ellauri042.html on line 804: Euclid’s fifth proposition in the first book of his Elements (that the base angles in an isosceles triangle are equal) may have been named the Bridge of Asses (Latin: Pons Asinorum) for medieval students who, clearly not destined to cross over into more abstract mathematics, had difficulty understanding the proof—or even the need for the proof. An alternative name for this famous theorem was Elefuga, which Roger Bacon, writing circa ad 1250, derived from Greek words indicating “escape from misery.” Medieval schoolboys did not usually go beyond the Bridge of Asses, which thus marked their last obstruction before liberation from the Elements.
ellauri051.html on line 1864: 1250 I swear I will never again mention love or death inside a house, 1250 Vannon, etten enää koskaan mainitse rakkautta tai kuolemaa talon sisällä,
ellauri143.html on line 1573: Luku 125. Siniressin (sydämen residuaalinen sekoittaminen): 1241–1250
ellauri180.html on line 224: Literary assaults such as these have served to fuel the debates and even a Medline® search today reveals that in the last year alone, 155 reviews or letters have been published arguing for or against routine circumcision. However, studying the evolution of the medical indications provides us with a pleasing demonstration of how controversy drives scientific enquiry. We have already described how the surgeons of 100 years ago advocated circumcision for a wide variety of conditions, such as impotence, nocturnal enuresis, sterility, excess masturbation, night terrors, epilepsy, etc. There can be no doubt that a large element of surgical self-interest drove these claims. However, most of the contemporary textbooks also included epithelioma (carcinoma) of the penis amidst the morass of complications of phimosis. Although rare, once this observation had been made, it presumably filtered down through the textbooks by rote, rather than scientific study. A few reports had appeared in the early 20th century indicating that carcinoma of the penis was rare in circumcised men, but not until the debate over neonatal circumcision erupted in the medical press in the 1930s that this surgical `mantra' was put to the test. In 1932, the editor of the Lancet challenged Abraham Wolbarst, a New York urologist, to prove his contention (in a previous Lancet editorial), that circumcision prevented penile carcinoma. Wolbarst responded by surveying every skin, cancer and Jewish hospital in the USA, along with 1250 of the largest general hospitals throughout the Union. With this survey, he was able to show that penile cancer virtually never occurred in circumcised men and that the risk related to the timing of the circumcision. Over the years this association has been reaffirmed by many research workers, although general hygiene, demographic and other factors such as human papilloma virus and smoking status are probably just as important. However, Wolbarst established that association through formal scientific enquiry and proponents of the procedure continue to use this as a compelling argument for circumcision at birth.
ellauri191.html on line 960: 1250" data-file-height="900" /> Islanti
ellauri191.html on line 1996: 12501">Toimittaja, länsipulu.
ellauri194.html on line 907: Tienasin yli 1250 viikossa! Jätän kohta työni ja teen vain tätä.
ellauri315.html on line 464: Schulmann, Ekaterina (2018). "Venäjän poliittinen järjestelmä murroksessa: vallansiirron skenaariot". NUPI-työpaperi. Norjan kansainvälisten asioiden instituutti (883): 20. hdl : 11250/2578621.
ellauri355.html on line 43: Svetlana Aleksijevizin haastattelukirja kierrätysryssistä jäi kesken albumissa 12501">329. Tässä albumissa olisi tarkoitus vihdoinkin pakertaa se loppuun. Mutta ensin vähän taustoitusta.
xxx/ellauri129.html on line 424: 12506">

Hei

xxx/ellauri303.html on line 48: 12508">

Grein pahexuu vilpittömästi uutisia

xxx/ellauri303.html on line 155:
xxx/ellauri329.html on line 323: 12501">

Marikan kirjajuttuja: Svetlana Aleksijevitš – tuleva nobelisti?

13