ellauri171.html on line 844: Baal Hammon, god of vegetative fertility and renewer of all energies of Ancient Carthage
ellauri171.html on line 950: According to the pantheon, known in Ugarit as 'ilhm (Elohim) or the children of El, supposedly obtained by Philo of Byblos from Sanchuniathon of Berythus (Beirut) the creator was known as Elion, who was the father of the divinities, and in the Greek sources he was married to Beruth (Beirut = the city). This marriage of the divinity with the city would seem to have Biblical parallels too with the stories of the link between Melqart and Tyre; Chemosh and Moab; Tanit and Baal Hammon in Carthage, Yah and Jerusalem.
ellauri190.html on line 376: Hannibal, General of Carthage
ellauri198.html on line 635: Most scholars agree that the ritual performed at the tophet was child sacrifice, and they connect it to similar episodes throughout the Bible and recorded in Phoenicia (whose inhabitants were referred to as Canaanites in the Bible) and Carthage by Hellenistic sources. There is disagreement about whether the sacrifices were offered to a god named "Moloch". Based on Phoenician and Carthaginian inscriptions, a growing number of scholars believe that the word moloch refers to the type of sacrifice rather than a deity. There is currently a dispute as to whether these sacrifices were dedicated to Yahweh rather than a foreign deity.
ellauri219.html on line 585: To a large degree, "Pelagianism" was defined by its opponent Augustine, and exact definitions remain elusive. Although Pelagianism had considerable support in the contemporary Christian world, especially among the Roman elite and monks, it was attacked by Augustine and his supporters, who had opposing views on grace, predestination and free will. Augustine proved victorious in the Pelagian controversy; Pelagianism was decisively condemned at the 418 Council of Carthage and is still regarded as heretical by the Roman Catholic Church and Eastern Orthodox Church.

Burn in hell Pelagius, go jump in the fiery lake! Vitun humanisti!
ellauri360.html on line 436: Mitä tulee käsikirjoituksiin, jotka poltettiin Konstantinuksen käskystä, ei todellakaan ole mainintaa sellaisesta tosiasiassa tapahtuneesta Konstantinuksen käskystä tai Nikean kirkolliskokouksessa. Anaalipuolueen asiakirja, jossa väitettiin Kristus olevan luotu olento, hylättiin sen voimakkaan vastustuksen vuoksi ja repelöitiin silpuiksi kaikkien neuvostossa läsnä olevien silmissä. Konstantinuksella ja Nikean kirkolliskokouksella ei ollut käytännössä mitään tekemistä kaanonin muodostamisen kanssa. Siitä ei edes keskusteltu Nizzassa. Neuvosto, joka teki kiistattoman päätöksen kaanonista, pidettiin Carthagessa vuonna 397, kuusikymmentä vuotta Konstantinuksen kuoleman jälkeen. Kuitenkin kauan ennen Konstantinusta kaikki kristityt tunnustivat 21 kirjaa (4 evankeliumia, Apostolien teot, 13 Paavali, 1. Pietari, 1. Johannes, Ilmestyskirja). Siellä oli 10 kiistanalaista kirjaa (Heprealaiskirje, Jaakob, 2. Pietari, 2-3 Johannes, Juudas, Ps-Barnabas, Hermas, Didache, Heprealaiskirje) ja useita, joita useimmat pidettiin harhaoppisina – Pietarin, Tuomaan, Mattaiaan evankeliumit, Apostolien teot. Andrew, John jne.
ellauri372.html on line 102: Regulus was a famously principled and courageous fictional figure from the Punic wars 2 centuries earlier. Captured by the Carthaginians with others during the Punic wars, he was sent to Rome, under an oath to return, to pass on peace proposals and a request for exchange of prisoners. According to legend, as described by Horace here, he advised the Senate not to accept, and returned to Carthage to a certain and painful death, keeping his oath. There is a clear echo of the campaign that Augustus was waging to restore traditional Roman and family values. Like the rock-hard Regulus, “proper” Romans should be prepared to face death and spit in its eye, rather than take a safe but dishonourable way out. The gulf between these traditions and the contemporary Romans partying and fornicating away in writers like Ovid and Propertius could not be deeper.
xxx/ellauri154.html on line 237: Matho (joka on ruumiikas kuten Flaubert izekin) steals the sacred veil of Carthage, the Zaïmph, prompting Salammbô to enter the mercenaries´ camp in an attempt to steal it back. This gives occasion for a round of juicy copulation. Believing each other to be divine apparitions, they make love, not war.
xxx/ellauri187.html on line 109: Augustine journeyed (unhurriedly) from the fleshpots of Carthage, from being in love with love, to the love of God. Rilke, along with other adventurers on the threshold of the twentieth century, traveled from God to a conviction that the only transcendent principle left was the love, erotic and spiritual, between men and women too. Rilke's experience as a young boy with a feminine persona seems in this sense to have been a great boon.
9