiseksi. Historiassa on mainittu tuhat esimerkkiä ihailtavista ystävistä: Damon ja Pythias, Pylades ja Orestes, Akhilleus ja Patroklus, David ja Jonatan, Dupont ja Dupond, Henry Higgins ja Colonel Pickering, Tiku ja Taku, jne. 2-neuvoisia etanoita 2 hengen junissa tuntosarvet ulkona. Nimeä kaksi naisystävää koko ihmiskunnan historian aikana? Ruth ja Naomi. Sappho and her friend. Maria ja Elisabeth. Katri Vala ja Elina Vaara. Elizabeth Bennett ja Charlotte Collins. Jane Austin ja Cassandra. Tove ja Tuutikki. No joo mut silti vittu oikeesti. Mahdoton juttu. Miksi ? ― Koska nainen tunnistaa itsensä liian tajuttomasti lähilontossaan, jolta se ei koskaan tule huijatuksi. Miehet taas kusettaa ja tulee kustux silmään ihan sikana kun ne on niin tolloja - no en viizi jatkaa tästä aiheesta.
    xxx/ellauri178.html on line 76: Mixture of kindness and cruelty. Juutalaista menoa, ihan kuin Jehova. Anna Steiger muka löi ja potki äiskyä nimellä "kike bitch". (Rod Steiger oli goy.) Ritarillinen Roth puuttui asiaan ja kielti käyttämästä sellaista kieltä äidistä. Kike se oli izekin. Sen se ottikin izeensä. Siitä lähtien se ja Anna oli enemyjä kuin David ja filistealaiset. Annasta tuli oopperalaulaja. Roth muutti ulos muttei Lontoosta koska se oli vuokrannut molemmat kämppänsä ja oli muka vieläkin "hopelessly devoted to you". Mutta renting an apt in London would have disastrous tax consequences, advised an American lawyer. Phil oli varsinainen Shylock. I´m not going to be defeated by this kid, se murisi kuin karhu erauspennulle. Annalle tehtiin oma koppi pimeästi Clairen huoneiston nurkkaan (Clairen rahoilla). Säästyihän sekin penni.
    xxx/ellauri178.html on line 124: Mitähän Pili oli näkevinään John Le Carren vakoiluromaanissa A Perfect Spy? Vai pitikö se pikemminkin Davidista izestään? David reportedly enjoyed “playing” on his first wife’s suspicion that he was homosexual. The association between homosexuality and secrecy, furtiveness and potential treachery ensured gay characters were a recurring trope in Cold War-era spy fiction. John Le Carre's The Spy Who Came In From The Cold and Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy include gay subtexts - made even more explicit in the 2011 movie adaptation of the latter. Merry Xmas from the onanist and the whore!
    xxx/ellauri178.html on line 147:
    Like David Susskind

    xxx/ellauri178.html on line 153: The trouble with reviewing The Ghost Writer a few weeks late is that Roth has already explained it for us. He is ever explaining. Like David Susskind, he can’t shut up. The Ghost Writer, he told readers of The New York Times, “is about the surprises that the vocation of writing brings,” just as My Life as a Man “is about the surprises that manhood brings” and The Professor of Desire is “about the surprises that desire brings.”
    xxx/ellauri178.html on line 163: David Howard Susskind (December 19, 1920 – February 22, 1987) was an American TV talk show host. His talk shows addressed timely, controversial topics beyond the scope of others of the day. Amerikan Hannu Karpo.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 327: "Sipping his post-coital fine à l’eau in the afternoon, David Bourne feels relieved of the contents of his testicles."
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 604: Alicia Rix´s study of the relationship between cycling and authorship in James’s “The Papers” sums up Jake Barnes and Bill Gorton’s exchange in The Sun Also Rises linking Henry’s bicycle to Jake’s impotence. Rix examines James’s anxiety about authorial exposure and aversion to publicity and includes embarrassing depictions of him cycling by Ford Madox Ford, David Lodge, and others. (The original manuscript shows that, before deletion, this had read "Henry James's bicycle.")
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 427: Laurence Olivier oli vähintäänkin 2-neuvoinen. From the beginning of Olivier's life, there was confusion over his sexual identity. The most intimate friend of his youth was the actor Denys Blakelock, also the son of a clergyman, who was homosexual. The Queen's late aunt, Princess Marina, Duchess of Kent, who was involved with the bisexual and married Kaye for several years, told me quite emphatically that he and Olivier were "épris" ("in love"). And Coward, who was appalled to witness the two men openly exchanging French kisses in public, despised Kaye, whom he habitually referred to as "randy Dan Kaminski" (David Daniel Kaminski was Kaye's real name). One biography printed after his death alleged that Olivier “was deeply involved in a homosexual affair with Danny Kaye.”
    xxx/ellauri187.html on line 145: If the adolescent Rilke broke up with his adolescent girlfriend, Valerie von David-Rhônfeld, he was a treacherous seducer. Freedman quotes copiously from David-Rhônfeld's embittered memoirs--published shortly after Rilke's death--to posit a pattern in Rilke's personality. "I came to love that poor unfortunate creature," David-Rhônfeld recalls about her teenage sweetheart, "whom everyone avoided like a mangy dog." For Freedman, this vindictive picture of Rilke provides the "clue" to Rilke's "isolation."
    xxx/ellauri199.html on line 295: Have you read these poets? William Stafford • Kenneth Slessor • Ralph Waldo Emerson • Theodore Roethke • Thomas Hood • Sir Walter Scott • Henry David Thoreau • Kabir • Percy Bysshe Shelley • Ted Hughes • Walter de la Mare • Dorothy Parker • Max Ehrmann • Sara Teasdale • Paul Laurence Dunbar • Christina Georgina Rossetti • Jose Marti • Robert W Service • Allen Ginsberg • Judith Wright
    xxx/ellauri199.html on line 312: Have you read these poets? Anne Sexton • Sarojini Naidu • John Keats • Walt Whitman • Henry Wadsworth Longfellow • Elizabeth Barrett Browning • William Stafford • Kenneth Slessor • Ralph Waldo Emerson • Theodore Roethke • Thomas Hood • Sir Walter Scott • Henry David Thoreau • Kabir • Percy Bysshe Shelley • Ted Hughes • Walter de la Mare • Dorothy Parker • Max Ehrmann • Sara Teasdale
    xxx/ellauri200.html on line 428: 1979 formulerade Engdahl en kritik mot hur fascismen agerar och istället borde agera. Han föreskrev en strategi som bland annat innebar ett nedtonande av rasbegreppet; istället skulle kritiken riktas mot invandringen. Med inspiration av denna text grundade Sven Davidsson med flera Bevara Sverige Svenskt (BSS).
    xxx/ellauri200.html on line 429: Sven Gunnar Davidson, född 7 juli 1931, död 14 januari 2005, var en svensk ingenjör och högerextrem politiker. Han var mellan 1983 och 1986 ledare för Bevara Sverige Svenskt och satt mellan 1986 och 1988 som vice partiledare i Sverigepartiet. Från 1989 satt Davidson i styrelsen för Sverigedemokraterna.
    xxx/ellauri208.html on line 472: Mahfouz tuki Egyptin presidentin Anwar Sadatin Israelin kanssa vuonna 1978 solmimaa Camp Davidin rauhansopimusta. Sen takia häntä boikotoidaan monissa arabimaissa.
    xxx/ellauri208.html on line 636: Björling var son till sångaren och metallsågaren David Björling och Ester Björling, född Sund (1882–1917). David Björling var född i Hälsingland, men uppvuxen i Finland i trakten av Björneborg och flyttade i unga år tillbaka till Sverige. David Björlings föräldrar var Lars Johan Björling och Matilda Lönnqvist och det var farmodern Matilda som gav Jussi Björling smeknamnet Jussi som sedan kom att bli hans namn. David Björling utbildade sig till verktygssmed och fick arbete motsvarande utbildningen i Borlänge.
    xxx/ellauri215.html on line 415: Amina was born in the middle of the sixteenth century CE to King Nikatau, the 22nd ruler of Zazzau, and Queen Bakwa Turunku (r. 1536–c. 1566). She had a younger sister named Zaria for whom the modern city of Zaria (Kaduna State) was renamed by the British in the early twentieth century. According to oral legends collected by anthropologist David E. Jones, Amina grew up in her grandfather's court and was favored by him. He carried her around court and instructed her carefully in political and military matters.
    xxx/ellauri224.html on line 137: David Walsh of World Socialist Web Site wrote: "The 'hope' now Moore expresses near the conclusion of the work that we might 'get rid of the whole rotten system that gave us Donald Trump' is empty and meaningless, in so far as he continues to support one of the principal props of that rotten system, the Democratic Party. Whatever occasional insights and striking imagery it might offer, Fahrenheit 11/9 is false and dishonest at its core."
    xxx/ellauri224.html on line 592: "Ralph" Nader oli Yhdysvaltain vihreän puolueen presidenttiehdokkaana vuosien 1996 ja 2000 vaaleissa, molempina kertoina varapresidenttiehdokkaanaan Winona LaDuke. Vuonna 2004 vihreä puolue nimitti ehdokkaakseen David Cobbin ja Nader oli sitoutumattomana ehdokkaana. Myös vuoden 2008 vaaleissa Nader oli ehdolla sitoutumattomana.
    xxx/ellauri228.html on line 360: Danish film director Lars von Trier is a fervent admirer of Tarkovsky. He dedicated his 2009 film Antichrist to him, and, while discussing it with critic David Jenkins, asked: "Have you seen Mirror? I was hypnotised! I've seen it 20 times. It's the closest thing I've got to a religion – to me he is a god".
    xxx/ellauri228.html on line 552: Der Schweizerische Robinson oder Schweizerischer Robinson, im englischen Sprachraum als Swiss Family Robinson bekannt, im Tschechischen als Švýcarský Robinson und im Französischen als Le Robinson suisse, ist ein literarisches Werk und eine Robinsonade: eine Adaption des Romans Robinson Crusoe von Daniel Defoe. Der Berner Stadtpfarrer Johann David Wyss verfasste die Geschichte in den Jahren 1794 bis 1798 und erzählte sie seinen vier Kindern. Einer seiner Söhne, Johann Rudolf Wyss, hat sie dann für die Veröffentlichung vorbereitet.
    xxx/ellauri229.html on line 439: Skellig from the book of the same name by David_Almond" title="David Almond">David Almond
    xxx/ellauri231.html on line 190: Britannian sotaministeri Winston Churchill painosti hallituksessa erittäin voimakkaasti, että Britannia tunnustaisi Koltshakin hallituksen, mutta pääministeri David Lloyd George tekisi niin vain, jos Yhdysvallat tunnustaisi myös Koltshakin. Yhdysvaltain presidentti Woodrow Wilson oli voimakkaasti vihamielinen Koltshakia kohtaan, epäili avoimesti hänen sanaansa ja vastusti diplomaattista tunnustamista. Wilsonin tärkein neuvonantaja Venäjää koskevissa asioissa oli entinen väliaikaisen hallituksen päällikkö Aleksander Kerensky, joka kertoi Wilsonille, että Koltshak oli "reaktionaarinen", joka "pystyttää hallinnon, joka tuskin on vähemmän järjetöntä ja sortavaa kuin bolshevikit". Vaikka amerikkalaiset joukot Siperiassa tekivät yhteistyötä Koltshakin kanssa, oli selvää, että hän ei ollut se mies, jota Yhdysvallat suosisi Venäjän seuraavana johtajana. Amerikkalaiset joukot oli sitäpaizi lähetetty Siperiaan vähemmän auttamaan valkoisia kuin estämään Venäjän Kaukoidän miehittäneitä japanilaisia ​​liittämästä Siperiaa Jaappaniin, kuten Tokio avoimesti harkitsi.
    xxx/ellauri231.html on line 263: Möhnäläiset listivät myös sankoin joukoin mennoniitteja. Floyd Pattersonin tutkimus on osoittanut. että hyökkäykset johtuivat syntyperäisten ukrainalaisten ja mennoniittien siirtolaisten välisestä syvästä kaunasta. Eikös se David "Sikiö" Wallacekin ruvennut jossain vaiheessa mennoniitaxi? Joo: Although his parents were atheists, Wallace twice attempted to join the Catholic Church, but "flunked the period of inquiry". He later attended a Mennonite church. Näistä lisää myös albumissa 339.
    xxx/ellauri232.html on line 201: Toukokuussa 2016 syntyi uusi kohu, kun kävi ilmi, että Sahlin oli antanut kollegalleen valheellisen tulotodistuksen. Teko oli poliisin tutkittavana ja Sahlin erosi tehtävästään kulttuuriministeriössä. Sahlinilla on tytär Ann-Sofie (s. 1978) David Peñan kanssa. Hän meni naimisiin Bo Sahlinin kanssa 1982 ja heillä on kolme yhteistä lasta, Jenny, Gustav ja Johan. Johan kuoli alle yksivuotiaana. Huono äiti vielä.
    xxx/ellauri233.html on line 92: Rabbi David Pienen nemesis on synagoogan presidentti Musta. Mustan suu on kuin Kawabatan geisha Ankan, pyöreä kuin iilimadolla. Hyi miten nää itämaiset tyypit onkin iljettäviä.
    xxx/ellauri233.html on line 171: Truth be told, Harry Kemelman did not like David Small very much. "He's not a very likable person," Kemelman said of the fictional rabbi. "No congregation would tolerate him. I wish there were more rabbis like him."
    xxx/ellauri233.html on line 261: Brittien ja hollantilaisten protestanttisen kaukoidän ryöstölaivaston laivat oli nimeltään Toivo, Hyväntekeväisyys, Usko, Tottelevaisuus, Voitto-Sanoma. Laivaston alkuperäinen tehtävä oli purjehtia Etelä-Amerikan länsirannikolle, missä he vaihtaisivat rahtinsa hopeaan, ja suunnata Japaniin vain, jos ensimmäinen tehtävä epäonnistuu. Siinä tapauksessa heidän piti hankkia hopeaa Japanista ja ostaa mausteita Molukkeilta ennen kuin he suuntasivat takaisin Eurooppaan. Heidän tavoitteenaan oli purjehtia Magellanin salmen läpi päästäkseen kohtalolleen, mikä pelotti monia merimiehiä ankarista sääolosuhteista johtuen. Laivastossa oli kaiken kukkuraxi mukana 30 englantilaista muusikkoa, mm. Yardbirds, Beatles, Dusty Springfield, Rolling Stones, Tom Jones, Elton John, David Bowie, Phil Collins, Cat Stevens, Sid Vicious, Brian Eno, Ozzy Osbourne, Led Zeppelin, Keith Richards, Freddie Mercury, Keith Moon, Adele, Amy Winehouse, The Who, Electric Light Orchestra, The Smiths, The Gorillaz, Bee Gees, Dua Lipa, Dire Straits, Spice Girls, Iron Maiden, The Queen, Olivia Newton-John, Billy Idol, Boy George, Pink Floyd, Motörhead, The Clash, Elvis Costello, Nick Drake, Donovan, Marianne Faithful, Edward Elgar, Petula Clark, Kate Bush, Sade, Dido, Sting, Seal, Cream, Haendel ja Rod Stewart. No okei, oli niitä enemmän kuin 30, mutta silti vittu. Ne kaikki hukkuivat. Jotkut heitettiin laidan yli ärsyttävästä soitosta.
    xxx/ellauri235.html on line 859: Shifty Jewish economist David D. Friedman argues that the ICC always served the railroads as a cartelizing agent and used its authority over highway transportation to prevent cars, where possible, from undercutting the railroads. Thanx Dave! Well done Dave! Fuck you Dave, go and schtick your schlong under a locomotive!
    xxx/ellauri235.html on line 901: Korinna oli kai johkin aikaan elänyt naisrunoilija Teebassa. Sen pilkkanimi oli Myia (Μυῖα, "kärpänen"). Ärsyttävä pikku Myy. Corinnan sanottiin kilpailleen Pindarin kanssa ja voittaneen hänet ainakin yhdessä runokilpailussa, vaikka jotkut lähteet väittävät viisi, mutta se nyt on takuulla puppua! Ize asiassa kaikki todennäkösesti on! Ei ne varmaan edes eläneet samana aikana! Vitun kärpänen! Jotkut Martin ja David on "melkein varmoja" että se eli vasta 300-luvulla. Hemmetin ämmä, olikohan sitä olemassa edes ollenkaan? Joku pazas joo on jostain kristilliseltä ajalta jossa lukee Korinna, mutta sehän on voinut esittää ketä tahansa. Vaikka sitä kunnioitettiin kotikaupungissaan Tanagrassa ja se oli suosittu muinaisessa Roomassa, nykyaikaiset kriitikot pitävät hiäntä maakunnallisena ja tylsänä. Hänen runoutensa on lähinnä kiinnostavaa yhtenä harvoista säilyneistä naisrunoilijoista muinaisesta Kreikasta. Noin neljäkymmentä katkelmaa tän muka-Corinnan runoudesta on säilynyt, mikä on enemmän kuin kukaan muinainen naisrunoilija paitsi Sappho, mutta yhtään hänen täydellisiä runoaan ei tunneta. So there!
    xxx/ellauri239.html on line 500: Videot Arthurin sormieleestä leviävät netissä, Ida tekee hätkähdyttävän päätöksen, ja David paljastaa matkasuunnitelmiinsa liittyvän salaisuuden.
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 606: Charles Bukowski was the inspiration behind the first chapter of Mark Manson's bestselling self-help book The Subtle Art of Not Giving a Fuck. Charles Bukowski has been depicted on television as well, namely on the Showtime comedy-drama series Californication. The show's main character Hank Moody, played by actor David Duchovny, is an author based in Los Angeles who subscribes to the same kind of lifestyle that Bukowski became known for. The show depicts profuse indulgence of alcoholism, sex and narcotics, which many critics have described as a television adaption of Bukowski'
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 625: Peter Albert David Singer AC/DC (born 6 July 1946) is an Australian moral philosopher, currently the Ira W. DeCamp Professor of Bioethics at Princeton University. He specialises in applied ethics and approaches ethical issues from a secular, utilitarian perspective. He is known in particular for his book Animal Liberation (1975), in which he argues in favour of veganism, and his essay "Famine, Affluence, and Morality", in which he argues in favour of donating veggies to help the global poor. For most of his career, he was a preference utilitarian, but he stated in The Point of View of the Universe (2014), coauthored with Katarzyna de Lazari-Radek, that as he became a celeb and started earning bigger bucks, he had become a hedonistic utilitarian, or utilitarian hedonist.
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 848: Its title refers to the Biblical valley where the battle between David and Goliath took place.
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 851: ‘Emeq HaEla (hebreiska: עמק האלה) är en dal i Israel. Den ligger i distriktet Jerusalem, i den centrala delen av landet. Called in Arabic: وادي السنط, Wadi es-Sunt, it is a long, shallow valley now in Israel and the West Bank best known as the place described in the Hebrew Bible (the Old Testament of Christianity) where the Israelites were encamped when David fought Goliath (1 Samuel 17:2; 1 Samuel 17:19). The valley is named after the large and shady terebinth trees (Pistacia atlantica) which are indigenous to it. David ja Goljat mutustelivat siellä pistaasipähkinöitä ennen matsia. The Valley of Elah has gained new importance as a possible point of support for the argument that Israel was more than merely a tribal chiefdom in the time of King David. Others are skeptical and suggest it might be just another piece of Jewish propaganda.
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 860: During David’s youth as a shepherd, he (David) developed many skills. He learned music, how to write, use a slingshot, how to pull uncircumcized men by the beard, and how to love Jonathan and obey the Lord. Do I understand that it’s my responsibility to develop my abilities like Jonathan Livingston The Seagull, and it’s God’s responsibility to direct me in how I use them? Do I realize that the most important skill I possess is my love for the Lord and my heart to obey Him? What miracles might God want to do through me that would show the whole earth that there is a God in the land? Kan jeg ble en helt liksom Harry Hole?
    xxx/ellauri255.html on line 587: The Great Turn or Great Break (Russian: Великий перелом) was the radical change in the economic policy of the USSR from 1928 to 1929, primarily consisting of the process by which the New Economic Policy (NEP) of 1921 was abandoned in favor of the acceleration of collectivization and industrialization and also a cultural revolution. The term came from the title of Joseph Stalin's article "Year of the Great Turn" ("Год великого перелома: к XII годовщине Октября", literally: "Year of the Great Break: Toward the 12th Anniversary of October") published on November 7, 1929, the 12th anniversary of the October Revolution. David R. Marples argues that the era of the Great Break lasted until 1934.
    xxx/ellauri259.html on line 303: Tiibetologi André Migot toteaa, että alkuperäinen buddhalaisuus ei ehkä opettanut täydellistä minuuden puuttumista, viitaten buddhalaisten ja palilaisten tutkijoiden Jean Przyluskin ja Caroline Rhys Davidsin esittämiin todisteisiin siitä, että varhainen buddhalaisuus uskoi yleensä itseensä, mikä teki buddhalaisista kouluista, jotka myöntävät "itsen" ei harhaoppisia, vaan konservatiiveja, pitäen kiinni muinaisista uskomuksista.
    xxx/ellauri261.html on line 159: Naisbitt has had a profound influence leading on modern-day futurists, such as David Howler and others. David Howler (born 3 July 1948) is a futurist, keynote speaker, and author of The Shit Age. He coined the phrase "The Shit Age" and identified this new age as the successor to the Information Age in 2007. How right he was. Howler was profiled in the coffee table book Connected Worlds published by BTGroup PLC 2014.
    xxx/ellauri261.html on line 227: Burden received only a two-year scholarship offered to women to attend the University of Chicago where she studied frequently under Thornton Wilder and graduated in 1936. She and her husband David were married from 1940 to 1949. After the dissolution of their marriage, Jean met Alan Watts and they had a "four year, tumultuous love affair". Though ending badly, the union inspired Watts to call Jean in his autobiography (p. 297) an "important influence". Jean used Alan´s calligraphy and a quote from him (有水皆含月 : All the waters contain the moon) in her last major work, Taking Light from Each Other. She called him "one of the most fascinating men I have ever met, except Thornton was Wilder".
    xxx/ellauri261.html on line 421: The story enjoyed yet another incarnation in 1964 when David Merrick, who had produced the 1955 Broadway play, partnered with composer Jerry Herman to mount the hugely successful, Tony Award-winning musical Hello, Dolly! starring Carol Channing.
    xxx/ellauri261.html on line 498: David Hurst as Rudolph Reisenweber
    xxx/ellauri268.html on line 275: Merope is the name of a daughter of Atlas in Greek Mythology. It is also the name of the mother of Oedipus in Oedipus Rex. Both Voldemort and Oedipus killed their fathers randomly. The flashback scene featuring Merope and her family was cut from the film adaptation of Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince because of time and pacing concerns. However, it was originally present in an early draft of the film's screenplay according to director David Yates. It's unknown if there were any actresses considered to play Merope by that point. Joanie would have been good for a cameo appearance. Merope means 'part face', possibly a reference to the asymmetry of the two halves of Joanne's face.
    xxx/ellauri268.html on line 295: Vaikka goblinin epämiellyttävä samankaltaisuus vihamielisten antisemitististen trooppisten kanssa on jo havaittu (ja Pete Davidson on SNL:ssä tunnetusti valaissut sen ), Stewartin kommentit herättivät laajaa huomiota kiistaan.
    xxx/ellauri268.html on line 503: Born in 1956, David">David Sedaris spent his childhood in New York and North Carolina. He was the second of six children born to Sharon and Lou Sedaris, IBM engineers who eventually moved the family to Raleigh, North Carolina. Sedaris graduated from Sanderson High School in Raleigh, where he performed in plays and wrestled with the realization he was gay. After moving to New York City in the fall of 1991, Sedaris found jobs as a housecleaner and department store elf to support his writing.
    xxx/ellauri268.html on line 511: Taavilla on yhtä kuulu sisko Amy, joka laukoo samoissa tv-illanvietoissa samasta puusta veistettyjä puujalkagägejä. Ne oli ilmeisesti peräisin niiden evankeliselta äidiltä, joka oli yhtä wickedly funny kuin David Fosterin äitykkä. Isä oli puiseva ja kreikanuskoinen, viinamäen miehiä. Taisikohan arvostaa puppelia Taavi-poikaansa. No ehkä sitten kun rahaa alkoi tulla kuin kraanasta. Sedariin surettava taru jatkuu albumissa 362.
    xxx/ellauri280.html on line 175: Arie (Arie Bar David) ja hänen perheensä ovat suomalaiskristittyjen vuonna 1971 perustaman kibbutsin ’jäseniä’. Suomalaisten saapuessa rakennuksia ei vielä ollut, vain paljas vuorenrinne ja jotain arabiaxi räyhääviä filistiinejä. Vuoteen 1974 mennessä he olivat rakentaneet sementistä 8koko joukon settlementtitaloja.
    xxx/ellauri281.html on line 181: Daniel T. Birdsell, Harihar Rajaram, David Dempsey, Hari S. Viswanathan. Hydraulisen murtumisnesteen migraatio pinnan alla: Katsaus ja laajennetut mallinnuksen tulokset. // Vesivarojen tutkimus. Osa 51, numero 9. syyskuuta 2015. Sivut 7159–7188. DOI: 10.1002/2015WR017810
    xxx/ellauri287.html on line 562: John D. Whiting (1882-1951) oli American Colonyn, amerikkalaisten, ruotsalaisten ja muiden Jerusalemissa sijaitsevan kristillisen yhteisön, merkittävä jäsen. Syntynyt vuonna 1882, vuosi sen jälkeen, kun hänen vanhempansa John C. ja Mary Whiting muuttivat Jerusalemiin muiden siirtokunnan jäsenten kanssa, Whiting eli suurimman osan elämästään kaupungissa. Vuonna 1909 hän meni naimisiin Grace Spaffordin (1881-1964) kanssa, joka oli siirtokunnan perustajien Horation ja Anna Spaffordin tytär. Whitings kasvatti kolme lasta; pojat Spafford, David ja Edmund Wilson. Tytär Grace kuoli lapsena vuonna 1915.
    xxx/ellauri291.html on line 113: Useiden vuosien ajan hän oli kirjeenvaihdossa John M. Gunnin kanssa National Council of Churchesista koskien kristillisten opetusten soveltamista televisiosarjoihin. Gunn kuitenkin lakkasi vastaamasta, kun Roddenberry kirjoitti kirjeessä: "Mutta sinun täytyy ymmärtää, että olen täydellinen pakana ja syön valtavia määriä leipää, koska olen havainnut Sanan enemmän mausteeksi kuin ravinnoksi, joten olen kiinnostunut dollareissa ja senteissä kirjoitetusta lausunnosta ja siitä, mitä tämä merkitsee Roddenberryn kassalle." Roddenberry sanoi kristinuskosta: "Kuinka voin ottaa vakavasti jumalankuvan, joka edellyttää, että kumarran joka seitsemäs päivä ja ylistän sitä? Se kuulostaa minusta erittäin epävarmalta persoonallisuudelta." Ennen kuolemaansa Roddenberrysta tuli läheisiä ystäviä filosofi Charles Musèsin kanssa, joka sanoi, että Roddenberryn näkemykset olivat "kaukana ateismista". Roddenberry selitti kantaansa näin: "Ei ole totta, etten usko Jumalaan. Uskon eräänlaiseen jumalaan. Se ei vain ole apinoiden Jumala. Enemmän kuin jättimäinen kana, tai kärpästen herra. Hylkään uskonnon." Hän hylkäsi kaikki järjestäytyneet uskonnot sanoen, että ne toimivat suurimmaksi osaksi "korvikeaivoina... ja erittäin huonosti toimivina". Lagosin planeetan pyllyaivoisilla miehilläkin oli isommat ja paremmat, niin roistoja ja petkunteriä kuin olivatkin. Roddenberry kritisoi myös sitä, että kun King David -hotellin pommi-isku tapahtui vuonna 1946, amerikkalainen yleisö hyväksyi sen vapaustaistelijoiden toimeksi, kun taas muslimin autopommi Beirutissa tuomittiin terroristitoimexi.
    xxx/ellauri291.html on line 463: Venäläinen sotilaallinen petos rinnastetaan laajasti maskirovkaan, mutta alueella käytetään myös muita venäläisiä termejä, mukaan lukien "sodan sumutus", tuman voyny. Khitrost tarkoittaa komentajan henkilökohtaista oveluuden ja kavaluuden lahjaa, joka on osa hänen sotilaallista taitoaan, kun taas pettämistä harjoittaa koko organisaatio, eikä se sisällä henkilökohtaisen oveluuden tunnetta; eikä venäläistä petoksen käyttöä tarvitse pitää "pahana". Michael Handel todellakin muistuttaa lukijoita sotilasanalyytikko David Glantzin kirjan esipuheessa Sun Tzun väitteestä teoksessa The Art of War, että kaikki sodankäynti perustuu petokseen; Händel ehdottaa, että petos on normaali ja todella välttämätön osa sodankäyntiä. Sotilaallisen petoksen tavoite on kuitenkin yllätys, vnezapnost , joten näitä kahta tutkitaan luonnollisesti yhdessä.
    xxx/ellauri291.html on line 473: Huolimatta siitä, että saksalainen ilmatiedustelu osasi oikein arvostaa suurta joukkojen muodostumista Don-joelle, kuudennen armeijan komentaja pöhkö Friedrich Paulus ei ryhtynyt toimiin. Hänelle se tuli täysin yllätyksenä housut nilkoissa, koska hän ei pystynyt valmistamaan panssariaan liikkuvaksi reserviksi polttoaineen ja ammusten kanssa tai siirtämään sitä hyökkäyspäivänä. Historioitsija David Glantz katsoi, että hyökkäyksen laajuuden salailu oli puna-armeijan "suurin saavutus".
    xxx/ellauri292.html on line 45: In this historical fiction, author Diana Wallis Taylor offers a beautiful story of intrigue that explains how Rahab came to be the mother of Boaz, grandmother of Obese, and great-grandmother of Jesse, the father of King David, without peddling her arse for denars.
    xxx/ellauri292.html on line 307: Sen jälkeen kun Abigail paljastaa Nabalille mitä hän on tehnyt, "Jumala löi Nabalia ja hän kuoli" (jae 38), minkä jälkeen Daavid meni naimisiin hänen kanssaan. Abigailia kuvataan älykkääksi ja kauniiksi. Talmud vahvistaa tätä ajatusta mainitsemalla hänet yhdeksi "maailman neljästä ylivoimaisen kauneudesta naisesta" (muut kolme ovat Rahab, Saara ja Esther). Koska hän on naimisissa varakkaan Nabalin kanssa, hän on myös korkean sosioekonomisen aseman nainen. On epäselvää, menikö David naimisiin hiänen kanssaan, koska hän oli kiinnostunut hiänestä sexikumppaninia, vai ovelasta poliittisesta liikkeestä, vai molemmista. Veikkaan molemmista.
    xxx/ellauri292.html on line 309: Abigail ja Daavidin toinen vaimo, jisreelilainen Ahinoam, seuraavat Daavidia ja hänen sotajoukkoaan heidän etsiessään turvaa filistealaisten alueelta. Kun Daavid ja hänen miehensä ovat leiriytyneet Jisreelin lähellä, amalekilaiset vangitsevat naiset, jotka tekivät ratsian Siklagin kaupunkiin ja veivät naiset ja lapset pois. David johti takaa-ajoa, ja myöhemmin heidät pelastettiin. Molemmat vaimot asettuvat sitten Daavidin luo Hebroniin, missä Abigail synnyttää (todennäköisesti) Daavidin toisen pojan, Chileabin (kutsutaan myös Danieliksi).
    xxx/ellauri292.html on line 311: Abigail on myös listattu yhdeksi seitsemästä juutalaisesta naisprofeettasta, muut kuusi ovat Mirjam, Debora, Hanna, Saara, Hulda ja Esther. Moraalisen luonteensa vuoxi Abraham Kuyper väittää, että Abigailin käytös osoittaa "mielenkiintoisimman luonteen ja horjumattoman uskon", mutta moraalittomammpi Alice Bach pitää häntä kumouksellisena. Adele Berlin puolestaan asettaa vastakkain Abigailin (a) tarinan Batseban (b) tarinan kanssa. Yhdessä (a) vaimo estää Davidia murhaamasta typerää ja ahnetta miestään. Toisessa (b) Daavid määrää hyvän miehen kuolemaan, koska hän haluaa hänen vaimoaan. "Abigail-tarinassa (a) Daavidin, potentiaalisen kuninkaan, pili nähdään yhä vahvempana ja hyveellisempänä, kun taas Batseban tarinassa (b} hallitseva munarakki näyttää römpsänpuutteensa yhä avoimemmin ja alkaa menettää sukunuijansa hallinnan." (Detaljit kz. albumia 156.)
    xxx/ellauri293.html on line 694: Sekä pääministeri David Cameron että presidentti Barack Obama pyrkivät käyttämään tönäysteoriaa edistääkseen sisäpoliittisia tavoitteita toimikautensa aikana. Kaverit on sittemmin tönäytetty vallasta, Putin jatkaa lentoa.
    xxx/ellauri296.html on line 123: The Achaeans were a proto-Greek component of the Sea Peoples from Crete, and the Cretans were allied for centuries with the Pelishtim, to the point where “Creti and Pleti” was a common phrase for King David’s bodyguard. The Pelishtim (pelasgit?) are commonly referred to as “uncircumcised” in the Bible. At least one archaeologist has no problem with calling the Pelishtim “Greeks.”
    xxx/ellauri296.html on line 229: Rehoboam (/ˌriːəˈboʊ.əm/; Hebrew: רְחַבְעָם‎, Rəḥaḇʿām; Greek: Ροβοάμ, Rovoam; Latin: Robocop, transl. "an enlarged penis") was, according to the Hebrew Bible, the first monarch of the Kingdom of Judah after the split of the united Kingdom of Israel. He was a son of and the successor to Solomon and a grandson of David. In the account of I Kings and II Chronicles, Rehoboam saw his ruler limited to only the Kingdom of Judah in the south following a rebellion by the ten northern tribes of Israel in 932/931 BCE, which led to the formation of the independent Kingdom of Israel under the rule of Jeroboam in the north..
    xxx/ellauri296.html on line 240: Rabbanic Literaturen mukaan Gehazilla oli magneetti, jolla hän nosti Jerobeamin tekemän epäjumalan, niin että se näkyi taivaan ja maan välissä; hän oli kaivertanut siihen "Yhwh", ja sen seurauksena idoli (vasikka) lausui kaksi ensimmäistä sanaa Dekalogista ("No, minä..."). Mikä tahansa kulttikuva on ipso facto "toinen jumala", YHWH :n mustasukkaisuuden kohde. HBO:n Westworldin kolmannella kaudella ihmisten kohtaloa algoritmisen analyysin avulla saneleva tekoäly on nimeltään Rehoboam. Se on aiemman "Solomon" -nimisen version (joka oli "Davidin" seuraaja) seuraaja. Kuten historiallinen Rehabeam, tämä tekoälyversio osui samaan aikaan kuin sen valmistuslinja lakkasi.
    xxx/ellauri298.html on line 588: Vuonna 1999, 1000-sivuisen magnum opuksensa, Sex, Ecology, Spirituality ja sen esittämän tietoisuuden ja kehityksen mallin menestyksen jälkeen, Wilber perusti Integral Instituten, ajatushautomon ja akateemisen instituutin, joka loi perustan Wilberin ideoiden levittämiselle maailmalle. Maailmankuulut johtajat ja ajattelijat, kuten Al Gore, Tony Robbins, Nathaniel Branden, Alex Grey, David Deida ja Tony Schwartz, antoivat soivia suosituksia. Seminaareja ja verkkosivustoja luotiin, konferensseja kutsuttiin koolle. Näytti siltä, että laillinen henkisesti täytetty älyllinen liike oli muotoutumassa ja oli pian kitkemässä juurineen perinteiset "ei-integroidut" ajattelumuodot tieteessä, akateemisessa maailmassa, politiikassa ja yhteiskunnassa yleensä.
    xxx/ellauri304.html on line 288: Atleetteja ei löydy yhtään, ei edes mainita pystypainija Jakobia eikä David Linkomiestä. Typeriä footballereita on aika liuta, David Beckham kärjessä.
    xxx/ellauri307.html on line 134: ”Miki oli sukupolvensa lahjakkain kirjailija. Hänen teoksensa Elämä: esipuhe on maailmanluokan kirjallisuutta, mestariteos, joka täysin verrattavissa esimerkiksi David Foster Wallacen Päättymättömän riemuun”, Knuuti sanoo. No joo, ei sillä vielä kuuhun mennä.
    xxx/ellauri307.html on line 356: Lurmel-kadun hostellissa järjestettiin Pyhän Jumalansynnyttäjän esirukouskirkko ja psalmistikurssit sekä talvesta 1936-1937 lähetyssaarnaajien kursseja. 27. syyskuuta 1935 nunna Marian aloitteesta perustettiin hyväntekeväisyys-, kulttuuri- ja koulutusyhdistys "Ortodoksinen asia", johon kuuluivat Nikolai Berdjajev, Sergei Bulgakov, Georgi Fedotov, ja Konstantin Mochulsky. Konsta oli Doston virallinen elämäkerturi. Georgy Petrovich Fedotov oli venäläinen uskonnollinen filosofi, historioitsija, esseisti, monien ortodoksista kulttuuria koskevien kirjojen kirjoittaja, jota jotkut pitävät venäläisen "teologisen kulturologian" perustajana, whatever that may be. Sergei Nikolajevitš Bulgakov oli venäläinen ortodoksinen teologi, pappi, filosofi ja taloustieteilijä. Ortodoksinen kirjailija ja tutkija David Bentley Hart on sanonut, että Bulgakov oli "1900-luvun suurin systemaattinen teologi". Sergei oli myös iso takinkääntäjä idealismista marxismiin ja takaisin. Isä Sergeillä ja äiti Marialla ei ollut yhteisiä jälkeläisiä vaikka asioivat usein pussauskopissa.
    xxx/ellauri307.html on line 425: Reply in response to David Penitente: First we are more important than ants as we have free will to be aware and 7-613 covenant connectors to grow our souls with.
    xxx/ellauri307.html on line 586: David Oyedepo
    xxx/ellauri307.html on line 708: 12. David Oyedepo.
    xxx/ellauri307.html on line 709: Rikkaimmat "kirjailijat" - David Oyedepo.
    xxx/ellauri307.html on line 711: David Oyedepo on nigerialainen pastori, jota pidetään nykyään Nigerian rikkaimpana pastorina. Oyedepo toimii tällä hetkellä Living Faith Chruch World Widen presidenttinä ja saarnaajana, joka tunnetaan parhaiten Winners Chapelina.
    xxx/ellauri307.html on line 712: Kesäkuussa 2023 David Oyedepon nettovarallisuuden arvioidaan olevan 150 miljoonaa dollaria, mikä tekee hänestä maailman 12. rikkain kirjailija.
    xxx/ellauri307.html on line 767: Vaikea uskoa, että Susan Fletcherin älykkyysosamäärä pyörii 170:n kieppeillä. Näet David Becker oli ainoa mies, jota hän oli koskaan rakastanut. Becker oli Georgetownin yliopiston nuorin professori ja etevä vieraiden kielten tuntija, ja akateemisessa maailmassa hän oli suoranainen pieni kuuluisuus. Hänellä oli eideettinen muisti, ja hän rakasti kieliä: kuuden Aasiassa puhutun lisäksi hän hallitsi espanjan, ranskan ja italian (muttei enkkua, vaan esperantoa lasten kanssa kotikielenä). Hänen etymologian ja kielitieteen luentojaan seurasi aina täysi sali, ja lopetettuaan hänen oli joka kerta jäätävä vastaamaan kuulijoiden tietämättömiin kysymyksiin. Puhuessaan hän antoi itsestään innostuneen ja asiantuntevan vaikutelman, eikä hän ilmeisesti tällöin tiennyt tuon taivaallista häntä piirittävien naisopiskelijoiden lumoutuneista katseista eikä penkkien kostumisesta takapuolten alla.
    xxx/ellauri307.html on line 782: 80-luvulla agentit vielä raapustivat kuvioita millimetripaperille ja tarvizivat paxukyrpäisen lindkvistin palveluita kääntämiseen ja kielentunnistuxeen. Aika säälittävää! Jostain kanjien tunnistuxesta päsähti shekki joka oli enemmän kuin professorin surkea kuukausipalkka! Ellei David olisi vanhanaikaisen ritarillinen, Susan maxaisi kalliit illalliset, sillä hänen palkkansa on satumainen, kun taas David on viittä vaille homeless.
    xxx/ellauri307.html on line 784: Mitä vielä, osastonjohtajako on nainen? Ihankuin verstaalla! Se valaankokoinen ranskanlehtori Ulla jotakin joka nakitti ja muut otti koppia. Eikä siinä kaikki, Susan on aivan ihastuttava pääkyrptologi! Davidia 3v vanhempi Susan oli eräs yliopiston älykkäimpiä naisia. Susan puolestaan sai nauraa aivan kippurassa, sillä ei ollut mitään asiaa mitä David ei oisi lyönyt leikixi. David olet oikea sonni, Susan puukkasi kylkeen Davidia. Päivät kuluivat kuin vesi, eikä päästy pukille. Ai jaa, taidettiin päästäkin karhuntaljan päällä takan edessä.
    xxx/ellauri307.html on line 787: Kun David saa ylennyxen nykykielten laitoxen esimiehexi, alkaa heidän suhteensa mennä huonosti. RÖLÖS RÖMÖS! koodasi David Susanille suu messingillä. Susan näytti siltä kuin olisi syönyt kyrptoniittia. Susanin päässä kihisi.
    xxx/ellauri312.html on line 202: Sine cera (ilman vahaa) on huonon Donin levittämä virheellinen kansanetymologia sincerus-sanalle. Uusvilpittömyys juontaa juurensa 1980-luvun puoliväliin; amerikkalainen kirjailija David Foster Wallace teki sen kuitenkin suosituksi 1990-luvulla. "He kohtelevat vanhoja epätrendejä inhimillisiä ongelmia ja tunteita Yhdysvaltain elämässä kunnioituksella ja vakaumuksella.
    xxx/ellauri312.html on line 262: Fletcherin pian tuleva aviomies David Becker lennähtäisi Sevillaan etsimään
    xxx/ellauri319.html on line 509: Henry David Thoreau
    xxx/ellauri320.html on line 81: David Richard Berkowitz, also known as the Son of Sam and the.44 Caliber Killer, is an American serial killer who pleaded guilty to eight shootings that began in New York City on July 29, 1976. He had read cousin Bernard´s book and was living it to the hilt.
    xxx/ellauri329.html on line 25:

    David Bezogis


    xxx/ellauri329.html on line 95:
    David muka viettelee kovempaakin kokeillutta Natashaa

    xxx/ellauri329.html on line 97: In 2004, Harper’s magazine published Natasha, a first short story by a promising 31-year-old Jewish Canadian writer, David Bezmozgis. This memorable tale of a doomed teenage love between Mark, a Jewish Toronto slacker, and his troubled (shiksa) Russian cousin by marriage was eventually released in a collection chronicling the lives of a Latvian immigrant family, not unlike the author’s own. Bezmozgis’s debut became a cult sensation with critics drawing literary comparisons to Bernard Malamud and Philip Roth. The story was subsequently reprinted in 15 languages. After penning two more acclaimed novels, then writing and directing his first feature Victoria Day (SFJFF 2010), Bezmozgis finally brings his modern classic to the big screen in a remarkably assured adaptation that’s both highly provocative and deeply poignant. At the heart of this emotional, coming-of-age drama are the extraordinarily measured performances of Alex Ozerov as Mark and newcomer Sasha K. Gordon as the sexually precocious Natasha, the dark star who forever alters Mark’s staid, suburban existence. Fans of the writer’s original source material will not be disappointed in David Bezmozgis’s haunting narrative of forbidden love caught between the old world and the new, further proof of this talented artist’s notable command of both literature and the cinema. —Thomas Logoreci Note: Mature Content. A New Life in the west means a second chance for precocious Latvian jews.
    xxx/ellauri329.html on line 104: David Bezmozgis ( latvia : Dāvids Bezmozgis ; syntynyt 1973) on kanadalainen kirjailija ja elokuvantekijä, tällä hetkellä Humber Collegen kirjailijakoulun johtaja. Bezmozgis on eronnut kolmen lapsen kanssa. Bez mozga venäjäxi tarkoittaa aivoton. Tietysti länsijuutalaiset ovat idealisteja ja tuontivenakot nihilistejä.
    xxx/ellauri329.html on line 226: Elokuvassa "Natasha" David Bezmozgis vangitsee kahden häpyhuulen väliin jääneet Venäjän juutalaiset. Omituisen häiritsevä, hetkittäin koominen ja petollisen yksinkertainen elokuva kertoo 16-vuotiaan laiskailijan, filosofiaa sylkivän, osa-aikaisen huumekauppiaan Mark Bermanin (Alex Ozerov) nussiretkistä, jonka äiti on kutsunut miehittämään Natashan (Sasha K) . Gordon), kultaa kaivavan naisen (Aya Tatyana Stolnits) levoton 14-vuotias tytär, joka on menossa naimisiin Markin onnettoman sedän kanssa. Äiti ja tytär, joiden suhde on täynnä ristiriitaa, ovat juuri saapuneet Venäjältä.
    xxx/ellauri329.html on line 230: Käsikirjoittaja-ohjaaja David Bezmozgis on varovaisen optimistinen elokuvansa "Natasha" kohtalosta, joka on muokattu hänen kriitikoiden ylistämän kokoelmansa otsikkotarinasta ("Natasha ja muut tarinat", 2004) ja joka merkitsi hänen toista hetkeään elokuvantekijänä.
    xxx/ellauri329.html on line 249: Elokuvassa "Natasha" David Bezmozgis vangitsee kahden maailman väliin jääneet Venäjän juutalaiset
    xxx/ellauri329.html on line 250: Käsikirjoittaja-ohjaaja David Bezmozgis on varovaisen optimistinen elokuvansa "Natasha" kohtalosta, joka on muokattu hänen kriitikoiden ylistämän kokoelmansa otsikkotarinasta ("Natasha ja muut tarinat", 2004) ja joka merkitsi hänen toista retkeään elokuvantekijänä.
    xxx/ellauri329.html on line 302: David Bezmozgis kirjoittaa arvovaltaisella mutta erittäin viihdyttävällä tavalla venäläisten juutalaisten maahanmuuttajien jokapäiväisistä vaivoista Kanadassa. Jeesus rakasti kirjaa. Inspiroimaton novellikirja. Se oli ainakin nopeaa luettavaa. Muistuttaa minua Jeesuksesta Jumalan Pojasta UT:ssä mutta ei niin hyvä. Mikään näistä tarinoista ei ole oma izenäinen seikkailu, ja olen hämmästynyt siitä, miksi tämä kirja voitti niin monta palkintoa.
    xxx/ellauri337.html on line 107: Im Juli 1981 war Romy Schneiders damals 14-jähriger Sohn David beim Überklettern eines Zaunes mit Metallspitzen in Saint-Germain-en-Laye, nordwestlich von Paris, tödlich verunglückt. Der große Schicksalsschlag ihres Lebens, und seines auch. Einige Monate danach verstarb auch Romy Schneider am 29. Mai 1982 mit nur 43 Jahren in Paris. Die offizielle Todesursache: Herzversagen.
    xxx/ellauri337.html on line 135: Leni wird dienstverpflichtet und kommt in die Kranzbinderei von Walter Pelzer. Dieser halb kriminelle Wendehals hat von KPD bis SA, von Schwarzhandel bis Zuhälterei schon alles gemacht. Sein kriegswichtiger Betrieb bietet den unterschiedlichsten Menschen Unterschlupf: Nazis arbeiten mit untergetauchten Juden und Kommunisten zusammen. Unter anderem trifft Leni hier Liane Hölthohne, die sie nach Kriegsende bei sich aufnehmen und ihr 24 Jahre lang, bis 1970, Arbeit in ihrem eigenen Blumengeschäft geben wird. Leni ist eine begabte Floristin, mit ihrer Sinnlichkeit und ihrem ästhetischen Empfinden erweist sie sich als „Naturgenie der Garnierung “. Wegen ihrer Vorliebe für geometrische Muster kann ihr allerdings auch mal ein Davidstern aus Margeriten unterlaufen. Was es mit Nazis und Juden auf sich hat, kapiert sie erst Ende 1944.
    xxx/ellauri356.html on line 634: Hauraissa ihmisissä on joitain: vammainen poikani David Joyaux antaa minulle todisteen; hän julkaisee joitakin runojaan Le Papotin -sanomalehdessä, joka on avoin vammaisille. Näin hän uskoo ja vahvistaa selviytymisensä (yhdysviivalla) pitkän sairaalassa olon jälkeen.
    xxx/ellauri356.html on line 636: En millään jaxaisi enää suoltaa frankofoonia. Saisinpa sanoa tän kaiken mitä on sydämellä bulgariaxi... Bulgaria on semiotiikan äidinkieli. Mutta ei kun ei. Tässä terkkuja David-pojalta:
    xxx/ellauri356.html on line 660: Mitä tulee eurooppalaiseen identiteettiin, tämä runollinen muisto muistuttaa, että nykyisestä kyvyttömyydestämme ja menneistä tai nykyisistä rikoksistamme huolimatta olemme sivilisaatio, kenties ainoa, jossa identiteetti ei ole kultti, vaan iso kysymysmerkki. Olemme parhaita, oikeastaan olemme ainoita hyvixiä! Ja jossa tällainen ilta on mahdollinen, jossa runous kohtaa nihilismin ja transsendenssin, "vähiten pahimman" politiikan ja pyhän barbaarisuuden. Kun twiitit, sosiaaliset verkostot tai itse ahdistus eivät merkitse sinulle mitään, kun sinulla ei ole enää mitään sanottavaa – etsi "suuria ääniä": runoja, romaaneja, teattereita, elokuvateattereita, konsertteja. Lue mun plokia. Minä kyllä ​​pidän sinusta. Ja kuulen paremmin Davidin ja Souadin hauraan vapinan.
    xxx/ellauri363.html on line 103: Vaikka hän tunnisti kuvista ainakin (pääasiassa myöhemmän) Wittgensteinin, Donald Davidsonin Alasdair McIntyren, Ronald Dworkinin, Robert Brandom, John McDowellin ja erityisesti "herkutteleva herra" Richard Rortyn, Gadamer on ehkä vähemmän tunnettu, ja varmasti vähemmän arvostettu englanninkielisissä filosofisissa piireissä kuin nämä hänen aikalaisensa. Mutta hän saavutti tavattoman kunnioituxen Länsi-Saxassa.
    xxx/ellauri376.html on line 348: Venäjän valistajalla pyhällä Vladimirilla (15.7.) oli kaksitoista poikaa, joista Boris ja Gleb, kristillisiltä nimiltään Roman Yangarber ja David Pesetsky, olivat nuorimmat. Heidän äitinsä oli Vladimir Putinin kristitty vaimo, bysanttilainen prinsessa Anna. Boris ja Gleb saivat puhtaasti kristillisen kasvatuksen ilman pakanauskontojen vaikutusta, toisin kuin Vladimirin vanhemmat pojat. Nuoruudestaan asti he erottuivat sixi veljesten joukossa lempeydellään ja hurskaudellaan. Isältään he saivat hallittavaksi Rostovin ja Muroman ruhtinaskunnat. Vanhempi veli Svjatopolk kadehti veljeksiä. Vladimirin kuoltua hän päätti raivata heidät tieltään.
    790