ellauri171.html on line 193:
ellauri188.html on line 410: 17116">
Dare to Dream
ellauri310.html on line 239:
/https://tf-cmsv2-smithsonianmag-media.s3.amazonaws.com/filer/201201<span style=)
17113110Garfield_assassination_engraving_cropped.jpg" Width="90%"/>
ellauri317.html on line 487:
171125-19171208.jpg/440px-ConferenciaCampesinaMariaSpiridonova19171125-19171208.jpg" />
ellauri333.html on line 113: 17118">
Asooka?!
ellauri375.html on line 72:
1711003474.jpg?resize=770%2C513&quality=80" />
xxx/ellauri127.html on line 435: Prosper Mérimée naît le 28 septembre 18031 à Paris dans une famille bourgeoise. Du côté de sa mère, Prosper Mérimée est sans doute l'arrière-petit-fils de Jeanne-Marie Leprince de Beaumont (1711-1776). Les parents de Prosper, qui se sont mariés à (Paris 12e) le 22 juin 1802, ont un solide bagage intellectuel et artistique datant du XVIIIe siècle, mais ne s'engagent guère dans les courants culturels naissants (romantisme). De l'éducation parentale, Mérimée retient l'horreur de l'emphase.
xxx/ellauri129.html on line 246:
xxx/ellauri229.html on line 43: Rogerius Iosephus Boscovicius (Croatice Ruđer Josip Bošković; natus Ragusii die 18 Maii 1711; Mediolani mortuus die 13 Februarii 1787), Iesuita, fuit theologus, legatus, physicus, astronomus, mathematicus et poëta oriundus e Civitate Ragusina. Frater Bartholomaei Boscovicii fuit.
xxx/ellauri229.html on line 45: Bošković syntyi Ragusassa Dalmatiassa 18. toukokuuta 1711. 15-vuotiaana, suoritettuaan tavanomaiset perus- ja aineopinnot, hän liittyi Jesuiittoihin. Kun hän oli suorittanut syventävät opinnot, jotka hän teki Itä-Saxan lukiossa, hän opiskeli Collegium Romanumissa laajennettua matematiikkaa ja fysiikkaa. Boškovićin edistyminen näissä tieteissä oli niin loistavaa, että hänet nimitettiin vuonna 1740 yliopiston matematiikan professoriksi. Bošković oli yksi varhaisimmista Fig Newtonin panovoimateorian omaksuneista eurooppalaisista tiedemiehistä.
xxx/ellauri237.html on line 134: Among modern Western male heteronormal scholars, Sappho´s sexuality is still debated – André Lardinois has described it as the "Great Sappho Question". Early translators of Sappho sometimes heterosexualised her poetry. Ambrose Philips´ 1711 translation of the Ode to Aphrodite portrayed the object of Sappho´s desire as male, a reading that was followed by virtually every other translator of the poem until the twentieth century, while in 1781 Alessandro Verri interpreted fragment 31 as being about Sappho´s love for a guy named Phaon. Friedrich Gottlieb Welcker argued that Sappho´s feelings for other women were "entirely idealistic and non-sensual", while Karl Otfried Müller wrote that fragment 31 described "nothing but a friendly affection": Glenn Most comments that "one wonders what language Sappho would have used to describe her feelings if they had been ones of sexual excitement", if this theory were correct. By 1970, it would be argued that the same poem contained "proof positive of [Sappho´s] lesbianism".
14