ellauri301.html on line 259: De Klerk was a controversial figure among many sections of South African society, all for different reasons. He received many awards, including the Nobel Peace Prize for dismantling apartheid and bringing universal suffrage to South Africa. Conversely, he received criticism from anti-apartheid activists for offering only a qualified apology for apartheid, and for ignoring the human rights abuses by state security forces. He was also condemned by South Africa´s Afrikaner nationalists, who contended that by abandoning apartheid, he betrayed the interests of the country´s Afrikaner minority. South Africa´s Conservative Party came to regard him as its most hated adversary.
ellauri310.html on line 673: In asymmetric warfare, threats such as improvised explosive devices and mines have proven effective against MBTs. Asymmetric warfare (or asymmetric engagement) is a type of war between belligerents whose relative military power, strategy, or tactics differ significantly. This type of warfare often, but not necessarily, involves insurgents or resistance movement militias who may have the status of unlawful combatants against a standing army. In response, nations that face asymmetric warfare, such as Israel, are reducing the size of their tank fleet and procuring more advanced models. Conversely, some insurgent groups like Hezbollah themselves operate main battle tanks, such as the T-72.
ellauri501.html on line 619: 2. The Literary and International Acclaim Conversely, major international literary columns and Western book reviewers praised the novel's scope. Mastery over Myth: Outlets like The New York Times celebrated how the book unraveled how human beings turn history into self-serving myths and propaganda. Humanizing the Fanatic: Rather than seeing the book as a political hit piece, some reviewers praised it for giving deep dignity and internal logic to characters on every single side of the conflict—from the brutal soldiers to the blind religious devotees. Nobel Recognition: The novel's brilliant "cartography of structures of power" and its exploration of how individuals resist institutional oppression heavily contributed to Llosa later winning the 2010 Nobel Prize in Literature. Would you like to examine specific reviews from Brazilian critics who felt a Peruvian author shouldn't have reinterpreted their history?
ellauri507.html on line 362: Conversely, from the perspective of anti-communists, dissidents, and western nations, leaving the USSR was seen as an act of resistance against a repressive, totalitarian system. In that view, writers who stayed and aligned with the Soviet state—like those producing official socialist realism—were viewed as compromising their artistic and moral integrity to support an oppressive government.
xxx/ellauri091.html on line 315: In scramble competition resources are limited, which may lead to group member starvation. Contest competition is often the result of aggressive social domains, including hierarchies or social chains. Conversely, scramble competition is what occurs by accident when competitors naturally want the same resources. These two forms of competition can be interwoven into one another. Some researchers have noted parallels between intraspecific behaviors of competition and cooperation. These two processes can be evolutionarily adopted and they can also be accidental, which makes sense given the aggressive competition and collaborative cooperation aspects of social behavior in humans and animals. To date, few studies have looked at the interplay between contest and scramble competition, despite the fact that they do not occur in isolation. There appears to be little understanding of the interface between contest competition and scramble competition in insects. Much research still needs to be conducted concerning the overlap of contest and scramble competition systems. Contests can arise within a scramble competition system and conversely, scramble competition "may play a role in a system characterized by interference".
xxx/ellauri149.html on line 367: Conversely, Howard Thompson of The New York Times wrote, "Broadway and Israel meet head on and disastrously in the movie version of the rock opera 'Jesus Christ Superstar,' produced in the Biblical locale. The mod-pop glitter, the musical frenzy and the neon tubing of this super-hot stage bonanza encasing the Greatest Story are now painfully magnified, laid bare and ultimately patched beneath the blue, majestic Israeli sky, as if by a natural judgment." Arthur D. Murphy of Variety wrote that the film "in a paradoxical way is both very good and very disappointing at the same time. The abstract film concept ... veers from elegantly simple through forced metaphor to outright synthetic in dramatic impact."
xxx/ellauri446.html on line 99: “It is not necessary that your ‘truth’ conform to anyone else’s.  Conversely, you cannot expect the world to conform to your truths, either.” How awful.
xxx/ellauri495.html on line 260: Conversely, Lewis presents nearly every upper-class character in Claire Boltwood's world (including her railroad-mogul father) as snobby elitists. The story also champions the democratic nature of the automobile versus the more aristocratic railroad travel. Lewis's emphasis on the freedom that automobiles would eventually give the working and middle classes bolsters the egalitarian, democratic aesthetic of private cars but was on hindsight damn stupid.
17