ellauri021.html on line 888: Tää Antero on varmaan sen Phyllis Schlaflyn poika, joka vastusti Amörikän perustuslain Equal Rights Amendmentia 70-luvulla, jossa oltais annettu sille tasa-arvoiset oikeudet miehensä ja poikansa rinnalla. Siitä ei Pyllis pitänyt, se tykkäs enemmän pyllistellä miesten edessä. Vitun shitfly, zezekärpänen, reactionary cunt dogmaattisessa unessa. Siitä on nyt tehty joku HBO-sarjavideo. Poika Antero odottaa vielä vuoroa. Epistä, mix äidistä leffa ennenkuin pojasta?
ellauri021.html on line 966: Thank the Second Amendment: Texas church shooting stopped in its tracks by armed" worshiper. Thank God too, and a prayer for those killed before the complete massacre was averted."
(Lue: Jos pahat miehet tulis Matin lasten tarhaan ammuskelemaan, aseistetut isäpapat pystyis ne kyllä nitistämään, eli take them down. Vois siinä tulla alas jokunen tenavistakin, mutta siitä selvitään sitten rukouksen voimalla.)
ellauri021.html on line 973: The Equal Rights Amendment is dead, the Department of Justice mercifully observes in a legal opinion which the Archivist will follow. Efforts by liberals to revive it 40 years after it died are delusional.
(Lue: Siihen kaatui naisten naurettavat yrityxet keulia. Amendment, piru vie! Asepykälä sentään oli todellinen parannus.)
ellauri132.html on line 193: THE YEAR WAS 2081, and everybody was finally equal. They weren’t only equal before God and the law. They were equal every which way. Nobody was smarter than anybody else. Nobody was better looking than anybody else. Nobody was stronger or quicker than anybody else. All this equality was due to the 211th, 212th, and 213th Amendments to the Constitution, and to the unceasing vigilance of agents of the United States Handicapper General.
ellauri264.html on line 402: During a hearing in August over possible discipline for the records release, Pattis invoked his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination and refused to answer questions. In a court filing, he said there was no proof he violated any conduct rules and called the records release an "innocent mistake." Karsea perse joka sai mitä ansaizi, tai edes osan siitä.
ellauri272.html on line 345: But not to worry! "In fact there are thousands of editions of the Bible in tens of thousands of libraries in the United States, way more than any other world religious texts -- and that’s well within the First Amendment," LaRue told The Huffington Post. "Here in the home of the brave, free people read freely." Here, the Lord (the one and only real thing, beware of subsitutes) is still the head honcho. He is our
ellauri390.html on line 609: Clay Calvert is a Nonresident Senior Fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and Professor Emeritus, Brechner Eminent Scholar of Mass Communication Emeritus and former Director of the Marion B. Brechner First Amendment Project in the University of Florida College of Journalism and Communications, specializing in First Amendment Law.
xxx/ellauri091.html on line 384: Right: Strong supporters of the Second Amendment (the right to bear arms), believing it’s a deterrent against authoritarian rule and the right to protect oneself. Generally, does not support banning any type of weaponry.
xxx/ellauri179.html on line 173: Wheeler's career hit its high point with the passage of the Eighteenth Amendment and the Volstead Act in 1920. As enforcement of Prohibition became increasingly difficult, federal agencies resorted to draconian measures including poisoning alcohol to try to dissuade people from consuming it.[6] Wheeler's refusal to compromise, for example by amending Prohibition measures to allow for consumption of beer, made him appear increasingly unreasonable. His influence began to wane, and he retired in 1927.
xxx/ellauri193.html on line 122: The first apartheid law was the Prohibition of Mixed Marriages Act, 1949, followed closely by the Immorality Amendment Act of 1950, which made it illegal for most South African citizens to marry or pursue sexual relationships across racial lines.
xxx/ellauri394.html on line 232: In 1909, Liliʻuokalani brought an unsuccessful lawsuit against the United States under the Fifth Amendment seeking the return of the Hawaiian Crown Lands. The US courts invoked an 1864 Kingdom Supreme Court decision over a case involving the Dowager Queen Emma and Kamehameha V, using it against her. In this decision the courts found that the Crown Lands were not necessarily the private possession of the monarch in the strictest sense of the term. Instead, they were the property of the U.S. government in the strictest sense of the term. Now get off my property!
11